Gastric distension has important implications for motility and satiety. The hypothesis of this study was that distension affects the amplitude and duration of gastric contraction and that these parameters are largely mediated by efferent vagus stimulation.
A novel isovolumic myograph was introduced to test these hypotheses. The isovolumic myograph isolates the stomach and records the pressure generated by the gastric contraction under isovolumic conditions. Accordingly, the phasic changes of gastric contractility can be documented. A group of 12 rats were used under in vivo conditions and isolated ex vivo conditions and with two different gastric restraints (small and large) to determine the effect of degree of restraint.
The comparison of the in vivo and ex vivo contractility provided information on the efferent vagus mediation of gastric contraction, i.e., the in vivo amplitude and duration reached maximum of 12.6 ± 2.7 mmHg and 19.8 ± 5.6 s in contrast to maximum of 5.7 ± 0.9 mmHg and 7.3 ± 1.3 s in ex vivo amplitude and duration, respectively. The comparison of gastric restraint and control groups highlights the role of distension on in vivo gastric contractility. The limitation of gastric distension by restraint drastically reduced the maximal amplitude to below 2.9 ± 0.2 mmHg.
The results show that distension-induced gastric contractility is regulated by both central nervous system and local mechanisms with the former being more substantial. Furthermore, the gastric restraint significantly attenuates gastric contractility (decreased amplitude and shortened duration of contraction) which is mediated by the efferent vagus activation. These findings have important implications for gastric motility and physiology and may improve our understanding of satiety.
Sarna SK. Tachykinins and in vivo gut motility. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44(8 Suppl):114S–8. PubMed
Andrews PL, Grundy D, Scratcherd T. Reflex excitation of antral motility induced by gastric distension in the ferret. J Physiol. 1980;298:79–84. PubMed
Leek BF. Abdominal and pelvic visceral receptors. Br Med Bull. 1977;33(2):163–8. PubMed
Woods SC. Gastrointestinal satiety signals I. An overview of gastrointestinal signals that influence food intake. Am J Physiol Gasterointest Liver Physiol. 2004;286(1):G7–13. CrossRef
Andrews PL, Grundy D, Scratcherd T. Vagal afferent discharge from mechanoreceptors in different regions of the ferret stomach. J Physiol. 1980;298:513–24. PubMed
Davis JD, Smith GP, Sayler JL. Reduction of intake in the rat due to gastric filling. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1997;272:R1599–605.
Peles S, Petersen J, Aviv R, et al. Enhancement of antral contractions and vagal afferent signaling with synchronized electrical stimulation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;285(3):G577–85. PubMed
Schwartz GJ, McHugh PR, Moran TH. Integration of vagal afferent responses to gastric loads and cholecystokinin in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1991;261:R64–9.
Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Changes in comorbidities and improvements in quality of life after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(Suppl):S51–4. CrossRef
Schindler K, Prager G, Ballaban T, et al. Impact of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on plasma ghrelin, eating behaviour and body weight. Eur J Clin Investig. 2004;34:549–54. CrossRef
Korner J, Inabnet W, Conwell IM, et al. Differential effects of gastric bypass and banding on circulating gut hormone and leptin levels. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:1553–61. CrossRef
Keating CL, Dixon JB, Moodie ML, et al. Cost-efficacy of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diab Care. 2009;32(4):580–4. CrossRef
Herron DM. The surgical management of severe obesity. Mt Sinai J Med. 2004;71(1):63–71. PubMed
- Distension-Induced Gastric Contraction is Attenuated in an Experimental Model of Gastric Restraint
Samer G. Mattar
Jose A. Navia
Ghassan S. Kassab
Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie
Mail Icon II