Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2019

31.01.2019 | Letter to the Editor

Direct oral anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists, and simple single tooth extraction

verfasst von: Beuy Joob, Viroj Wiwanitkit

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Dear Editor, we read the publication on “Should we fear direct oral anticoagulants more than vitamin K antagonists in simple single tooth extraction? A prospective comparative study” with great interest [1]. Berton et al. concluded that “Patients assuming DOACs can be treated similarly to patients in VKAs therapy with INR index between 2 and 3 [1].” In fact, the management of the patients receiving any medication affecting hemostasis is an important consideration in dental surgery. The good decision-making should base on the coagulation test results. Nevertheless, there is still an important precaution on the interpretation of INR index. In laboratory medicine, different laboratory reagents can result in different INR index values. As reported by Morrison et al., the INR value by Manchester method is lower than those values obtained by the other methods [2]. Also, the sensitivity of a thromboplastin reagent to heparin can result in false increased INR value [3]. To interpret INR index, the dentist has to recognize about the problem of false value. At least, the dentist should recheck by history, taking to rule out any risk of bleeding tendency of the patients. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berton F, Costantinides F, Rizzo R, Franco A, Contarin J, Stacchi C, Maglione M, Visintini E, Di Lenarda A, Di Lenarda R (2018) Should we fear direct oral anticoagulants more than vitamin K antagonists in simple single tooth extraction? A prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2739-9 Berton F, Costantinides F, Rizzo R, Franco A, Contarin J, Stacchi C, Maglione M, Visintini E, Di Lenarda A, Di Lenarda R (2018) Should we fear direct oral anticoagulants more than vitamin K antagonists in simple single tooth extraction? A prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Investig. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00784-018-2739-9
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison M, Caldwell A, McQuaker G, Fitzsimons EJ (1989) Discrepant INR values: a comparison between Manchester and thrombotest reagents using capillary and venous samples. Clin Lab Haematol 11(4):393–398CrossRefPubMed Morrison M, Caldwell A, McQuaker G, Fitzsimons EJ (1989) Discrepant INR values: a comparison between Manchester and thrombotest reagents using capillary and venous samples. Clin Lab Haematol 11(4):393–398CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Leech BF, Carter CJ (1998 Jun) Falsely elevated INR results due to the sensitivity of a thromboplastin reagent to heparin. Am J Clin Pathol 109(6):764–768CrossRefPubMed Leech BF, Carter CJ (1998 Jun) Falsely elevated INR results due to the sensitivity of a thromboplastin reagent to heparin. Am J Clin Pathol 109(6):764–768CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Direct oral anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists, and simple single tooth extraction
verfasst von
Beuy Joob
Viroj Wiwanitkit
Publikationsdatum
31.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02836-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.