Introduction
Renal tumours account for 5–7% of all paediatric malignancies; 85% of which are nephroblastoma (Wilms’ tumour, WT) [
1‐
6]. The latter is a heterogeneous mass that develops from embryonic renal cells, containing various amounts of stromal, epithelial and blastemal components. This results in different histological WT subtypes, with varying aggressiveness [
3,
7,
8]. Nephrogenic rests (NR), foci of persistent embryonal metanephric blastema, often occur in conjunction with or as a pre-stage of WT [
9‐
12].
Regardless of these different potential diagnoses of renal malignancies, within the International Society of Paediatric Oncology-Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) protocols, in case of radiologically suspected WT neoadjuvant chemotherapy is started without histological confirmation or differentiation of histological variant [
13,
14]. If a different renal neoplastic entity is suspected, a biopsy might be indicated [
8,
15]. This is in contrast to The Children’s Oncology Group (COG, North-America), who instead advocate upfront surgery in localised disease [
16]. Nonetheless, a biopsy might not be representative of whole-tumour histology in the case of triphasic lesions. Both approaches show equal survival rates, however, WT-based chemotherapy can potentially be initiated in other suspected tumours following the SIOP-RTSG approach. The exception is when clinical and imaging characteristics raise suspicion of a non-WT, in which case a biopsy might be indicated [
3,
13,
14]. Accordingly, imaging may play an increasingly fundamental role in the non-invasive discrimination of WT subtypes as well as in the differentiation of non-WTs from WT, and therefore in guiding the decision for neoadjuvant treatment and a potential biopsy [
17].
MR is the standard of care within the SIOP-RTSG 2016-UMBRELLA protocol. It provides high soft tissue contrast without ionising radiation and functional tools such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Previous studies have already suggested differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among WT subtypes [
18‐
24]. Nonetheless, these studies focused on the correlation of histopathology and whole-tumour ADC values, or visual comparison of slices after freehand slicing of the specimen [
18,
20,
22,
23,
25]. This might obscure underlying specific correlations of histopathological subtypes. Therefore, non-invasive discrimination based on MR could be improved by directly comparing in-vivo imaging features with ex-vivo histopathological findings [
21,
26,
27].
In a recent feasibility study, we reported on the workflow for a patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guide, providing a direct comparison of ADC and histopathological features of paediatric renal neoplasms [
27]. The current prospective national study correlates MR findings including ADC values directly with histopathological WT subtypes, with the ultimate aim to identify MR-DWI features to discriminate WT subtypes at diagnosis.
Discussion
In this prospective national study, we showed that MR-DWI can be used to discriminate the histological WT subtypes. Our results are in concordance with previous studies that found an association among ADC values, histopathological findings, and architectural changes related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [
12,
18‐
23,
25,
30,
38]. Nevertheless, previous results were predominantly based on whole-tumour analyses of WT. We included the correlation between histology and DWI on a microscopic slide level through a patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guide, providing highly accurate radiological data and a highly discriminative cut-off ADC value for stromal WT [
27]. Previous studies demonstrated that the latter is less aggressive than the blastemal or diffuse anaplastic variants after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which are associated with poor outcomes. Nonetheless, identification of stromal type WT is clinically relevant in the light of additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy after standard neoadjuvant treatment aiming for nephron-sparing surgery in bilateral cases, given the often-seen limited shrinkage [
8,
19,
37,
39,
40]. The increasing ability of DWI as a non-invasive diagnostic tool to help discriminate paediatric renal neoplasms at an early stage, combining both morphological and semi-quantitative data of the lesions, is especially important for patients treated in the SIOP-RTSG setting [
8,
17,
19,
22,
30,
39].
At baseline, WT usually presents as a large heterogeneous encapsulated mass with haemorrhagic, necrotic, and cystic components with a tumour thrombus, displacing the adjacent structures [
9,
10,
38,
41,
42]. The high percentage of haemorrhagic, cystic, and necrotic components in this study is, therefore, in line with previous results, as is the percentage of venous invasion (11%) [
6,
10,
30,
43‐
47]. As expected, 98% of WT patients (98%) showed a (pseudo) capsule at diagnosis; the renal parenchymal invasion was seen in almost half of the patients [
48]. Also in our cohort, WTs appeared typically T1W hypointense and T2W hyperintense, heterogeneously vascularised and with a high-cellular solid component [
20,
41,
45‐
47,
49].
Previous studies concluded chemotherapy generally reduces the tumour volume, which is also one of the main aims of neoadjuvant treatment in SIOP-RTSG protocols [
3,
20,
50,
51]. However, the traditional response assessment based on the change in size of imaging has become less important over the past decades and has even been discouraged as a sole marker [
45,
52,
53]. As confirmed in this large prospective study, stromal WT has been associated with a tendency to differentiate into more mature stromal or mesenchymal components following the neoadjuvant chemotherapy; whereas, the volume might remain unaltered or even increase [
23,
37,
50,
51]. Furthermore, blastemal type WT is the most chemosensitive variant, often markedly shrinking. Nevertheless, shrunken lesions may still contain predominantly malignant cells, such as chemo-resistant blastemal cells, associated with poorer event-free and overall survival [
8,
20,
21,
38,
50‐
52,
54].
Stromal lesions showed relatively high ADC values of the whole mass at diagnosis, with an increase after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggested to be related to the differentiation of the tissue [
18,
20‐
22]. Furthermore, we found that median and 25th percentile ADC values on a whole-tumour level on the baseline and response assessment MR-DWI scans were lower in lesions with remaining blastema after chemotherapy [
18‐
22]. Likewise, the rather low ADC values at baseline seen in pathologically proven regressive lesions, together with their previously discussed decrease in volume, could suggest a chemosensitive blastemal nature [
8,
10,
20,
21,
38].
In this context, Hötker et al advocated for further analysis of the ADC histogram distribution, including median, percentile, kurtosis, and skewness of the ADC values for better risk stratification [
19]. However, this study focused on whole-tumour ADC values, disregarding underlying heterogeneous histopathology and leading to less accurate correlations [
21,
55‐
59]. Littooij et al proposed that a direct correlation of single-slice ADC measurements with a matched histopathology slice could make the evaluation more specific [
21]. This retrospective visual correlation led to a varying degree of comparability due to differences in slice thickness and orientation [
21,
60]. The cutting guide, as demonstrated in an earlier feasibility study, enabled comparison of slices concerning orientation and thickness in this study. As expected, the only issues were caused by large cystic neoplasms [
27,
61]. Analyses of directly correlated data on a microscopic slide level resulted in a significant difference in median ADC values of stromal areas compared to epithelial and blastemal areas of the WT. Although this is in line with previous retrospective results, this study has additionally provided a highly significant cut-off value with high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting clinical applicability [
22]. Since measurements were based on enhancing components, representing viable neoplastic tissue, these ADC values may refer to WT variants regardless of the assessment before or after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Mixed WT lesions were difficult to evaluate due to the wide range of ADC values, which is related to the heterogeneous composition of the subtype. Furthermore, despite the exclusion of haemorrhagic and necrotic components, regressive WT also showed wide ranges of ADC values. Necrosis is related to low cellularity; whereas haemorrhagic areas can mimic high-cellular components in case of coagulation, explaining these findings [
32,
33]. Therefore, these foci are usually both identified T1W sequences with and without gadolinium administration [
32]. Finally, early recognition of diffuse anaplastic WT may have important clinical implications. Despite a lack of discriminative features, ADC values in this study were rather high; this seems in line with the report by Hötker et al, showing a significantly increased ADC value of the 75th percentile for diffuse anaplastic lesions, which was suggested to be due to a greater amount of regressive changes [
18].
This study has several limitations. First, patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in an expected rather high number of regressive specimina and a low number of epithelial and blastemal ones. Hence, the ADC values of the microscopic slides of the latter were combined as more aggressive subtypes in the discriminative analysis from stromal type WTs. Second, although the correlation of histopathology and DWI slices after the use of the cutting guide resulted in more specific and larger amounts of data, this only allowed for correlation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while the response to it could only be assessed on a whole-tumour level. Nonetheless, the exclusion of non-enhancing components from the measurements resulted in ADC values of viable neoplastic tissue, which may be clinically applicable for discrimination of subtypes regardless of the assessment before or after drug administration. Third, analysis of MR characteristics was only performed by one rater, based on tested interobserver variability of the CRF and measurement of whole-tumour ADC values [
31,
34]. This novel approach on slice and slide level might be subject to a somewhat broader variability, whereas also variability in ADC values originating from different MR equipment needs to be taken into consideration concerning validation for international use, despite the specified SIOP-RTSG 2016 UMBRELLA MR-DWI acquisition protocol [
21,
62,
63]. Nonetheless, despite the existing variability related to imaging features, we feel the methods used and choice for a single rater have not caused limitations regarding the reliability of the results. Finally, the rarity of non-WTs limited the ability to focus on their discrimination from WTs, especially in the light of the identification of features that should prompt consideration of biopsy. Ongoing inclusion as well as international collaboration may lead to potential analyses of the discriminative value of MR-DWI for the differentiation of WTs and non-WTs, while previously identified general solid tumour characteristics on other MR-sequences should also be taken into consideration [
17,
31,
64,
65]. NRs which were separately identifiable and measurable on histopathology and on MR were also scarce, limiting strong conclusions concerning their differentiation from small WTs. Nonetheless, ongoing inclusion and analysis of non-WTs and NRs using correlation through the cutting guide might allow future discriminative analyses.
In conclusion, the correlation between histopathology and MR-DWI after slicing in the innovative cutting guide resulted in a highly significant discrimination of stromal type WT based on ADC-value, together with limited shrinkage and a considerable increase in ADC-values after chemotherapy. Especially in bilateral cases, potentially eligible for nephron-sparing surgery, stromal tumours might not benefit from additional pre-operative chemotherapy given the potentially limited decrease in size, whereas in general the early recognition of high-risk histopathology might facilitate more personalised treatment already from diagnosis on. Yet, reliable differentiation between epithelial and blastemal lesions remains difficult due to the rarity of these histological types after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a similar marked diffusion restriction. Collaborative international efforts, analysing, for instance, treatment-naïve WTs, might enable replication, validation, and inclusion of a higher number of epithelial and blastemal-type tumours.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.