Introduction
Maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MS-SCC) is often detected at an advanced stage because of the lack of symptoms in early-stage cases [
1,
2]. Surgery for locally advanced maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (LA-MS-SCC) leads to changes in appearance and functional impairment related to oral intake and articulation [
3]. In some cases, it is necessary to sacrifice the affected eye. Intra-venous chemoradiotherapy has been performed to preserve appearance and function, but its effectiveness has been limited, due in part to the large tumour volume of LA-MS-SCC [
2,
4].
Robbins et al. developed a therapy in which high-dose cisplatin is injected arterially through the arteries feeding the tumor, and neutralized cisplatin intravenously with sodium thiosulfate [
5,
6]. They reported that the arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer, named RADPLAT, showed good oncological results [
7]. Subsequently, good clinical outcomes were reported with RADPLAT for LA-MS-SCC [
8‐
10], and it was expected afford a promising function-preserving treatment. However, a randomized trial in the Netherlands comparing arterial and intravenous infusion reported no significant difference in locoregional control or overall survival (OS) between the two arms [
11]. This trial enrolled patients with head and neck cancers other than maxillary cancer, and included many bilateral cases, which may have affected the results by including patients who were less likely to benefit from arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, we conducted a dose-finding and efficacy confirmation trial of the superselective intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin and concomitant radiotherapy for LA-MS-SCC (JCOG1212) [
12].
We have already reported the primary analysis of the efficacy confirmation phase in the T4a cohort [
13]. We demonstrated that RADPLAT showed favorable results for patients with T4aN0M0 disease (3-year OS: 82.8% (90% CI, 73.4–89.2%)) compared with the historical control for 3-year OS based on surgery (80%). There were no unacceptable acute complications except for one death from a treatment-related pulmonary embolus. Based on this, RADPLAT, as well as surgery, can be regarded as a possible treatment option for these patients through the primary study. However, this treatment involves localized radiation therapy (70 Gy) and up to seven arterial infusions of cisplatin, which may increase late complications such as radiation osteonecrosis and visual function-related disorders, as well as treatment-related death. This report presents the final analysis from the updated data with 5-year follow-up and late adverse events.
Discussion
We demonstrated that RADPLAT showed favorable results for patients with T4aN0M0 MS-SCCs with no significant increase in late adverse events. Standard therapy for LA-MS-SCC is surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy; however, the 5-year OS is poor at 36–52%, with the most frequent cause of death being local recurrence [
2,
16]. Surgical resection along with free flap reconstruction has been utilized as the standard treatment, but this approach is associated with postoperative esthetic issues, trismus, and vision disturbances.
In recent years, the efficacy of RADPLAT, a form of curative IA-CRT administered via the Seldinger method, has been reported for LA-MS-SCC [
8‐
10]. These reports have shown high 5-year survival rates ranging from 69.3 to 78.4%, primarily for T4 cases. IA-CRT has the advantage of organ preservation and a therapeutic effect that is similar to that of surgical resection. We have already reported that RADPLAT showed favorable results for patients with T4aN0M0 compared with the historical control for 3-year OS based on surgery in the primary analysis [
13]. According to this final analysis, the 5-year OS was good, with no considerable survival loss occurring over a longer period of time. Moreover, the added deaths were caused by other causes in 4 patients, with only 3 caused by the disease. Although local recurrence was the most common recurrence pattern, most of them were salvaged by surgery. On the other hand, most cases with distant metastases or regional lymph node metastases could not be salvaged. The recurrence pattern is also very different from that observed in the Dutch randomized trial that compared IA-CRT and IV-CRT for inoperable SCC of the oropharynx, oral cavity, or hypopharynx [
11]. In the Dutch trial, distant metastatic recurrence was observed in 65 cases compared to 57 cases of local recurrence [
17]. The Dutch trial focused on oral and pharyngeal cancers, which are more prone to distant metastasis compared to MS-SCC. On the other hand, in our study, the number of distant metastasis was low compared to that of local recurrence. As distant metastasis is relatively unlikely to occur in MS-SCC, we speculate that RADPLAT contributed to survival by increasing the intensity of local treatment.
Early diagnosis of local recurrence is the first step to improving survival. When salvage surgery can be performed, a high salvage proportion is achieved. Although it is difficult to distinguish between posttreatment scarring and recurrent lesions on imaging studies, early diagnosis is achieved by combining multiple modalities. Actually, in this study, most of the cases with local recurrence could be treated with salvage surgery. Long-term survival was achieved in cases in which salvage surgery could be performed. We believe that the high proportion of salvage for local recurrence contributes to the improved survival. Prophylactic radiation therapy to regional lymph nodes was not performed in this study. Late regional metastasis was observed in a few case, and many of these cases were not salvageable. Thus, early diagnosis and salvage treatment of delayed lymph nodes remain an issue.
Acute adverse events were already reported to be equally frequent with the standard 3-weekly cisplatin RT regimen, although high-dose cisplatin was administered [
13]. This is thought to have been due to the neutralization of cisplatin by sodium thiosulfate. We were concerned about increased late adverse events due to the 70 Gy radiation therapy and an average of 7 doses of 100 mg/m
2 cisplatin locally, with particular concern about increased radiation osteonecrosis, brain necrosis, and visual function-related complications. Fortunately, however, these late complications showed little increase since the previous report. Shokri et al. reported that in their review of 80 patients of radiogenic maxillary osteonecrosis, 74% of them occurred within 3 years of treatment, with tooth extraction being a factor in half of them [
18]. Similar to that report, we observed no significant increase in cases of osteonecrosis after 3 years of treatment. In many cases, the affected eye is in close proximity to the tumor, and removal of the eyeball is required by surgical treatment. Therefore, high doses of radiation are administered to the affected eye, and the treatment allows for some loss of vision in that eye. However, the incidence of cataract, corneal ulcer, retinopathy, and glaucoma in Grade 3 and Grade 4 patients was less than 20%, indicating that visual function was preserved at a better-than-expected proportion. Actually, Ashraf et al. [
2] reported that 34 of 63 cases of T4 maxillary carcinoma treated with surgery were required with orbital content removal. One advantage of RADPLAT over surgery is that it prevents facial deformities, including preservation of the eyeball, and may also provide additional benefits in terms of the preservation of visual function. In particular, significantly fewer cases of cataract were observed on the affected side in the group using IMRT than in the group using 3D-RT, suggesting that the use of IMRT may contribute to visual function preservation by limiting the dose to the eye. Konishi et al. [
19] similarly performed RADPLAT in 58 patients with advanced maxillary carcinoma and reported that IMRT was associated with fewer visual complications than observed for 3D-RT. Further study of the relationship between ocular dose and preservation of visual function is warranted. On the other hand, there was no difference in OS and LEFS between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups.
This study had several limitations. First, the study included only cases with T4N0 disease among advanced maxillary carcinomas and did not present information on cases with lymph node metastases. Moreover, we cannot present results for T4b at this time as the data will be analyzed separately from T4a due to different endpoints. Second, this was a single-arm study as MS-SCC is a rare disease and it was impossible to recruit patients for a randomized trial comparing surgical interventions such as total maxillectomy, often with orbital content removal. As we did not directly compare surgical treatment with RADPLAT, no definitive conclusions of treatment superiority or inferiority can be drawn. Rather, a comparison of 3D-RT and IMRT is being made. The number of centers performing IMRT increased in the latter half of the study, and the possibility that the timing of treatment may have influenced the results cannot be ruled out.
In conclusion, RADPLAT for advanced maxillary sinus carcinoma T4aN0M0 showed a favorable oncologic response and no considerable increase in late adverse events, suggesting that IMRT may reduce visual dysfunction. RADPLAT is a promising treatment for advanced maxillary sinus carcinoma.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.