Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2018

14.11.2017 | Original Research

Downstream Breast Imaging Following Screening Mammography in Medicare Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Population-Based Study

verfasst von: Gelareh Sadigh, MD, Richard Duszak Jr., MD, Kevin C. Ward, PhD, MPH, CTR, Renjian Jiang, MPH, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, PhD, Kimberly E. Applegate, MD, MS, FACR, Ruth C. Carlos, MD, MS, FACR

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Screening tests are generally not recommended in patients with advanced cancer and limited life expectancy. Nonetheless, screening mammography still occurs and may lead to follow-up testing.

Objective

We assessed the frequency of downstream breast imaging following screening mammography in patients with advanced colorectal or lung cancer.

Design

Population-based study.

Participants

The study included continuously enrolled female fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age with advanced colorectal (stage IV) or lung (stage IIIB-IV) cancer reported to a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry between 2000 and 2011.

Main Measures

We assessed the utilization of diagnostic mammography, breast ultrasound, and breast MRI following screening mammography. Logistic regression models were used to explore independent predictors of utilization of downstream tests while controlling for cancer type and patient sociodemographic and regional characteristics.

Key Results

Among 34,127 women with advanced cancer (23% colorectal; 77% lung cancer; mean age at diagnosis 75 years), 9% (n = 3159) underwent a total of 5750 screening mammograms. Of these, 11% (n = 639) resulted in at least one subsequent diagnostic breast imaging examination within 9 months. Diagnostic mammography was most common (9%; n = 532), followed by ultrasound (6%; n = 334) and MRI (0.2%; n = 14). Diagnostic mammography rates were higher in whites than African Americans (OR, 1.6; p <0.05). Higher ultrasound utilization was associated with more favorable economic status (OR, 1.8; p <0.05).

Conclusions

Among women with advanced colorectal and lung cancer, 9% continued screening mammography, and 11% of these screening studies led to at least one additional downstream test, resulting in costs with little likelihood of meaningful benefit.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am College Radiol. 2010;7(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022 Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am College Radiol. 2010;7(1):18–27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacr.​2009.​09.​022
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat “Reducing Waste in Health Care," Health Affairs Health Policy Brief, December 13, 2012. DOI: 10.1377/hpb20121213.959735 “Reducing Waste in Health Care," Health Affairs Health Policy Brief, December 13, 2012. DOI: 10.1377/hpb20121213.959735
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(8):657–61.CrossRefPubMed Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(8):657–61.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Ward K, et al. Predictors of Screening Mammography in Patients with Early vs. Advanced Stage Colorectal and Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study. American College of Radiology annual meeting; Chicago, IL. May 2017. Available at: https://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/Annual-Meeting/Abstracts/2017/17020_Sadigh.pdf?la=en. Accessed on Novemebr 10, 2017 Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Ward K, et al. Predictors of Screening Mammography in Patients with Early vs. Advanced Stage Colorectal and Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study. American College of Radiology annual meeting; Chicago, IL. May 2017. Available at: https://​www.​acr.​org/​~/​media/​ACR/​Documents/​PDF/​Annual-Meeting/​Abstracts/​2017/​17020_​Sadigh.​pdf?​la=​en.​ Accessed on Novemebr 10, 2017
15.
Zurück zum Zitat AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat CPT Standard Edition: Current Procedural Terminology. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2013. CPT Standard Edition: Current Procedural Terminology. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2013.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13–22.CrossRef Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13–22.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Quality determinants of mammography: guideline overview. Agency for Health Care Policy and research. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995;87(2):91-2. Quality determinants of mammography: guideline overview. Agency for Health Care Policy and research. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995;87(2):91-2.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995;273(2):149–54.CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995;273(2):149–54.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistic Review, 1975–2003. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistic Review, 1975–2003. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006.
32.
Metadaten
Titel
Downstream Breast Imaging Following Screening Mammography in Medicare Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Population-Based Study
verfasst von
Gelareh Sadigh, MD
Richard Duszak Jr., MD
Kevin C. Ward, PhD, MPH, CTR
Renjian Jiang, MPH
Jeffrey M. Switchenko, PhD
Kimberly E. Applegate, MD, MS, FACR
Ruth C. Carlos, MD, MS, FACR
Publikationsdatum
14.11.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4212-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.