Zum Inhalt

Domestic violence in pregnancy: a systematic review of clinical guidelines

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2025
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Background

Domestic violence is a public health concern and human rights violation affecting more than one-third of all pregnant women globally. Abused pregnant women need several interventions to reduce domestic violence and its negative consequences on mother and child. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality, scope, and consistency of clinical guidelines for managing domestic violence during pregnancy.

Methods

This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Electronic databases of Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Up-to-date, Cochrane Library database, Google Scholar, and Guideline repositories, including NICE, SIGN, GAC, NHMRC, NGC, New Zealand Guidelines Group, TRIP, AHRQ, G-I-N, and MD Consult, using appropriate keywords were searched. Included studies were clinical guidelines containing recommendations about domestic violence in pregnancy and postpartum. Two reviewers used the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation version 2) instrument to evaluate the quality of guidelines, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare the relevant recommendations. Out of 381 relevant published guidelines, 14 clinical guidelines were ultimately reviewed systematically.

Results

Seven countries had a clinical guideline for domestic violence during pregnancy. None of the reviewed guidelines was rated > 75% across all domains of AGREE II while the highest-rated domains were scope, purpose, and clarity. Four related categories were recognized from the synthesis of recommendations within the appropriate guidelines. These consisted of an introduction, domestic violence in pregnancy, the role of health care professionals, and the resources. Recommendations for privacy and confidentiality, screening, identification, support, and documentation were the most commonly reported, which all of the guidelines advised them, suggesting the importance of identification of violence in pregnancy and support for abused pregnant women. 93% of the reviewed guidelines had recommendations on communication, support and building trust, child protection, and professional education and training.

Conclusion

The study findings suggest that there are currently gaps in clinical guidelines in various areas, including patterns of violence, the cycle of violence, identifying risk factors for violence during pregnancy, providing medical care, implementing home visitation programs, promoting self-care and empowerment, preventing violence, offering follow-up support, and conducting community education programs. Therefore, it is crucial to develop or adapt clinical guidelines for abused pregnant women, emphasizing their needs to ensure their safety and well-being.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07459-6.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Domestic violence is a significant social and public health problem, which globally affects more than one-third of all women [1, 2]. The World Health Organization describes domestic violence as any violent and gender-based behavior causing damage or emotional, sexual, physical injury or distress for women [3]. Domestic violence and intimate partner violence that is perpetrated by a current or former partner are often used interchangeably in the literature [4]. The prevalence of domestic violence during pregnancy has been reported as high as 20% [5] and ranging from 15 to 71% in low and middle-income countries [6]. Estimations on rates of domestic violence in pregnancy amongst Iranian women vary significantly and range from 19.3 to 94.5% highlighting the extent of this problem [7]. Domestic violence has been associated with several adverse perinatal physical and mental health outcomes [8]. These perinatal effects include unplanned pregnancy, postponed entry to prenatal care, inadequate antenatal weight gain, several mental problems, miscarriage, vaginal bleeding, preeclampsia, preterm labor, dystocia, low birth weight infants, and postpartum depression [811]. Prenatal care is a chance for healthcare providers to recognize abused pregnant women and support them with appropriate counselling and programs to protect the health of both mothers and infants [12, 13].
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are a progressively common component of clinical care worldwide. Clinical practice guidelines have the potential to develop the care received by patients by improving interventions of proven benefit and reducing ineffective interventions [14]. Clinical practice guidelines are systematically standardized, and scientifically developed statements, designed to help practitioners in decision-making about appropriate health care for specific clinical conditions or health care issues [15]. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBCPGs) are developed through a systematic review of high-quality research to provide the best scientific evidence for healthcare recommendations [16]. These guidelines aim to promote patient outcomes by improving healthcare practice for certain medical conditions, standardizing care, reducing variations in practice, and minimizing morbidity and mortality. While EBCPGs are crucial for unifying practices and enhancing patient care, their development requires significant expertise, resources, and time [16]. In some cases, the costs of creating and implementing guidelines may exceed their benefits. For resource-limited settings, adapting existing high-quality guidelines may be a more efficient solution [14] similar to other settings [17]. The results of the preliminary review have shown that the existing clinical guidelines on violence during pregnancy related to universities and health centres in Toronto-Ontario [18], British Columbia [19], England [2026], Northern Ireland [27], and Queensland [28].
Considering the high prevalence of domestic violence during pregnancy in Iran and its adverse maternal and fetal consequences, it is necessary to provide a culturally based supportive care program to help these abused women. Although Integrated Maternal Health Care in Iran (a guide for midwives and general practitioners in the health care centres providing healthcare services before pregnancy and continues during the pregnancy and postpartum periods) is a valuable step toward improving maternal health, it cannot provide comprehensive and complete care for abused pregnant women [29]. According to the Integrated Maternal Health Care, pregnant women are screened for domestic violence at four stages: pre-pregnancy, the first trimester, the second trimester, and the third trimester. If no physical harm is detected, women are advised to communicate effectively and may be referred to a psychologist. In cases of maternal or fetal physical injury, vital signs are monitored, fetal heart rate is checked, injuries are treated, and immediate referral to a specialist is made [29]. The lack of a specific supportive care program and clinical guidelines for abused pregnant women, which is based on the economic, social, political, cultural, and religious situation of the country, demonstrates the necessity of developing such a program. Domestic violence during pregnancy is a widespread problem in many countries, and establishing effective and culturally sensitive clinical guidelines is essential to providing optimal care for abused pregnant women worldwide. In the process of designing the supportive care program for abused pregnant women and adapting the related guidelines, it is helpful to review the relevant clinical guidelines available in other countries. Therefore, the present study was designed to systematically review the existing clinical guidelines for domestic violence during pregnancy to explore insights for developing clinical guidelines in Iran and offering valuable instructions for healthcare systems worldwide.

Methods

Identification and selection of guidelines

Inclusion criteria for guideline selection were clinical guidelines that focus on domestic violence or intimate partner violence during pregnancy, a national government organization endorsed them and guidelines published in English. Guidelines that do not address domestic violence or intimate partner violence in the context of pregnancy and documents not published in English were excluded.

Search for guidelines

Based on the PRISMA flowchart; academic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, UpToDate, Cochrane Library database, and Google Scholar were searched until July 2022. Guideline repositories were also searched, including NICE, SIGN, GAC, NHMRC, NGC, New Zealand Guidelines Group, TRIP, AHRQ, G-I-N, and MD Consult. Keywords and Boolean combinations were used to identify related results. The search terms included guideline, guide, clinical guide, clinical recommendation, management, operational framework, good clinical practice, consensus, standard, procedure, instruction, principle, rule, maternal, antenatal, pregnancy, prenatal, perinatal, violence, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, victim, and abuse. Reference lists of comprised studies were also reviewed to ensure that all guidelines were found. Medical topic headings and Boolean terms were used to increase the precision of the search process. MAB screened titles and abstracts, and full-text articles were reviewed independently by two authors MAB and FSH. Disagreements were judged by the third reviewer RB.

Appraisal of guidelines

The AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, REsearch, and Evaluation) instrument is a tool that assesses the methodological rigour and transparency in which a guideline is developed. The original AGREE instrument was refined, which resulted in the AGREE II. The AGREE II instrument was used to evaluate the guidelines’ methodological quality in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, and editorial independence [30]. The 23-item AGREE II tool uses a 7-point agreement scale, ranging from 1 for strongly disagree to 7 for strongly agree. Two authors, MAB and FSH, evaluated each guideline independently, and major disagreements in the scores were deliberated and independently checked by the third author RB. Domain scores were calculated, and a total quality score was achieved for each domain by summing the score of each item. The mean domain score between the two appraisers was used to standardize the domain score as a percentage. To assess agreement between two appraisers on the AGREE II grading, a weighted kappa was computed using SPSS V.24.0. The extent of variations among appraisers with less agreement on weight allocation was identified [31, 32], and a kappa value was calculated for all guidelines. A kappa value less than 0.2 indicates poor agreement, 0.21 – 0.4 fair, 0.41 – 0.6 moderate, 0.61 – 0.8 good, and 0.81 – 1.0 very good agreement [33]. Moreover, the appraiser assigned a total guideline assessment score, made a recommendation decision and provided options of Yes, Yes with modifications, or No.

Synthesis of guideline recommendations

The scope, content, and consistency of guideline recommendations were analyzed by textual descriptive synthesis [34]. At first, each guideline was read to obtain a general knowledge of the content, and then MAB and FSH coded the guidelines to recognize the categories/clinical content areas encompassed by the guidelines. Preliminary codes were identified and described by constant comparison of each guideline’s recommendations as data collection progressed. For each domain, guideline recommendations were compared across other guidelines to identify similarities and inconsistencies. Within each category, the recommendations were further coded into separate subcategories where appropriate. MAB and FSH compared guidelines for consistency in content and recommendations and the level of underpinning evidence for each category. Finally, recommendations from the guidelines that were of the highest quality based on the AGREE II rating were synthesized to give an overview of all recommendations.

Results

Guideline selection and data extraction

381 publications came up in the initial search including 324 documents from academic databases, 32 from guideline repositories, and 25 from additional resources. After 125 duplicate studies were removed, 256 documents remained. The titles and abstracts of the 256 studies were screened according to the criteria for inclusion. A total of 219 documents were removed and 37 guidelines remained. The full texts of the 37 guidelines were assessed for eligibility, and 21 guidelines were excluded. The 21 excluded studies were those that were: incorrect population (n = 5), not a clinical guideline (n = 8), not endorsed by a national government organization (n = 5), and no systematic literature search was conducted (n = 3). 16 clinical guidelines remained and were reviewed for qualitative synthesis. Finally, based on the quality score of the clinical guidelines, the recommendations of 14 clinical guidelines were systematically reviewed. (Fig. 1)
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the search strategy
Bild vergrößern

General information about the guidelines

The fourteen guidelines assessed in this systematic review were published from 2003 to 2021. The guideline development group was from seven countries, including Canada (n = 1), Finland (n = 1), Queensland (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), UK (n = 7), Australia (n = 2), and British Columbia (n = 1). Table 1 shows general information about the guidelines.
Table 1
Characteristics of the included guidelines (n = 14)
Guideline organization/society/
Authors
Guideline name(s)
Version
Years of publication
Country
Target users
Guideline writers
Search strategy for evidence
Level of evidence included
Best Start: Ontario’s Maternal, Newborn and Early Child Development Resource Centre [35]
Abuse in Pregnancy: Information and Strategies for Prenatal Education
1
2015
Canada
Toronto, Ontario
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Sirkka Perttu
Verena Kaselitz [36]
Addressing Intimate Partner Violence
1
2005/2006
Finland
Health Professionals in Maternity and Child Health Care
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Queensland Health [44]
Antenatal screening for domestic and family violence
1
2018
Queensland
midwives, obstetricians, nurses, and other health service professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Institute of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, and Directorate of Quality and Strategy Health Service Executive [37]
Antenatal routine inquiry regarding violence in the home
1
2012
Ireland
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
NCT(England) [38]
NCT Policy Briefing: Domestic abuse during pregnancy and the postnatal period
1
2008
UK
NCT specialist workers, students, and volunteers providing parent support
Multidisciplinary?
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Amanda Shearer
NHS Royal Berkshire
NHS Foundation Trust [45]
Domestic abuse in pregnancy guidelines (GL828)
7.1
2021
UK
Policy Hub/ Clinical/ Maternity/ Social Issues & Public Health
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Sandra Harrington Midwifery Development Officer, NHS Highland [39]
Domestic Abuse: Pregnancy and the Early Years
4
2015
UK
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
C Rogers, P Ryan – Updated by C. Robinson
By: Maternity Service Governance Group
University Hospital of Leicester NHS [46]
Domestic Violence Abuse in Maternity UHL Obstetric Guideline
2
2020
UK
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Australian Government Department of Health [47]
Pregnancy Care Guidelines 29 Family violence
1
2018
Australia
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Amanda Shearer
NHS Royal Berkshire
NHS Foundation Trust [40]
Domestic Abuse documentation and procedural framework policy (CG480)
6.1
2021
UK
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Diane Sawchuck [48]
Intimate partner violence during the perinatal period
Obstetric Guideline 13
1
2003
British Columbia
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
NICE Pathways National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [41]
Pregnant women who experience domestic abuse: service provision
2
2021
UK
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (NHS)
Maternity service [42]
Routine Enquiry into Domestic Abuse in the Antenatal Period
2
2015
UK
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW),
Michelle Quee [43]
Screening for domestic violence during pregnancy Options for future reporting in the National Perinatal Data Collection
1
2015
Australia
healthcare professionals
Multidisciplinary
Systematic literature review
Levels 1–4

Assessment of the quality of the reviewed guidelines

The quality of each guideline (n = 14) was assessed using the AGREE II domain scores (Table 2). Each guideline was quality assessed by two independent researchers MAB and FSH with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer RB. No guidelines were assessed as high. The domain score for purpose and clarity of presentation was good, while the score for editorial independence and rigor of development was poor. The mean scores (range; SD) for the domains were: scope and purpose 83.29% (63.80–100%; SD 12.53); stakeholder involvement 54.32% (38.80–75%; SD 11.83); rigor of development 31.93% (14.50–65.60%; SD 13.26); clarity of presentation 81.30% (69.40–97.20%; SD 10.30); applicability 51.15% (31.20–93.70%; SD 17.61) and editorial independence 13.39% (0–50%; SD 22.16). The kappa values ranged from fair kappa = 0.39 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.58) to 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.99). The overall inter-appraiser agreement was an interclass correlation = 0.69 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.84), indicating good strength of the agreement.
Table 2
Guideline assessment according to the AGREE-II instrument (n = 14)
Guideline organization/society/authors
Domain scores (%)
Mean domain scores (%)
Agreement between appraisers
Scope and purpose
[3]
Stakeholder involvement[3]
Rigor of development
[8]
Clarity and presentation[3]
Applicability[4]
Editorial independence[2]
Weighted kappa coefficient (K,95%CI)
Best Start: Ontario’s Maternal, Newborn and Early Child Development Resource Centre [35]
69.4%
75%
26%
77.7%
45.8%
50%
57.3%
0.75 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.88)
Sirkka Perttu
Verena Kaselitz [36]
91.6%
63.8%
37.5%
83.3%
35.4%
12.5%
54%
0.62 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.84)
Queensland Health [44]
86.1%
55.5%
14.5%
69.4%
37.5%
0%
43.8%
0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94)
Institute of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, and Directorate of Quality and Strategy Health Service Executive [37]
86.1%
58.3%
65.6%
69.4%
58.3%
25%
60.4%
0.84 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.91)
NCT(England) [38]
91.6%
38.8%
36.4%
77.7%
62.5%
0%
51.2%
0.71 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.91)
Amanda Shearer
NHS Royal Berkshire
NHS Foundation Trust [45]
63.8%
44.4%
27%
75%
39.5%
0%
41.6%
0.78 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.87)
Sandra Harrington Midwifery Development Officer [39]
94.4%
63.8%
23.9%
88.8%
56.2%
0%
54.5%
0.39 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.58)
C Rogers, P Ryan – Updated by C. Robinson
By: Maternity Service Governance Group
University Hospital of Leicester NHS [46]
88.8%
50%
18.7%
69.4%
35.4%
0%
43.7%
0.89 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.84)
Australian Government Department of Health [47]
69.4%
38.8%
29.1%
88.8%
54.1%
0%
46.7%
0.67 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.87)
Amanda Shearer
NHS Royal Berkshire
NHS Foundation Trust [40]
86.1%
50%
41.6%
97.2%
54.1%
0%
54.8%
0.71 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.89)
Diane Sawchuck [48]
66.6%
72.2%
33.3%
94.4%
31.2%
0%
49.6%
0.43 (95% 0.26 to 0.67)
NICE Pathways
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [41]
100%
61.1%
27%
97.2%
37.5%
0%
53.8%
0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.99)
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (NHS)
Maternity service [42]
72.2%
41.6%
19.7%
72.2%
93.7%
50%
58.2%
0.48 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.69)
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW),
Michelle Quee [43]
100%
47.2%
46.8%
77.7%
75%
50%
66.1%
0.65 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.89)
Mean
83.27%
54.32%
31.93%
81.3%
51.15%
13.39%
  
Nine guidelines (64%) were assessed as ‘recommended’ for use since their quality score ranged between 5 and 7 representing good quality guidelines [3543]. Five guidelines (36%) were ‘recommended after modification’ with an overall score of 4 to 5 representing moderate quality guidelines [4448]. Three guidelines (21%) which updated more frequently had higher quality [39, 40, 45]. None of the 14 guidelines were assessed as high (> 75%) in all domains of AGREE II. Mean domain scores for the guidelines ranged from 41 to 66%. Six guidelines, which is 43%, were published in the UK and updated more frequently.

Synthesis of recommendations

The synthesis of related categories for each guideline is conducted in Table 3. Two reviewers MAB and FSH extracted all relevant recommendations from each included guideline. Four related categories were recognized within the appropriate guidelines. These consisted of Category 1: introduction, Category 2: domestic violence in pregnancy, Category 3: the role of health care professionals, and Category 4: the resources.
Table 3
Guidelines recommendation categories and subcategories
category & guidelines
recommendation subcategory
1
[35]
2
[36]
3
[44]
4
[37]
5
[38]
6
[45]
7
[39]
8
[46]
9
[47]
10
[40]
11
[48]
12
[41]
13
[42]
14
[43]
Introduction
Purpose and scope
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
Definition of violence
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
Patterns of violence
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
Cycle of violence
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Domestic violence during pregnancy
Prevalence of violence during pregnancy
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Signs and symptoms of violence during pregnancy
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
Risk factors of violence during pregnancy
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
Health consequences of violence during pregnancy
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
The role of healthcare professionals
Communication support and building trust
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Privacy and confidentiality
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Screening
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Barriers to screening
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
Identification
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Non-disclosure
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
Psychological counseling
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
Medical care
-
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
Home visitation program
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
Child protection
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Risk assessment
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Safety planning
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Self-care and empowering
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
Prevention
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
Support
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Documentation
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Follow up
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
The resources
Professionals’ education and training
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
Community education program
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
Multi-professional co-operation
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
Useful organization
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
Sources of information
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
Sources of support
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
List and number of local resources
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
-

Category 1: introduction

All fourteen guidelines (100%) included relevant content in the introduction, which was categorized into purpose and scope, definition of violence, patterns of violence, and the cycle of violence.
The most common subcategory was for the definition of violence (93%), twelve of the fourteen guidelines contained relevant content on the purpose and scope (86%), three guidelines had relevant content on the patterns of violence (21%) and one guideline had relevant content related to the cycle of violence (7%).

Category 2: domestic violence during pregnancy

All fourteen guidelines (100%) had relevant content on domestic violence during pregnancy. There were four subcategories identified within this category such as the prevalence of violence during pregnancy, signs and symptoms of violence during pregnancy, risk factors of violence during pregnancy, and health consequences of violence during pregnancy.
The most common subcategories of the statements were the prevalence of violence during pregnancy (93% of the guidelines provided statements), health consequences of violence during pregnancy (71% provided statements), and signs and symptoms of violence during pregnancy (64%). Six guidelines made statements for the subcategories of risk factors of violence during pregnancy (43%).

Category 3: the role of healthcare professionals

All fourteen guidelines (100%) had recommendations about the role of healthcare professionals. There were 17 subcategories identified within this category. These categories were communication support and building trust, privacy, and confidentiality, screening, barriers to screening, identification, non-disclosure, psychological counselling, medical care, home visitation program, child protection, risk assessment, safety planning, self-care and empowering, prevention, support, documentation and follow-up.
The most common subcategories of recommendation were privacy and confidentiality, screening, identification, support, documentation (100% of the guidelines provided recommendations), communication support and building trust, child protection (93% provided recommendations), risk assessment (86%), non-disclosure, safety planning (71% each), barriers to screening, psychological counselling (50% each), home visitation program (36%), and few guidelines made recommendations for the categories of medical care, prevention, follow up (26% each) and self-care and empowering (21%).

Category 4: the resources

All of the fourteen included guidelines (100%) contained recommendations related to the resources which were grouped into the following subcategories such as professionals’ education and training, community education program, multi-professional co-operation, useful organization, sources of information, sources of support and list and number of local resources.
13 guidelines contained recommendations related to professionals’ education and training (93%), 11 guidelines contained recommendations related to sources of information (79%), nine guidelines contained recommendations related to useful organization, sources of support (64%), seven guidelines contained recommendations related to multi-professional co-operation, list and number of local resources (50%), and two of them included recommendations about community education program (14%).

Discussion

This systematic review evaluates the quality of published clinical guidelines on domestic violence during pregnancy. It offers an overview of perinatal supportive care for abused pregnant women. The review includes international clinical guidelines to provide a global perspective. Fourteen guidelines were assessed in this systematic review. The results showed that the guideline development group was from seven high-income countries, and half were in the UK. The lack of guidelines from low and middle-income countries, and the cultural differences and different socio-economic statuses highlighted the importance of developing or adapting guidelines in these regions.
While the review highlights the importance of screening, identifying, and supporting women experiencing domestic violence [36, 37, 40, 4244], the interpretation of the findings suggests that there are significant gaps and inconsistencies in the existing guidelines.
One of the most important observations from this review is the variation in the methodological quality of the guidelines. While most clinical guidelines were of sufficient quality according to AGREE II ratings to be recommended [3543], none of the reviewed guidelines achieved high ratings across all six AGREE II domains. This suggests that while some guidelines offer valuable recommendations, there is a lack of comprehensive, high-quality frameworks that can be universally applied to effectively address domestic violence during pregnancy. For example, although privacy, screening, support, and documentation were commonly addressed, several key elements, such as the patterns of violence [3747] and the cycle of violence [35, 3748], were largely underrepresented. This inconsistency reflects an overall gap in providing healthcare providers with the adequate information necessary to fully understand the basis complexities of domestic violence as a global health issue.
Clinical guidelines need to include information about recognizing signs and symptoms of violence during pregnancy, as well as the risk factors associated with violence during pregnancy. This is crucial for identifying and supporting pregnant women who may be experiencing abuse or hidden violence during pregnancy but some of the reviewed guidelines had no recommendations about them [37, 4345]. This deficiency suggests that current guidelines may not fully equip healthcare professionals with the information necessary for early detection and intervention, particularly in settings where domestic violence is underreported. Furthermore, the result emphasizes the need for more practical training programs, particularly for midwives and other frontline healthcare professionals, to ensure they are equipped to handle the challenges of identifying and supporting women who are experiencing abuse.
The result of this study revealed that most of the reviewed guidelines explained the health consequences of violence during pregnancy [3539, 41, 4548]. Informing healthcare professionals about these consequences helps them to identify abused pregnant women and reduce the adverse effects of violence.
The most important part of reviewed clinical guidelines was the role of health care professionals. All of the guidelines had recommendations about privacy and confidentiality, screening, identification, support, and documentation. While these recommendations are crucial, they represent only the foundation of care. The last recommendations were about self-care and empowering [39, 41, 48], prevention [39, 41, 44, 48], medical care [36, 39, 41, 46], follow-up [39, 41, 43, 45], home visitation program [35, 39, 40, 43, 47], psychological counselling [35, 39, 41, 44, 4648] and barriers to screening [3842, 47, 48]. This highlights a significant area for improvement that guidelines should not only inform healthcare providers about recognizing violence but also about the broader systems of support that are necessary for long-term maternal and fetal well-being.
The reviewed guidelines noted the importance of training programs in improving the confidence and competency of health professionals in identifying and caring for women experiencing domestic violence. For successful screening, there should be a greater focus on training health professionals who conduct the screening; this may require comprehensive educational efforts, rather than just producing and distributing guidelines [43]. Training and support for midwives must be included to provide clinicians with the skills they need to identify and respond effectively to domestic violence. All of the guidelines except one [40] had recommendations on professional education and training. However, the training described often focuses on recognizing signs of violence and offering basic support, rather than equipping health providers with the comprehensive knowledge needed to address the complexity of domestic violence during pregnancy. Similarly, community awareness, and education programs, along with an appropriate response to domestic violence can play an important role in reducing violence, especially during pregnancy, but only two guidelines had recommendations for them [41, 48]. Community-based approaches, which are instrumental in reducing stigma and providing resources for at-risk individuals, should be incorporated into guideline frameworks, particularly in regions where domestic violence is prevalent but underreported.
The results showed that the guideline development group was from seven high-income countries, and half were in the UK. The study highlights a significant gap in the availability of domestic violence guidelines for pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the prevalence of domestic violence is high and healthcare infrastructure is often inadequate. While the absence of these guidelines is a significant concern, the study suggests that adapting existing guidelines, rather than creating new ones, could be more effective. The focus should not be on the urgent development of new frameworks, but on adapting and strengthening existing ones to suit the specific cultural, socio-economic, and healthcare contexts of LMICs. The study advocates for research and collaboration to develop contextually relevant, culturally sensitive guidelines, involving localized studies and engagement with local healthcare providers to address the needs of these populations effectively.
In conclusion, while the review offers valuable insights into the current state of clinical guidelines for domestic violence during pregnancy, it also highlights the need for critical improvements in both the content and implementation of these guidelines. Greater attention must be given to training, the provision of detailed, actionable information, and the contextualization of guidelines to ensure their relevance and effectiveness in diverse healthcare settings.
This is the first study that systematically reviewed guidelines in the field of domestic violence during pregnancy. The use of a standardized method and rating tool AGREE II was one of the strengths of the present study. Screening the title and abstract by one reviewer was the limitation of the study.

Conclusion

This study reviewed clinical guidelines for managing domestic violence during pregnancy, highlighting the essential role of healthcare professionals in identifying and supporting pregnant women affected by violence. Although many guidelines included recommendations on privacy, screening, and medical care, significant gaps remain, particularly in addressing the full range of healthcare needs—such as psychological counseling, prevention strategies, and follow-up support. Moreover, professional training and community education, which are critical for effective intervention, are insufficiently addressed in many guidelines.
The findings underscore the need for enhancing existing guidelines rather than creating entirely new ones. Efforts should focus on strengthening the current framework by incorporating more comprehensive recommendations on preventing violence, improving follow-up care, and addressing the barriers to screening. This is especially pertinent for low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of domestic violence during pregnancy is often under-recognized, and clinical guidelines are lacking. These countries should focus on adapting international guidelines to their specific contexts, ensuring that healthcare providers are equipped with the necessary knowledge and resources to support pregnant women experiencing domestic violence.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the vice chancellor for research at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Declarations

The study was approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and the Ethics Code was IR.MUMS.NURSE.REC.1399.047.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Domestic violence in pregnancy: a systematic review of clinical guidelines
Verfasst von
Raheleh Babazadeh
Farangis Sharifi
Malikeh Amel Barez
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07459-6

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Organization WH. Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. 2021.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, Meyer SR, García-Moreno C. Global, regional, and National prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. Lancet. 2022;399(10327):803–13.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Organization WH. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization; 2013.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Organization WH. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. World Health Organization; 2013.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Das S, Bapat U, More NS, Alcock G, Joshi W, Pantvaidya S, et al. Intimate partner violence against women during and after pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in Mumbai slums. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–12.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallitto CC, García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Watts C. Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the WHO Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;120(1):3–9.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Moafi F, Dolatian M, Sajjadi H, Alimoradi Z, Mirabzadeh A, Mahmoodi Z. Domestic violence and its associated factors in Iran: according to world health organization model. Pajoohandeh J. 2014;19(1):25–36.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhusen JL, Ray E, Sharps P, Bullock L. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Women’s Health. 2015;24(1):100–6.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ezzati-Rastegar K, Moeini B, Rezapur-Shahkolai F, Naghdi A, Karami M, Jahanfar S. The impact of intimate partner violence on the mental health of pregnant women residing in slum areas: a cross-sectional study. J Public Health. 2022;30:353–9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Golmakani N. Domestic violence in pregnancy, outcomes and strategies: a review Article. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2013;15(42):13–22.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill A, Pallitto C, McCleary-Sills J, Garcia-Moreno C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;133(3):269–76.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feltner C, Wallace I, Berkman N, Kistler CE, Middleton JC, Barclay C, et al. Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2018;320(16):1688–701.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Silva C, Reed S. Severity of abuse before and during pregnancy for African American, Hispanic, and Anglo women. J Nurse-Midwifery. 1999;44(2):139–44.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimshaw J, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C, Vale L et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. 2004.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Field MJ, Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington DC. 1992.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Attia A. Adaptation of international evidence based clinical practice guidelines: the ADAPTE process. Middle East Fertility Soc J. 2013;18(2):123–6.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Selby P, Hunter K, Rogers J, Lang-Robertson K, Soklaridis S, Chow V, et al. How to adapt existing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a case example with smoking cessation guidelines in Canada. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e016124.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Debbie Aylward AJ, Leslie M. Rosemary Scofich. Abuse in Pregnancy: Information and Strategies for Prenatal Education. Toronto. 2015.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawchuck D. Intimate partner violence during the perinatal period. 2003.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheare A. Domestic abuse in pregnancy guidelines (GL828). 2017.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat NCT U. NCT Policy Briefing: Domestic abuse during pregnancy and the postnatal period. 2008.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pathways N. Pregnant women who experience domestic abuse: service provision. 2017.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuels T. The management of domestic abuse in maternity patients. 2014.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers C. PR. Domestic Violence / Abuse: guidance for practice in maternity. University Hospital Of Leicester NHS; 2017.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzie Boyd TRCoOaG. Providing quality patient care maternity standards a framework for maternity service standards 2016.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Denise Kerr BM. Domestic Abuse Guidelines for Public Health Nursing, Midwifery, and Children’s Nursing Services. 2012.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mary Holohan EK, Richard Greene. Antenatal routine enquiry regarding violence in the home. clinical practice guideline, 2014.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat health Q. Antenatal screening for domestic and family violence, Guideline QH-GDL-456. 2018.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Safe Mother National Program, Integrated Maternal Health Care. Ministry of Health and Medical Education: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2022.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–42.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(4):213.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D. Multiple regression. Practical statistics for medical research. 1991:349.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston A, Kelly SE, Hsieh S-C, Skidmore B, Wells GA. Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;108:64–76.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Centre BSR. Abuse in pregnancy: information and strategies for the prenatal education. Ontario, Canada: Toronto; 2015.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sirkka Perttu VK. Addressing Intimate Partner Violence Guidelines for Health Professionals in Maternity and Child Health Care. Finland. 2006.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Obstetricians and Gynecologists RCoPoIaDoQaSHSE. clinical practice guideline Antenatal routine enquiry regarding violence in the home. Ireland. 2012.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat NCT. NCT Policy Briefing: Domestic abuse during pregnancy and the postnatal perio. united kingdom 2008.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Midwifery Development Officer SH. Domestic Abuse: Pregnancy and the Early Years. NHS highland. 2015.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat NHS Royal Berkshire AS. Domestic Abuse documentation and procedural framework policy (CG480). united kingdom. 2021.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Excellence NPNIfHaC. Pregnant women who experience domestic abuse: service provision. united kingdom. 2021.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Bevan UHBNMsA. Routine Enquiry into Domestic Abuse in the Antenatal Period. united kingdom. 2015.
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) MQ. Screening for domestic violence during pregnancy Options for future reporting in the National Perinatal Data Collection. Australia. 2015.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Health Q. Antenatal screening for domestic and family violence Guideline QH-GDL-456. Queensland. 2018.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat NHS Royal Berkshire AS. Domestic abuse in pregnancy guidelines (GL828). united kingdom. 2021.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Maternity Service Governance Group University Hospital of Leicester NHS CR. P Ryan – Updated by C. Robinson. Domestic Violence Abuse in Maternity UHL Obstetric Guideline. united kingdom. 2020.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Government Department of Health. Pregnancy care guidelines (GL29). Family violence. Australia; 2018.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawchuck D. Intimate partner violence during the perinatal period obstetric guideline 13. British Columbia. 2003.

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

KI-Chatbots bieten 24/7-Sprechstunde für Patienten

Medizinischen Rat von Chatbots auf der Basis sogenannter künstlicher Intelligenz haben laut Umfragen bereits knapp die Hälfte aller Erwachsenen schon einmal eingeholt. Welche Chancen und Risiken birgt das?

Mehr körperliche Aktivität könnte Brustkrebsmortalität senken

Die körperliche Aktivität zu steigern – das scheint das Leben von Frauen mit Brustkrebs auf Basis eine Modellrechnung deutlich zu verlängern. Wie sie aber mehr Bewegung erreichen können, bleibt offen.

Zu frühe Geburt – 10 IQ-Punkte weniger

Kommen Kinder zu früh oder mit sehr niedrigem Geburtsgewicht auf die Welt, hat dies oft kognitive Auswirkungen bis ins Erwachsenenalter: Der IQ bleibt niedriger, die Schulleistungen sind schlechter und der Förderbedarf ist höher als im Durchschnitt.

Datopotamab deruxtecan verlängert Überleben bei fortgeschrittenem TNBC

Bei zuvor unbehandeltem, fortgeschrittenem TNBC ohne Option für eine Immuntherapie zeigte Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in einer internationalen Phase-III-Studie deutliche Vorteile gegenüber Chemotherapie – sowohl im progressionsfreien als auch im Gesamtüberleben.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise
Ältere Frau hält Hanteln in den Händen/© yavdat / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Frühgeborenes/© manonallard / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Frau erhält Infusion/© Seventyfour / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell)