Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 3/2016

01.03.2016 | Musculoskeletal

Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours: use of additive qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging to standard MR imaging at 3.0 T

verfasst von: So-Yeon Lee, Won-Hee Jee, Joon-Yong Jung, Michael Y. Park, Sun-Ki Kim, Chan-Kwon Jung, Yang-Guk Chung

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate malignant from benign soft tissue tumours at 3.0 T.

Methods

3.0 T MR images including DWI in 63 patients who underwent surgery for soft tissue tumours were retrospectively analyzed. Two readers independently interpreted MRI for the presence of malignancy in two steps: standard MRI alone, standard MRI and DWI with qualitative and quantitative analysis combined.

Results

There were 34 malignant and 29 non-malignant soft tissue tumours. In qualitative analysis, hyperintensity relative to skeletal muscle was more frequent in malignant than benign tumours on DWI (P=0.003). In quantitative analysis, ADCs of malignant tumours were significantly lower than those of non-malignant tumours (P≤0.002): 759±385 vs. 1188±423 μm2/sec minimum ADC value, 941±440 vs. 1310±440 μm2/sec average ADC value. The mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of both readers were 96 %, 72 %, and 85 % on standard MRI alone and 97 %, 90 %, and 94 % on standard MRI with DWI.

Conclusions

The addition of DWI to standard MRI improves the diagnostic accuracy for differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours at 3.0 T.

Key Points

DWI has added value for differentiating malignant from benign soft tissue tumours.
Addition of DWI to standard MRI at 3.0 T improves the diagnostic accuracy.
Measurements of both ADC min within solid portion and ADC av are helpful.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD (2014) Imaging of soft tissue masses. In: Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD (eds) Imaging of soft tissue tumors, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelphia, pp 39–94 Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD (2014) Imaging of soft tissue masses. In: Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD (eds) Imaging of soft tissue tumors, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelphia, pp 39–94
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendorm PC, Mertens F (eds) (2013) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th ed. IARC, Lyon Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendorm PC, Mertens F (eds) (2013) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th ed. IARC, Lyon
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Crim JR, Seeger LL, Yao L, Chandnani V, Eckardt JJ (1992) Diagnosis of soft-tissue masses with MR imaging: can benign masses be differentiated from malignant ones? Radiology 185:581–586CrossRefPubMed Crim JR, Seeger LL, Yao L, Chandnani V, Eckardt JJ (1992) Diagnosis of soft-tissue masses with MR imaging: can benign masses be differentiated from malignant ones? Radiology 185:581–586CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Knapp EL, Kransdorf MJ, Letson GD (2005) Diagnostic imaging update: soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Control 12:22–26PubMed Knapp EL, Kransdorf MJ, Letson GD (2005) Diagnostic imaging update: soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Control 12:22–26PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moulton JS, Blebea JS, Dunco DM, Braley SE, Bisset GS 3rd, Emery KH (1995) MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1191–1199CrossRefPubMed Moulton JS, Blebea JS, Dunco DM, Braley SE, Bisset GS 3rd, Emery KH (1995) MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1191–1199CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Vanhoenacker F et al (2004) Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors. A prospective study in 548 patients. Eur Radiol 14:2320–2330CrossRefPubMed Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Vanhoenacker F et al (2004) Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors. A prospective study in 548 patients. Eur Radiol 14:2320–2330CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC et al (2004) Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology 233:493–502CrossRefPubMed Van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC et al (2004) Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology 233:493–502CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rijswijk CS, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Doornbos J, Bloem JL (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:302–307CrossRefPubMed van Rijswijk CS, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Doornbos J, Bloem JL (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:302–307CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Einarsdottir H, Karlsson M, Wejde J, Bauer HC (2004) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol 14:959–963CrossRefPubMed Einarsdottir H, Karlsson M, Wejde J, Bauer HC (2004) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol 14:959–963CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeda M, Matsumine A, Kato H et al (2007) Soft-tissue tumors evaluated by line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging: influence of myxoid matrix on the apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:1199–1204CrossRefPubMed Maeda M, Matsumine A, Kato H et al (2007) Soft-tissue tumors evaluated by line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging: influence of myxoid matrix on the apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:1199–1204CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagata S, Nishimura H, Uchida M et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis. Radiat Med 26:287–295CrossRefPubMed Nagata S, Nishimura H, Uchida M et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis. Radiat Med 26:287–295CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Razek A, Nada N, Ghaniem M, Elkhamary S (2012) Assessment of soft tissue tumours of the extremities with diffusion echoplanar MR imaging. Radiol Med 117:96–101CrossRefPubMed Razek A, Nada N, Ghaniem M, Elkhamary S (2012) Assessment of soft tissue tumours of the extremities with diffusion echoplanar MR imaging. Radiol Med 117:96–101CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Grande F, Subhawong T, Weber K et al (2014) Detection of soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence: added value of functional MR imaging techniques at 3.0 T. Radiology 271:499–511CrossRefPubMed Del Grande F, Subhawong T, Weber K et al (2014) Detection of soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence: added value of functional MR imaging techniques at 3.0 T. Radiology 271:499–511CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kransdorf MJ, Bridges MD (2013) Current developments and recent advances in musculoskeletal tumor imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17:145–155CrossRefPubMed Kransdorf MJ, Bridges MD (2013) Current developments and recent advances in musculoskeletal tumor imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17:145–155CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki C, Maeda M, Matsumine A et al (2007) Apparent diffusion coefficient of subcutaneous epidermal cysts in the head and neck comparison with intracranial epidermoid cysts. Acad Radiol 14:1020–1028CrossRefPubMed Suzuki C, Maeda M, Matsumine A et al (2007) Apparent diffusion coefficient of subcutaneous epidermal cysts in the head and neck comparison with intracranial epidermoid cysts. Acad Radiol 14:1020–1028CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoo MM, Tyler PA, Saifuddin A, Padhani AR (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review. Skelet Radiol 40:665–681CrossRef Khoo MM, Tyler PA, Saifuddin A, Padhani AR (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review. Skelet Radiol 40:665–681CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat El Kady RM, Choudhary AK, Tappouni R (2011) Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient value measurement on PACS workstation: a comparative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W280–W284CrossRefPubMed El Kady RM, Choudhary AK, Tappouni R (2011) Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient value measurement on PACS workstation: a comparative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W280–W284CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginat DT, Mangla R, Yeaney G, Johnson M, Ekholm S (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign from malignant skull lesions and correlation with cell density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W597–W601CrossRefPubMed Ginat DT, Mangla R, Yeaney G, Johnson M, Ekholm S (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign from malignant skull lesions and correlation with cell density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W597–W601CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Subhawong TK, Durand DJ, Thawait GK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM (2013) Characterization of soft tissue masses: can quantitative diffusion weighted imaging reliably distinguish cysts from solid masses? Skelet Radiol 42:1583–1592CrossRef Subhawong TK, Durand DJ, Thawait GK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM (2013) Characterization of soft tissue masses: can quantitative diffusion weighted imaging reliably distinguish cysts from solid masses? Skelet Radiol 42:1583–1592CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630CrossRefPubMed Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Giles SL, Messiou C, Collins DJ et al (2014) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessment of treatment response in myeloma. Radiology 271:785–794CrossRefPubMed Giles SL, Messiou C, Collins DJ et al (2014) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessment of treatment response in myeloma. Radiology 271:785–794CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung JK, Jee WH, Jung JY et al (2014) Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 271:488–498CrossRefPubMed Sung JK, Jee WH, Jung JY et al (2014) Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 271:488–498CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours: use of additive qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging to standard MR imaging at 3.0 T
verfasst von
So-Yeon Lee
Won-Hee Jee
Joon-Yong Jung
Michael Y. Park
Sun-Ki Kim
Chan-Kwon Jung
Yang-Guk Chung
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3878-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

European Radiology 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.