Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

10.07.2021 | Review Article

Does thoracoscopic esophagectomy really reduce post-operative pneumonia in all cases?

verfasst von: Kentaro Murakami, Masahiro Yoshida, Masaya Uesato, Takeshi Toyozumi, Tetsuro Isozaki, Ryuma Urahama, Masayuki Kano, Yasunori Matsumoto, Hisahiro Matsubara

Erschienen in: Esophagus | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

It has been said that “thoracoscopy suppresses the occurrence of pneumonia in comparison to thoracotomy”, but does it reflect real clinical practice? To resolve this clinical question, we compared the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies from limited institutes (CLIs) in which a large number of high-volume centers were the main participants to those of retrospective cohort studies based on nationwide databases (CNDs) in which both high-volume centers and low-volume hospitals participated. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic to open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the three above-mentioned research formats. In total, 43 studies with 21,057 patients, which included 1 RCT with 115 patients, 38 CLIs with 6,126 patients and 4 CNDs with 14,816 patients, were selected. Pneumonia was one of the most important complications. Although significant superiority in thoracoscopic esophagectomy was observed in RCTs (p = 0.005) and CLIs (p = 0.003), no such difference was seen in findings using nationwide databases (p = 0.69). In conclusion, unlike RCTs and CLIs, CNDs did not show the superiority of thoracoscopic surgery in terms of post-operative pneumonia. RCTs and CLIs were predominantly performed by high-volume hospitals, while CNDs were often performed by low-volume hospitals. In actual clinical practice including various types of hospitals, the superiority of thoracoscopic over open esophagectomy regarding the incidence of pneumonia may, therefore, decrease.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992;37:7–11.PubMed Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992;37:7–11.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Shimizu H, Okada M, Tangoku A, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeries in Japan during 2017: annual report by the Japanese association for thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68:414–49.CrossRef Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Shimizu H, Okada M, Tangoku A, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeries in Japan during 2017: annual report by the Japanese association for thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68:414–49.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.PubMedCrossRef Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.PubMedCrossRef Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1455–63.PubMed Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1455–63.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong L, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. The short-term outcome of three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy for Siewert type I esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1826–31.PubMedCrossRef Hong L, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. The short-term outcome of three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy for Siewert type I esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1826–31.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu PK, Huang CS, Wu YC, et al. Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2014;38:402–9.PubMedCrossRef Hsu PK, Huang CS, Wu YC, et al. Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2014;38:402–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, et al. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:925–30.PubMedCrossRef Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, et al. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:925–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mei X, Xu M, Guo M, et al. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86:274–9.PubMedCrossRef Mei X, Xu M, Guo M, et al. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86:274–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Motoyama S, Maeda E, Yano M, et al. Appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries by the Japan Esophageal Society: evaluation of survival outcomes using data from the National Database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries in Japan. Esophagus. 2019;16:114–21.PubMedCrossRef Motoyama S, Maeda E, Yano M, et al. Appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries by the Japan Esophageal Society: evaluation of survival outcomes using data from the National Database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries in Japan. Esophagus. 2019;16:114–21.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Motoyama S, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, et al. Impact of certification status of the institute and surgeon on short-term outcomes after surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer: evaluation using data on 16,752 patients from the National Clinical Database in Japan. Esophagus. 2020;17:41–9.PubMedCrossRef Motoyama S, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, et al. Impact of certification status of the institute and surgeon on short-term outcomes after surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer: evaluation using data on 16,752 patients from the National Clinical Database in Japan. Esophagus. 2020;17:41–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Blonde L, Khunti K, Harris SB, et al. Interpretation and impact of real-world clinical data for the practicing clinician. Adv Ther. 2018;35:1763–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Blonde L, Khunti K, Harris SB, et al. Interpretation and impact of real-world clinical data for the practicing clinician. Adv Ther. 2018;35:1763–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16:1–24.PubMedCrossRef Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16:1–24.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16:25–43.PubMedCrossRef Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16:25–43.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial—the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial—the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Berrisford R, et al. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer–the ROMIO (randomized oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:200–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Berrisford R, et al. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer–the ROMIO (randomized oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:200–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalfe C, Avery K, Berrisford R, et al. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (randomised oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) feasibility study and pilot trial. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Metcalfe C, Avery K, Berrisford R, et al. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (randomised oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) feasibility study and pilot trial. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. Japan esophageal oncology group/Japan clinical oncology group. A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:174–7.PubMedCrossRef Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. Japan esophageal oncology group/Japan clinical oncology group. A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:174–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1281–9.PubMedCrossRef Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1281–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L, et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2017;266:839–46.PubMedCrossRef Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L, et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2017;266:839–46.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1821–7.PubMedCrossRef Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1821–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauppila JH, Helminen O, Kytö V, et al. Short-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy: a population-based study from Finland and Sweden. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:326–32.PubMedCrossRef Kauppila JH, Helminen O, Kytö V, et al. Short-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy: a population-based study from Finland and Sweden. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:326–32.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyasaka D, Okushiba S, Sasaki T, et al. Clinical evaluation of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6:26–32.PubMedCrossRef Miyasaka D, Okushiba S, Sasaki T, et al. Clinical evaluation of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6:26–32.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.PubMedCrossRef Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie MR, Liu CQ, Guo MF, et al. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1721–7.PubMedCrossRef Xie MR, Liu CQ, Guo MF, et al. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1721–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, et al. Clinical benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:1708–15.PubMedCrossRef Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, et al. Clinical benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:1708–15.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, et al. Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3873–81.PubMedCrossRef Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, et al. Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3873–81.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:304–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:304–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus. 2016;13:1–7.PubMedCrossRef Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus. 2016;13:1–7.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Udagawa H, Ueno M, Haruta S, et al. Re-evaluation of the role of thoracoscopic esophagectomy as a Japanese-style radical surgery. Esophagus. 2017;14:165–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Udagawa H, Ueno M, Haruta S, et al. Re-evaluation of the role of thoracoscopic esophagectomy as a Japanese-style radical surgery. Esophagus. 2017;14:165–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–5.CrossRef Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–5.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 1997;122:8–14.PubMedCrossRef Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 1997;122:8–14.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–5.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–5.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.PubMedCrossRef Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868–75.PubMedCrossRef Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868–75.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:911–9.PubMedCrossRef Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:911–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2010;199:594–8.PubMedCrossRef Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2010;199:594–8.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, et al. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1845–53.PubMedCrossRef Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, et al. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1845–53.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger AC, Bloomenthal A, Weksler B, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:560–6.PubMedCrossRef Berger AC, Bloomenthal A, Weksler B, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:560–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:366–9.PubMedCrossRef Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:366–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JM, Cheng JW, Lin MT, et al. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35:790–7.PubMedCrossRef Lee JM, Cheng JW, Lin MT, et al. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35:790–7.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Daiko H, Nishimura M. A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:673–80.PubMedCrossRef Daiko H, Nishimura M. A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:673–80.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Sihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:430–7.PubMedCrossRef Sihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:430–7.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:168–76.PubMedCrossRef Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:168–76.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsujimoto H, Takahata R, Nomura S, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications. Surgery. 2012;151:667–73.PubMedCrossRef Tsujimoto H, Takahata R, Nomura S, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications. Surgery. 2012;151:667–73.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan JP, Kaur T, Diggs BS, et al. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4094–103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dolan JP, Kaur T, Diggs BS, et al. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4094–103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, et al. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:263–71.PubMedCrossRef Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, et al. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:263–71.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeno S, Takahashi Y, Moroga T, et al. Retrospective study using the propensity score to clarify the oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37:1673–80.PubMedCrossRef Takeno S, Takahashi Y, Moroga T, et al. Retrospective study using the propensity score to clarify the oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37:1673–80.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Komine O, Tanaka Y, Kawashima Y, et al. Short-term postoperative superiority and 5-year follow-up outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma: a historical comparison with conventional open esophagectomy under a single experienced surgeon. Esophagus. 2014;11:54–63.CrossRef Komine O, Tanaka Y, Kawashima Y, et al. Short-term postoperative superiority and 5-year follow-up outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma: a historical comparison with conventional open esophagectomy under a single experienced surgeon. Esophagus. 2014;11:54–63.CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, et al. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:2399–404.PubMed Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, et al. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:2399–404.PubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu J, Yuan Z, Zhang B, et al. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:747–52. Mu J, Yuan Z, Zhang B, et al. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:747–52.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan JT, Zhong JH, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of postoperative immune function in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or conventional open esophagectomy. Int J Surg. 2016;30:155–60.PubMedCrossRef Tan JT, Zhong JH, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of postoperative immune function in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or conventional open esophagectomy. Int J Surg. 2016;30:155–60.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1097–103.PubMedCrossRef Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1097–103.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Findlay L, Yao C, Bennett DH, et al. Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3681–9.PubMedCrossRef Findlay L, Yao C, Bennett DH, et al. Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3681–9.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanasoot A, Yolsuriyanwong K, Ruangsin S, et al. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017;25:513–7.PubMedCrossRef Yanasoot A, Yolsuriyanwong K, Ruangsin S, et al. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017;25:513–7.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Klevebro F, Scandavini CM, Kamiya S, et al. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31:1–6.CrossRef Klevebro F, Scandavini CM, Kamiya S, et al. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31:1–6.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma G, Cao H, Wei R, et al. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy by comprehensive complication index. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14:789–94.PubMedCrossRef Ma G, Cao H, Wei R, et al. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy by comprehensive complication index. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14:789–94.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Does thoracoscopic esophagectomy really reduce post-operative pneumonia in all cases?
verfasst von
Kentaro Murakami
Masahiro Yoshida
Masaya Uesato
Takeshi Toyozumi
Tetsuro Isozaki
Ryuma Urahama
Masayuki Kano
Yasunori Matsumoto
Hisahiro Matsubara
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Esophagus / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-021-00855-9

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Metastasiertes CRC: besser Checkpointhemmer im Doppelpack!

Die Kombination von Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab ist beim metastasierten Kolorektalkarzinom mit MSI-H- oder dMMR klar im Vorteil gegenüber einer Nivolumab-Monotherapie: Das Progressionsrisiko war damit in einer Phase-3-Studie um 38% reduziert.

Riesenzellarteriitis: bilaterale Biopsie der Temporalarterien von Vorteil

Die Riesenzellarteriitis (RZA) erfordert eine rasche und präzise Diagnose, da innerhalb weniger Tage ein schwerer, irreversibler Sehverlust drohen kann. In diesem Zusammenhang scheint die bilaterale Biopsie der Temporalarterien (TAB) der unilateralen überlegen zu sein.

Große Trinkmengen bei Blasentumoren möglicherweise von Nachteil

Beim nicht-muskelinvasiven Blasenkrebs scheint eine hohe Flüssigkeitszufuhr keinen schützenden Effekt in Bezug auf das Risiko eines Rezidivs oder einer Krankheitsprogression zu haben. Eine niederländische Studie legt sogar nahe, dass große Trinkmengen das Fortschreiten der Erkrankung begünstigen könnten.

Höhere Trefferquoten bei Brustkrebsscreening dank KI?

Künstliche Intelligenz unterstützt bei der Auswertung von Mammografie-Screenings und senkt somit den Arbeitsaufwand für Radiologen. Wie wirken sich diese Technologien auf die Trefferquote und die Falsch-positiv-Rate aus? Das hat jetzt eine Studie aus Schweden untersucht.

EKG Essentials: EKG befunden mit System (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

In diesem CME-Kurs können Sie Ihr Wissen zur EKG-Befundung anhand von zwölf Video-Tutorials auffrischen und 10 CME-Punkte sammeln.
Praxisnah, relevant und mit vielen Tipps & Tricks vom Profi.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.