Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2019

22.03.2019 | Head and Neck

Distinguishing early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI

verfasst von: Qi-Yong Ai, Ann D. King, Janet S. M. Chan, Weitian Chen, K. C. Allen Chan, John K. S. Woo, Benny C. Y. Zee, Anthony T. C. Chan, Darren M. C. Poon, Brigette B. Y. Ma, Edwin P. Hui, Anil T. Ahuja, Alexander C. Vlantis, Jing Yuan

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

MRI can detect early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the detection is more challenging in early-stage NPCs because they must be distinguished from benign hyperplasia in the nasopharynx. This study aimed to determine whether intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM DWI) MRI could distinguish between these two entities.

Methods

Thirty-four subjects with early-stage NPC and 30 subjects with benign hyperplasia prospectively underwent IVIM DWI. The mean pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for all subjects and compared between the 2 groups using Student’s t test. Receiver operating characteristics with the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal threshold for all significant parameters, and the corresponding diagnostic performance was calculated. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with benign hyperplasia, early-stage NPC exhibited a significantly lower D mean (0.64 ± 0.06 vs 0.87 ± 0.11 × 10−3 mm2/s), ADC0–1000 mean (0.77 ± 0.08 vs 1.00 ± 0.13 × 10−3 mm2/s), ADC300–1000 (0.63 ± 0.05 vs 0.86 ± 0.10 × 10−3 mm2/s) and a higher D* mean (32.66 ± 4.79 vs 21.96 ± 5.21 × 10−3 mm2/s) (all p < 0.001). No significant difference in the f mean was observed between the two groups (p = 0.216). The D and ADC300–1000 mean had the highest AUC of 0.985 and 0.988, respectively, and the D mean of < 0.75 × 10−3 mm2/s yielded the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (100%, 93.3% and 96.9%, respectively) in distinguishing early-stage NPC from benign hyperplasia.

Conclusion

DWI has potential to distinguish early-stage NPC from benign hyperplasia and D and ADC300–1000 mean were the most promising parameters.

Key Points

• Diffusion-weighted imaging has potential to distinguish early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia in the nasopharynx.
• The pure diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient from intravoxel incoherent motion model and apparent diffusion coefficient from conventional diffusion-weighted imaging were significant parameters for distinguishing these two entities in the nasopharynx.
• The pure diffusion coefficient, followed by apparent diffusion coefficient, may be the most promising parameters to be used in screening studies to help detect early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatia KSS, King AD, Vlantis AC et al (2012) Nasopharyngeal mucosa and adenoids: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 263:437–443CrossRefPubMed Bhatia KSS, King AD, Vlantis AC et al (2012) Nasopharyngeal mucosa and adenoids: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 263:437–443CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A et al (2017) Analysis of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal Cancer. N Engl J Med 377:513–522CrossRefPubMed Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A et al (2017) Analysis of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal Cancer. N Engl J Med 377:513–522CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KSS et al (2011) Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma : diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology 258:531–537CrossRefPubMed King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KSS et al (2011) Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma : diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology 258:531–537CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat King AD, Wong LYS, Law BKH et al (2018) MR imaging criteria for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: discrimination of early-stage primary tumors from benign hyperplasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:515–523 King AD, Wong LYS, Law BKH et al (2018) MR imaging criteria for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: discrimination of early-stage primary tumors from benign hyperplasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:515–523
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263:19–32CrossRefPubMed Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263:19–32CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang SX, Jia QJ, Zhang ZP et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI: emerging applications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the primary site. Eur Radiol 24:1998–2004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang SX, Jia QJ, Zhang ZP et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI: emerging applications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the primary site. Eur Radiol 24:1998–2004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D et al (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRefPubMed Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D et al (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat King AD, Lam WWM, Leung SF et al (1999) MRI of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: tumour extent vs tumour stage. Br J Radiol 72:734–741CrossRefPubMed King AD, Lam WWM, Leung SF et al (1999) MRI of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: tumour extent vs tumour stage. Br J Radiol 72:734–741CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat King AD, Vlantis AC, Yuen TWC et al (2015) Detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared with endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy based on long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2380–2385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral King AD, Vlantis AC, Yuen TWC et al (2015) Detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared with endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy based on long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2380–2385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida T, Urikura A, Shirata K et al (2016) Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 89:20160512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoshida T, Urikura A, Shirata K et al (2016) Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 89:20160512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikayama R, Yabuuchi H, Sonoda S et al (2018) Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging between turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 26:316–324CrossRef Mikayama R, Yabuuchi H, Sonoda S et al (2018) Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging between turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 26:316–324CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakamoto J, Imaizumi A, Sasaki Y et al (2014) Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 32:860–866CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto J, Imaizumi A, Sasaki Y et al (2014) Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 32:860–866CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang L, Luo X, Lian Z et al (2017) Lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 90:159–165CrossRefPubMed Liang L, Luo X, Lian Z et al (2017) Lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 90:159–165CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T et al (2012) Salivary gland tumors: use of Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 263:770–777CrossRefPubMed Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T et al (2012) Salivary gland tumors: use of Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 263:770–777CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen J, Xu X, Su G, Hu H (2018) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging of the normal-appearing parotid glands in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after radioiodine therapy. Acta Radiol 59:204–211CrossRefPubMed Shen J, Xu X, Su G, Hu H (2018) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging of the normal-appearing parotid glands in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after radioiodine therapy. Acta Radiol 59:204–211CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai V, Li X, Ho V et al (2013) Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging : comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and post-chemoradiation fibrosis. Eur Radiol 23:2793–2801CrossRefPubMed Lai V, Li X, Ho V et al (2013) Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging : comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and post-chemoradiation fibrosis. Eur Radiol 23:2793–2801CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao J, Shen J, Yang Q (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in differentiation between recurrent carcinoma and postchemoradiation fibrosis of the skull base in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:1556–1564CrossRefPubMed Mao J, Shen J, Yang Q (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in differentiation between recurrent carcinoma and postchemoradiation fibrosis of the skull base in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:1556–1564CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia QJ, Zhang SX, Chen WB et al (2014) Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24:3076–3087CrossRefPubMed Jia QJ, Zhang SX, Chen WB et al (2014) Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24:3076–3087CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai V, Li X, Lee VHF et al (2014) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Eur Radiol 24:176–183CrossRefPubMed Lai V, Li X, Lee VHF et al (2014) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Eur Radiol 24:176–183CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao Y, Pan J, Chen Y et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motionmagnetic resonance imaging as an early predictor of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e973 Xiao Y, Pan J, Chen Y et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motionmagnetic resonance imaging as an early predictor of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e973
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao-Ping Y, Jing H, Fei-Ping L et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for predicting early response to induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1179–1190CrossRefPubMed Xiao-Ping Y, Jing H, Fei-Ping L et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for predicting early response to induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1179–1190CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu X, Hou J, Li F et al (2016) Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45:20150317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu X, Hou J, Li F et al (2016) Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45:20150317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Surov A, Ryl I, Bartel-Friedrich S et al (2015) Diffusion weighted imaging of nasopharyngeal adenoid hypertrophy. Acta Radiol 56:587–591CrossRefPubMed Surov A, Ryl I, Bartel-Friedrich S et al (2015) Diffusion weighted imaging of nasopharyngeal adenoid hypertrophy. Acta Radiol 56:587–591CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Noij DP, Martens RM, Marcus JT et al (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the diagnostic and prognostic value. Oral Oncol 68:81–91CrossRefPubMed Noij DP, Martens RM, Marcus JT et al (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the diagnostic and prognostic value. Oral Oncol 68:81–91CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Distinguishing early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI
verfasst von
Qi-Yong Ai
Ann D. King
Janet S. M. Chan
Weitian Chen
K. C. Allen Chan
John K. S. Woo
Benny C. Y. Zee
Anthony T. C. Chan
Darren M. C. Poon
Brigette B. Y. Ma
Edwin P. Hui
Anil T. Ahuja
Alexander C. Vlantis
Jing Yuan
Publikationsdatum
22.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06133-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

European Radiology 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.