Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 12/2015

01.12.2015 | Original Article

Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

verfasst von: Andy Chien, Dar-Ming Lai, Shwu-Fen Wang, Chih-Hsiu Cheng, Wei-Li Hsu, Jaw-Lin Wang

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine and compare the biomechanical effects of single- and two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the re-distribution of the segmental contribution to total cervical range of motion (ROM) in a prospective longitudinal design.

Methods

Fifty-one patients undergoing either a single- or two-level ACDF due to cervical disc disease were recruited. Functional radiographs were taken preoperatively and then at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Global ROM of C2–C7, ROM of the treated functional spinal unit (FSU) and the superior and inferior segmental ROMs were then measured. The relative contribution from the FSU and each of the adjacent segments to total cervical ROM were compared pre- and post-operatively within and between the two groups at each of the time points.

Results

Single-level ACDF patients demonstrated a significantly greater total cervical ROM at 6 and 12 months compared with the two-level ACDF group (p = 0.021 and 0.045, respectively). A significantly greater contribution from the FSU to the total ROM was found at 3 months in the two-level ACDF group (p = 0.016), but the greater contribution shifted to the superior adjacent segment at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.025 and 0.046). The two-level ACDF group did not demonstrate a significant difference at 3 months (p = 0.087), but a significant increase in contribution was found at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Single-level ACDF maintains and restores a more physiological re-distribution of segmental contribution of ROM compared with two-level ACDF, which required longer time to achieve stable FSU immobilization and coupled with significantly increased superior segment contribution.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JY, Kim KH, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE (2013) What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery? Comparative study between anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22:1078–1089. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2613-4 CrossRef Park JY, Kim KH, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE (2013) What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery? Comparative study between anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22:1078–1089. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-012-2613-4 CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Hipp J, Norvell DC, Raich A, Hashimoto R (2012) Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 37:S85–S95. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d6628 CrossRefPubMed Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Hipp J, Norvell DC, Raich A, Hashimoto R (2012) Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 37:S85–S95. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31826d6628​ CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante L (2009) Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages. Neurosurg Rev 32:215–224. doi:10.1007/s10143-008-0164-2 (discussion 224)CrossRefPubMed Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante L (2009) Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages. Neurosurg Rev 32:215–224. doi:10.​1007/​s10143-008-0164-2 (discussion 224)CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Choi BW, Jeon TS, Lee KB, Chang H (2011) Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20:1940–1945. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1864-9 CrossRef Song KJ, Choi BW, Jeon TS, Lee KB, Chang H (2011) Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20:1940–1945. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-011-1864-9 CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528PubMed Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Marotta N, Landi A, Tarantino R, Mancarella C, Ruggeri A, Delfini R (2011) Five-year outcome of stand-alone fusion using carbon cages in cervical disc arthrosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20(Suppl 1):S8–S12. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1747-0 CrossRef Marotta N, Landi A, Tarantino R, Mancarella C, Ruggeri A, Delfini R (2011) Five-year outcome of stand-alone fusion using carbon cages in cervical disc arthrosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20(Suppl 1):S8–S12. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-011-1747-0 CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bydon M, Xu R, Macki M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2014) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in a large series. Neurosurgery 74:139–146. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000204 (discussion 146)CrossRefPubMed Bydon M, Xu R, Macki M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2014) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in a large series. Neurosurgery 74:139–146. doi:10.​1227/​neu.​0000000000000204​ (discussion 146)CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JC, Liu L, Wen-Cheng H, Chen YC, Ko CC, Wu CL, Chen TJ, Cheng H, Su TP (2012) The incidence of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: estimation using an 11-year comprehensive nationwide database in Taiwan. Neurosurgery 70:594–601. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318232d4f2 CrossRefPubMed Wu JC, Liu L, Wen-Cheng H, Chen YC, Ko CC, Wu CL, Chen TJ, Cheng H, Su TP (2012) The incidence of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: estimation using an 11-year comprehensive nationwide database in Taiwan. Neurosurgery 70:594–601. doi:10.​1227/​NEU.​0b013e318232d4f2​ CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI (2004) Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 29:E221–E226CrossRefPubMed Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI (2004) Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 29:E221–E226CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimamoto N, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev AE, Minami A, McAfee PC (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine. Spine 26:E432–E436CrossRefPubMed Shimamoto N, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev AE, Minami A, McAfee PC (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine. Spine 26:E432–E436CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Iwanami A, Ikegami T, Takahata T, Hashimoto T (2010) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine 35:36–43. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Iwanami A, Ikegami T, Takahata T, Hashimoto T (2010) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine 35:36–43. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181b8a80d​ CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabhan A, Ishak B, Steudel WI, Ramadhan S, Steimer O (2011) Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year’s results. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20:934–941. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1588-2 CrossRef Nabhan A, Ishak B, Steudel WI, Ramadhan S, Steimer O (2011) Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year’s results. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20:934–941. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-010-1588-2 CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EJ 3rd, Gordon CJ, Cavanaugh DA, Birdsong EM, Stocks M, Danielson G (2012) Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine 37:445–451. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822174b3 CrossRefPubMed Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EJ 3rd, Gordon CJ, Cavanaugh DA, Birdsong EM, Stocks M, Danielson G (2012) Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine 37:445–451. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31822174b3​ CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Landers MR, Addis KA, Longhurst JK, Vom Steeg BL, Puentedura EJ, Daubs MD (2013) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion on neck range of motion, pain, and function: a prospective analysis. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 13:1650–1658. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.020 CrossRef Landers MR, Addis KA, Longhurst JK, Vom Steeg BL, Puentedura EJ, Daubs MD (2013) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion on neck range of motion, pain, and function: a prospective analysis. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 13:1650–1658. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2013.​06.​020 CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Harada M, Abumi K, Ito M, Kaneda K (2000) Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine 25:1932–1937CrossRefPubMed Harada M, Abumi K, Ito M, Kaneda K (2000) Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine 25:1932–1937CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
verfasst von
Andy Chien
Dar-Ming Lai
Shwu-Fen Wang
Chih-Hsiu Cheng
Wei-Li Hsu
Jaw-Lin Wang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3900-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

European Spine Journal 12/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.