Background
Methods
Study design, focused question, registration and protocol
Literature search strategy
Database | Search Strategy |
---|---|
PubMed | #1 (((((((((((((((aged [MeSH Terms]) OR aged [Title/Abstract]) OR elderly [Title/Abstract]) OR ((Aged, 80 and over [MeSH Terms]))) OR ((“Aged, 80[Title/Abstract] AND over”[Title/Abstract]))) OR “oldest old”[Title/Abstract]) OR Nonagenarian*[Title/Abstract]) OR Octogenarian*[Title/Abstract]) OR Centenarian*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Old people”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Old person”) OR “Elders”) OR “Elderly people”) OR “Elderly person”) OR “Elderly population”) OR Seniors [Title/Abstract] #2 (((((((((((((((((((((((Institutionalization [MeSH Terms]) OR Institutionalized Person*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Person, Institutionalized”[Title/Abstract]) OR Institutionalization*[Title/Abstract]) OR Homes for the Aged [MeSH Terms]) OR “Home, Old Age”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Homes, Old Age”[Title/Abstract]) OR Old Age Home*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Facilities”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Institutions”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Homes for the Aged”[Title/Abstract]) OR Almshouses [MeSH Terms]) OR Almshouse*[Title/Abstract]) OR Poorhouse*[Title/Abstract]) OR Nursing Homes [MeSH Terms]) OR “Homes, Nursing”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Home, Nursing”[Title/Abstract]) OR Nursing Home*[Title/Abstract]) OR Housing for the elderly [MeSH Terms]) OR “Life Care Centers, Retirement”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Continuing Care Retirement Centers”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Housing for the elderly”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Institutionalized older adults”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Institutionalized elderly”[Title/Abstract] #3 (((((((((((((((Independent living [MeSH Terms]) OR “Living, Independent”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Community Dwelling”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Dwelling, Community”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Dwellings, Community”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Aging in Place”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Independent living”[Title/Abstract]) OR Deinstitutionalization [MeSH Terms]) OR “Deinstitutionalized Persons”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Deinstitutionalized Person”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Persons, Deinstitutionalized”[Title/Abstract]) OR Deinstitutionalization [Title/Abstract]) OR “Non-institutionalized elderly”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Non-institutionalized elders”[Title/Abstract]) OR Non-institutional [Title/Abstract]) OR Community [Title/Abstract] #4 ((((Quality of Life [MeSH Terms]) OR “Life Quality”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Health Related Quality Of Life”[Title/Abstract]) OR HRQOL [Title/Abstract]) OR “Quality of life”[Title/Abstract] #1 AND #2 AND #3 AND #4 |
Scopus | #1 TITLE-ABS-KEY (aged) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (elderly) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Oldest Old”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Nonagenarian*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Octogenarian*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Centenarian*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“aged, 80 over”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Old people”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“old person”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (elders) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“elderly people”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“elderly person”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“elderly population”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (seniors) #2 TITLE-ABS-KEY (Institutionalized AND Person*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Person, Institutionalized”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Institutionalization*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Home, Old Age”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Homes, Old Age”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Old AND Age AND Home*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Geriatric Long-Term Care Facilities”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Geriatric Long-Term Care Institutions”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Homes for the Aged”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Almshouse*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Poorhouse*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Nursing AND Home*) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Home, Nursing”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Homes, Nursing”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Housing for the elderly”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Life Care Centers, Retirement”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Continuing Care Retirement Centers”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Institutionalized older adults”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Institutionalized elderly”) #3 TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Independent living”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Community Dwelling”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Dwelling, Community”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Dwellings, Community”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Aging in Place”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Deinstitutionalization) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Deinstitutionalized Persons”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Deinstitutionalized Person”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Persons, Deinstitutionalized”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Independent living”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Non-institutionalized elderly”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Non-institutionalized elders”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (non-institutional) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (community) #4 TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Quality of Life”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Life Quality”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY(“Health Related Quality of Life”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (HRQOL) #1 AND #2 AND #3 AND #4 |
Web of Science | #1 TS = (aged OR elderly OR “Oldest Old” OR Nonagenarian* OR Octogenarian* OR Centenarian* OR “Aged, 80 and over” OR “Old people” OR “old person” OR elders OR “elderly people” OR “elderly person” OR “elderly population” OR seniors) #2 TS = (Institutionalized Person* OR “Person, Institutionalized” OR Institutionalization OR Institutionalization* OR “Home, Old Age” OR “Homes, Old Age” OR Old Age Home* OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Facilities” OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Institutions” OR “Homes for the Aged” OR “Homes for the Aged” OR Almshouses OR Almshouse* OR Poorhouse* OR “Nursing Homes” OR Nursing Home* OR “Home, Nursing” OR “Homes, Nursing” OR “Housing for the elderly” OR “Life Care Centers, Retirement” OR “Continuing Care Retirement Centers” OR “Institutionalized older adults” OR “Institutionalized elderly”) #3 TS = (“Independent living” OR “Living, Independent” OR “Community Dwelling” OR “Dwelling, Community” OR “Dwellings, Community” OR “Aging in Place” OR Deinstitutionalization OR “Deinstitutionalized Persons” OR “Deinstitutionalized Person” OR “Persons, Deinstitutionalized” OR Deinstitutionalization OR “Independent living” OR “Non-institutionalized elderly” OR “Non-institutionalized elders” OR “non-institutional” OR community) #4 TS = (“Quality of Life” OR “Life Quality” OR “Health Related Quality Of Life” OR HRQOL) #1 AND #2 AND #3 AND #4 |
Cochrane Library | #1 MeSH descriptor: [Aged] explode all trees 1640 #2 aged OR elderly OR “Oldest Old” OR Nonagenarian* OR Octogenarian* OR Centenarian* 430,102 #3 MeSH descriptor: [Aged, 80 and over] explode all trees 262 #4 “Aged, 80 and over” OR “Old people” OR “old person” OR elders OR “elderly people” OR “elderly person” OR “elderly population” OR seniors 52,836 #5 #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 430,609 #6 MeSH descriptor: [Institutionalization] explode all trees 200 #7 Institutionalization* OR Institutionalized Person* OR “Person, Institutionalized” 794 #8 MeSH descriptor: [Homes for the Aged] explode all trees 556 #9 “Homes for the Aged” OR “Home, Old Age” OR “Homes, Old Age”OR Old Age Home* OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Facilities”OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Institutions” 0 #10 MeSH descriptor: [Almshouses] explode all trees 0 #11 Almshouse* OR Poorhouse* 2 #12 MeSH descriptor: [Nursing Homes] explode all trees 1189 #13 Nursing Home* OR “Home, Nursing” OR “Homes, Nursing” 6599 #14 MeSH descriptor: [Housing for the Elderly] explode all trees 35 #15 “Housing for the elderly” OR “Care Centers, Retirement” OR “Continuing Care Retirement Centers” OR “Institutionalized older adults” OR “Institutionalized elderly” 352 #16 #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 OR #14 OR #15 1,302,402 #17 MeSH descriptor: [Independent Living] explode all trees 267 #18 “Independent living” OR “Living, Independent” OR “Community Dwelling” OR “Dwelling, Community” OR “Dwellings, Community” OR “Aging in Place” 3417 #19 MeSH descriptor: [Deinstitutionalization] explode all trees 22 #20 Deinstitutionalization OR “Deinstitutionalized Persons” OR “Deinstitutionalized Person” OR “Persons, Deinstitutionalized” OR “Non-institutionalized elderly” OR “Non-institutionalized elders” OR “non-institutional” OR community 37,791 #21 MeSH descriptor: [Quality of Life] explode all trees 20,225 #22 “Quality of Life” OR “Life Quality” OR “Health Related Quality Of Life” OR HRQOL 72,184 #23 #17 OR #18 OR #19 OR #20 38,098 #24 #21 OR #22 72,184 #25 #5 AND #16 AND #23 AND #24 3450 |
Lilacs | #1 (mh:(aged)) OR (tw:(aged)) OR (tw:(elderly)) OR (tw:(“Oldest Old”)) OR (tw:(Nonagenarian$)) OR (tw:(Octogenarian$)) OR (tw:(Centenarian$)) OR (mh:(“Aged, 80 and over”)) OR (tw:(“Aged, 80 and over”)) OR (tw:(“Old people”)) OR (tw:(“old person”)) OR (tw:(elders)) OR (tw:(“elderly people”)) OR (tw:(“elderly person”)) OR (tw:(“elderly population”)) OR (tw:(seniors)) #2 (tw:(Institutionalized Person$)) OR (tw:(“Person, Institutionalized”)) OR (mh:(“Institutionalization”)) OR (tw:(Institutionalization$)) OR (tw:(“Home, Old Age”)) OR (tw:(“Homes, Old Age”)) OR (tw:(Old Age Home$)) OR (tw:(“Geriatric Long-Term Care Facilities”)) OR (tw:(“Geriatric Long-Term Care Institutions”)) OR (tw:(“Homes for the Aged”)) OR (tw:(“Homes for the Aged”)) OR (mh:(“Almshouses”)) OR (tw:(Almshouse$)) OR (tw:(Poorhouse$)) OR (mh:(“Nursing Homes”)) OR (tw:(Nursing Home$)) OR (tw:(“Home, Nursing”)) OR (tw:(“Homes, Nursing”)) OR (mh:(“Housing for the elderly”)) OR (tw:(“Housing for the elderly”)) OR (tw:(“Life Care Centers, Retirement”)) OR (tw:(“Continuing Care Retirement Centers”)) OR (tw:(“Institutionalized older adults”)) OR (tw:(“Institutionalized elderly”)) #3 (mh:(Independent living)) OR (tw:(“Independent living”)) OR (tw:(“Living, Independent”)) OR (tw:(“Community Dwelling”)) OR (tw:(“Dwelling, Community”)) OR (tw:(“Dwellings, Community”)) OR (tw:(“Aging in Place”)) OR (mh:(Deinstitutionalization)) OR (tw:(Deinstitutionalization)) OR (tw:(“Deinstitutionalized Persons”)) OR (tw:(“Deinstitutionalized Person”)) OR (tw:(“Persons, Deinstitutionalized”)) OR (mh:(Deinstitutionalization)) OR (tw:(Deinstitutionalization)) OR (mh:(“Non-institutionalized elderly”)) OR (tw:(“Non-institutionalized elders”)) OR (tw:(“non-institutional”)) OR (tw:(community)) #4 (mh:(“Quality of Life”)) OR (tw:(“Quality of Life”)) OR (tw:(“Life Quality”)) OR (tw:(“Health Related Quality Of Life”)) OR (tw:(HRQOL)) #1 AND #2 AND #3 AND #4 |
Open Grey | #1 (aged OR elderly OR “Oldest Old” OR Nonagenarian* OR Octogenarian* OR Centenarian* OR “Aged, 80 and over” OR “Old people” OR “old person” OR elders OR “elderly people” OR “elderly person” OR “elderly population” OR seniors) #2 (Institutionalized Person* OR “Person, Institutionalized” OR Institutionalization OR Institutionalization* OR “Home, Old Age” OR “Homes, Old Age” OR Old Age Home* OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Facilities” OR “Geriatric Long-Term Care Institutions” OR “Homes for the Aged” OR “Homes for the Aged” OR Almshouses OR Almshouse* OR Poorhouse* OR “Nursing Homes” OR Nursing Home* OR “Home, Nursing” OR “Homes, Nursing” OR “Housing for the elderly” OR “Life Care Centers, Retirement” OR “Continuing Care Retirement Centers” OR “Institutionalized older adults” OR “Institutionalized elderly”) #3 (“Independent living” OR “Living, Independent” OR “Community Dwelling” OR “Dwelling, Community” OR “Dwellings, Community” OR “Aging in Place” OR Deinstitutionalization OR “Deinstitutionalized Persons” OR “Deinstitutionalized Person” OR “Persons, Deinstitutionalized” OR Deinstitutionalization OR “Independent living” OR “Non-institutionalized elderly” OR “Non-institutionalized elders” OR “non-institutional” OR community) #4 (“Quality of Life” OR “Life Quality” OR “Health Related Quality Of Life” OR HRQOL) #1 AND #2 AND #3 AND #4 |
Eligibility criteria
Data extraction
Authors, year (local) | Study Design | Sample size | Sample characteristics | Data collection | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urciuoli et al., 1998 [24] (Italy) | Cross-sectional | Convenience sample (n = 66, being 29 IE and 37 NIE) | IE = 4 male and 25 females; NIE = 6 male and 31 females Age: > 88 years | LEIPAD (The lower the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–93 points | Physical functions: IE: mean = 7.20, SD = 1.91; NIE: mean = 6.55, SD = 2.37 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Self-care skills: IE: mean = 12.86, SD = 3.39; NIE: mean = 10.45, SD = 5.58 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Cognitive functions: IE: mean = 4.50, SD = 2.08; NIE: mean = 4.74, SD = 2.91 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Depression and anxiety: IE: mean = 1.79, SD = 2.42; NIE: mean = 2.23, SD = 2.17 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Social functions: IE mean = 3.48, SD = 1.80; NIE: mean = 2.79, SD = 1.93 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Sexual functions: IE mean = 6.00, SD = 0.00; NIE: mean = 6.00, SD = 0.00 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Life Satisfaction: IE mean = 4.75, SD = 2.31; NIE: mean = 5.52, SD = 2.83 (p > 0,05, Student’s T-test) |
Akça; Sahin, 2008 [10] (Turkey) | Cross-sectional | Convenience sample (n = 251, being 90 IE and 124 NIE) | IE = 52 male and 38 females; NIE = 87 male and 37 females Age: ≥ 60 years | LEIPAD (The lower the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–93 points | Physical functions: IE mean = 12.70, SD = 2.67; NIE: mean = 12.46, SD = 2.51 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Self-care skills: IE mean = 9.63, SD = 4.76; NIE: mean = 10.28, SD = 5.00 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Cognitive functions: IE mean = 11.28, SD = 2.39; NIE: mean = 12.04, SD = 2.43 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Depression and anxiety: IE mean = 9.14, SD = 2.95; NIE: mean = 9.94, SD = 3.29 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Social functions: IE mean = 7.94, SD = 1.91; NIE: mean = 7.21, SD = 2.28 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Sexual functions: IE mean = 7.43, SD = 1.25; NIE: mean = 6.33, SD = 1.50 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Life Satisfaction: IE mean = 17.19, SD = 2.66; NIE: mean = 16.90, SD = 3.20 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) |
Bonan et al., 2008 [14] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 90, being 45 IE and 45 NIE) | IE = 22 male and 23 females; NIE = 20 male and 25 females Age: > 55 years | GOHAI (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–60 points | IE: mean = 50, SD = 8; NIE: mean = 50, SD = 6 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) |
Bodur; Cingil, 2009 [13] (Turkey) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 74, being 37 IE and 37 NIE) | IE = 60% male and 40% females; NIE = 38% male and 62% females Age: > 60 years | WHOQOL-BREF (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | General Health: IE: mean = 71.9, SD = 20.4; NIE: mean = 65.1, SD = 18.8 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Physical Health: IE: mean = 62.2, SD = 29.7; NIE: mean = 58.1, SD = 22.3 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Psychological Health: IE: mean = 66.2, SD = 24.7; NIE: mean = 63.1, SD = 20.3 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Social relationship: IE: mean = 58.1, SD = 23.7; NIE: mean = 73.9, SD = 23.0 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Environmental area: IE: mean = 66.5, SD = 17.2; NIE: mean = 75.9, SD = 17.9 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) |
Alcarde et al., 2010 [11] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 137, being 90 IE and 47 NIE) | IE = 68 male and 69 females; NIE = 68 male and 69 females Age: 60 to 92 years | GOHAI (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–60 points | IE: median ≤ 28 (n = 55, 61.1%) and > 28 (n = 35, 38.9%); NIE: median ≤ 28 (n = 18, 38.3%) and > 28 (n = 29, 61.7%) (p < 0,05, Chi-square test) |
Bodner et al., 2011 [12] (Israel) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 126, being 32 IE and 94 NIE) | IE = 33,4% male and 65,6% females; NIE = 47,8% male and 52,2% females Age: > 64 years | SF-36 (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | The ‘general health perceptions’, ‘physical functioning’, ‘physical role functioning’, ‘bodily pain’, ‘vitality’ and ‘emotional role functioning’ did not show significant difference between the IE and NIE Mental Health: IE: mean = 51.23, SD = 29.82; NIE: mean = 79.45, SD = 12.78 (p < 0.05, MANCOVA) Social Functioning: IE: mean = 94.94, SD = 22.54; NIE: mean = 76.70, SD = 20.09 (p < 0.05, MANCOVA) |
Ramos et al., 2012 [23] (South Africa) | Cross-sectional | Convenience sample (n = 284, being 73 IE and 175 NIE) | Distribution according sex not informed Age: > 60 years | WHOQOL-OLD (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | Sensorial abilities: IE: mean = 40, SD = 15.1; NIE: mean = 50.2, SD = 14.2 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Autonomy: IE: mean = 28.3, SD = 16.5; NIE: mean = 36.5, SD = 20.9 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Past, present and future activities: IE: mean = 38.5, SD = 15.2; NIE: mean = 52.6, SD = 13.4 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Death and dying: IE: mean = 61.2, SD = 15.7; NIE: mean = 72.6, SD = 15.2 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Social participation: IE: mean = 63.6, SD = 17.1; NIE: mean = 76.2, SD = 16.1 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Intimacy: IE: mean = 57.3, SD = 21.7; NIE: mean = 74.7, SD = 21.7 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) |
Vitorino et al., 2013 [25] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience sample (n = 354, being 66 IE and 288 NIE) | IE = 38 male and 38 females; NIE = 94 male and 194 females Age: 60 to 80 or older | WHOQOL-BREF (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | General Health: IE: mean = 69.83, SD = 19.18; NIE: mean = 69.81, SD = 19.01 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Physical Health: IE: mean = 63.6, SD = 22.14; NIE: mean = 68.61, SD = 18.26 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Psychological Health: IE: mean = 65.19, SD = 17.62; NIE: mean = 69.69, SD = 15.33 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Social relationship: IE: mean = 67.87, SD = 20.31; NIE: mean = 75.10, SD = 17.27 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Environmental area: IE: mean = 66.20, SD = 15.42; NIE: mean = 65.09, SD = 16.19 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) |
Even-Zohar, 2014 [17] (Israel) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 115, being 60 IE and 55 NIE) | IE = 20 male and 40 females; NIE = 23 male and 32 females Age: IE: mean = 74.7 and NIE: mean = 75.8 | WHOQOL-BREF (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–20 points | Physical health: IE: mean = 3.06, SD = 0.457; NIE: mean = 3.70, SD = 0.623. (p < 0.05, Multivariate analysis of covariance) Psychological health: IE: mean = 3.03, SD = 0.42; NIE: mean = 3.82, SD = 0.57 (p < 0.05, Multivariate analysis of covariance) Social relationship: IE: mean = 2.90, SD = 0.81; NIE: mean = 4.06, SD = 0.62 (p < 0.05, Multivariate analysis of covariance) Environmental area: IE: mean = 2.96, SD = 0.46; NIE mean = 3.85, SD = 0.57 (p < 0.05, Multivariate analysis of covariance) |
Khoury; Sá-Neves, 2014 [19] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 66, being 33 IE and 33 NIE) | IE = 13 male and 20 females; NIE = 8 male and 25 females Age: 60 to 96 years | WHOQOL-OLD (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | Sensory Abilities: IE: mean = 27.86; NIE: mean = 39.14 (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) Autonomy: IE: mean = 26.76; NIE: mean = 40.24 (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) Past, present and future activities: IE: mean = 27.95; NIE: mean = 39,05 (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) Death and dying: IE: mean = 33.17; NIE mean = 33.83 (p > 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) Social participation: IE: mean = 28.17; NIE: mean = 38.83 (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) Intimicy: IE: mean = 27.48; NIE: mean = 39.52 (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) |
Dagios et al., 2015 [16] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 136, being 36 IE and 100 NIE) | IE = 25 male and 11 females; NIE = 37 male and 63 females Age: > 60 years | WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–20 points | WHOQOL-BREF General Health: IE: mean = 10.17, SD = 3.04; NIE: mean = 14.06, SD = 3.84 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Physical Health: IE: mean = 10.08, SD = 3.32; NIE: mean = 14.61, SD = 2.73 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Psychological Health: IE: mean = 11.35, SD = 2.65; NIE: mean = 16.02, SD = 2.54 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Social relationship: IE: mean = 10.67, SD = 3.12; NIE: mean = 15.28, SD = 2.66 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Environmental area: IE: mean = 10.64, SD = 1.73; NIE: mean = 12.88, SD = 2.08 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) WHOQOL-OLD Sensory Abilities: IE: mean = 11.00, SD = 3.06; NIE: mean = 15.69, SD = 3.26 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Autonomy: IE: mean = 9.21, SD = 2.53; NIE: mean = 14.69, SD = 2.04 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Past, Present and Future Activities: IE: mean = 9.64, SD = 3.0; NIE: mean = 15.12, SD = 2.65 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Death and dying: IE: mean = 14.21, SD = 3.14; NIE: mean = 14.69, SD = 3.07 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Social Participation: IE: mean = 9.30, SD = 3.64; NIE: mean = 14.93, SD = 2.80 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Intimicy: IE: mean = 10.22, SD = 2.85; NIE: mean = 15.52, SD = 3.59 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) |
Rachadel et al., 2015 [21] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience sample (n = 61, being 21 IE and 40 NIE) | Distribution according sex not informed Age: > 60 years | SF-36 (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | Physical functioning: IE: mean = 35.9, SD = 25.9; NIE-Active: mean = 78, SD = 19.6; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 51, SD = 27.3 (p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) Role physical: IE: mean = 79.7, SD = 33.1; NIE-Active: mean = 62.5, SD = 39.3; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 52.5, SD = 41.2 (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) Bodily pain: IE: mean = 83.2, SD = 21.6; NIE-Active: mean = 61.4, SD = 25.9; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 54.4, SD = 33.3 (p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) General Health Perceptions: IE: mean = 68.1, SD = 20.5; NIE-Active: mean = 68.4, SD = 22.2; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 58.7, SD = 29.9 (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) Role Emotional: IE: mean = 87.3, SD = 12.8; NIE -Active: mean = 73.3, SD = 35.2; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 76.6, SD = 34.3 (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) Vitality: IE: mean = 70.7, SD = 12.4; NIE-Active: mean = 69.7, SD = 19.7; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 66.0, SD = 23.4 (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) Mental health: IE: mean = 78.1, SD = 24.2; NIE -Active: mean = 77.2, SD = 19.6; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 69, SD = 27.9 (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) Social functioning: IE: mean = 95.8, SD = 4.4; NIE-Active: mean = 85, SD = 23.5; NIE-Not-Active: mean = 78.7, SD = 30.6 (p > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) |
Cucato et al., 2016 [15] (Brazil) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 496, being 99 IE and 387 NIE) | IE = 24 male e 75 females; NIE = Living with family: 110 male and 170 females, Living alone: 42 male and 75 females Age: > 65 years | WHOQOL-BREF (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–20 points | Institutionalized elderly men presented higher scores in physical domains compared to non-institutionalized elderly men that lives alone (p < 0.05, ANOVA). The scores in all domains (physical, psychological, relationship, and environment) were similar among the three groups (p < 0.05, ANOVA) |
Herazo-Beltrán et al., 2017 [18] (Colombia) | Cross-sectional | Convenience Sample (n = 245, being 113 IE and 132 NIE) | IE = 48 male and 65 females; NIE = 56 male and 75 females Age: Not informed | SF-36 (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | Physical Functioning: IE mean = 49.5, SD = 30.4; NIE: mean = 75.4, SD = 25.6 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Role physical: IE mean = 35.8, SD = 40.6; NIE: mean = 57.2, SD = 40.5 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Bodily Pain: IE mean = 62.5, SD = 30.1; NIE: mean = 69.1, SD = 27.3 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) General Health Perceptions: IE mean = 58.2, SD = 21.3; NIE: mean = 59.5, SD = 18.6 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Role Emotional: IE mean = 45.1, SD = 43.1; NIE: mean = 61.6, SD = 43.4 (p < 0.05, Student’s T-test) Vitality: IE mean = 64.1, SD = 23.8; NIE: mean = 68.1, SD = 19.2 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Mental Health: IE mean = 64.8, SD = 22.8; NIE: mean = 68.6, SD = 24.5 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) Social Functioning: IE mean = 69.9, SD = 24.8; NIE: mean = 75.7, SD = 23.1 (p > 0.05, Student’s T-test) |
Kuok et al., 2017 [20] (China) | Cross-sectional | Randomly selected (n = 451, being 248 IE and 203 NIE) | IE = 35 male and 213 females; NIE = 61 male and 142 females Age: ≥50 years | WHOQOL-BREF (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–20 points | Physical Health: IE: mean = 13.0, SD = 2.6; NIE: mean = 14.6, SD = 2.2 (p > 0.05, ANCOVA) Psychological Health: IE: mean = 13.2, SD = 2.4; NIE: mean = 14.6, SD = 2.2 (p > 0.05, ANCOVA) Social relationship: IE: mean = 14.0, SD = 2.6; NIE: mean = 14.4, SD = 2.3 (p > 0.05, ANCOVA) Environmental area: IE: mean = 13.5, SD = 2.0; NIE: mean = 13.7, SD = 2.0 (p > 0,05, ANCOVA) |
Ramocha et al., 2017 [22] (South Africa) | Cross-sectional | Convenience sample (n = 80, being 40 IE and 40 NIE) | IE = 23 male and 17 females; NIE = 0 male and 40 females Age: 60 to 90 years | RAND-36 (The higher the scores, the better the QoL) Scale: 0–100 points | Physical functioning: IE: mean = 74.7, SD = 29.6; NIE: mean = 81.1, SD = 22.9 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Role physical: IE: mean = 61.2, SD = 47.3; NIE: mean = 68.1, SD = 44.2 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Bodily pain: IE: mean = 66.7, SD = 28.9; NIE: mean = 73.8, SD = 26.4 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) General Health Perceptions (General Health): IE: mean = 66.1, SD = 20; NIE: mean = 73.0, SD = 18.9 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Role Emotional: IE: mean = 59.1, SD = 46.2; NIE: mean = 74.1, SD = 42.3 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) Vitality (Energy and Fatigue): IE: mean = 66.3, SD = 20.5; NIE: mean = 79.5, SD = 19.1 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Mental Health (Emotional well-being): IE: mean = 73.9, SD = 19.0; NIE: mean = 86.8, SD = 13.1 (p < 0.05, Student’s t test) Social functioning: IE: mean = 68.9, SD = 21.4; NIE: mean = 77.1, SD = 20.5 (p > 0.05, Student’s t test) |
Quality assessment and risk of bias
Guideline | Checklist | Classification | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | + | ++ | ||
Study sample representative? | Source of sample | Included many long-term institutions for elderly | Included a single long-term institution for elderly, but it was the unique on local | Included a single long-term institution for elderly, even with more institutions to be included |
Sampling method | Random sample | Convenience sample, but it was a cense | Convenience sample and not a cense | |
Sample size | High power of study (equal or greater than 80%) | Median power of study (between 75 and 80%) | Low power of study (lower than 75%) | |
Entry criteria/ exclusions | inclusion and exclusion criteria well defined, namely, presented both criteria | Inclusion and exclusion criteria not well defined, namely, presented only one of them | No criteria presented | |
Non-respondents | Response rate of 100% | Response rate between 80 and 99% | Response rate lower than 80% | |
Control group acceptable? | Definition of controls | Well-defined control (adequate to the aim of the study) | Control group not well defined (inadequate to the aim of the study) | Control group not defined |
Source of controls | Control group from the same city of IE and/or with comparable characteristics | Control group came from different locations (non-comparable characteristics) and/or physical activities programs, elderly group, etc. | Did not mention where the control group came from | |
Matching/ randomisation | Case-control relation: 1:2; 1:3, etc. | Case-control relation: 1:1 | Case-control relation: 2:1; 3:1, etc. | |
Comparable characteristics | Paired by age, gender, socioeconomical characteristics and comorbidity | Paired by only one of the criteria: age, gender, socioeconomical characteristics or comorbidity | Not paired | |
Quality of measurements and outcomes? | Validity | Used a questionnaire validated and adapted to the target language and population and/or with a good Cronbach’s alpha | Used a questionnaire validated but not adapted to the target language and population and/or with a good Cronbach’s alpha | Did not use a questionnaire validated and adapted to the target language and population and/or with a good Cronbach’s alpha |
Reproducibility | Used a validated questionnaire and performed kappa test, repeatability of measures and/or checking of measures | Used a validated questionnaire, but did not performed kappa test, repeatability of measurements and/or checking of measurements; or did not use a validated questionnaire, but did kappa test, repeatability of measurements and/ or checking of measurement | Did not used a validated questionnaire and did not perform kappa test, test and retest, etc | |
Blindness | NA | NA | NA | |
Quality control | Single interviewer questionnaire research | Interview questionnaire, applied by many researchers | Self-applied questionnaire | |
Completeness? | Compliance | NA | NA | NA |
Drop outs | NA | NA | NA | |
Deaths | NA | NA | NA | |
Missing data | No loss | Up to 20% of loss | More than 20% of loss | |
Distorting influences? | Extraneous treatments | NA | NA | NA |
Contamination | NA | NA | NA | |
Changes over time | NA | NA | NA | |
Confounding factors | No confounding factors | Some confounding factor (cognitive capacity or comorbidity) | Many confounding factors (cognitive capacity, comorbidity, etc) | |
Distortion reduced by analysis | All confounding factors were reduced in data analysis | Some confounding factors were reduced in data analysis | Confounding factors were not reduced in data analysis |
Meta-analysis (quantitative synthesis)
Certainty of evidence
Results
Study selection
Characteristics of included articles
Guideline | Checklist | Urciuoli et al., 1998 [24] | Akça; Sahin, 2008 [10] | Bonan et al., 2008 [14] | Bodur; Cingil, 2009 [13] | Alcarde et al., 2010 [11] | Bodner et al., 2011 [12] | Ramos et al., 2012 [23] | Vitorino et al., 2013 [25] | Even-Zohar, 2014 [17] | Khoury; Sá-Neves, 2014 [19] | Dagios et al., 2015 [16] | Rachadel et al., 2015 [21] | Cucato et al., 2016 [15] | Herazo-Beltrán et al., 2017 [18] | Kuok et al., 2017 [20] | Ramocha et al., 2017 [22] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study design appropriate to objectives? | Cross-sectional | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Cohort | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Controlled trial | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Case control | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Study sample representative? | Source of sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sampling method | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | 0 | |
Sample size | ++ | 0 | ++ | 0 | ++ | 0 | 0 | ++ | 0 | ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ++ | |
Entry criteria/ exclusions | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | |
Non-respondents | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | |
Control group accetable? | Definition of controls | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source of controls | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | |
Matching / randomisation | + | + | + | + | ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | |
Comparable characteristics | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | |
Quality of measurements and outcomes? | Validity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reproducibility | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | |
Blindness | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Quality control | + | ++ | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | |
Completeness? | Compliance | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Drop outs | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Deaths | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Missing data | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | |
Distorting influences? | Extraneous treatments | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Contamination | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Changes over time | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Confounding factors | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | + | |
Distortion reduced by analysis | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | 0 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | 0 | ++ | |
Summary questions | Bias | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Confounding | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Chance | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
Risk of bias within studies (qualitative synthesis)
Meta-analysis and certainty of evidence
LEIPAD questionnaire
Questionnaire | Questionnaire domain | p-value | I2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LEIPAD | cognitive functions | SMD −0.26 [−0.50, −0.02] | 0.03 | 0% |
depression and axiety | SMD −0.24 [−0.48, −0.00] | 0.05 | 0% | |
social functions | SMD 0.35 [0.11, 0.59] | 0.004 | 0% | |
sexual functions | SMD 0.78 [0.50, 1.06] | < 0.00001 | NA | |
physical functions | SMD 0.14 [−0.10, 0.38] | 0.25 | 0% | |
self-care skils | SMD 0.15 [−0.47, 0.77] | 0.63 | 79% | |
life satisfaction | SMD 0.06 [−0.37, 0.48] | 0.79 | 0% | |
pooled results | SMD 0.11 [−0.10, 0.32] | 0.31 | 76% | |
WHOQOL-OLD | death and dying | SMD −0.46 [−1.04, 0.11] | 0.11 | 83% |
autonomy | SMD −1.45 [−3.49, 0.60] | 0.17 | 98% | |
past, present and future activities | SMD −1.48 [−2.44, − 0.52] | 0.002 | 92% | |
intimacy | SMD −1.15 [−1.88, − 0.43] | 0.002 | 88% | |
social participation | SMD −1.29 [−2.34, − 0.24] | 0.02 | 94% | |
sensory abilities | SMD −1.06 [−1.80, −0.33] | 0.005 | 88% | |
pooled results | SMD −1.13 [−1.47, −0.80] | < 0.00001 | 91% | |
WHOQOL-BREF | general health | SMD −0.24 [1.00, 0.52] | 0.54 | 92% |
physical health | SMD −0.69 [−1.17, − 0.22] | 0.004 | 91% | |
psychological health | SMD −0.82 [−1.40, − 0.24] | 0.006 | 94% | |
social relationship | SMD −0.88 [− 1.46, − 0.29] | 0.003 | 94% | |
environmental area | SMD −0.66 [− 1.26, − 0.07] | 0.03 | 94% | |
pooled results | SMD −0.70 [− 0.94, − 0.47] | < 0.00001 | 93% | |
SD-36 and RAND-36 | physical functioning | SMD −21.74 [−35.70, −7.79] | 0.002 | 81% |
general health perceptions | SMD −2.06 [−6.31, 2.19] | 0.34 | 5% | |
role emotional | SMD −5.99 [−26.18, 14.20] | 0.56 | 85% | |
bodily pain | SMD 2.50 [−14.93, 19.92] | 0.78 | 88% | |
mental health | SMD −10.39 [−21.53, 0.75] | 0.07 | 85% | |
social functioning | SMD 4.35 [−8.21, 16.91] | 0.5 | 92% | |
role physical | SMD −12.30 [−46.79, 22.18] | 0.48 | 94% | |
vitality | SMD −4.52 [−12.36, 3.33] | 0.26 | 74% | |
pooled results | SMD −5.97 [−11.29, −0.64] | 0.03 | 90% |
Certainty assessment | Summary of findings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
№ of participants (studies) Follow-up | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Overall certainty of evidence | Study event rates (%) | Anticipated absolute effects | ||
With NIE | With IE | Risk with NIE | Risk difference with IE | |||||||
LEIPAD – Overall | ||||||||||
1765 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | not serious | very strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW | 1009 | 756 | – | SMD 0.11 higher (0.1 lower to 0.32 higher) |
LEIPAD - Physical functions | ||||||||||
280 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | serious d | very strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW | 161 | 119 | – | SMD 0.14 higher (0.1 lower to 0.38 higher) |
LEIPAD - Self-care skills | ||||||||||
280 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | very serious d, e | very strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW | 161 | 119 | – | SMD 0.15 higher (0.47 lower to 0.77 higher) |
LEIPAD - Cognitive functions | ||||||||||
280 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | serious d | strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW | 161 | 119 | – | SMD 0.26 lower (0.5 lower to 0.02 lower) |
LEIPAD - Depression and anxiety | ||||||||||
280 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | serious d | strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW | 161 | 119 | – | SMD 0.24 lower (0.48 lower to 0) |
LEIPAD - Social functions | ||||||||||
280 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | serious d | strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 161 | 119 | – | SMD 0.35 SD higher (0.11 higher to 0.59 higher) |
LEIPAD - Sexual functions | ||||||||||
280 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | serious d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW | 161 | 119 | – | SMD 0.78 higher (0.5 higher to 1.06 higher) |
LEIPAD - Life Satisfaction | ||||||||||
85 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | serious d | very strong association all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW | 43 | 42 | – | SMD 0.06 higher (0.37 lower to 0.48 higher) |
WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire
Certainty assessment | Summary of findings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
№ of participants (studies) Follow-up | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Overall certainty of evidence | Study event rates (%) | Anticipated absolute effects | ||
With NIE | With IE | Risk with NIE | Risk difference with IE | |||||||
WHOQOL-BREF – Overall | ||||||||||
5044 (5 observational studies) | not serious | serious a | not serious | not serious | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁⨁◯◯LOW | 3157 | 1887 | – | SMD 0.69 lower(0.93 lower to 0.46 lower) |
WHOQOL-BREF - General Health | ||||||||||
564 (3 observational studies) | very serious b | very serious a,c | not serious | serious d | strong associationall plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 425 | 139 | – | SMD 0.24 lower(1.0 lower to 0.52 higher) |
WHOQOL-BREF - Physical Health | ||||||||||
1120 (5 observational studies) | not serious | very serious a,c | not serious | not serious | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 683 | 437 | – | SMD 0.69 lower(1.17 lower to 0.22 lower) |
WHOQOL-BREF - Psychological Health | ||||||||||
1120 (5 observational studies) | not serious | very serious a,c | not serious | serious d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 683 | 437 | – | SMD 0.82 lower(1.4 lower to 0.24 lower) |
WHOQOL-BREF - Social relationship | ||||||||||
1120 (5 observational studies) | serious e | serious a | not serious | serious d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 683 | 437 | – | SMD 0.88 lower(1.46 lower to 0.29 lower) |
WHOQOL-BREF - Environmental area | ||||||||||
1120 (5 observational studies) | serious f | serious a | not serious | serious d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 683 | 437 | – | SMD 0.66 lower(1.26 lower to 0.07 lower) |
WHOQOL-OLD questionnaire
Certainty assessment | Summary of findings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
№ of participants (studies) Follow-up | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Overall certainty of evidence | Study event rates (%) | Anticipated absolute effects | ||
With NIE | With IE | Risk with NIE | Risk difference with IE | |||||||
WHOQOL-OLD | ||||||||||
2304 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | serious c | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 1650 | 654 | – | SMD 1.13 lower(1.47 lower to 0.8 lower) |
WHOQOL-OLD - Past, Present and Future Activities | ||||||||||
384 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious c, d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 275 | 109 | – | SMD 1.48 lower(2.44 lower to 0.52 lower) |
WHOQOL-OLD - Death and dying | ||||||||||
384 (2 observational studies) | serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious c, d | strong associationall plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 275 | 109 | – | SMD 0.46 lower(1.04 lower to 0.11 higher) |
WHOQOL-OLD – Intimicy | ||||||||||
384 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious c, d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 275 | 109 | – | SMD 1.15 lower(1.88 lower to 0.43 lower) |
WHOQOL-OLD - Social Participation | ||||||||||
384 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious c, d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 275 | 109 | - | SMD 1.29 lower(2.34 lower to 0.24 lower) |
WHOQOL-OLD - Sensory Abilities | ||||||||||
384 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious c, d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 275 | 109 | – | SMD 1.06 lower(1.8 lower to 0.33 lower) |
WHOQOL-OLD – Autonomy | ||||||||||
384 (2 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious c, d | all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 275 | 109 | - | SMD 1.45 lower(3.49 lower to 0.6 higher) |
SD-36 RAND-36 questionnaire
Certainty assessment | Summary of findings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
№ of participants (studies) Follow-up | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Overall certainty of evidence | Study event rates (%) | Anticipated absolute effects | ||
With NIE | With IE | Risk with NIE | Risk difference with IE | |||||||
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Overall | ||||||||||
3340 (4 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | serious d | very strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 1884 | 1456 | The mean SF-36 and RAND-36 was 0 | MD 5.97 lower(11.29 lower to 0.64 lower) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - General Health Perceptions | ||||||||||
386 (3 observational studies) | very serious a | not serious | not serious | very serious d, e | strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 212 | 174 | The mean SF-36 and RAND-36 - General Health Perceptions was 0 | MD 2.06 lower(6.31 lower to 2.19 higher) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Physical Functioning | ||||||||||
386 (3 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious d, e | very strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 212 | 174 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 - Physical Functioning was 0 | MD 21.74 lower(35.7 lower to 7.79 lower) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Role Emotional | ||||||||||
386 (3 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | very serious d, e | very strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 212 | 174 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 - Role Emotional was 0 | MD 5.99 lower(26.18 lower to 14.2 higher) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Bodily Pain | ||||||||||
386 (3 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | very serious d, e | strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 212 | 174 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 - Bodily Pain was 0 | MD 2.5 higher(14.93 lower to 19.92 higher) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Mental Health | ||||||||||
512 (4 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | serious d | very strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 306 | 206 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 (QVRS) - Mental Health was 0 | MD 10.39 lower(21.53 lower to 0.75 higher) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Social Functioning | ||||||||||
512 (4 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | serious d | strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 306 | 206 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 (QVRS) - Social Functioning was 0 | MD 4.35 higher(8.21 lower to 16.91 higher) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Role physical | ||||||||||
386 (3 observational studies) | very serious a | very serious b,c | not serious | very serious d, e | very strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 212 | 174 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 (QVRS) - Role physical was 0 | MD 12.3 lower(46.79 lower to 22.18 higher) |
SF-36 and RAND-36 - Vitality | ||||||||||
386 (3 observational studies) | very serious a | serious b | not serious | very serious d, e | strong association | ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW | 212 | 174 | The mean SF-36 RAND-36 - Vitality was 0 | MD 4.52 lower(12.36 lower to 3.33 higher) |