Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2019

13.12.2018 | Original Article

Differentiating stable buckle fractures from other distal radius fractures: the 1-cm rule

verfasst von: Benjamin W. Iles, Julie B. Samora, Satbir Singh, Lynne Ruess

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Treatment pathways for isolated distal radius fractures in children are becoming more tailored to specific fracture types and include different management plans for stable buckle fractures versus potentially unstable distal radius fractures.

Objective

To propose a measurement rule to aid in differentiating stable buckle fractures from other distal radius fractures in children.

Materials and methods

A medical record search identified 203 children with closed distal radius fractures during a 14-month period. A consensus of two senior readers served as a reference standard to distinguish buckle fractures from other distal radius fractures. We measured fracture-to-physis distance on posteroanterior (PA) and lateral radiographs for each of the isolated distal radius fractures. We analyzed diagnostic accuracy, using fracture-to-physis distance as a predictor for buckle fractures, in children ages 3–16 years. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cut-off values tested.

Results

There were 148 buckle fractures (73%) and 55 isolated potentially unstable distal radius fractures (27%). For children 7–16 years, buckle fracture-to-physis distance was <1 cm in only 1/106 (0.9%) on the PA projection and none on the lateral projection. Diagnostic accuracy for buckle fracture diagnosis was 82% using a cut-off of 14 mm (PA) and 13 mm (lateral). In children 3–6 years old, the buckle fracture-to-physis distance was <1 cm in 1/42 (2.4%) on the PA radiographs and another 1/42 (2.4%) on the lateral radiographs. Diagnostic accuracy was low for younger children for all tested distances.

Conclusion

We propose utilizing a measurement rule to increase diagnostic accuracy for buckle fractures in children ≥7 years old. An isolated distal radius fracture in a child 7 years or older is not likely to be a buckle fracture if the fracture-to-physis distance is <1 cm.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae DS (2008) Pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures. J Hand Surg 33A:1911–1923CrossRef Bae DS (2008) Pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures. J Hand Surg 33A:1911–1923CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Symons S, Rowsell M, Bhowal B, Dias JJ (2001) Hospital versus home management of children with buckle fractures of the distal radius: a prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:556–560CrossRefPubMed Symons S, Rowsell M, Bhowal B, Dias JJ (2001) Hospital versus home management of children with buckle fractures of the distal radius: a prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:556–560CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Bosse HJP, Patel RJ, Thacker M, Sala DAS (2005) Minimalistic approach to treating wrist torus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 25:495–500CrossRefPubMed Van Bosse HJP, Patel RJ, Thacker M, Sala DAS (2005) Minimalistic approach to treating wrist torus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 25:495–500CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat West S, Andrews J, Bebbington A et al (2005) Buckle fractures of the distal radius are safely treated in a soft bandage: a randomized prospective trial of bandage versus plaster cast. J Pediatr Orthop 25:322–325CrossRefPubMed West S, Andrews J, Bebbington A et al (2005) Buckle fractures of the distal radius are safely treated in a soft bandage: a randomized prospective trial of bandage versus plaster cast. J Pediatr Orthop 25:322–325CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Randsborg PH, Sivertsen EA (2009) Distal radius fractures in children: substantial difference in stability between buckle and greenstick fractures. Acta Orthop 80:585–589CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Randsborg PH, Sivertsen EA (2009) Distal radius fractures in children: substantial difference in stability between buckle and greenstick fractures. Acta Orthop 80:585–589CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Witney-Lagen C, Smith C, Walsh G (2012) Soft cast versus rigid cast for treatment of distal radius buckle fractures in children. Injury 44:508–513CrossRefPubMed Witney-Lagen C, Smith C, Walsh G (2012) Soft cast versus rigid cast for treatment of distal radius buckle fractures in children. Injury 44:508–513CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Koelink E, Schuh S, Howard A et al (2016) Primary care physician follow-up of distal radius buckle fractures. Pediatrics 137:1–9CrossRef Koelink E, Schuh S, Howard A et al (2016) Primary care physician follow-up of distal radius buckle fractures. Pediatrics 137:1–9CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bochang C, Katz K, Weigl D et al (2008) Are frequent radiographs necessary in the management of closed forearm fractures in children? J Clin Orthop 2:217–220 Bochang C, Katz K, Weigl D et al (2008) Are frequent radiographs necessary in the management of closed forearm fractures in children? J Clin Orthop 2:217–220
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Plint AC, Perry JJ, Correll R et al (2006) A randomized, controlled trial of removable splinting versus casting for wrist buckle fractures in children. Pediatrics 117:691–697CrossRefPubMed Plint AC, Perry JJ, Correll R et al (2006) A randomized, controlled trial of removable splinting versus casting for wrist buckle fractures in children. Pediatrics 117:691–697CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill CE, Masters JPM, Perry DC (2016) A systemic review of alternative splinting versus complete plaster casts for the management of childhood buckle fractures of the wrist. J Pediatr Orthop B 25:183–190CrossRefPubMed Hill CE, Masters JPM, Perry DC (2016) A systemic review of alternative splinting versus complete plaster casts for the management of childhood buckle fractures of the wrist. J Pediatr Orthop B 25:183–190CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams KG, Smith G, Luhmann SJ et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial of cast versus splint for distal radial buckle fracture: an evaluation of satisfaction, convenience, and preference. Pediatr Emerg Care 29:555–559CrossRefPubMed Williams KG, Smith G, Luhmann SJ et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial of cast versus splint for distal radial buckle fracture: an evaluation of satisfaction, convenience, and preference. Pediatr Emerg Care 29:555–559CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight KM, Hadley G, Parikh A (2015) Buckle fractures of the distal radius: increased efficiency and cost savings through a new management pathway. Arch Dis Child 100:A229CrossRef Knight KM, Hadley G, Parikh A (2015) Buckle fractures of the distal radius: increased efficiency and cost savings through a new management pathway. Arch Dis Child 100:A229CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap) — a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap) — a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Yngve DA, Carmichael JD (2003) The angled buckle fracture in pediatrics: a frequently missed fracture. Emerg Radiol 10:71–75CrossRefPubMed Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Yngve DA, Carmichael JD (2003) The angled buckle fracture in pediatrics: a frequently missed fracture. Emerg Radiol 10:71–75CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Joeris A, Lutz N, Blumenthal A (2017) The AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures (PCCF). Acta Orthop 88:123–128CrossRefPubMed Joeris A, Lutz N, Blumenthal A (2017) The AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures (PCCF). Acta Orthop 88:123–128CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Differentiating stable buckle fractures from other distal radius fractures: the 1-cm rule
verfasst von
Benjamin W. Iles
Julie B. Samora
Satbir Singh
Lynne Ruess
Publikationsdatum
13.12.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4316-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Pediatric Radiology 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.