Skip to main content

01.12.2016 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2016 Open Access

BMC Public Health 1/2016

Does wine glass size influence sales for on-site consumption? A multiple treatment reversal design

BMC Public Health > Ausgabe 1/2016
Rachel Pechey, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Gareth J. Hollands, Eleni Mantzari, Marcus R. Munafò, Theresa M. Marteau
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RP, GJH, EM, MRM and TMM designed the study. RP and DLC co-ordinated the intervention and data collection. DLC analysed the study data. RP drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.



Wine glass size can influence both perceptions of portion size and the amount poured, but its impact upon purchasing and consumption is unknown. This study aimed to examine the impact of wine glass size on wine sales for on-site consumption, keeping portion size constant.


In one establishment (with separate bar and restaurant areas) in Cambridge, England, wine glass size (Standard; Larger; Smaller) was changed over eight fortnightly periods. The bar and restaurant differ in wine sales by the glass vs. by the bottle (93 % vs. 63 % by the glass respectively).


Daily wine volume purchased was 9.4 % (95 % CI: 1.9, 17.5) higher when sold in larger compared to standard-sized glasses. This effect seemed principally driven by sales in the bar area (bar: 14.4 % [3.3, 26.7]; restaurant: 8.2 % [−2.5, 20.1]). Findings were inconclusive as to whether sales were different with smaller vs. standard-sized glasses.


The size of glasses in which wine is sold, keeping the portion size constant, can affect consumption, with larger glasses increasing consumption. The hypothesised mechanisms for these differential effects need to be tested in a replication study. If replicated, policy implications could include considering glass size amongst alcohol licensing requirements.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN12018175. Registered 12th May 2015.
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe