Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2019

19.02.2019 | Original Article

Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model

verfasst von: Helen Louise Preston, Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian Elizabeth Fowler, Steven Lane

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a significant complication of vaginal delivery. Water birth has become a popular preference for women giving birth in the UK, however, there is limited data on the risk of OASI following water birth. Our aim was to assess OASI risk in low-risk women giving birth in water without medical intervention compared with on land and to create a prognostic model for OASI prediction.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 15,734 low-risk women giving birth by spontaneous vaginal delivery between January 2008 and October 2014 in a midwifery-led unit (MLU). Patient factors and delivery data were analysed to identify differences between water and land births. Univariate analysis determined factors that statistically predicted OASI and was then used to create multivariate analysis. Significant multivariate factors were used to create a prognostic model to predict likelihood of OASI.

Results

OASI rates were 1.6% on land and 3.3% in water [odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–2.94). Multivariate analysis confirmed water birth, ethnicity and parity as independent risk factors for OASI (adjusted OR water birth: 1.77 (CI 1.25–2.51). Our prognostic model showed Black and Asian primigravidae following water birth had the highest risk of OASI and white multiparae on land the lowest.

Conclusion

This study of comparable low-risk women shows an increased risk of OASI following water birth compared with land birth. Use of this prognostic model will help women determine their risk of OASI following birth in water or on land.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12363. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1471-0528.​12363.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Anal and urinary incontinence 4 years after a vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:55–60.CrossRef Anal and urinary incontinence 4 years after a vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:55–60.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1621–7.CrossRefPubMed Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1621–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Baghestan E, Irgens L, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed Baghestan E, Irgens L, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:225–98.PubMed Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:225–98.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McLeod NL, Gilmour DT, Joseph KS, Farrell SA, Luther ER. Trends in major risk factors for anal sphincter lacerations: a 10-year study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25(7):586–93. McLeod NL, Gilmour DT, Joseph KS, Farrell SA, Luther ER. Trends in major risk factors for anal sphincter lacerations: a 10-year study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25(7):586–93.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB, Gåreberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG. 2000;107(7):926–31. Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB, Gåreberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG. 2000;107(7):926–31.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rush J, Burlock S, Lambert K, Loosley-Millman M, Hutchison B, Enkin M. The effects of whirlpools baths in labor: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 1996;23(3):136–43. Rush J, Burlock S, Lambert K, Loosley-Millman M, Hutchison B, Enkin M. The effects of whirlpools baths in labor: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 1996;23(3):136–43.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A. Immersion in water in the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2001;28(2):84–93. Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A. Immersion in water in the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2001;28(2):84–93.
Metadaten
Titel
Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model
verfasst von
Helen Louise Preston
Zarko Alfirevic
Gillian Elizabeth Fowler
Steven Lane
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03879-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.