Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Forensic Toxicology 2/2020

25.02.2020 | Original Article

Dispersive SPE, an alternative to traditional SPE for extraction of 43 doping peptides from equine urine prior to LC–MS screening

verfasst von: Joanne Pugliese, Mary C. Boyce, Nathan G. Lawler, John Coumbaros, Thao T. Le

Erschienen in: Forensic Toxicology | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Dermorphin, growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP), TB-500 and their analogues have been used illegally in the horse racing industry to improve the performance of the horses. This study aims to present dispersive solid phase extraction (dSPE) as an alternative to solid phase extraction (SPE) for the clean-up of equine urine samples prior to liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) screening of 43 illegal performance enhancing peptides.

Methods

Sorbent types and mass, washing and eluting solvents were tested to obtain the optimal clean-up conditions for these peptides in horse urine matrices.

Results

The resulting dSPE clean-up method gave optimal recovery and reproducibility of 43 target peptides; for the first time dSPE is proven as a viable alternative to SPE and achieves limits of detection (LOD) that are sufficient for the screening of these peptides. The LODs for all dermorphin, TB-500 and GHRP peptides were 1 ng/mL. Recoveries of the 43 target analytes extracted from 3 spiked urine samples ranged from 8.9 to 58.8%. The intra-day and inter-day precision for all target analytes ranged from 0.6 to 24.1% and 1.4 to 27.8% respectively.

Conclusions

Using dSPE as a clean-up method, 43 peptide analytes of interest were successfully screened by LC–MS/MS.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas A, Höppner S, Geyer H, Schänzer W, Petrou M, Kwiatkowska D, Thevis M (2011) Determination of growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRP) and their major metabolites in human urine for doping controls by means of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:507–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4702-3 CrossRefPubMed Thomas A, Höppner S, Geyer H, Schänzer W, Petrou M, Kwiatkowska D, Thevis M (2011) Determination of growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRP) and their major metabolites in human urine for doping controls by means of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:507–516. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00216-011-4702-3 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzarino M, Calvaresi V, de la Torre X, Parrotta G, Sebastianelli C, Botre F (2015) Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry procedure after solid-phase extraction for detection of 19 doping peptides in human urine. Forensic Toxicol 33:321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-015-0279-4 CrossRef Mazzarino M, Calvaresi V, de la Torre X, Parrotta G, Sebastianelli C, Botre F (2015) Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry procedure after solid-phase extraction for detection of 19 doping peptides in human urine. Forensic Toxicol 33:321–337. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11419-015-0279-4 CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Semenistaya E, Zvereva I, Thomas A, Thevis M, Krotova G, Rodchenkova G (2015) Determination of growth hormone releasing peptidesmetabolites in human urine after nasal administration of GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, Hexarelin, and Ipamorelin. Drug Test Anal 7:919–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1787 CrossRefPubMed Semenistaya E, Zvereva I, Thomas A, Thevis M, Krotova G, Rodchenkova G (2015) Determination of growth hormone releasing peptidesmetabolites in human urine after nasal administration of GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, Hexarelin, and Ipamorelin. Drug Test Anal 7:919–925. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​dta.​1787 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, štajnbaher D (2003) Quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) approach for the determination of pesticide residues. WTQA 2002—18th annual waste testing and quality assurance symposium, Arlington 231–24. Doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.081 Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, štajnbaher D (2003) Quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) approach for the determination of pesticide residues. WTQA 2002—18th annual waste testing and quality assurance symposium, Arlington 231–24. Doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.081
13.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sapozhnikova Y, Lehotay SJ (2013) Multi-class, multi-residue analysis of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers and novel flame retardants in fish using fast, low-pressure gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 758:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.034 CrossRefPubMed Sapozhnikova Y, Lehotay SJ (2013) Multi-class, multi-residue analysis of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers and novel flame retardants in fish using fast, low-pressure gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 758:80–92. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​aca.​2012.​10.​034 CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrade-Eiroa A, Canle M, Leroy-Cancellieri V, Cerdà V (2016) Solid phase extraction of organic compounds: a critical review. Part I. TrAC Trend Anal Chem 80:641–654CrossRef Andrade-Eiroa A, Canle M, Leroy-Cancellieri V, Cerdà V (2016) Solid phase extraction of organic compounds: a critical review. Part I. TrAC Trend Anal Chem 80:641–654CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dzomba F, Kugara J, Zaranyika MF (2015) Extraction of tetracycline antimicrobials from river water and sediment: a comparative study of three solid phase extraction methods. Afric J Pharm Parmacol 9:523–531CrossRef Dzomba F, Kugara J, Zaranyika MF (2015) Extraction of tetracycline antimicrobials from river water and sediment: a comparative study of three solid phase extraction methods. Afric J Pharm Parmacol 9:523–531CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall TG, Smukste I, Bresciano KR, Wang Y, McKearn D, Savage RE (2012) Identifying and overcoming matrix effects in drug discovery and development. In: Prasain JK (ed) Tandem mass spectrometry-applications and principles. IntechOpen, pp 389–421. https://doi.org/10.5772/32108 Hall TG, Smukste I, Bresciano KR, Wang Y, McKearn D, Savage RE (2012) Identifying and overcoming matrix effects in drug discovery and development. In: Prasain JK (ed) Tandem mass spectrometry-applications and principles. IntechOpen, pp 389–421. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5772/​32108
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tiwari G, Tiwari R (2010) Bioanalytical method validation: an updated review. Parmaceut Method 1:25–38CrossRef Tiwari G, Tiwari R (2010) Bioanalytical method validation: an updated review. Parmaceut Method 1:25–38CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dispersive SPE, an alternative to traditional SPE for extraction of 43 doping peptides from equine urine prior to LC–MS screening
verfasst von
Joanne Pugliese
Mary C. Boyce
Nathan G. Lawler
John Coumbaros
Thao T. Le
Publikationsdatum
25.02.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Forensic Toxicology / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1860-8965
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-8973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00524-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Forensic Toxicology 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin