Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2021

15.03.2021 | Original Scientific Report

Drain Lipase Levels and Decreased Rate of Drain Amylase Levels as Independent Predictors of Pancreatic Fistula with Nomogram After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

verfasst von: Shuji Suzuki, Mitsugi Shimoda, Jiro Shimazaki, Yukio Oshiro, Kiyotaka Nishida, Masahiro Shiihara, Wataru Izumo, Masakazu Yamamoto

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has recently been improved due to its increased safety. However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a lethal complication of PD. Identifying novel clinicophysiological risk factors for POPF during the early post-PD period would help improve patient morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate possible risk factors during the early postoperative period after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

Data from 349 patients who underwent PD between 2007 and 2012 were examined retrospectively. All patients were classified into 2 groups: group A, patients without fistulae or biochemical leaks (288 patients), and group B, those with grade B or C POPF (61 patients). Data on various clinicophysiological parameters, including serum and drain laboratory data, were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate POPF predictors. A predictive nomogram was established for these results.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that various serum and drain-related factors, such as white blood cell count, C-reactive protein levels, drain amylase (DAMY) levels, and drain lipase (DLIP) levels, were possible POPF risk factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that postoperative day (POD) 1 DLIP levels (hazard ratio, 15.393; p = 0.037) and decreased rate (POD3/1) of DAMY levels (hazard ratio, 4.415; p = 0.028) were independent risk factors. Further, POD1 DLIP levels and decreased rate of DAMY levels were significantly lower in group A than in group B. The accuracy of nomogram was 0.810.

Conclusions

POD1 DLIP levels (> 245 U/mL) and decreased rate of DAMY levels (> 0.44) were POPF risk factors, making them possible biomarkers for POPF.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) a Pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 259:773–780CrossRef Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) a Pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 259:773–780CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210CrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662CrossRef Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Iizawa Y, Kato H, Kishiwada M et al (2017) Long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy using pair-watch suturing technique: different roles of pancreatic duct dilatation and remnant pancreatic volume for the development of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine dysfunction. Pancreatology 17:814–821CrossRef Iizawa Y, Kato H, Kishiwada M et al (2017) Long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy using pair-watch suturing technique: different roles of pancreatic duct dilatation and remnant pancreatic volume for the development of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine dysfunction. Pancreatology 17:814–821CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R et al (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262:1092–1101CrossRef Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R et al (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262:1092–1101CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Senda Y, Shimizu Y, Natsume S et al (2018) Randomized clinical trial of duct-to-mucosa versus invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 105:48–57CrossRef Senda Y, Shimizu Y, Natsume S et al (2018) Randomized clinical trial of duct-to-mucosa versus invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 105:48–57CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Newhook TE, LaPar DJ, Lindberg JM et al (2015) Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1072–1077CrossRef Newhook TE, LaPar DJ, Lindberg JM et al (2015) Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1072–1077CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggino L, Malleo G, Bassi C et al (2019) Decoding grade B pancreatic fistula: a clinical and economical analysis and subclassification proposal. Ann Surg 269:1146–1153CrossRef Maggino L, Malleo G, Bassi C et al (2019) Decoding grade B pancreatic fistula: a clinical and economical analysis and subclassification proposal. Ann Surg 269:1146–1153CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:601–618CrossRef Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:601–618CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H et al (2017) Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:243–251CrossRef Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H et al (2017) Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:243–251CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wada K, Traverso IW (2006) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope. Surgery 139:735–742CrossRef Wada K, Traverso IW (2006) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope. Surgery 139:735–742CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23CrossRef Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng Y, Zhao B, Yang M et al (2018) Association between the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy and the degree of pancreatic fibrosis. J Gastrointest Surg 22:438–443CrossRef Deng Y, Zhao B, Yang M et al (2018) Association between the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy and the degree of pancreatic fibrosis. J Gastrointest Surg 22:438–443CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7CrossRef Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kajiwara T, Sakamoto Y, Morofuji N et al (2010) An Analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical impact of bile juice infection on day 1. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:707–712CrossRef Kajiwara T, Sakamoto Y, Morofuji N et al (2010) An Analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical impact of bile juice infection on day 1. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:707–712CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat de Reuver PR, Gundara J, Hugh TJ et al (2016) Intra-operative amylase in peri-pancreatic fluid independently predicts for pancreatic fistula post pancreaticoduodectomy. HPB (Oxford) 18:608–614CrossRef de Reuver PR, Gundara J, Hugh TJ et al (2016) Intra-operative amylase in peri-pancreatic fluid independently predicts for pancreatic fistula post pancreaticoduodectomy. HPB (Oxford) 18:608–614CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M et al (2000) Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 87:883–889CrossRef Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M et al (2000) Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 87:883–889CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Yoo BM, Kim JH et al (2009) Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg 33:326–332CrossRef Kim JH, Yoo BM, Kim JH et al (2009) Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg 33:326–332CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pulvirenti A, Marchegiani G, Pea A et al (2018) Clinical implications of the 2016 international study group on pancreatic surgery definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula on 775 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 268:1069–1075CrossRef Pulvirenti A, Marchegiani G, Pea A et al (2018) Clinical implications of the 2016 international study group on pancreatic surgery definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula on 775 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 268:1069–1075CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Frymerman AS, Schuld J, Ziehen P et al (2010) Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on surgical outcome-the need for a classification-driven risk management. J Gastrointest Surg 14:711–718CrossRef Frymerman AS, Schuld J, Ziehen P et al (2010) Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on surgical outcome-the need for a classification-driven risk management. J Gastrointest Surg 14:711–718CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E et al (2009) Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade c) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 197:702–709CrossRef Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E et al (2009) Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade c) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 197:702–709CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong ZV, Correa-Gallego C, Ferrone CR et al (2015) Early drain removal—the middle ground between the drain versus no drain debate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. A Prospective Validation Study. Ann Surg 262:378–383CrossRef Fong ZV, Correa-Gallego C, Ferrone CR et al (2015) Early drain removal—the middle ground between the drain versus no drain debate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. A Prospective Validation Study. Ann Surg 262:378–383CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R et al (2007) Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg 246:281–287CrossRef Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R et al (2007) Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg 246:281–287CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertens KA, Crown A, Clanton J et al (2007) What is a better predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): postoperative day one drain amylase (POD1DA) or the fistula risk score (FRS)? HPB (Oxford) 19:75–81CrossRef Bertens KA, Crown A, Clanton J et al (2007) What is a better predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): postoperative day one drain amylase (POD1DA) or the fistula risk score (FRS)? HPB (Oxford) 19:75–81CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosaka H, Satoi S, Yamamoto T et al (2019) Clinical impact of the sequentially-checked drain removal criteria on postoperative outcomes after pancreatectomy: a retrospective study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 26:426–434CrossRef Kosaka H, Satoi S, Yamamoto T et al (2019) Clinical impact of the sequentially-checked drain removal criteria on postoperative outcomes after pancreatectomy: a retrospective study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 26:426–434CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson HJ, Obekpa PO, Smith AN et al (1987) Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a proposed sequence of biochemical investigations. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:719–724CrossRef Thomson HJ, Obekpa PO, Smith AN et al (1987) Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a proposed sequence of biochemical investigations. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:719–724CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordestgaard AG, Wilson SE, Williams RA (1988) Correlation of serum amylase levels with pancreatic pathology and pancreatitis etiology. Pancreas 3:159–161CrossRef Nordestgaard AG, Wilson SE, Williams RA (1988) Correlation of serum amylase levels with pancreatic pathology and pancreatitis etiology. Pancreas 3:159–161CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Apple F, Benson P, Preese L et al (1991) Lipase and pancreatic amylase activities in tissues and in patients with hyperamylasemia. Am J Clin Pathol 96:610–614CrossRef Apple F, Benson P, Preese L et al (1991) Lipase and pancreatic amylase activities in tissues and in patients with hyperamylasemia. Am J Clin Pathol 96:610–614CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RC, Southwell-Keely J, Chesher D (2005) Should serum pancreatic lipase replace serum amylase as a biomarker of acute pancreatitis? ANZ J Surg 75:399–404CrossRef Smith RC, Southwell-Keely J, Chesher D (2005) Should serum pancreatic lipase replace serum amylase as a biomarker of acute pancreatitis? ANZ J Surg 75:399–404CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav D, Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (2002) A critical evaluation of laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1309–1318CrossRef Yadav D, Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (2002) A critical evaluation of laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1309–1318CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagnière J, Abjean A, Franz M et al (2017) A normal preoperative lipase serum level is an easy and objective risk factor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 46:1133–1140CrossRef Gagnière J, Abjean A, Franz M et al (2017) A normal preoperative lipase serum level is an easy and objective risk factor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 46:1133–1140CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Facy O, Chalumeau C, Poussier M et al (2012) Diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 99:1072–1075CrossRef Facy O, Chalumeau C, Poussier M et al (2012) Diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 99:1072–1075CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Park JS, Kim JK et al (2013) A model for predicting pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the international study group of pancreatic surgery classification. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 17:166–170CrossRef Kim JY, Park JS, Kim JK et al (2013) A model for predicting pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the international study group of pancreatic surgery classification. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 17:166–170CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Drain Lipase Levels and Decreased Rate of Drain Amylase Levels as Independent Predictors of Pancreatic Fistula with Nomogram After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
verfasst von
Shuji Suzuki
Mitsugi Shimoda
Jiro Shimazaki
Yukio Oshiro
Kiyotaka Nishida
Masahiro Shiihara
Wataru Izumo
Masakazu Yamamoto
Publikationsdatum
15.03.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06038-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

World Journal of Surgery 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.