nach oben

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Erschienen in:

02.01.2019 | Original Article

Does Modification of Implicit Associations Regarding Contamination Affect Approach Behavior and Attentional Bias?

verfasst von: Christina Dusend, Laura M. S. De Putter, Ernst H. W. Koster, Fanny A. Dietel, Ulrike Buhlmann

Erschienen in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Individuals with contamination concerns show aberrant interpretational and attentional processes. Yet, it is unclear whether threat-related associations play a causal role in anxiety symptoms and attentional bias. The objective of our study was to investigate if training implicit associations affects stress reactivity and attention in the context of contamination concerns. In a double-blind randomized design, we used a modified Implicit Associations Task (IAT) to train associations between contamination and danger in a non-clinical sample (N = 121). Dependent measures were a brief-IAT to assess changes in associations, contamination-related behavior approach tasks, and a spatial cueing task to measure attentional bias. Results show that training successfully modified implicit associations. However, there were no transfer effects on approach behavior or attention. Findings suggest that the modified IAT is a useful task for training implicit associations, but that transfer to other domains (attention and behavior) is limited. Limitations and future implications are discussed.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

We assessed current depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation again upon arrival prior to study conduction. Participants were excluded prior to the study when they had a sum score of more than 19 or a score of more than 1 on the item no 9 in the BDI-II (N = 0).

In the following we will describe the blocks using the notation contamination/dangerous and contamination/not dangerous. This includes the blocks with reversed positions of same categories.

Words of the cleanliness set were used as neutral words for the spatial cueing task. To keep consistent with other studies, we refer to them as neutral words (since they are not related to danger or specific concerns) for the spatial cueing task.

The spatial cueing task contained 192 trials. Due to an error in programming, general threatening words were presented only on the left side of the screen. We did not use them for analyses to avoid bias of presentation location.

We provide further analyses in the Supplementary Material confirming our conclusion that increase in stress reactivity occurred in response to the BATs and is not related to other aspects of the experiment. Please find a time-course of adverse emotionality ratings assessed over visual analogue scales in the Supplementary Material.

We also conducted the same analyses with only both of the active training groups (NT vs. PT), since analyses of the B-IAT suggested significant differences only between those two. Results showed the same pattern, and there were no further significant results supporting hypothesis testing.

Abramowitz, J. S., Fabricant, L. E., Taylor, S., Deacon, B. J., McKay, D., & Storch, E. A. (2014). The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.004.CrossRefPubMed

Amir, N., Bomyea, J., & Beard, C. (2010). The effect of single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(2), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.005.CrossRefPubMed

Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(11), 1325–1335.CrossRef

Arjona, A., Escudero, M., & Gómez, C. M. (2016). Cue validity probability influences neural processing of targets. Biological Psychology, 119, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.001.CrossRefPubMed

Beadel, J. R., Smyth, F. L., & Teachman, B. A. (2014). Change processes during cognitive bias modification for obsessive compulsive beliefs. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9576-6.CrossRef

Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 49–58.CrossRef

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). BDI-II, Beck depression inventory: Manual (2nd edn.). San Antonio: Psychological Corp.; Harcourt Brace.

Bowler, J. O., Hoppitt, L., Illingworth, J., Dalgleish, T., Ononaiye, M., Perez-Olivas, G., & Mackintosh, B. (2017). Asymmetrical transfer effects of cognitive bias modification: Modifying attention to threat influences interpretation of emotional ambiguity, but not vice versa. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Lang, A.-G. (2011). G*Power (Version 3.1.3). Kiel.

Cisler, J. M., & Olatunji, B. O. (2010). Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: Evidence for difficulty in disengagement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.003.CrossRefPubMed

Clerkin, E. M., & Teachman, B. A. (2010). Training implicit social anxiety associations: An experimental intervention. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(3), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.01.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Clerkin, E. M., & Teachman, B. A. (2011). Training interpretation biases among individuals with symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Conley, S. L., & Wu, K. D. (2018). Experimental modification of dysfunctional interpretations in individuals with contamination concerns. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 59, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.11.005.CrossRefPubMed

Cristea, I. A., Mogoașe, C., David, D., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Practitioner review: Cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(7), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12383.CrossRefPubMed

Davis, M. L., Rosenfield, D., Bernstein, A., Zvielli, A., Reinecke, A., Beevers, C. G., et al. (2016). Attention bias dynamics and symptom severity during and following CBT for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(9), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000125.CrossRefPubMed

De Putter, L. M. S., Van Yper, L., & Koster, E. H. W. (2017). Obsessions and compulsions in the lab: A meta-analysis of procedures to induce symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 52, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.01.001.CrossRefPubMed

Dusend, C., De Putter, L. M. S., Koster, E. H. W., Möllmann, A., & Buhlmann, U. (2018). Inducing attentional bias in individuals with elevated contamination concerns: Effects on information processing and approach behavior (Manuscript in preparation).

Ebert, I. D., Steffens, M. C., von Stülpnagel, R., & Jelenec, P. (2009). How to like yourself better, or chocolate less: Changing implicit attitudes with one IAT task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.008.CrossRef

Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2002). The obsessive-compulsive inventory: Development and validation of a short version. Psychological Assessment, 14(4), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.14.4.485.CrossRefPubMed

Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000527.CrossRefPubMed

Gönner, S., Leonhart, R., & Ecker, W. (2007). Das Zwangsinventar OCI-R - die deutsche Version des Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised. PPmP: Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie, 57(09/10), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970894.CrossRef

Green, J. S., & Teachman, B. A. (2012). Is “cootie” in the eye of the beholder? An experimental attempt to modify implicit associations tied to contamination fears. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3(3), jep.026111. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.026111.CrossRef

Green, J. S., & Teachman, B. A. (2013). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit threat overestimation in contamination fear. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.09.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.CrossRef

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.CrossRef

Hautzinger, M., Keller, F., & Kühner, C. (2006). Beck Depressionsinventar: BDI II. Revision. Frankfurt/Main: Harcourt Test Services.

Hezel, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (2016). A theoretical review of cognitive biases and deficits in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Biological Psychology, 121, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.012.CrossRefPubMed

Inquisit 4 [Computer Software]. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.millisecond.com/download/.

Jelinek, L., Hottenrott, B., & Moritz, S. (2009). When cancer is associated with illness but no longer with animal or zodiac sign: Investigation of biased semantic networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(8), 1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

Koster, E. H. W., De Raedt, R., Goeleven, E., Franck, E., & Crombez, G. (2005). Mood-congruent attentional bias in dysphoria: Maintained attention to and impaired disengagement from negative information. Emotion, 5(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.446.CrossRefPubMed

MacLeod, C., & Grafton, B. (2016). Anxiety-linked attentional bias and its modification: Illustrating the importance of distinguishing processes and procedures in experimental psychopathology research. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

Menne-Lothmann, C., Viechtbauer, W., Höhn, P., Kasanova, Z., Haller, S. P., Drukker, M., et al. (2014). How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e100925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100925.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2018). Anxiety and threat-related attention: Cognitive-motivational framework and treatment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.001.CrossRefPubMed

Mogg, K., Holmes, A., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2008). Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(5), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.02.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Najmi, S., & Amir, N. (2010). The effect of attention training on a behavioral test of contamination fears in individuals with subclinical obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(1), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nicholson, E., Dempsey, K., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). The role of responsibility and threat appraisals in contamination fear and obsessive-compulsive tendencies at the implicit level. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.11.001.CrossRef

Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., Axt, J., & Greenwald, A. G. (2014). Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended scoring procedures. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e110938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (2005). Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory—Part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(11), 1527–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.07.010.CrossRef

Ouimet, A. J., Gawronski, B., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2009). Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety: A review and an integrative model. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.004.CrossRefPubMed

Park, J. W., Yoon, S. O., Kim, K. H., & Wyer, R. S. (2001). Effects of priming a bipolar attribute concept on dimension versus concept-specific accessibility of semantic memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 405–420.CrossRef

Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231.CrossRefPubMed

Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(5), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(85)90105-6.CrossRefPubMed

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1977). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Redwood City: Mindgarden Inc.

Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283.CrossRefPubMed

Taylor, S., Coles, M. E., Abramowitz, J. S., Wu, K. D., Olatunji, B. O., Timpano, K. R., et al. (2010). How are dysfunctional beliefs related to obsessive-compulsive symptoms? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.24.3.165.CrossRef

Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. H. W. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 682–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034834.CrossRefPubMed

Võ, M. L. H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 534–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.534.CrossRefPubMed

Williams, A. D., & Grisham, J. R. (2013). Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) of obsessive compulsive beliefs. BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H. W. (2014). Dynamics of attentional bias to threat in anxious adults: Bias towards and/or away? PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H. W. (2015). Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), 772–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614551572.CrossRef

Titel: Does Modification of Implicit Associations Regarding Contamination Affect Approach Behavior and Attentional Bias?
verfasst von: Christina Dusend
Laura M. S. De Putter
Ernst H. W. Koster
Fanny A. Dietel
Ulrike Buhlmann
Publikationsdatum: 02.01.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-09991-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

23.04.2024 | Demenz | Nachrichten

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Does Modification of Implicit Associations Regarding Contamination Affect Approach Behavior and Attentional Bias?

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Profiles of Emotion Regulation in Young People Accessing Youth Mental Health and Drug Treatment

Symptom-Specific Threat Perception Mediates the Relationship Between Obsessive Beliefs and OCD Symptoms

How Do I Say This? An Experimental Comparison of the Effects of Partner Feedback Styles on Reassurance Seeking Behaviour

Imagining as an Observer: Manipulating Visual Perspective in Obsessional Imagery

Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on a Behavioural Measure of Rumination in Patients with Chronic, Treatment-Resistant Depression

Different Patterns of Attention Bias in Worry and Rumination

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie