Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2020

10.04.2020 | Original Article

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ mobility after treatment for uterine descent: differences between surgical procedures

verfasst von: Mèlanie N. van IJsselmuiden, Pauline Lecomte-Grosbras, Jean-François Witz, Mathias Brieu, Michel Cosson, Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic organ mobility is defined as the displacement of pelvic organs between rest and maximal straining. We hypothesized that pelvic organ mobility after vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) might be increased compared with other surgeries for uterine descent, which may contribute to the high occurrence of postoperative cystocele after this surgery. Pelvic organ mobility and the vaginal axes after SSHP are compared with other surgical procedures for uterine descent: vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension (VH) and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH).

Methods

In this prospective pilot study, 15 women were included (5 for each procedure). Six months postoperatively, POP-Q examination and dynamic MRI were performed and questionnaires were filled out regarding prolapse complaints. Pelvic organ mobility on MRI was defined as vertical displacement of pelvic organs at rest and maximal straining. The displacements and angles were measured using an image registration method. Furthermore, the angle of displacement of cervix/vaginal vault and vaginal axes were assessed.

Results

No anatomical recurrences of pelvic organ prolapse were found. No difference in pelvic organ mobility was demonstrated. After VH, a more posterior position of the upper vagina was found compared with SSHP and LSH.

Conclusions

Based on these data, the higher recurrence risk in the anterior compartment after SSHP cannot be explained. Larger sample sizes, studying women with recurrence or de novo cystocele after SSHP or using an upright MRI scanner would be of interest to further assess the relationship between pelvic organ mobility and the occurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jha S, Cutner A, Moran P. The UK national prolapse survey: 10 years on. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:795–801.CrossRef Jha S, Cutner A, Moran P. The UK national prolapse survey: 10 years on. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:795–801.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Van IJsselmuiden MN, Detollenaere RJ, Gerritse MBE, Kluivers KB, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven HWF. Dutch women’s attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;220:79–83.CrossRef Van IJsselmuiden MN, Detollenaere RJ, Gerritse MBE, Kluivers KB, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven HWF. Dutch women’s attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;220:79–83.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470.CrossRef Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Madsen AM, Raker C, Sung VW. Trends in hysteropexy and apical support for uterovaginal prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(6):365–71.CrossRef Madsen AM, Raker C, Sung VW. Trends in hysteropexy and apical support for uterovaginal prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(6):365–71.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and uterine descent in the Netherlands. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):781–8.CrossRef Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and uterine descent in the Netherlands. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(5):781–8.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2019;366:I5149.CrossRef Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2019;366:I5149.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16.CrossRef Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Petri E, Ashok K. Sacrospinous vaginal fixation—current status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:429–36.CrossRef Petri E, Ashok K. Sacrospinous vaginal fixation—current status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:429–36.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1424–33.CrossRef Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1424–33.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Aigmueller T, Riss P, Dungl A, Bauer H. Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life. Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:965–9.CrossRef Aigmueller T, Riss P, Dungl A, Bauer H. Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life. Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:965–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.CrossRef DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobi M, Flusberg M, Paroder V, Chernyak V. Practical guide to dynamic pelvic floor MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:1155–70.CrossRef Kobi M, Flusberg M, Paroder V, Chernyak V. Practical guide to dynamic pelvic floor MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:1155–70.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubod C, Lecomte-Grosbas P, Brieu M, Giraudet G, Betrouni N, Cosson M. 3D simulation of pelvic system numerical simulation for a better understanding of the contribution of the uterine ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:2093.CrossRef Rubod C, Lecomte-Grosbas P, Brieu M, Giraudet G, Betrouni N, Cosson M. 3D simulation of pelvic system numerical simulation for a better understanding of the contribution of the uterine ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:2093.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. J Biomech. 2009;42(10):1371–7.CrossRef Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. J Biomech. 2009;42(10):1371–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeanditgautier E, Mayeur O, Brieu M, Lamblin G, Rubod C, Cosson M. Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):951–7.CrossRef Jeanditgautier E, Mayeur O, Brieu M, Lamblin G, Rubod C, Cosson M. Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):951–7.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental component summary measures—a user’s manual. 1994. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental component summary measures—a user’s manual. 1994. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22:97–104.CrossRef Van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22:97–104.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Prediction of findings at defecography om patients with genital prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:1547–53.CrossRef Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Prediction of findings at defecography om patients with genital prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:1547–53.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell K, Krabbe PF, van Busschbach JJ. Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149:1574–8.PubMed Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell K, Krabbe PF, van Busschbach JJ. Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149:1574–8.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweitzer KJ, de Jong M, Milani AL. Prolaps en seks: hoe meten we de relatie. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;121:79–82. Schweitzer KJ, de Jong M, Milani AL. Prolaps en seks: hoe meten we de relatie. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;121:79–82.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(1):196–205.CrossRef Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(1):196–205.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lecomte-Grosbras P, Witz JF, Faye N, Cosson M, Rubod C. Quantification of pelvic mobility on dynamic magnetic resonance images: using mechanical insight to help diagnose pelvic pathologies. Strain. 2015;51:301–10.CrossRef Lecomte-Grosbras P, Witz JF, Faye N, Cosson M, Rubod C. Quantification of pelvic mobility on dynamic magnetic resonance images: using mechanical insight to help diagnose pelvic pathologies. Strain. 2015;51:301–10.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sze EH, Meranus J, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Karram MM. Vaginal configuration on MRI after abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:375–9.CrossRef Sze EH, Meranus J, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Karram MM. Vaginal configuration on MRI after abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:375–9.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee DD, Siegelman ES, Chua WY, Arya LA, Harvie HS. Comparison of vaginal axis in women who have undergone hysterectomy versus women with an intact uterus. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(4):313–7.CrossRef Lee DD, Siegelman ES, Chua WY, Arya LA, Harvie HS. Comparison of vaginal axis in women who have undergone hysterectomy versus women with an intact uterus. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(4):313–7.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the pelvic inclination correction system. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1421–8.CrossRef Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the pelvic inclination correction system. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1421–8.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Alt CD, Brocker KA, Lenz F, Sohn C, Kauczor HU, Hallscheidt P. MRI findings before and after prolapse surgery. Acta Radiol. 2014;55(4):495–504.CrossRef Alt CD, Brocker KA, Lenz F, Sohn C, Kauczor HU, Hallscheidt P. MRI findings before and after prolapse surgery. Acta Radiol. 2014;55(4):495–504.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rane A, Lim YN, Withey G, Muller R. Magnetic resonance imaging findings following three different vaginal vault prolapse repair procedures: a randomized study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:135–9.CrossRef Rane A, Lim YN, Withey G, Muller R. Magnetic resonance imaging findings following three different vaginal vault prolapse repair procedures: a randomized study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:135–9.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tumbarello JA, Hsu Y, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Rohrer S, DeLancey JO. Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI? Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(10):1247–51.CrossRef Tumbarello JA, Hsu Y, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Rohrer S, DeLancey JO. Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI? Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(10):1247–51.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Grob ATM, Olde Heuvel J, Futterer JJ, Massop D, Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL, Simonis FFJ, van der Vaart CH. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1939–44.CrossRef Grob ATM, Olde Heuvel J, Futterer JJ, Massop D, Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL, Simonis FFJ, van der Vaart CH. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1939–44.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ mobility after treatment for uterine descent: differences between surgical procedures
verfasst von
Mèlanie N. van IJsselmuiden
Pauline Lecomte-Grosbras
Jean-François Witz
Mathias Brieu
Michel Cosson
Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven
Publikationsdatum
10.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04278-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.