Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018

14.09.2018 | Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Drivers of Cost for Pancreatic Surgery: It’s Not About Hospital Volume

verfasst von: Sarah B. Bateni, MD, Jennifer L. Olson, MD, Jeffrey S. Hoch, PhD, Robert J. Canter, MD, Richard J. Bold, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 13/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Outcomes for pancreatic resection have been studied extensively due to the high morbidity and mortality rates, with high-volume centers achieving superior outcomes. Ongoing investigations include healthcare costs, given the national focus on reducing expenditures. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the relationships between pancreatic surgery costs with perioperative outcomes and volume status.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 27,653 patients who underwent elective pancreatic resections from October 2013 to June 2017 using the Vizient database. Costs were calculated from charges using cost–charge ratios and adjusted for geographic variation. Generalized linear modeling adjusting for demographic, clinical, and operation characteristics was performed to assess the relationships between cost and length of stay, complications, in-hospital mortality, readmissions, and hospital volume. High-volume centers were defined as hospitals performing ≥ 19 operations annually.

Results

The unadjusted mean cost for pancreatic resection and corresponding hospitalization was $20,352. There were no differences in mean costs for pancreatectomies performed at high- and low-volume centers [− $1175, 95% confidence interval (CI) − $3254 to $904, p = 0.27]. In subgroup analysis comparing adjusted mean costs at high- and low-volume centers, there was no difference among patients without an adverse outcome (− $99, 95% CI − $1612 to 1414, p = 0.90), one or more adverse outcomes (− $1586, 95% CI − $4771 to 1599, p = 0.33), or one or more complications (− $2835, 95% CI − $7588 to 1919, p = 0.24).

Conclusions

While high-volume hospitals have fewer adverse outcomes, there is no relationship between surgical volume and costs, which suggests that, in itself, surgical volume is not an indicator of improved healthcare efficiency reflected by lower costs. Patient referral to high-volume centers may not reduce overall healthcare expenditures for pancreatic operations.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Munoz E, Munoz W 3rd, Wise L. National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005–2025. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):195–00.CrossRef Munoz E, Munoz W 3rd, Wise L. National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005–2025. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):195–00.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Moses DA, Mehaffey JH, Strider DV, Tracci MC, Kern JA, Upchurch GR Jr. Smoking cessation counseling improves quality of care and surgical outcomes with financial gain for a vascular practice. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;42:214–21.CrossRef Moses DA, Mehaffey JH, Strider DV, Tracci MC, Kern JA, Upchurch GR Jr. Smoking cessation counseling improves quality of care and surgical outcomes with financial gain for a vascular practice. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;42:214–21.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber MH, Delitto D, Crippen CJ, et al. Analysis of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(9):1404–10.CrossRef Gerber MH, Delitto D, Crippen CJ, et al. Analysis of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(9):1404–10.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham KE, Zenati MS, Petrie JR, et al. A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective. J Surg Res. 2016;204(1):8–14.CrossRef Cunningham KE, Zenati MS, Petrie JR, et al. A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective. J Surg Res. 2016;204(1):8–14.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC. Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):713–21.CrossRef Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC. Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):713–21.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):664–72.CrossRef Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):664–72.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–37.CrossRef Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–37.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):485–94.CrossRef Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):485–94.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown EG, Yang A, Canter RJ, Bold RJ. Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: where should we focus our efforts on improving outcomes? JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):694–99.CrossRef Brown EG, Yang A, Canter RJ, Bold RJ. Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: where should we focus our efforts on improving outcomes? JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):694–99.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gani F, Johnston FM, Nelson-Williams H, et al. Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(9):1411–19.CrossRef Gani F, Johnston FM, Nelson-Williams H, et al. Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(9):1411–19.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Healy MA, Krell RW, Abdelsattar ZM, et al. Pancreatic resection results in a statewide surgical collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2468–74.CrossRef Healy MA, Krell RW, Abdelsattar ZM, et al. Pancreatic resection results in a statewide surgical collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2468–74.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dudekula A, Munigala S, Zureikat AH, Yadav D. Operative trends for pancreatic diseases in the USA: analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 1998–2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(4):803–11.CrossRef Dudekula A, Munigala S, Zureikat AH, Yadav D. Operative trends for pancreatic diseases in the USA: analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 1998–2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(4):803–11.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton JM, Hayes AJ, Wilson GC, et al. Validation of the University HealthSystem Consortium administrative dataset: concordance and discordance with patient-level institutional data. J Surg Res. 2014;190(2):484–90.CrossRef Sutton JM, Hayes AJ, Wilson GC, et al. Validation of the University HealthSystem Consortium administrative dataset: concordance and discordance with patient-level institutional data. J Surg Res. 2014;190(2):484–90.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang AL, Kim Y, Ertel AE, et al. Case mix-adjusted cost of colectomy at low-, middle-, and high-volume academic centers. Surgery. 2017;161(5):1405–13.CrossRef Chang AL, Kim Y, Ertel AE, et al. Case mix-adjusted cost of colectomy at low-, middle-, and high-volume academic centers. Surgery. 2017;161(5):1405–13.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ertel AE, Wima K, Hoehn RS, et al. Variability in postoperative resource utilization after pancreaticoduodenectomy: who is responsible. Surgery. 2016;160(6):1477–84.CrossRef Ertel AE, Wima K, Hoehn RS, et al. Variability in postoperative resource utilization after pancreaticoduodenectomy: who is responsible. Surgery. 2016;160(6):1477–84.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy S, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, et al. Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation of morbidity and long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):282–87.CrossRef Reddy S, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, et al. Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation of morbidity and long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):282–87.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhayani NH, Miller JL, Ortenzi G, et al. Perioperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy compared to total pancreatectomy for neoplasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):549–54.CrossRef Bhayani NH, Miller JL, Ortenzi G, et al. Perioperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy compared to total pancreatectomy for neoplasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):549–54.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care. 2009;47(6):626–33.CrossRef van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care. 2009;47(6):626–33.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore BJ, White S, Washington R, Coenen N, Elixhauser A. Identifying increased risk of readmission and in-hospital mortality using hospital administrative data: the AHRQ Elixhauser comorbidity index. Med Care. 2017;55(7):698–05.CrossRef Moore BJ, White S, Washington R, Coenen N, Elixhauser A. Identifying increased risk of readmission and in-hospital mortality using hospital administrative data: the AHRQ Elixhauser comorbidity index. Med Care. 2017;55(7):698–05.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.CrossRef Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Meguid RA, Ahuja N, Chang DC. What constitutes a “high-volume” hospital for pancreatic resection? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(4):622 e621–629.CrossRef Meguid RA, Ahuja N, Chang DC. What constitutes a “high-volume” hospital for pancreatic resection? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(4):622 e621–629.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, et al. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med Care. 2000;38(8):796–06.CrossRef Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, et al. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med Care. 2000;38(8):796–06.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH, Khuri SF. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg. 1999;230(2):251–9.CrossRef Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH, Khuri SF. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg. 1999;230(2):251–9.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ. 2001;20(4):461–94.CrossRef Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ. 2001;20(4):461–94.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–75.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–75.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton JM, Wilson GC, Paquette IM, et al. Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(12):1056–61.CrossRef Sutton JM, Wilson GC, Paquette IM, et al. Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(12):1056–61.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathan H, Atoria CL, Bach PB, Elkin EB. Hospital volume, complications, and cost of cancer surgery in the elderly. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):107–14.CrossRef Nathan H, Atoria CL, Bach PB, Elkin EB. Hospital volume, complications, and cost of cancer surgery in the elderly. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):107–14.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson-Williams H, Gani F, Kilic A, et al. Factors associated with interhospital variability in inpatient costs of liver and pancreatic resections. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(2):155–63.CrossRef Nelson-Williams H, Gani F, Kilic A, et al. Factors associated with interhospital variability in inpatient costs of liver and pancreatic resections. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(2):155–63.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Short MN, Aloia TA, Ho V. The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1035–41.CrossRef Short MN, Aloia TA, Ho V. The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1035–41.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakeam E, Hyder JA. Raising the bar for failure to rescue: critical appraisal of current measurement and strategies to catalyze improvement. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(11):1023–4.CrossRef Wakeam E, Hyder JA. Raising the bar for failure to rescue: critical appraisal of current measurement and strategies to catalyze improvement. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(11):1023–4.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul Olson TJ, Schwarze ML. Failure-to-pursue rescue: truly a failure? Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):e43–44.CrossRef Paul Olson TJ, Schwarze ML. Failure-to-pursue rescue: truly a failure? Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):e43–44.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakeam E, Hyder JA, Lipsitz SR, et al. Hospital-level variation in secondary complications after surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(3):493–01.CrossRef Wakeam E, Hyder JA, Lipsitz SR, et al. Hospital-level variation in secondary complications after surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(3):493–01.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(18):e3497.CrossRef Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(18):e3497.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho V, Aloia T. Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care. 2008;46(7):718–25.CrossRef Ho V, Aloia T. Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care. 2008;46(7):718–25.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho V, Short MN, Aloia TA. Can postoperative process of care utilization or complication rates explain the volume-cost relationship for cancer surgery? Surgery. 2017;162(2):418–28.CrossRef Ho V, Short MN, Aloia TA. Can postoperative process of care utilization or complication rates explain the volume-cost relationship for cancer surgery? Surgery. 2017;162(2):418–28.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Drivers of Cost for Pancreatic Surgery: It’s Not About Hospital Volume
verfasst von
Sarah B. Bateni, MD
Jennifer L. Olson, MD
Jeffrey S. Hoch, PhD
Robert J. Canter, MD
Richard J. Bold, MD
Publikationsdatum
14.09.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 13/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6758-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 13/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.