Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2020

31.07.2020 | Recent Developments

DIY Genetic Tests: A Product of Fact or Fallacy?

verfasst von: Olga C. Pandos

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Commercialization of DNA is the new norm of biological enterprise. Our genetic material underpins our notions of self and well-being and, most importantly, our risk for disease. DNA holds the information necessary to quantitatively determine predispositions to disease and the likelihood of that disease occurring. Although do-it-yourself (DIY) genetic tests have introduced a new dimension to genetic screening, the ethical concerns are telling. Issues relating to genetic misinformation through misleading advertisement are significant problems in the context of DIY genetic tests. …
Fußnoten
1
SNPs are single base pair changes within a DNA sequence.
 
2
Also known as “genes of interest.”
 
3
A phenotype refers to the expression of a characteristic, such as hair colour.
 
4
Receptor: a membrane protein which accepts a molecule to initiate a response.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Golubeva, V.A., T. Nepomuceno, and A. Monteiro. 2019. Germline missense variants in BRCA1: New trends and challenges for clinical annotation. Cancers (Basel) 11(4): 522.CrossRef Golubeva, V.A., T. Nepomuceno, and A. Monteiro. 2019. Germline missense variants in BRCA1: New trends and challenges for clinical annotation. Cancers (Basel) 11(4): 522.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ingelsson, E., and M. McCarthy. 2018. Human genetics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine 11(6): 1. Ingelsson, E., and M. McCarthy. 2018. Human genetics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine 11(6): 1.
Zurück zum Zitat Niemiec, E., L. Kalokairinou, and H.C. Howard. 2017. Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Future Medicine 14(5): 433–445. Niemiec, E., L. Kalokairinou, and H.C. Howard. 2017. Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Future Medicine 14(5): 433–445.
Zurück zum Zitat Short, P. 2019. DNA isn’t a marketing tool. New Scientist, June 8, 23. Short, P. 2019. DNA isn’t a marketing tool. New Scientist, June 8, 23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, Y.T., and P. Zettler. 2019. Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory shift on direct-to-consumer genetic tests for cancer risk. Cancer 125(1): 12–14.CrossRef Yang, Y.T., and P. Zettler. 2019. Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory shift on direct-to-consumer genetic tests for cancer risk. Cancer 125(1): 12–14.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
DIY Genetic Tests: A Product of Fact or Fallacy?
verfasst von
Olga C. Pandos
Publikationsdatum
31.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-09995-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe