nach oben

Erschienen in:

14.02.2019 | Review

Different light-activation systems associated with dental bleaching: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis

verfasst von: Bianca Medeiros Maran, Patrícia K. Ziegelmann, Adrieli Burey, Thalita de Paris Matos, Alessandro D. Loguercio, Alessandra Reis

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

A systematic review and a network meta-analysis were performed to answer the following research question: “Is there any light-activation protocol capable of improving color change efficacy when associated with an in-office bleaching gel in adults?”

Material and methods

A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, Cochrane Library, and SIGLE without date and/or language restrictions in April 23, 2017 (updated on March 30, 2018). IADR abstracts (1990–2018), unpublished and ongoing trial registries, dissertations, and theses were also searched. Only randomized clinical trials conducted in adults that included at least one group treated with in-office dental bleaching with light activation were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A random-effects Bayesian-mixed treatment comparison (MTC) model was used to combine light-activated versus light-free in-office bleaching with direct light-free comparison trials. A meta-analysis with independent analysis (high- and low-concentrate hydrogen peroxide [HP]) was conducted for color change (∆E*, ∆SGU).

Results

After the removal of duplicates, title, and abstract screening, 28 studies remained. Nine were considered to be at a low RoB, five were at a high RoB, and the remaining were at an unclear RoB. The MTC analysis showed no significant difference in color change (ΔE* and ΔSGU) between light-activation protocols and light-free in-office bleaching, regardless of the HP concentration in the efficacy of the bleaching.

Conclusion

No type of light-activated in-office bleaching was superior to light-free in-office bleaching for both high- and low-concentrate in-office bleaching gels (PROSPERO—CRD42017078743).

Clinical relevance

Although many times dental professionals use “laser whitening” as a form of marketing, this study confirmed that no type of light-activation for in-office bleaching can improve the bleaching efficacy.

Mehr K, Maciejewska-Szaniec Z, Stanglewicz T, Maciejewska B, Pilarska A, Lira J, Piotrowski P (2016) Temperament and perception of tooth bleaching results. J Family Med Prim Care 3:294–297. https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr/63667 CrossRef

Martin J, Rivas V, Vildósola P, Moncada L, Oliveira Junior OB, Saad JRC, Fernandez E, Moncada G (2016) Personality style in patients looking for tooth bleaching and its correlation with treatment satisfaction. Braz Dent J 27:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600127 CrossRefPubMed

Dahl JE, Pallesen U (2003) Tooth bleaching - a critical review of the biological aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14:292–304CrossRefPubMed

De Geus JL, Wambier LM, Kossatz S, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2016) At-home vs in-office bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 41:341–356. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-287-lit CrossRefPubMed

Almeida LCA, Riehl H, Dos Santos PH, Sundfeld MLMM, Briso ALF (2012) Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of different bleaching therapies in vital teeth. Int J Periodont Rest 32:302–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.587 CrossRef

Charakorn P, Cabanilla L, Wagner W, Foong W, Shaheen J, Pregitzer R, Schneider D (2009) The effect of preoperative ibuprofen on tooth sensitivity caused by in-office bleaching. Oper Dent 34:131–135. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-33 CrossRefPubMed

Gallagher A, Maggio B, Bowman J, Borden L, Mason S, Felix H (2002) Clinical study to compare two in-office (chairside) whitening systems. J Clin Dent 13:219–224PubMed

Giachetti L, Bertini F, Bambi C, Nieri M, Russo DS (2010) A randomized clinical trial comparing at-home and in-office tooth whitening techniques a nine-month follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 141:1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0081 CrossRefPubMed

Tay LY, Kose C, Herrera DR, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2012) Long-term efficacy of in-office and at-home bleaching: a 2-year double-blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Dent 25:199–204PubMed

10.

Joiner A (2006) The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent 34:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.02.002 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Yazici E (2010) Different light-activated in-office bleaching systems: a clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 25:817–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0688-x CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sulieman M, Macdonald E, Rees J, Addy M (2005) Comparison of three in-office bleaching systems based on 35% hydrogen peroxide with different light activators. Am J Dent 18:194–197PubMed

13.

Kashima-Tanaka M, Tsujimoto Y, Kawamoto K, Senda N, Ito K, Yamazaki M (2003) Generation of free radicals and/or active oxygen by light or laser irradiation of hydrogen peroxide or sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 29:141–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200302000-00013 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Buchalla W, Attin T (2007) External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser - a systematic review. Dent Mater J 23:586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.018 CrossRef

15.

De Almeida Farhat PB, Santos FA, Gomes JC, Gomes OM (2014) Evaluation of the efficacy of led-laser treatment and control of tooth sensitivity during in-office bleaching procedures. Photomed Laser Surg 32:422–426. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3729 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Alomari Q, El Daraa E (2010) A randomized clinical trial of in-office dental bleaching with or without light activation. J Contemp Dent Pract 11:e17–e24CrossRef

17.

Henry RK, Bauchmoyer SM, Moore W, Rashid RG (2013) The effect of light on tooth whitening: a split-mouth design. Int J Dent Hyg 11:151–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00568.x CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kugel G, Papathanasiou A, Williams AJ, Anderson C, Ferreira S (2006) Clinical evaluation of chemical and light-activated tooth whitening systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 27:54–62PubMed

19.

Tavares M, Stultz J, Newman M, Smith V, Kent R, Carpino E, Goodson JM (2003) Light augments tooth whitening with peroxide. J Am Dent Assoc 134:167–175. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0130 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Posso Moreno SL, Ramírez Ramírez DX, Rosas Jaimes JA, Güiza Cristancho EH (2010) Comparación del blanqueamiento dental con peróxido de hidrógeno al 25 percent en consultorio, utilizando o no activación con lámpara de luz halógena. Univ Odontol 29:19–25

21.

De Freitas PM, Menezes AN, Da Mota AC, Simoes A, Mendes FM, Lago AD, Ferreira LS, Ramos-Oliveira TM (2016) Does the hybrid light source (led/laser) influence temperature variation on the enamel surface during 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching? A randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 47:61–73. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a34454 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Bortolatto JF, Trevisan TC, Bernardi PSI, Fernandez E, Dovigo LN, Loguercio AD, Batista De Oliveira Junior O, Pretel H (2016) A novel approach for in-office tooth bleaching with 6% H2O2/TiO_N and LED/laser system—a controlled, triple-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 31:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1866-2 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Calatayud JO, Calatayud CO, Zaccagnini AO, Box M (2010) Clinical efficacy of a bleaching system based on hydrogen peroxide with or without light activation. Eur J Esthet Dent 5:216–224PubMed

24.

Maran BM, Burey A, De Paris Matos T, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2018) In-office dental bleaching with light vs. without light: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 70:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.007 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lu G, Ades A (2004) Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med 23:3105–3124. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1875 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP (2015) The prisma extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162:777–784. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Dias S, Welton N, Caldwell D, Ades A (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29:932–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3767 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Bortolatto JF, Pretel H, Neto CS, Andrade MF, Moncada G, Junior OBO (2013) Effects of led–laser hybrid light on bleaching effectiveness and tooth sensitivity: a randomized clinical study. Laser Phys Lett 10:085601CrossRef

30.

Kossatz S, Dalanhol AP, Cunha T, Loguercio A, Reis A (2011) Effect of light activation on tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching. Oper Dent 36:251–257. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-289-C CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kugel G, Ferreira S, Sharma S, Barker ML, Gerlach RW (2009) Clinical trial assessing light enhancement of in-office tooth whitening: Masters of esthetic dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:336–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00287.x CrossRefPubMed

32.

Lo Giudice R, Pantaleo G, Lizio A, Romeo U, Castiello G, Spagnuolo G, Lo Giudice G (2016) Clinical and spectrophotometric evaluation of led and laser activated teeth bleaching. Open Dent J 10:242–250. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010242 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Marson FC, Sensi LG, Vieira LCC, Araujo E (2008) Clinical evaluation of in-office dental bleaching treatments with and without the use of light-activation sources. Oper Dent 33:15–22. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-57 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Martín J, Ovies N, Cisternas P, Fernández E, Junior OO, De Andrade M, Moncada G, Vildósola P (2015) Can an led-laser hybrid light help to decrease hydrogen peroxide concentration while maintaining effectiveness in teeth bleaching? Laser Phys 25:025608. https://doi.org/10.1088/1054-660X/25/2/025608 CrossRef

35.

Mena-Serrano A, Garcia E, Luque-Martinez I, Grande R, Loguercio A, Reis A (2016) A single-blind randomized trial about the effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on light-activated bleaching. Oper Dent 41:455–464. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-077-C CrossRefPubMed

36.

Polydorou O, Wirsching M, Wokewitz M, Hahn P (2013) Three-month evaluation of vital tooth bleaching using light units-a randomized clinical study. Oper Dent 38:21–32. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-041-C CrossRefPubMed

37.

Ziemba SL, Felix H, Macdonald J, Ward M (2005) Clinical evaluation of a novel dental whitening lamp and light-catalyzed peroxide gel. J Clin Dent 16:123–127PubMed

38.

Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigao J, Lopes G, Baratieri LN (2010) Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques. Oper Dent 35:3–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-008cr CrossRefPubMed

39.

Mondelli RFL, De Azevedo JFDG, Francisconi AC, De Almeida CM, Ishikiriama SK (2012) Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci 20:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000400008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Ontiveros JC, Paravina RD (2009) Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light. J Dent 37:840–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.015 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Strobl A, Gutknecht N, Franzen R, Hilgers RD, Lampert F, Meister J (2010) Laser-assisted in-office bleaching using a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser: an in vivo study. Lasers Med Sci 25:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0675-2 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Papathanasiou A, Kastali S, Perry RD, Kugel G (2002) Clinical evaluation of a 35% hydrogen peroxide in-office whitening system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 23:335–338PubMed

43.

Ward M, Felix H (2012) A clinical evaluation comparing two H2O2 concentrations used with a light-assisted chairside tooth whitening system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 33:286–291PubMed

44.

Gomes RS, Souza FBD, Lacerda CM, Brambilla CFF, Pascotto RC (2008) Avaliação clínica da eficiência do uso do sistema led-laser, led e luz halógena na ativação do agente clareador em dentes vitalizados. Rev Dental Press Estét 5:62–77

45.

Martin J, Vildosola P, Bersezio C, Herrera A, Bortolatto J, Saad JR, Oliveira OB Jr, Fernandez E (2015) Effectiveness of 6% hydrogen peroxide concentration for tooth bleaching-a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Dent 43:965–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.011 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Ma J, Liu W, Hunter A, Zhang W (2008) Performing meta-analysis with incomplete statistical information in clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 8(56). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-5

47.

He LB, Shao MY, Tan K, Xu X, Li JY (2012) The effects of light on bleaching and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 40:644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.010 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Sekine L, Morais VD, Lima KM, Onsten TG, Ziegelmann PK, Ribeiro RA (2015) Conventional and high-dose daunorubicin and idarubicin in acute myeloid leukaemia remission induction treatment: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of 7258 patients. Hematol Oncol 33:212–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2173 CrossRefPubMed

49.

Rheinheimer J, Ziegelmann PK, Carlessi R, Reck LR, Bauer AC, Leitao CB, Crispim D (2014) Different digestion enzymes used for human pancreatic islet isolation: a mixed treatment comparison (mtc) meta-analysis. Islets 6:e977118. https://doi.org/10.4161/19382014.2014.977118 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Ribeiro RA, Ziegelmann PK, Duncan BB, Stella SF, Da Costa Vieira JL, Restelatto LMF, Moriguchi EH, Polanczyk CA (2013) Impact of statin dose on major cardiovascular events: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis involving more than 175,000 patients. Int J Cardiol 166:431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.128 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Bangalore S, Toklu B, Amoroso N, Fusaro M, Kumar S, Hannan EL, Faxon DP, Feit F (2013) Bare metal stents, durable polymer drug eluting stents, and biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents for coronary artery disease: mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. BMJ 347:f6625. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6625 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Faggion CM Jr, Chambrone L, Listl S, Tu YK (2013) Network meta-analysis for evaluating interventions in implant dentistry: the case of peri-implantitis treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15:576–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00384.x CrossRefPubMed

53.

Pires CW, Pedrotti D, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Ziegelmann PK, Rocha RDO (2018) Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0010

54.

Pulikkotil S, Nagendrababu V, Veettil S, Jinatongthai P, Setzer F (2018) Effect of oral premedication on the anaesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis–a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Endod J 51:989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12912 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Joseph A, Ayyagari R, Xie M, Cai S, Xie J, Huss M, Sikirica V (2017) Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26:875–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Jansen JP, Crawford B, Bergman G, Stam W (2008) Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons. Value Health 11:956–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00347.x CrossRefPubMed

57.

Rezende M, Loguercio AD, Kossatz S, Reis A (2016) Predictive factors on the efficacy and risk/intensity of tooth sensitivity of dental bleaching: a multi regression and logistic analysis. J Dent 45:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.003 CrossRefPubMed

58.

Rezende M, Coppla F, Chemin K, Chibinski AC, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2018) Tooth sensitivity after dental bleaching with a desensitizing-containing and a desensitizing-free bleaching gel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-253-L

59.

De Geus JL, Wambier LM, Boing TF, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2018) At-home bleaching with 10% vs. more concentrated carbamide peroxide gels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 43:E210–E222. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-222-L CrossRefPubMed

60.

Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Higgins J, Sterne J, Savović J, Page M, Hróbjartsson A, Boutron I, Reeves B, Eldridge S (2016) A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Methods Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10:29–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD201601 CrossRef

Titel: Different light-activation systems associated with dental bleaching: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
verfasst von: Bianca Medeiros Maran
Patrícia K. Ziegelmann
Adrieli Burey
Thalita de Paris Matos
Alessandro D. Loguercio
Alessandra Reis
Publikationsdatum: 14.02.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02835-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Different light-activation systems associated with dental bleaching: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Long-term outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity using surgery-first approach

Evaluation of the effect of probiotics in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial

Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin

Correction to: Cytokine release kinetics of concentrated growth factors in different scaffolds

Effects of oral prophylaxis including tongue cleaning on halitosis and gingival inflammation in gingivitis patients—a randomized controlled clinical trial

Cytokine release kinetics of concentrated growth factors in different scaffolds

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter