Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2020

Open Access 09.12.2019 | Original Scientific Report

Distribution of Metastatic Cancer Cells in Colorectal Mesentery

verfasst von: Chen-Sen Ma, Yi-Xin Tong, Jian-Ping Gong

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2020

Abstract

Background

To investigate the distribution of metastatic cancer cells in the mesentery (referred to as metastasis V) and enrich the understanding of the metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Methods

A total of two hundred ninety-nine patients who received colorectal operations at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between April 2018 and December 2018 were included. Samples were acquired from the dissected mesentery after the operation, and hematoxylin–eosin staining or immunohistochemistry was used to detect metastatic cancer cells. Pathological factors, including tumor position, tumor size, invasion depth, tumor differentiation, lymph node involvement, local vessel invasion, and perineural invasion, were recorded.

Results

Metastatic cancer cells in the colorectal mesentery (metastasis V) were detected in 62 of 299 patients. Metastasis V was closely correlated with tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, and perineural and vessel invasion by cancer cells. Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with T3 stage (26.27%) and T4 stage (40.00%) than in patients with T1 and T2 stages (0% and 2%, respectively). Metastasis V was frequently detected in patients with N2a and N2b stage tumors (51.72% and 61.54%, respectively). Metastasis V was more frequently detected in patients with perineural metastasis and local vessel invasion. In addition, metastasis V incidences in colon and rectal cancer were similar.

Conclusion

The incidence rate of metastasis V is correlated with tumor staging factors and occurs more frequently in advanced-stage patients.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00268-019-05284-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a high-mortality disease worldwide [1]. A high local regional recurrence rate is one of the reasons for the high mortality rate [2, 3]. Over time, surgeons have paid attention to reducing recurrence. RJ Heald introduced the total mesorectum excision (TME) for rectal cancer 30 years ago [4]. Recently, Hohenberger proposed complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer [5]. Their work had increased the lymph node harvest number and reduced local regional recurrence of CRC. However, lymph node dissection protocols cannot thoroughly explain the promotion of prognosis.
A previous study reported the existence of metastatic cancer cells in adipose tissue, and metastatic cancer cells have been closely related to poor prognosis [6]. In addition, we have also discovered metastatic cancer cells and nodules in mesentery of gastric cancer [7] and colorectal cancer [8]. The metastatic cancer cells and nodules in the mesentery were not continuous with primary tumor, metastatic lymph node, or hematogenous metastasis. We assume that this metastatic pathway was different from the conventional routes (direct invasion, peritoneum dissemination, lymphatic metastasis, and hematogenous metastasis); thus, we named it “metastasis V” [79]. Metastasis V left behind after an operation is termed “cancer leak” and leads to poor prognosis [10]. We aimed in the current study to investigate the distribution of metastasis V in the colorectal mesentery and provide information for clinical treatment.

Materials and methods

Patients, samples, and sectional tissue analysis

A total of 299 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for CRC at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between April 2018 and December 2018 were included in this study. All participants signed written informed consent forms for this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the first author’s institute. Clinical samples of CRC were obtained from resected colorectal tissue specimens. The demographic characteristics of the 299 patients are described in Tables 1 and 2. The clinicopathological stages were determined according to the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.
Table 1
Data in 299 colorectal cancer patients
Parameters
Resultsa
Gender
 
Female
27/117 (23.08%)
Male
35/182 (19.23%)
Age (year, mean, range)
56.69 ± 11.74 (25–86)
Lymph nodes retrieved (mean ± SD, range)
16.16 ± 9.12 (2–75)
Location of tumor
 
Colon
24/138 (17.39%)
Rectum
38/161 (23.60%)
Histologic grade (G)b
 
G1
2/17 (11.76%)
G2
32/195 (15.42%)
G3
28/87 (32.18%)
Invasive depth
 
T1
0/7 (0.00%)
T2
1/50 (2.00%)
T3
51/217 (26.27%)
T4
10/25 (40.00%)
Lymph node metastasis
 
N0
9/181 (4.97%)
N1
24/68 (35.29%)
N2a
18/34 (52.94%)
N2b
11/16 (68.75%)
Distant metastasis
 
M0
55/289 (19.03%)
M1
7/10 (70.00%)
LVI
 
Negative
39/243 (16.05%)
Positive
23/46 (50.00%)
Perineural invasion
 
Negative
28/225 (12.44%)
Positive
34/74 (45.94%)
LVI local vessel invasion of cancer cells
aThe data were showing as (number of patients with metastasis V)/(number of total patients in the category) (%)
bHistologic Grade classification according to AJCC 8th, G1: well differentiated; G2: moderately differentiated; G3: poorly differentiated
Table 2
Cases in TNM classification
 
TNM stage
Totala
I
T1N0M0
0/7 (0)
I
T2N0M0
1/41 (2.44%)
IIa
T3N0M0
8/123 (6.50%)
IIb
T4N0M0
1/8 (12.50%)
IIIa
T2N1M0
0/8 (0)
IIIb
T3N1M0
15/46 (32.61%)
IIIb
T3N2aM0
12/25 (48.00%)
IIIc
T3N2bM0
10/15 (66.67%)
IIIb
T4N1M0
5/12 (41.67%)
IIIc
T4N2aM0
1/1 (100.00%)
IIIc
T4N2bM0
2/3 (66.67%)
IV
T3N0M1
0/1 (0)
IV
T3N1M1
2/2 (100.00%)
IV
T3N2M1
3/4 (75.00%)
IV
T4N2M1
1/2 (50.00%)
aThe data were showing as (number of patients with metastasis V)/(number of total patients in the category) (%)

Metastasis V detection

All the mesentery from the colonic wall to the ligation clip of the vessel root was obtained after the local lymph nodes were retrieved. The specimen was divided into 1 cm × 1 cm pieces and numbered (see Supplementary Figure S1) and fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution for at least 24 h. After fixation, HE slices were generated for each piece of mesentery for the first screening. The number of slices for each specimen varied with the area of the entire obtained mesentery. If a potential or suspect metastasis V was found in a specimen, IHC (pan-cytokeratin, PCK) staining slices were generated and investigated for confirmation. The slices were checked by two senior pathologists.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square and ANOVA analyses were used to inspect the inter-group differences in incidence and metastasis V numbers, respectively. We considered a P value less than 0.05 to be statistically significant. Standard statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 22.0.

Results

Patients and baseline analysis

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study. As shown in Table 1, the participants were 117 females (39.13%) and 182 males (60.87%). The average patient age was 56.69 ± 11.74 years (range 25–86). Among the patients, 289 (96.66%) received radical operations, and 10 (3.34%) received palliative operations because of distant metastasis or peritoneal metastasis with complications, such as obstruction and perforation. There were 48, 131, 110, and 10 patients with stages I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. The average number of retrieved lymph nodes was 16.16 ± 9.16 (2–75). Metastasis V was detected in 62 of the 299 (20.74%) patients.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Tumor stage is closely related to poor prognosis in CRC [11]. We compared the incidence and average metastasis V numbers among patients with each stage of cancer. The Chi-square analysis showed significant differences in the incidence rates between each stage (P < 0.05), and the incidence of metastasis V in patients with advanced stage (stage III 45/110; 40.91%; stage IV 7/10; 70.00%) was higher than that in patients with stage II (9/131; 6.87%) and stage I (1/52; 1.92%). The ANOVA results showed that there was no significant difference in the average metastasis V number between those with stage I and stage II disease, and the average metastasis V number in stage III and stage IV patients was much higher than that in stage I and stage II patients (Fig. 1a). Therefore, metastasis V occurs more frequently in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with colorectal cancer with invasion depths greater than T3

We compared the incidence and the metastasis V number at different tumor invasion depths (T stage) (Table 1, Fig. 1b). Most metastasis V occurred in stage T3 and T4 patients. Chi-square analysis showed significant differences in incidence rates between different T stages. Metastasis V was more likely to occur in patients with stages T3 (51/217; 23.50%) and T4 (10/25; 40.00%) than in those with stages T1 (0/7; 0%) and T2 (1/50; 2.00%) (Table 1). Moreover, ANOVA showed that the average metastasis number was also much higher in T3 and T4 patients than in T2 and T1 patients (Fig. 1b). The above results support that metastasis V occurs more frequently in patients with colorectal cancer with deeper invasion.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with local regional lymph node metastasis

Local regional lymph node metastasis (N stage) can predict poor prognosis [6]. We analyzed the incidences and average metastasis V number in each N stage. Chi-square analysis showed significant differences in incidence rates between different N stages, and metastasis V appeared to occur more frequently in the N-positive groups (N1: 35.29%; N2a: 52.94%; N2b: 68.75%) than in the N-negative group (4.97%) (Table 1). ANOVA showed that the average metastasis V number in the N2b group was significantly higher than that in the N2a, N1, and N0 groups combined (P < 0.05); the average metastasis V number in the N2a group was significantly higher than that in the N1 and N0 groups combined (P < 0.05); and the average metastasis V number in the N1 group was significantly higher than that in the N0 group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1c). Therefore, metastasis V occurs more frequently in patients with regional lymph node metastasis.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in colorectal cancer with low histologic grade

We compared the incidence and metastasis V number in each histologic grade. Chi-square analysis showed significant differences in incidence rates between different grades. Metastasis V was more likely to occur in patients with G3 (28/87; 32.18%) than in those with G1 (2/17; 11.76%) and G2 (32/195; 15.42%) (Table 1). Moreover, ANOVA showed that the average metastasis V number was also much higher in G3 patients than in G2 patients, but it was not higher in G3 patients than in G1 patients, possibly because the G1 sample size was small (Fig. 1d). The above results support that metastasis V occurs more frequently in colorectal cancer patients with low histologic grades.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with local vessel invasion

A previous study showed that metastasis V is the appearance of cancer cells in the mesogastrium, mesocolon, or mesorectum independent of lymph node or vessel invasion [7, 8]. We explored whether metastasis V is related to local vessel invasion by cancer cells. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the groups with local vessel invasion (LVI-positive group) and without local vessel invasion (LVI-negative group), and specifically, the metastasis V incidence in the LVI-negative group (39/243, 16.05%) was significantly lower than the incidence in the LVI-positive group (23/46, 50.00%) (P < 0.05); the patients without LVI had a lower metastasis V number than the patients with LVI (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1e). Thus, metastasis V is associated with LVI by tumor cells.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with perineural invasion

The results showed that there was a significant difference between the groups with perineural invasion (neuro-positive group) and without perineural invasion (neuro-negative group), and specifically, the incidence of metastasis V in the neuro-negative group (28/225, 12.44%) was significantly lower than that in the neuro-positive group (34/74, 45.94%) (P < 0.05). The patients without perineural invasion had a lower metastasis V number than the patients with perineural invasion (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1f). Thus, metastasis V is associated with perineural invasion by tumor cells.

Metastasis V occurred more frequently in patients with rectal cancer

The prognosis of rectal cancer is much worse than that of colon cancer [12]. Thus, we compared the metastasis V incidence among tumors in different parts of the colorectum. Metastasis V occurred more frequently in rectal cancer patients (23.60%) than in patients with colon cancer (17.39%) (Table 1). The Chi-square analysis was not significant (P > 0.05). However, ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference between the average metastasis V numbers in rectal cancer patients and colonic cancer patients, and the average metastasis V number in rectal cancer patients was significantly higher than that in colon cancer patients (Fig. 1g). Therefore, the incidence of metastasis V was similar between colonic cancer and rectal cancer patients, but the metastasis V number was higher in rectal cancer patients than in colon cancer patients.
We concluded that metastasis V occurs more frequently in advanced stage patients (stage III and stage IV) and patients with deeper tumor invasion, local lymph node metastasis, low histologic grade, LVI, and perineural metastasis. We also analyzed the relationship between metastasis V and clinical factors involved above in colon cancer and rectal cancer separately. The results in colon cancer and rectal cancer showed similar trend except for the differentiation category (Figures S2, S3; Tables S1, S2). There was no significant difference between the metastasis V incidence rates in colon cancer and rectal cancer patients.

Discussion

Local recurrence is an important factor that affects CRC prognosis [13]. Lymph node dissection has been proven to be effective at improving the prognosis of colorectal cancer [1416]. Further, metastatic cancer cells have been identified in the mesentery, and patients with metastatic cancer cells in adipose tissue around tumors have a relatively worse prognosis [17]. However, the distribution of metastatic cancer cells has rarely been studied.
Metastatic cancer cells in the adipose tissue were first called tumor deposits (TD) by Gabriel et al. [16] and were considered the result of vascular tumor dissemination. TD was further studied and defined as adenocarcinoma within adipose or fibrous tissue around that was not associated with a lymph node [1719]. Later, isolated tumor cells (ITC) was also proposed and focused on single tumor cell or cell clusters in lymph node, hematologic system, bone marrow, etc., and has also proven associated to poor prognosis [20, 21].
In our previous studies, we discovered metastatic cancer cells in the mesentery of the stomach, colon, and rectum and proposed the definition of metastasis V [79]. Metastasis V defined a novel metastasis route of gastric cancer and colorectal cancer that occurred in the mesentery of stomach and colorectum. An important character of metastasis V is removable by complete mesentery excision operations and can “leak out” from ruptured mesentery. Complete mesentery excision in gastric cancer has been proven less “cancer leak” and with favorable prognosis [10]. We are also expanding the study on colorectal cancer. Thus, the distribution of metastasis V is meaningful for clinical strategy selection.
In this study, we have shown that metastasis V incidence is related to tumor stage. Metastasis V occurs more frequently in N-positive patients, and those with cancer in the N2b stage have a much higher metastasis V incidence than those with stage N2a, who in turn have a much higher incidence than those with N1. Consistent with our previous study, metastasis V occurs more in T3 or T4 stage disease than in T1 or T2 disease. Interestingly, we also noticed that metastasis V occurs more frequently in patients with local perineural or vessel invasion.
The limitation of this study is the lack of long-term survival data; we will continue to follow these patients and report the follow-up results, and an additional randomized clinical trial will be conducted to study the efficiency and reliability of CME/TME in preventing “cancer leak” and reduce tumor recurrence.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in the study were done so in accordance with the ethical standards of Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee, Wuhan, China.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386CrossRef Ferlay J et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouvier AM et al (2015) Incidence and patterns of late recurrences in colon cancer patients. Int J Cancer 137(9):2133–2138CrossRef Bouvier AM et al (2015) Incidence and patterns of late recurrences in colon cancer patients. Int J Cancer 137(9):2133–2138CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH (2010) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616CrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH (2010) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohenberger W et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364CrossRef Hohenberger W et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura K et al (2005) Evaluation of prognostic significance in extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Surgery 137(5):511–517CrossRef Nakamura K et al (2005) Evaluation of prognostic significance in extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Surgery 137(5):511–517CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie D et al (2013) Mesogastrium: a fifth route of metastasis in gastric cancer? Med Hypotheses 80(4):498–500CrossRef Xie D et al (2013) Mesogastrium: a fifth route of metastasis in gastric cancer? Med Hypotheses 80(4):498–500CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo X-L et al (2017) Detection of metastatic cancer cells in mesentery of colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 23(34):6315CrossRef Luo X-L et al (2017) Detection of metastatic cancer cells in mesentery of colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 23(34):6315CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Daxing X et al (2015) Detection and characterization of metastatic cancer cells in the mesogastrium of gastric cancer patients. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0142970CrossRef Daxing X et al (2015) Detection and characterization of metastatic cancer cells in the mesogastrium of gastric cancer patients. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0142970CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie D, Wang Y, Shen J et al (2018) Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen in peritoneal fluid of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with complete mesogastric excision. Br J Surg 105(11):1471–1479CrossRef Xie D, Wang Y, Shen J et al (2018) Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen in peritoneal fluid of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with complete mesogastric excision. Br J Surg 105(11):1471–1479CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang GJ et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(6):433–441CrossRef Chang GJ et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(6):433–441CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Astler VB, Coller FA (1954) The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 139(6):846CrossRef Astler VB, Coller FA (1954) The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 139(6):846CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81(1):7–19CrossRef Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81(1):7–19CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21(15):2912–2919CrossRef Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21(15):2912–2919CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabriel W, Dukes C, Bussey H (1935) Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum. Br J Surg 23(90):395–413CrossRef Gabriel W, Dukes C, Bussey H (1935) Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum. Br J Surg 23(90):395–413CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronese N, Nottegar A, Pea A et al (2015) Prognostic impact and implications of extracapsular lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 27(1):42–48CrossRef Veronese N, Nottegar A, Pea A et al (2015) Prognostic impact and implications of extracapsular lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 27(1):42–48CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein NS, Turner JR (2000) Pericolonic tumor deposits in patients with T3 N + M0 colon adenocarcinomas: markers of reduced disease free survival and intra-abdominal metastases and their implications for TNM classification. Cancer 88(10):2228–2238CrossRef Goldstein NS, Turner JR (2000) Pericolonic tumor deposits in patients with T3 N + M0 colon adenocarcinomas: markers of reduced disease free survival and intra-abdominal metastases and their implications for TNM classification. Cancer 88(10):2228–2238CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison JC et al (1995) Impact of the Crohn’s-like lymphoid reaction on staging of right-sided colon cancer: results of multivariate analysis. Hum Pathol 26(1):31–38CrossRef Harrison JC et al (1995) Impact of the Crohn’s-like lymphoid reaction on staging of right-sided colon cancer: results of multivariate analysis. Hum Pathol 26(1):31–38CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Luchini C et al (2016) Extranodal extension is an important prognostic parameter for both colonic and rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27(5):955–956CrossRef Luchini C et al (2016) Extranodal extension is an important prognostic parameter for both colonic and rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27(5):955–956CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermanek P, Hutter RV, Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1999) Classification of isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis. Cancer Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc 86(12):2668–2673 Hermanek P, Hutter RV, Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1999) Classification of isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis. Cancer Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc 86(12):2668–2673
Metadaten
Titel
Distribution of Metastatic Cancer Cells in Colorectal Mesentery
verfasst von
Chen-Sen Ma
Yi-Xin Tong
Jian-Ping Gong
Publikationsdatum
09.12.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05284-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

World Journal of Surgery 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.