Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2015

01.10.2015 | Review

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)

verfasst von: Martin Daniaux, Tobias De Zordo, Wolfram Santner, Birgit Amort, Florian Koppelstätter, Werner Jaschke, Clarisse Dromain, Willi Oberaigner, Michael Hubalek, Christian Marth

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography is one of the latest developments in breast care. Imaging with contrast agents in breast cancer was already known from previous magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography studies. However, high costs, limited availability—or high radiation dose—led to the development of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). We reviewed the current literature, present our experience, discuss the advantages and drawbacks of CESM and look at the future of this innovative technique.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewin J (2001) Dual-energy contrast protocol offers new tool to detect breast cancer. Diagn Imaging 11:107–112 Lewin J (2001) Dual-energy contrast protocol offers new tool to detect breast cancer. Diagn Imaging 11:107–112
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S et al (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 21(3):565–574CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S et al (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 21(3):565–574CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842–850CrossRefPubMed Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842–850CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Allec N, Abbaszadeh S, Scott CC et al (2012) Including the effect of motion artifacts in noise and performance analysis of dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography. Phys Med Biol 57(24):8405–8425CrossRefPubMed Allec N, Abbaszadeh S, Scott CC et al (2012) Including the effect of motion artifacts in noise and performance analysis of dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography. Phys Med Biol 57(24):8405–8425CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V et al (2003) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229(1):261–268CrossRefPubMed Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V et al (2003) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229(1):261–268CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266(3):743–751CrossRefPubMed Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266(3):743–751CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty DP, Barnes GT (1989) An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. Med Phys 16(1):7–13CrossRefPubMed Chakraborty DP, Barnes GT (1989) An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. Med Phys 16(1):7–13CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bornefalk H, Lewin JM, Danielsson M et al (2006) Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility. Eur J Radiol 60(2):275–278CrossRefPubMed Bornefalk H, Lewin JM, Danielsson M et al (2006) Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility. Eur J Radiol 60(2):275–278CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Taupitz M et al (2003) Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography—initial experience. Rofo 175(3):342–345CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Taupitz M et al (2003) Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography—initial experience. Rofo 175(3):342–345CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK et al (2002) Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 29(10):2419–2426CrossRefPubMed Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK et al (2002) Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 29(10):2419–2426CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S et al (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR 187(5):W528–W537CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S et al (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR 187(5):W528–W537CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobbes MB, Smidt ML, Houwers J et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications. Clin Radiol 68(9):935–944CrossRefPubMed Lobbes MB, Smidt ML, Houwers J et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications. Clin Radiol 68(9):935–944CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S et al (2011) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 78(1):112–121CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S et al (2011) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 78(1):112–121CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F et al (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 40(7):397–404CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F et al (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 40(7):397–404CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Badr S, Laurent N, Régis C et al (2014) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:245–258CrossRefPubMed Badr S, Laurent N, Régis C et al (2014) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:245–258CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol 24(1):256–264CrossRefPubMed Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol 24(1):256–264CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided? Breast Cancer Res Treat 146(2):371–381CrossRefPubMed Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided? Breast Cancer Res Treat 146(2):371–381CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F et al (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 14(3):R94PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F et al (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 14(3):R94PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung YC, Lin YC, Wan YL et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3271-1 PubMed Cheung YC, Lin YC, Wan YL et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-014-3271-1 PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thibault F, Balleyguier C, Tardivon A et al (2012) Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI? Eur J Radiol 81(Suppl 1):S162–S164CrossRefPubMed Thibault F, Balleyguier C, Tardivon A et al (2012) Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI? Eur J Radiol 81(Suppl 1):S162–S164CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Francescone MA, Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD et al (2014) Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Eur J Radiol 83(8):1350–1355CrossRefPubMed Francescone MA, Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD et al (2014) Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Eur J Radiol 83(8):1350–1355CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobbes MB, Lalji U, Houwers J et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol 24(7):1668–1676PubMed Lobbes MB, Lalji U, Houwers J et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol 24(7):1668–1676PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Froeling V, Diekmann F, Renz DM et al (2013) Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23(6):1528–1536CrossRefPubMed Froeling V, Diekmann F, Renz DM et al (2013) Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23(6):1528–1536CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Drukker K, Duewer F, Giger ML et al (2014) Mammographic quantitative image analysis and biologic image composition for breast lesion characterization and classification. Med Phys 41(3):031915PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Drukker K, Duewer F, Giger ML et al (2014) Mammographic quantitative image analysis and biologic image composition for breast lesion characterization and classification. Med Phys 41(3):031915PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai CJ, Chen RC, Hung SH et al (2012) Feasibility study for the improvement of microcalcification visualization in different breast thicknesses and tissue components using a dual-energy approach in digital mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(4):488–494CrossRefPubMed Tsai CJ, Chen RC, Hung SH et al (2012) Feasibility study for the improvement of microcalcification visualization in different breast thicknesses and tissue components using a dual-energy approach in digital mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(4):488–494CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)
verfasst von
Martin Daniaux
Tobias De Zordo
Wolfram Santner
Birgit Amort
Florian Koppelstätter
Werner Jaschke
Clarisse Dromain
Willi Oberaigner
Michael Hubalek
Christian Marth
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3693-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.