Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 7/2019

01.10.2018 | Original Article

Does routine repeat imaging change management in high-grade renal trauma? Results from three level 1 trauma centers

verfasst von: David B. Bayne, Anas Tresh, Nima Baradaran, Gregory Murphy, E. Charles Osterberg, Shellee Ogawa, Jessica Wenzel, Lindsay Hampson, Jack McAninch, Benjamin Breyer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Guidelines call for routine reimaging of Grade 4–5 renal injuries at 48–72 h. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the clinical utility of computed tomography (CT) reimaging in high-grade renal injuries.

Materials and methods

We assembled data on 216 trauma patients with high-grade renal trauma at three level 1 trauma centers over a 19-year span between 1999 and 2017 in retrospectively collected trauma database. Demographic, radiographic, and clinical characteristics of patients were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

In total, 151 cases were Grade 4 renal injuries, and 65 were Grade 5 renal injuries. 53.6% (81) Grade 4 and 15.4% (10) Grade 5 renal injuries were initially managed conservatively. Of the 6 asymptomatic cases where repeat imaging resulted in intervention, 100% had collecting system injuries at initial imaging. Collecting system injuries were only present in 42.9% of cases where routine repeat imaging did not trigger surgical intervention. Collecting system injury at the time of initial imaging was a statistically significant predictor of routine repeat imaging triggering surgical intervention (p = 0.022). Trauma grade and the presence of vascular injury were not significant predictors of intervention after repeat imaging in asymptomatic patients.

Conclusion

In asymptomatic patients with high-grade renal trauma, the number needed to image is approximately one in eight (12.5%) to identify need for surgical intervention. There is potentially room to improve criteria for routine renal imaging in high-grade renal trauma based on the more predictive imaging finding of collecting system injury.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McAninch JW (1996) Renal injuries. In: Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Duckett JW (eds) Adult and pediatric urology, 3rd edn. Mosby, St Louis, pp 539–553 McAninch JW (1996) Renal injuries. In: Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Duckett JW (eds) Adult and pediatric urology, 3rd edn. Mosby, St Louis, pp 539–553
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Voelzke Bryan B, Leddy L (2014) The epidemiology of renal trauma. Transl Androl Urol 3.2:143–149 (PMC. Web. 12 June 2017) Voelzke Bryan B, Leddy L (2014) The epidemiology of renal trauma. Transl Androl Urol 3.2:143–149 (PMC. Web. 12 June 2017)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wessells H et al (2003) Renal injury and operative management in the United States: results of a population-based study. J Trauma 54.3:423–430CrossRef Wessells H et al (2003) Renal injury and operative management in the United States: results of a population-based study. J Trauma 54.3:423–430CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore E et al (1989) Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma 29(12):1664–1666CrossRefPubMed Moore E et al (1989) Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma 29(12):1664–1666CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Thall EH et al (1996) Conservative management of penetrating and blunt Type III renal injuries. Br J Urol 77(4):512–517CrossRefPubMed Thall EH et al (1996) Conservative management of penetrating and blunt Type III renal injuries. Br J Urol 77(4):512–517CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bukur M, Inaba K, Barmparas G et al (2011) Routine follow-up imaging of kidney injuries may not be justified. J Trauma 70:1229CrossRefPubMed Bukur M, Inaba K, Barmparas G et al (2011) Routine follow-up imaging of kidney injuries may not be justified. J Trauma 70:1229CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Breen KJ et al (2014) Adult blunt renal trauma: routine follow-up imaging is excessive. Urology 84.1:62–67CrossRef Breen KJ et al (2014) Adult blunt renal trauma: routine follow-up imaging is excessive. Urology 84.1:62–67CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng DL, Lazan D, Stone N (1994) Conservative treatment of type III renal trauma. J Trauma 36(4):491–494CrossRefPubMed Cheng DL, Lazan D, Stone N (1994) Conservative treatment of type III renal trauma. J Trauma 36(4):491–494CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Blankenship JC, Gavant ML, Cox CE et al (2001) Importance of delayed imaging for blunt renal trauma. World J Surg 25:1561CrossRefPubMed Blankenship JC, Gavant ML, Cox CE et al (2001) Importance of delayed imaging for blunt renal trauma. World J Surg 25:1561CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shariat S et al (2008) Features and outcomes of patients with grade IV renal injury. BJU Int 102(6):728–733 (discussion 733) CrossRefPubMed Shariat S et al (2008) Features and outcomes of patients with grade IV renal injury. BJU Int 102(6):728–733 (discussion 733) CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley J, Jack M (2006) Selective management of isolated and nonisolated grade IV renal injuries. J Urol 176(6):2498–2502 (discussion 2502) CrossRefPubMed Buckley J, Jack M (2006) Selective management of isolated and nonisolated grade IV renal injuries. J Urol 176(6):2498–2502 (discussion 2502) CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis P, Bultitude MF, Koukounaras J et al (2010) Assessing the usefulness of delayed imaging in routine followup for renal trauma. J Urol 184:973CrossRefPubMed Davis P, Bultitude MF, Koukounaras J et al (2010) Assessing the usefulness of delayed imaging in routine followup for renal trauma. J Urol 184:973CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley Jill, McAninch Jack (2011) Revision of current American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Renal Injury grading system. J Trauma 70(1):35–37CrossRefPubMed Buckley Jill, McAninch Jack (2011) Revision of current American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Renal Injury grading system. J Trauma 70(1):35–37CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire J et al (2011) Predictors of outcome for blunt high grade renal injury treated with conservative intent. J Urol 185(1):187–191CrossRefPubMed McGuire J et al (2011) Predictors of outcome for blunt high grade renal injury treated with conservative intent. J Urol 185(1):187–191CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley Jill, McAninch Jack (2011) Revision of current American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Renal Injury grading system. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 70(1):35–37CrossRef Buckley Jill, McAninch Jack (2011) Revision of current American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Renal Injury grading system. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 70(1):35–37CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaither T et al (2018) Missed opportunities to decrease radiation exposure in children with renal trauma. J Urol 199(2):552–557CrossRefPubMed Gaither T et al (2018) Missed opportunities to decrease radiation exposure in children with renal trauma. J Urol 199(2):552–557CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Does routine repeat imaging change management in high-grade renal trauma? Results from three level 1 trauma centers
verfasst von
David B. Bayne
Anas Tresh
Nima Baradaran
Gregory Murphy
E. Charles Osterberg
Shellee Ogawa
Jessica Wenzel
Lindsay Hampson
Jack McAninch
Benjamin Breyer
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2513-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

World Journal of Urology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.