Erschienen in:
01.11.2013 | General Gynecology
Direct colposcopic vision used with the LLETZ procedure for optimal treatment of CIN: results of joint cohort studies
verfasst von:
Xavier Carcopino, Julien Mancini, Colette Charpin, Céline Grisot, Joan Annette Maycock, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Aubert Agostini, Léon Boubli, Walter Prendiville
Erschienen in:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
|
Ausgabe 5/2013
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the value of direct colposcopic vision (DCV) for optimizing large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Methods
Data from 648 patients who underwent excisional procedures for CIN and were included in two previously published cohort studies were retrospectively reviewed. Women who had a LLETZ were included for analysis (n = 436). Margin status, surgical specimen dimensions and volume were analysed according to the use of colposcopy during procedure.
Results
Compared to LLETZ guided by previous colposcopy report only, and to LLETZ performed immediately after colposcopy, DCV allowed for a significantly higher rate of clear margins: 33 (52.4 %), 104 (68.0 %) and 142 (84.5 %), respectively (p < 0.001). It also allowed for a significantly higher probability of achieving both negative margins and depth of specimen <10 mm: 10 (15.9 %) cases, 47 (30.7 %) cases and 125 (74.4 %) cases, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, when compared with the use of previous colposcopy report or with colposcopy immediately before the LLETZ, DCV allowed for a significantly higher probability of negative margins (AOR: 4.61; 95 % CI: 2.37–8.99 and AOR: 2.55; 95 % CI: 1.47–4.41), combined negative margins and depth <75th percentile (AOR: 3.67; 95 % CI: 1.97–6.86 and AOR: 3.05; 95 % CI: 1.91–4.87) and combined negative margins and volume <75th percentile (AOR: 12.96; 95 % CI: 5.99–28.05 and AOR: 6.16; 95 % CI: 3.75–10.14), respectively.
Conclusions
When used with the LLETZ procedure, DCV allows for optimal outcomes in terms of negative resection margins, and minimized depth and volume of the excised specimen; and should therefore be recommended.