Background
Single tablet regimen (STR) has been associated with better drug compliance [1], improved quality of life [2] and less likely to development of resistance [3, 4] compared to multiple tablet regimens in antiretroviral therapy. Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF, Atripla®) was the first STR in Taiwan and was introduced in 2010 then followed by Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (FTC/RPV/TDF, Complera®) and Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine (ABC/DTG/3TC, Triumeq®) in June 2016. The three STRs were recommended as the first line antiretroviral (ARV) drugs in Taiwanese reimbursement regulation for treatment-naïve patients with HIV infection since June 2016.
There are cohort studies dealing with ARV regimen durability in HIV infected treatment-naïve patients in the real-world settings. In a retrospective cohort study at eight UK centers, Lewis et al. found that the rilpivirine based STR (FTC/RPV/TDF) had a significantly lower discontinuation rate than another STR (EFV/FTC/TDF) and other third agents [5]. In another study from Maple Leaf Medical Clinic in Canada, researchers found that being on an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens versus protease inhibitors (PI) regimen were associated with longer time to virologic failure and better virologic durability. However, the information of durability of STR uses was lack [6].
Anzeige
The results with contemporary STRs in registrational studies in treatment-naïve HIV infected individuals showed that the efficacy was about 88–93%, rate of virological failure was 0.8–4.4% and rate of discontinuation due to severe adverse effects were around 0–1.9% [7]. Real- world ART durability may reflect more subjective treatment outcomes like quality of life or mild side effects that affect adherence in routine care and are likely of greater importance in clinic settings [8]. There is no pure STR durability data in the real- world.
The objectives of this study were to investigate the durability of different initial regimens in patients starting ART with single tablet regimen in southern Taiwan.
Methods
Study design and participants
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital; a 1500-bed medical center in southern Taiwan. The study period was from May 2016 to Dec 2017. In Taiwan, all of the HIV infected patients were mandatory to enroll into the case management program sponsored by Taiwan Center for Disease Control (CDC) since 2008. The data of social, demographic, pharmacologic, laboratory, and concurrent infections were collected through electronic medical records. We included treatment-naïve patients with age more than 20 years old, initiating STR (one of the EFV/FTC/TDF, FTC/RPV/TDF, or ABC/DTG/3TC) between May, 2016 and December, 2017 in this retrospective cohort. This cohort study was conducted in parallel with the introduction of second and third STRs (FTC/RPV/TDF and ABC/DTG/3TC) into Taiwan in June 2016. Before June 2016, the only available STR was EFV/FTC/TDF which was used as the second line ARVs in those patients unable to tolerance to zidovudine (AZT)/3TC/EFV or HIV/HBV coinfection. After June 2016, any one of the three STRs (EFV/FTC/TDF, FTC/RPV/TDF, or ABC/DTG/3TC) was recommended as the first line therapy in those HIV-1 infected, treatment-naïve patients in Taiwan.
The laboratory tests for patients diagnosed with HIV infection included CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, serological markers for syphilis, hepatitis, cryptococcus, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, amoebiasis, liver and renal function. HIV-1 genotype resistance testing (GRT) for treatment-naive patients was not routinely performed in our country due to limited budget. Standard follow-up of the HIV-infected patients consisted of out-patient visits every 3 months. Testing for CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, haematology, and biochemistry were conducted every 6 months for viral suppressed patients. HIV Genotypic drug resistance testing for the protease and reverse transcriptase region was done by the commercial kit Viroseq version 2.8 (Celera; Quest Diagnostics, Secaucus, NJ, USA) [9]. For integrase sequencing, the in house protocol with nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used according to our previous published methods [10].
Anzeige
Durability was defined as the number of weeks from the STR regimen initiation until discontinuation or modification. Viral suppression was defined as viral load (VL) < 20 copies/ml. Virologic failure was defined if at least one of the following occurred: (1) failure to achieve viral suppression by 48 weeks or (2) after achieving viral suppression, having a detectable VL on two consecutive occasions at least 14 days apart or a single VL ≥ 200 copies/ml. Treatment failure was a composite endpoint defined as virological failure or discontinuation/switch of STR for any reason or death. Active syphilis was defined as a new positive rapid plasma regain (RPR) and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination test (TPPA) [11]. In those patients had ever received syphilis treatment, a fourfold increase in the RPR titer was also indicated a new infection [12].
Statistics analysis
Categorical data were analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate, and continuous variables, expressed as median and interquartile range, were compared using the Manne-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted assessing time to virological suppression, treatment failure and discontinuation for the three STRs. The median duration for durability was reported in weeks and compared across stratified STRs using the log-rank test. In treatment failure analysis, patients were censored if they were lost to follow-up, discontinuation/switch of STR for any reason or death. Association of various demographic characteristics with time to viral suppression, treatment failure or regimen modification/ discontinuation were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multivariable regression models. The following clinically important variables were included: age, sex, HIV transmission risk factor, CD4 count, viral load, concurrent infection with hepatitis A, B, C and syphilis and individual STR. Variables that were significant in univariate analysis were considered for the multivariable model. A stepwise selection was used to select the covariates to be included in the final model using a p-value of 0.2 to enter the model and a p-value of 0.10 to remain in the model. We also examined all variables for correlation and interaction and excluded the variables that were highly correlated. Validity of the proportional hazards assumption was evaluated using Schoenfeld residuals. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical calculations were performed using the SPSS program version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 345 HIV-1 infected, treatment-naïve patients were eligible for the study between May 2016 to Dec 2017. Among them, 122 patients were not enrolled due to no ARV use during the study period, use of multiple tablet regimen, or incomplete clinical data, received with less than 60 days of STRs, transferred out or went to jail (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics of the remaining 223 HIV-1 infected treatment-naïve patients starting STR between May 2016 to Dec 2017 were showed in Table 1. Briefly, their medium age (IQR) was 35 (27–41) years old with men consisting of 93.7%. The HIV transmission risk factor included MSM (67.7%) and intravenous drug abuser (26.5%). 26% (58/223) had concurrent infection with hepatitis C, 30.5% had hepatitis B, 48% hepatitis A and 41% syphilis. Only 27.3% (61/223) of the patients had baseline GRT. 31% (70/223) of the patients started EFV/FTC/TDF, 24% (54/223) FTC/RPV/TDF and 44% (99/223) ABC/DTG/3TC. The medium (IQR) duration of follow up (weeks) was 73.9 (48–101.6) weeks. Among the 223 patients starting STRs, 13 developed treatment failure to FTC/RPV/TDF (13/54, 24.1%), 16 had treatment failure to EFV/FTC/TDF (16/70, 22.9%), 24 to ABC/DTG/3TC (24/99, 24.1%) at week 48, without differences between groups (p = 0.16) (Fig. 2) The switch between different STR was also common. EFV/FTC/TDF was associated with significantly higher rates of treatment modification (50%, p < 0.0001) compared to FTC/RPV/TDF and ABC/DTG/3TC. Among the 70 patients starting EFV/FTC/TDF, 15 switched to FTC/RPV/TDF and 13 switched to ABC/DTG/3TC due to different adverse effects.
Fig. 1
Study flow. HAART retention rate, adverse effects, and virological outcomes among HIV-1 infected treatment- naïve patients starting STRs
×
![]()
Table.1
Baseline characteristics of the 223 HIV infected treatment-naïve patients starting STRs
Characteristics | Total | Atripla | Complera | Triumeq | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | 223 | 70 (31.4) | 54 (24.2) | 99 (44.4) | < 0.001 | |||
Age, yearsa | 35 (27–41) | 33 (27–41.3) | 39.5 (33.8–46) | 33 (26–40) | < 0.0001 | |||
Sexb | ||||||||
Male | 209 (93.7) | 66 (94.3) | 49 (90.7) | 95 (94.9) | < 0.0001 | |||
HIV risk factorsb | ||||||||
IVDU | 59 (26.5) | 14 (20) | 32 (59.3) | 16 (16.2) | 0.009 | |||
MSM | 151 (67.7) | 50 (71.5) | 17 (31.5) | 71 (71.7) | < 0.0001 | |||
Heterosexual | 13 (5.8) | 5 (7.1) | 4 (7.5) | 10 (10.1) | 0.196 | |||
Unknown | 4 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (1.9) | 2 (2) | 0.779 | |||
CD4 count at baselinea | 288.75 (162–422) | 253.8 (125–387) | 350.7 (255–495) | 265.7 (138.3–403.9) | < 0.0001 | |||
Last CD4 counta | 495.2 (347–656) | 485.8 (365.3–639.8) | 497 (375.6–661.6) | 518.4 (332.3–676.2) | < 0.0001 | |||
Viral load at baseline copies/mlb | ||||||||
< 100,000 | 149 (66.8) | 38 (54.3) | 50 (92.6) | 61 (61.6) | 0.07 | |||
≧ 100,000 | 74 (33.2) | 32 (45.7) | 4 (7.4) | 38 (38.4) | < 0.0001 | |||
Duration of follow-up (weeks)a | 73.9 (48–101.6) | 99.4 (55.8–125) | 73.9 (37.2–96.9) | 69.4 (45.3–86.3) | < 0.0001 | |||
Co-infectionsb | ||||||||
Hepatitis A virus coinfection | 107 (48) | 36 (51.4) | 25 (46.3) | 46 (46.5) | 0.045 | |||
Hepatitis B virus coinfection | 68 (30.5) | 21 (30) | 25 (46.3) | 22 (22.2) | 0.82 | |||
Hepatitis C virus coinfection | 58 (26) | 16 (22.9) | 28 (51.9) | 14 (14.1) | 0.05 | |||
Syphilis | 92 (41.3) | 32 (45.7) | 19 (35.2) | 41 (41.4) | 0.02 | |||
GRT | 61 (27.3) | 28 (40) | 5 (9.3) | 28 (28.3) | < 0.0001 | |||
Virologic failureb | 53 (23.8) | 16 (22.9) | 13 (24.1) | 24 (24.2) | 0.16 | |||
Switched another STRb | 56 (25.1) | 35 (50) | 7 (13) | 14 (14.1) | < 0.0001 | |||
Fig. 2
Treatment outcomes and drug switch among the 223 HIV-1 infected patients starting STRs
×
![]()
Evaluation of tolerability
A total of 56 patients (EFV/FTC/TDF 35, FTC/RPV/TDF 7, ABC/DTG/3TC 14) discontinued their STRs due to drug adverse effects (p < 0.0001). The most common cause for discontinuing EFV/FTC/TDF was neuropsychiatric adverse effects (30%, 21/70, p < 0.0001). The most frequent symptoms included insomnia and sleep disturbances as well as dizziness and dreaminess. For ABC/DTG/3TC, it was skin pruritis and rash (6%, 6/99). A similar but nonsignificant result was also seen in EFV/FTC/TDF (Table 2).
Table 2
Types of AEs leading to discontinuation among the 56 patients with HIV infections starting STRs
Atripla (n = 70) | Complera (n = 54) | Triumeq (n = 99) | p-valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Numbers (%) of AEs | 35 (50) | 7 (12.9) | 14 (14.1) | < 0.0001 |
Neuropsychiatric (%) | 21 (30) | 1 (1.9) | 0 | < 0.0001 |
Skin (%) | 6 (8.5) | 2 (3.7) | 6 (6) | 0.319 |
Other (%) | 8 (11.4) | 4 (7.4) | 8 (8) | 0.449 |
Time to discontinue, median (IQR) | 25 (14–57) | 23 (5–14) | 11 (5–31) | < 0.0.05 |
Anzeige
Treatment response
Time to viral suppression was different in 3 STRs. Compared to EFV/FTC/TDF and FTC/RPV/TDF, ABC/DTG/3TC was the ART with rapidly speed to reach viral load less than 50 copies/ml (15.86 weeks, CI 12.22–19.49), log rank test p < 0.001; Fig. 3). The predictors for viral suppression in the Cox proportional model included treatment with ABC/DTG/3TC (aHR 8.65, CI 2.64–28.39, p < 0.001), switch in different STRs (aHR 2.86, CI 1.47–5.52, p = 0.002) and free of active syphilis infection (aHR 0.15, CI 0.04–0.59, p = 0.006; Table 3).
Fig. 3
Time to viral suppression among 233 HIV-1 infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy with STRs (Atripla: EFV/FTC/TDF; Complera: FTC/RPV/TDF; Triumeq: ABC/DTG/3TC)
×
![]()
Table 3
Predictors of virological suppression among 223 HIV infected treatment-naïve patients starting single tablet regimen
Variable | Comparator | Unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age ≦ 30 years | > 30years | 2.71 (0.78 to 9.44) | 0.12 | ||
Baseline CD4+ count(cells/mm3) ≦100 | > 100 | 1.33 (0.09 to 18.19) | 0.83 | ||
Treatment regimena | 0.003 | 0.002 | |||
Atripla | 1 | 1 | |||
Triumeq | 9.85 (2.68 to 36.20) | 0.001 | 8.65 (2.64 to 28.39) | 0.000 | |
HAV | 1.49 (0.42 to 5.30) | 0.53 | |||
HBV | 0.97 (0.19 to 5.05) | 0.97 | |||
HCV | 0.71 (0.29 to 1.77) | 0.47 | |||
Switch between different STR | 2.81 (1.26 to 6.25) | 0.03 | 2.86(1.47 to 5.52) | 0.002 | |
Active syphilis infection | 0.099 (0.02to 0.50) | 0.005 | 0.15 (0.04 to 0.59) | 0.006 |
The risk of treatment failure was also different in 3 STRs (log rank test p = 0.015; Fig. 4). When compared to EFV/FTC/TDF, treatment with FTC/RPV/TDF (aHR 8.39, CI 1.98–35.58, p = 0.004) and ABC/DTG/3TC (aHR 8.40, CI 2.39–29.54, p = 0.001) were more likely to have treatment failure. When the risk of treatment failure was compared between two different STRs, treatment with FTC/RPV/TDF was not found to have higher risk of treatment failure when compared to EFV/FTC/TDF (log rank test p=0.116). However, treatment with ABC/DTG/3TC was associated with higher risk of treatment failure when compared to EFV/FTC/TDF (log rank test p = 0.048).
Anzeige
Fig. 4
Cumulative probability of treatment failure among 223 HIV-1 infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy with STRs ( Atripla: EFV/FTC/TDF; Complera: FTC/RPV/TDF; Triumeq: ABC/DTG/3TC)
×
![]()
The other predictors for treatment failure included age ≦ 30 years old (aHR 3.73, CI 1.25–11.17, p = 0.018), switch between different STR (aHR 2.3, CI 1.18–4.50, p = 0.001) and active syphilis infection (aHR 0.24, CI 0.08–0.73, p = 0.012; Table 4).
Table 4
Predictors of treatment failure among 223 HIV infected treatment-naïve patients starting single tablet regimen
Variable | Comparator | Unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age ≦ 30 years | > 30years | 4.985 (1.33 to 18.62) | 0.017 | 3.73 (1.25 to 11.17) | 0.018 |
Baseline CD4+ count (cells/mm3) ≦100 | > 100 | 5.29 (1.55 to 18.02) | 0.008 | ||
Treatment regimen | 0.003 | 0.002 | |||
Atripla | 1 | 1 | |||
Complera | 7.83 (1.78 to 34.53) | 0.007 | 8.39 (1.98 to 35.58) | 0.004 | |
Triumeq | 9.02 (2.40 to 33.95) | 0.001 | 8.40 (2.39 to 29.54) | 0.001 | |
HAV | 1.39 (0.51 to 3.80) | 0.53 | |||
HBV | 0.90 (0.20 to 4.04) | 0.89 | |||
HCV | 0.36 (0.06 to 2.17) | 0.27 | |||
Switch between different STR | 2.37 (1.08 to 5.18) | 0.03 | 2.3 (1.18 to 4.50) | 0.001 | |
Active syphilis infection | 0.19 (0.06 to 0.64) | 0.008 | 0.24 (0.08 0.73) | 0.012 |
The risk factor for treatment discontinuation in the Cox proportional model included younger age ≦ 30 years old (aHR 3.82, CI 1.21–12.37, p = 0.023), treatment with EFV/FTC/TDF (aHR 8.65, CI 2.64–28.39, p < 0.001) and active syphilis infection (aHR0.16, CI 0.04–0.62, p = 0.006; Table 5).
Anzeige
Table 5
Predictors of treatment discontinuation among 223 HIV infected treatment-naïve patients starting single tablet regimen
Variable | Comparator | Unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age ≦ 30 years | > 30years | 4.85 (1.08 to 21.83) | 0.04 | 3.82 (1.21 to 12.37) | 0.023 |
Baseline CD4+ count (cells/mm3) ≦100 | > 100 | 1.14 (0.07 to 16.97) | 0.92 | ||
Treatment regimen | 0.004 | 0.002 | |||
Atripla | 23.97(3.72 to 154.47) | 0.001 | 16.61 (3.41 to 80.88) | 0.001 | |
Complera | 9.32 (0.63 to 138.72 ) | 0.105 | 8.59 (0.67 to 109.6) | 0.098 | |
Triumeq | 1 | 1 | |||
HAV | 2.71 (0.782 to 9.32) | 0.12 | |||
HBV | 0.67 (0.14 to 3.25) | 0.61 | |||
HCV | 1.25 (0.38 to 4.14) | 0.71 | |||
Active syphilis infection | 0.17 (0.04to 0.81) | 0.03 | 0.16 (0.04 to 0.62) | 0.008 |
Discussion
In this study, we found that STRs virological failure and treatment discontinuation was quite common in the real-world settings. A high percentage (25%) of the patients discontinued their STRs due to toxicity/intolerance. Treatment with ABC/DTG/3TC and FTC/RPV/TDF were associated with treatment failure. However, when the risk of treatment failure was compared between two different STRs, treatment with FTC/RPV/TDF was not found to have higher risk of treatment failure when compared to EFV/FTC/TDF. Treatment discontinuation was common in the EFV/FTC/TDF group. Younger age ≦ 30 years old was associated with treatment failure and drug discontinuation. However, active syphilis received treatment was not associated with treatment failure and drug discontinuation.
The finding of a higher treatment failure rate in the ABC/DTG/3TC group was interesting and the result of a higher drug discontinuation rate in the EFV/FTC/TDF group was quite similar to that reported in the literature [5].
In a retrospective study from Maple Leaf Medical Clinic in Canada, researchers enrolled 780 patients between January 2006 and June 2016 to investigate the virologic durability of first-line INSTI, NNRTI, or PI -based antiretroviral regimens. No information on the percentage of STR uses were lack. They found that being on an INSTI or NNRTI-based regimens versus PI regimen, frequent VL testing and longer duration on of ART were associated with better durability [6].
In an Italian ICONA cohort, they prospectively followed up patients with low CD4 count (less than 200 cells/mm3) and high viral load (> 5 log10 copies/ml) who started first line ART with boosted protease inhibitors (bPIs), NNRTIs or INSTIs to analyze the durability of their different regimen. They concluded that starting ART with NNRTIs versus starting with bPIs; and starting ART with InSTIs versus starting with NNRTIs were less likely to be associated with treatment failure. Therefore, the durability of InSTIs-based regimen was longer than that of NNRTI- and bPI-based regimens [13]. In another study also from ICONA cohort, researchers evaluate the durability of three INSTIs and two NRTIs in ART naive patients. Among the 2016 patients enrolled, a total of 167 patients experienced treatment failure; the 1-year probability of treatment failure was 6.5% for raltegravir, 5.4% for DTG and 6.7% for elvitegravir/cobicistat. No detailed information on STR use was provided in both studies. Sixty-eight patients (3.4%) discontinued INSTIs owing to toxicity/intolerance. In the real-life setting, INSTI-based regimens showed high potency and durability. DTG are associated with a lower risk of treatment failure [14].
In a retrospective study in a multisite cohort (CFAR Network of Integrated Clinical Systems) in USA, they integrated data from eight Centers for AIDS Research (CFARs), focusing on HIV infected patients initiating ART between 2007 and 2014. In that study, 59% of patients starting their ART with STRs (EFV/FTC/TDF (n = 2173) 40%, Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/FTC/TDF (n = 571) 11%, FTC/RPV/TDF (n = 336) 6% and ABC/DTG/3TC (n = 106) 2%)). The initial regimen was modified in 43% (2285/5373) of patients. The median durability for all regimens was 48.6 months. Female sex, intravenous drug use, and CD4 cell count less than 200 cells/µl were significantly associated with regimen modification. NNRTI and INSTI-based ART were most durable in this study [15].
The possible explanation for the higher treatment failure rate in the ABC/DTG/3TC group in this study might be related to the high rates with drug discontinuation and loss of follow up. Clinicians may tend to prescribe high genetic barrier STR in those patients with suspicious poor drug adherence and severe diseases. Among the 24 patients suffered from virological failure, 8 loss of follow up, 11 patients reattained viral suppression at the end of our follow-up and 5 had persistent viremia. Only 2 patients had genotypic drug resistance testing, none had INSTI resistance-associated mutations and one of them had resistance to NRTI and NNRTI. In addition, the median follow-up times were short in our cohort, at around 1.5 years. This raises the possibility that, for some ART regimens such as ABC/DTG/3TC, the lost follow-up rate may be higher in the first year of therapy due to drug adverse effects but reduced to a lower rate (for those remaining on therapy) for subsequent years on treatment. The low STR discontinuation in the FTC/RPV/TDF group was similar to the study from UK. In a retrospective cohort study at eight UK centers conducted between 2012 and 2015 with only 2 STRs in their centers, Lewis et al. [5] found that the RPV based STR (FTC/RPV/TDF) had a significantly lower discontinuation rate than another STR (EFV/FTC/TDF) and other third agents.
Active syphilis received treatment was associated with less treatment failure and drug discontinuation. Our study result was different from that from the France [16] and similar to the 2 studies from Canada [17, 18]. In a large HIV cohort in France, they showed that early syphilis was associated with a 2-fold increase in the risk of viral load elevation in the months after diagnosis, even in patients receiving effective antiretrovial therapy [16]. In another study of systemic review and meta analysis, researchers did not find any direct evidence about the effects of sexually transmitted co-infection on transmission from individuals on ART. Their data suggested that the average effect of STI co-infection (including syphilis) on HIV viral load in individuals on ART were unlikely to decrease the effectiveness of treatment as prevention [17]. Recently, Grewal et al. determined the effect of acute syphilis on virologic failure among 2632 virally suppressed HIV-infected MSM taking antiretroviral therapy in Ontario, Canada. They demonstrated that acute syphilis was not associated with virological failure among virologically suppressed MSM on ART [18].
In this study, younger age (≤ 30 years) was associated with treatment failure and drug discontinuation. Several large cohort studies also report that older age was associated with better treatment outcomes [19, 20], and less virological non-suppression [21].
No data about the level of adherence was available in this study due to the retrospective cohort design. However, all of the patients were educated about their adherence and cared by the case management nurses, suggesting that other issues than adherence can explain their treatment failure and drug discontinuation [21, 22].
The reasons why the median time (IQR) to discontinue STRs were longer in the EFV/FTC/TDF group compared to FTC/RPV/TDF and ABC/DTG/3TC groups were unclear. This was probably due to the neuropsychiatric adverse effects for EFV/FTC/TDF were well known by the doctors, care management nurses and patients themselves, and patients were well educated about the adverse effects before the EFV/FTC/TDF was prescribing.
Our study had some limitations. First, there was always the risk of bias due to unmeasured confounding, such as drug adherence levels, not reporting adverse effects and missing data, when using retrospective cohort data. Secondly, reasons for regimen selection were not reported, patients with presumed poorer adherence, loss to follow-up in the initial phase of treatment and higher viral load were more likely to be prescribed ABC/DTG/3TC (INSTI-based) and could impact our analysis. Another caveat was that we censored patients who were lost to follow-up. Such censoring could have led to bias in increasing rate of treatment failure. Finally, our study results could not be applied to those health care systems whom did not have HIV case management program and free STR available.
In conclusion, younger age was associated with treatment failure and drug discontinuation. Active syphilis infection was not associated with an increase risk of treatment failure and discontinuation. Treatment with ABC/DTG/3TC was associated with more treatment failure. The STR durability was dependent on the drug toxicity/intolerance, age and syphilis infection regardless of genetic barrier of antiretroviral regimen.
Conclusions
Younger age was associated with treatment failure and drug discontinuation. Active syphilis infection s/p treatment was associated with free from treatment failure and discontinuation. This probably driven by the more frequently sexual health education and counseling when patients had syphilis infection. The STR durability was dependent on the drug toxicity/intolerance, age and syphilis infection.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (VGHKS19-CT4-02) in Taiwan. All the procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant guidelines. Since this was a retrospective cohort study, the individual informed consents were exempted.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.