Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2019

30.07.2019 | Original Article

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as a Tool in Confirming Negative Surgical Margins in Non-palpable Breast Lesions

verfasst von: Jithin T. Chand, Mala M. Sharma, Janaki P. Dharmarajan, Ajit Nambiar

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the leading killers among women the world over. Widespread mammographic screening programs have led to almost 20% of breast cancers being detected when they are radiologically visible but clinically impalpable. For the localization of these cancers before surgical excision, the Kopan hook wire is the standard technique, but the extent of margins excised still needs to be determined. In this study, we have evaluated the accuracy of specimen mammogram (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for margin assessment by comparing it to the excised margins as measured in final histopathology. This is a prospective observational study of patients with radiologically suspicious impalpable breast lesions. The patients underwent ultrasound-guided hook wire placement followed by excision of the lesion, subjected to digital tomosynthesis mammogram, and margins were revised on table when indicated. These findings were correlated with final histopathological margin. Our study included 30 patients and out of the 6 lesions, which showed positive margins on specimen mammography, 4 were histologically confirmed to have tumour at the surgical margin and 2 were confirmed to be tumour free. All DBT-positive margins were re-excised at the time of primary surgery. Individual comparison of the margins revealed a good agreement and high level of correlation between DBT and histopathology margins. None of the cases required a second surgery for margin revision. It can be concluded that specimen mammogram with DBT can be used as a reliable tool for intraoperative surgical margin assessment in non-palpable breast lesions to reduce rate of margin revision as well as reduce the volume of breast excised without compromising the oncological safety of the procedure.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S (2017) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women: breast cancer epidemiology. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 13(4):289–295CrossRefPubMed Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S (2017) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women: breast cancer epidemiology. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 13(4):289–295CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012: Globocan 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386PubMed Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012: Globocan 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Luini A, Botteri E, Zurrida S, Monti S, Galimberti V, Cassano E, Latronico A, Pizzamiglio M, Viale G, Vezzoli D, Rotmensz N, Musmeci S, Bassi F, Burgoa L, Maisonneuve P, Paganelli G, Veronesi P (2010) Nonpalpable breast carcinomas: long-term evaluation of 1,258 cases. Oncologist 15(12):1248–1252CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Veronesi U, Luini A, Botteri E, Zurrida S, Monti S, Galimberti V, Cassano E, Latronico A, Pizzamiglio M, Viale G, Vezzoli D, Rotmensz N, Musmeci S, Bassi F, Burgoa L, Maisonneuve P, Paganelli G, Veronesi P (2010) Nonpalpable breast carcinomas: long-term evaluation of 1,258 cases. Oncologist 15(12):1248–1252CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Das K, Sarkar DK, Karim R, Manna AK (2010) Preoperative ultrasound guided needle localisation for non-palpable breast lesions. Indian J Surg 72(2):117–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Das K, Sarkar DK, Karim R, Manna AK (2010) Preoperative ultrasound guided needle localisation for non-palpable breast lesions. Indian J Surg 72(2):117–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Demiral G, Senol M, Bayraktar B, Ozturk H, Celik Y, Boluk S (2016) Diagnostic value of hook wire localization technique for non-palpable breast lesions. J Clin Med Res 8(5):389–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Demiral G, Senol M, Bayraktar B, Ozturk H, Celik Y, Boluk S (2016) Diagnostic value of hook wire localization technique for non-palpable breast lesions. J Clin Med Res 8(5):389–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakimovska Dimitrovska M, Mitreska N, Lazareska M, Stojovska Jovanovska E, Dodevski A, Stojkoski A (2015) Hook wire localization procedure and early detection of breast cancer - our experience. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 3(2):273CrossRef Jakimovska Dimitrovska M, Mitreska N, Lazareska M, Stojovska Jovanovska E, Dodevski A, Stojkoski A (2015) Hook wire localization procedure and early detection of breast cancer - our experience. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 3(2):273CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ocal K, Dag A, Turkmenoglu O, Gunay EC, Yucel E, Duce MN (2011) Radioguided occult lesion localization versus wire-guided localization for non-palpable breast lesions: randomized controlled trial. Clin (Sao Paulo) 66(6):1003–1007CrossRef Ocal K, Dag A, Turkmenoglu O, Gunay EC, Yucel E, Duce MN (2011) Radioguided occult lesion localization versus wire-guided localization for non-palpable breast lesions: randomized controlled trial. Clin (Sao Paulo) 66(6):1003–1007CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goudreau SH, Joseph JP, Seiler SJ (2015) Preoperative radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: technique, pitfalls, and solutions. RadioGraphics 35(5):1319–1334CrossRefPubMed Goudreau SH, Joseph JP, Seiler SJ (2015) Preoperative radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: technique, pitfalls, and solutions. RadioGraphics 35(5):1319–1334CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarkowski R, Rzaca M (2014) Cryosurgery in the treatment of women with breast cancer-a review. Gland Surg 3(2):88–93PubMedPubMedCentral Tarkowski R, Rzaca M (2014) Cryosurgery in the treatment of women with breast cancer-a review. Gland Surg 3(2):88–93PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Karanlik H, Ozgur I, Sahin D, Fayda M, Onder S, Yavuz E (2015) Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery. World J Surg Oncol 13:321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karanlik H, Ozgur I, Sahin D, Fayda M, Onder S, Yavuz E (2015) Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery. World J Surg Oncol 13:321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan BKY, Wiseberg-Firtell JA, Jois RHS, Jensen K, Audisio RA (2015) Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD009206 Chan BKY, Wiseberg-Firtell JA, Jois RHS, Jensen K, Audisio RA (2015) Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD009206
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ, Kim CS, Park YS, Choi EH, Han KD (2016) The efficacy of intraoperative frozen section analysis during breast-conserving surgery for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 10:BCBCR.S40868CrossRef Kim MJ, Kim CS, Park YS, Choi EH, Han KD (2016) The efficacy of intraoperative frozen section analysis during breast-conserving surgery for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 10:BCBCR.S40868CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorns JM, Visscher D, Sabel M, Breslin T, Healy P, Daignaut S, Myers JL, Wu AJ (2012) Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. Am J Clin Pathol 138(5):657–669CrossRefPubMed Jorns JM, Visscher D, Sabel M, Breslin T, Healy P, Daignaut S, Myers JL, Wu AJ (2012) Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. Am J Clin Pathol 138(5):657–669CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Amer HA, Schmitzberger F, Ingold-Heppner B, Kussmaul J, El Tohamy MF, Tantawy HI et al (2017) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography—which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography? Eur J Radiol 93:258–264CrossRefPubMed Amer HA, Schmitzberger F, Ingold-Heppner B, Kussmaul J, El Tohamy MF, Tantawy HI et al (2017) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography—which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography? Eur J Radiol 93:258–264CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, Safaii H, Schmid CH, Marchant DJ, Smith TJ (1994) The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(1):33–36CrossRefPubMed Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, Safaii H, Schmid CH, Marchant DJ, Smith TJ (1994) The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(1):33–36CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bimston D, Bebb G, Wagman L (2000) Is specimen mammography beneficial? Arch Surg 135:1083–1088CrossRefPubMed Bimston D, Bebb G, Wagman L (2000) Is specimen mammography beneficial? Arch Surg 135:1083–1088CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormick JT, Keleher AJ, Tikhomirov VB, Budway RJ, Caushaj PF (2004) Analysis of the use of specimen mammography in breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 188(4):433–436CrossRefPubMed McCormick JT, Keleher AJ, Tikhomirov VB, Budway RJ, Caushaj PF (2004) Analysis of the use of specimen mammography in breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 188(4):433–436CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as a Tool in Confirming Negative Surgical Margins in Non-palpable Breast Lesions
verfasst von
Jithin T. Chand
Mala M. Sharma
Janaki P. Dharmarajan
Ajit Nambiar
Publikationsdatum
30.07.2019
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00956-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.