Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medical Oncology 10/2018

01.10.2018 | Original Paper

Dose-dense temozolomide for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study

verfasst von: Catherine R. Garcia, Stacey A. Slone, Rachael M. Morgan, Lindsey Gruber, Sameera S. Kumar, Donita D. Lightner, John L. Villano

Erschienen in: Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There are limited treatment modalities after high-grade gliomas recurrence. MGMT depletion modulated by dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) remains a debated therapy for initial TMZ responders. Patients were selected retrospectively from our practice with diagnosis of high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III or IV), and were followed since the start of ddTMZ until death or change of therapy. Twenty-one patients were reviewed, with a median age of 47 (25–61) years and a median of 5.8 (1.5–38.8) cycles of ddTMZ. The majority were males (71.4%). Sixty-six percent received 21 on/28 off ddTMZ schedule, 28.6% daily, and 1 patient received a 7 days on/7 days off schedule. IDH mutation status was available for 18 (85.7%) patients, with 7 (33.3%) IDH mutant and 11 (52.5%) IDH wild type. MGMT methylation was assessed in 6 (28.6%) of the patients, being MGMT methylated in 3 (14.3%) patients, and non-methylated in 3 (14.3%) patients. The majority of patients (57.1%) were receiving ddTMZ in addition to other forms of therapy, including either bevacizumab (38.1%) or tumor-treating fields (TTFields) (19.1%). Overall ddTMZ was well tolerated, with few adverse events reported. The estimated median overall survival after ddTMZ start was 11 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months. Outcomes did not vary between patients receiving ddTMZ alone or those using TTFields or bevacizumab as concomitant therapy, but there was a trend to longer survival with the use of concomitant TTFields. Our results demonstrate benefit of ddTMZ after previous treatment with standard TMZ dosing with no apparent increase in treatment-related toxicities. In summary, ddTMZ should be considered in TMZ responsive patients and warrants further investigation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abacioglu U, Caglar HB, Yumuk PF, et al. Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neuro-oncol. 2011;103:585–93.CrossRef Abacioglu U, Caglar HB, Yumuk PF, et al. Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neuro-oncol. 2011;103:585–93.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong TS, Won M, Wefel JS, et al. Comparative impact of treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) enrolled in RTOG 0825. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2003–3. Armstrong TS, Won M, Wefel JS, et al. Comparative impact of treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) enrolled in RTOG 0825. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2003–3.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baer JC, Freeman AA, Newlands ES, et al. Depletion of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase correlates with potentiation of temozolomide and CCNU toxicity in human tumour cells. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1299–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baer JC, Freeman AA, Newlands ES, et al. Depletion of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase correlates with potentiation of temozolomide and CCNU toxicity in human tumour cells. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1299–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Balmaceda C, Peereboom D, Pannullo S, et al. Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer. 2008;112:1139–46.CrossRefPubMed Balmaceda C, Peereboom D, Pannullo S, et al. Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer. 2008;112:1139–46.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Banissi C, Ghiringhelli F, Chen L, et al. Treg depletion with a low-dose metronomic temozolomide regimen in a rat glioma model. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2009;58:1627–34.CrossRefPubMed Banissi C, Ghiringhelli F, Chen L, et al. Treg depletion with a low-dose metronomic temozolomide regimen in a rat glioma model. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2009;58:1627–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berrocal A, Perez Segura P, Gil M, et al. Extended-schedule dose-dense temozolomide in refractory gliomas. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:417–22.CrossRef Berrocal A, Perez Segura P, Gil M, et al. Extended-schedule dose-dense temozolomide in refractory gliomas. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:417–22.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R, et al. Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4601–8.CrossRefPubMed Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R, et al. Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4601–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Kesari S, et al. A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:1146–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Kesari S, et al. A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:1146–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Cavallo G, et al. Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO). Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1155–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Cavallo G, et al. Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO). Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1155–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Caroli M, Locatelli M, Campanella R, et al. Temozolomide in glioblastoma: results of administration at first relapse and in newly diagnosed cases. Is still proposable an alternative schedule to concomitant protocol? J Neuro-oncol. 2007;84:71–7.CrossRef Caroli M, Locatelli M, Campanella R, et al. Temozolomide in glioblastoma: results of administration at first relapse and in newly diagnosed cases. Is still proposable an alternative schedule to concomitant protocol? J Neuro-oncol. 2007;84:71–7.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: International Agency For Research On Cancer; 2016. Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: International Agency For Research On Cancer; 2016.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK. Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:259–69.CrossRef Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK. Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:259–69.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14:307–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14:307–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, et al. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1350–4.CrossRefPubMed Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, et al. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1350–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman HS, Pluda J, Quinn JA, et al. Phase I trial of carmustine plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3522–8.CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Pluda J, Quinn JA, et al. Phase I trial of carmustine plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3522–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4733–40.CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4733–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Galldiks N, Berhorn T, Blau T, et al. “One week on-one week off”: efficacy and side effects of dose-intensified temozolomide chemotherapy: experiences of a single center. J Neuro-oncol. 2013;112:209–15.CrossRef Galldiks N, Berhorn T, Blau T, et al. “One week on-one week off”: efficacy and side effects of dose-intensified temozolomide chemotherapy: experiences of a single center. J Neuro-oncol. 2013;112:209–15.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghiringhelli F, Menard C, Puig PE, et al. Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2007;56:641–8.CrossRefPubMed Ghiringhelli F, Menard C, Puig PE, et al. Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2007;56:641–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert MR, Pugh SL, Aldape K, et al. NRG oncology RTOG 0625: a randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab with either irinotecan or dose-dense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2017;131:193–9.CrossRef Gilbert MR, Pugh SL, Aldape K, et al. NRG oncology RTOG 0625: a randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab with either irinotecan or dose-dense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2017;131:193–9.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Han SJ, Rolston JD, Molinaro AM, et al. Phase II trial of 7 days on/7 days off temozolmide for recurrent high-grade glioma. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:1255–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han SJ, Rolston JD, Molinaro AM, et al. Phase II trial of 7 days on/7 days off temozolmide for recurrent high-grade glioma. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:1255–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003.CrossRefPubMed Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilverda K, Bosma I, Heimans JJ, et al. Cognitive functioning in glioblastoma patients during radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment: initial findings. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;97:89–94.CrossRef Hilverda K, Bosma I, Heimans JJ, et al. Cognitive functioning in glioblastoma patients during radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment: initial findings. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;97:89–94.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan RB, Raizer JJ, Malkin MG, et al. A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas. Neuro Oncology. 2002;4:39–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan RB, Raizer JJ, Malkin MG, et al. A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas. Neuro Oncology. 2002;4:39–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:740–5.CrossRefPubMed Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:740–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SM, Thatcher N, Crowther D, et al. Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by temozolomide. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:452–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee SM, Thatcher N, Crowther D, et al. Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by temozolomide. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:452–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu L, Gerson SL. Targeted modulation of MGMT: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:328–31.CrossRefPubMed Liu L, Gerson SL. Targeted modulation of MGMT: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:328–31.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Madsen K, Poulsen HS. Needs for everyday life support for brain tumour patients’ relatives: systematic literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20:33–43.CrossRef Madsen K, Poulsen HS. Needs for everyday life support for brain tumour patients’ relatives: systematic literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20:33–43.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell RB, Moschel RC, Dolan ME. Effect of O6-benzylguanine on the sensitivity of human tumor xenografts to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and on DNA interstrand cross-link formation. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1171–5.PubMed Mitchell RB, Moschel RC, Dolan ME. Effect of O6-benzylguanine on the sensitivity of human tumor xenografts to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and on DNA interstrand cross-link formation. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1171–5.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagane M. Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising? Neurol Medico-Chir. 2015;55:38–49.CrossRef Nagane M. Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising? Neurol Medico-Chir. 2015;55:38–49.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Nayak L, Reardon DA. High-grade Gliomas. Continuum (Minneapolis, MN). 2017;23:1548–63. Nayak L, Reardon DA. High-grade Gliomas. Continuum (Minneapolis, MN). 2017;23:1548–63.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Neyns B, Chaskis C, Joosens E, et al. A multicenter cohort study of dose-dense temozolomide (21 of 28 days) for the treatment of recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma or oligoastrocytoma. Cancer Investig. 2008;26:269–77.CrossRef Neyns B, Chaskis C, Joosens E, et al. A multicenter cohort study of dose-dense temozolomide (21 of 28 days) for the treatment of recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma or oligoastrocytoma. Cancer Investig. 2008;26:269–77.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry JR, Belanger K, Mason WP, et al. Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2051–7.CrossRefPubMed Perry JR, Belanger K, Mason WP, et al. Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2051–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry JR, Rizek P, Cashman R, et al. Temozolomide rechallenge in recurrent malignant glioma by using a continuous temozolomide schedule: the “rescue” approach. Cancer. 2008;113:2152–7.CrossRefPubMed Perry JR, Rizek P, Cashman R, et al. Temozolomide rechallenge in recurrent malignant glioma by using a continuous temozolomide schedule: the “rescue” approach. Cancer. 2008;113:2152–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR, et al. Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:815–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR, et al. Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:815–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Reardon DA, Omuro A, Brandes AA, et al. OS10.3 Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: CheckMate 143. Neuro-oncology. 2017;19:iii21–1.CrossRefPubMedCentral Reardon DA, Omuro A, Brandes AA, et al. OS10.3 Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: CheckMate 143. Neuro-oncology. 2017;19:iii21–1.CrossRefPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Reithmeier T, Graf E, Piroth T, et al. BCNU for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reithmeier T, Graf E, Piroth T, et al. BCNU for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gilbert MR, et al. Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4127–36.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gilbert MR, et al. Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4127–36.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2535–43.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2535–43.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, et al. (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 48:2192–2202.CrossRef Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, et al. (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 48:2192–2202.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabatabai G, Wick W, Reifenberger G, et al. Dose-intensified rechallenge with temozolomide: One week on/one week off versus 3 weeks on/one week off in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (DIRECTOR). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:TPS2103–3.CrossRef Tabatabai G, Wick W, Reifenberger G, et al. Dose-intensified rechallenge with temozolomide: One week on/one week off versus 3 weeks on/one week off in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (DIRECTOR). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:TPS2103–3.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al. Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1004–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al. Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1004–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Wefel JS, Cloughesy T, Zazzali JL, et al. Neurocognitive function in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neuro-oncology. 2011;13:660–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wefel JS, Cloughesy T, Zazzali JL, et al. Neurocognitive function in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neuro-oncology. 2011;13:660–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2057–64.CrossRefPubMed Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2057–64.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wick A, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3357–61.CrossRefPubMed Wick A, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3357–61.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1954–63.CrossRefPubMed Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1954–63.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC, et al. Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1168–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC, et al. Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1168–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2572–8.CrossRefPubMed Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2572–8.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong ET, Timmons J, Callahan A, et al. Phase I study of low-dose metronomic temozolomide for recurrent malignant gliomas. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wong ET, Timmons J, Callahan A, et al. Phase I study of low-dose metronomic temozolomide for recurrent malignant gliomas. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:588–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:588–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Z, Howard TA, Villano JL. Long-term daily temozolomide with dose-dependent efficacy in MGMT promotor methylation negative recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:1043–6.CrossRefPubMed Zhou Z, Howard TA, Villano JL. Long-term daily temozolomide with dose-dependent efficacy in MGMT promotor methylation negative recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:1043–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Dose-dense temozolomide for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study
verfasst von
Catherine R. Garcia
Stacey A. Slone
Rachael M. Morgan
Lindsey Gruber
Sameera S. Kumar
Donita D. Lightner
John L. Villano
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1198-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Medical Oncology 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.