nach oben

19.02.2021 | Guidelines Open Access

E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET

Zeitschrift:: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Autoren:: Francesco Ceci, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Louise Emmett, Judit A. Adam, Jamshed Bomanji, Johannes Czernin, Matthias Eiber, Uwe Haberkorn, Michael S. Hofman, Thomas A. Hope, Rakesh Kumar, Steven P. Rowe, Sarah M. Schwarzenboeck, Stefano Fanti, Ken Herrmann

Ergänzende Inhalte

» Zum Volltext PDF-Version jetzt herunterladen

Wichtige Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology – Genitourinary

Stefano Fanti and Ken Herrmann are co-senior authors of this project.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Rationale

The development of consensus guidelines for interpretation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is needed to provide more consistent reports in clinical practice. The standardization of PSMA-PET interpretation may also contribute to increasing the data reproducibility within clinical trials. Finally, guidelines in PSMA-PET interpretation are needed to communicate the exact location of findings to referring physicians, to support clinician therapeutic management decisions.

Methods

A panel of worldwide experts in PSMA-PET was established. Panelists were selected based on their expertise and publication record in the diagnosis or treatment of PCa, in their involvement in clinical guidelines and according to their expertise in the clinical application of radiolabeled PSMA inhibitors. Panelists were actively involved in all stages of a modified, nonanonymous, Delphi consensus process.

Results

According to the findings obtained by modified Delphi consensus process, panelist recommendations were implemented in a structured report for PSMA-PET.

Conclusions

The E-PSMA standardized reporting guidelines, a document supported by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), provide consensus statements among a panel of experts in PSMA-PET imaging, to develop a structured report for PSMA-PET in prostate cancer and to harmonize diagnostic interpretation criteria.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

e.Med Onkologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Onkologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Onkologie, den Premium-Inhalten der onkologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten onkologischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ³

ESM 1 (DOCX 649 kb)

O’Keefe DS, Bacich DJ, Huang SS, Heston WDW. A perspective on the evolving story of PSMA biology, PSMA-based imaging, and endoradiotherapeutic strategies. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(7):1007–13. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gordon IO, Tretiakova MS, Noffsinger AE, Hart J, Reuter VE, Al-Ahmadie HA. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in regeneration and repair. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(12):1421–7. PubMedCrossRef

Kaittanis C, Andreou C, Hieronymus H, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen cleavage of vitamin B9 stimulates oncogenic signaling through metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Exp Med. 2018;215(1):159–75. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20171052. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aggarwal R, Wei X, Kim W, et al. Heterogeneous flare in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography tracer uptake with initiation of androgen pathway blockade in metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(1):78–82. PubMedCrossRef

Emmett L, Yin C, Crumbaker M, et al. Rapid modulation of PSMA expression by androgen deprivation: serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in men with hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer commencing androgen blockade. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):950–4. PubMedCrossRef

Fendler WP, Weber M, Iravani A, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(24):7448–54. PubMedCrossRef

Eder M, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Hull W-E, Wängler C, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23(4):688–97. PubMedCrossRef

Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, De Santis M, Fanti S, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. ISBN 978-94-92671-07-3.

Gillessen S, Omlin A, Attard G, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: recommendations of the St Gallen Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2015. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):e3. PubMedCrossRef

10.

Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 27]. Eur Urol. 2020:S0302–2838(20)30048–8.

11.

Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):403–17. PubMedCrossRef

12.

Calais J, Ceci F, Eiber M, et al. 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):e613] [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):e304]. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(9):1286–94. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

13.

Morigi JJ, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, et al. Prospective comparison of 18F-fluoromethylcholine versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients who have rising PSA after curative treatment and are being considered for targeted therapy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(8):1185–90. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.160382. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):856–63. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Trabulsi EJ, Rumble RB, Jadvar H, et al. Optimum imaging strategies for advanced prostate cancer: ASCO Guideline [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 15]. J Clin Oncol. 2020:JCO1902757.

16.

Fanti S, Goffin K, Hadaschik BA, et al. Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 2]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4.

17.

Kratochwil C, Fendler WP, Eiber M, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(12):2536–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04485-3. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Fanti S, Minozzi S, Morigi JJ, Giesel F, Ceci F, Uprimny C, et al. Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(10):1622–35. PubMedCrossRef

19.

Eiber M, Herrmann K, Calais J, Hadaschik B, Giesel FL, Hartenbach M, et al. Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(3):469–78. PubMedCrossRef

20.

Werner RA, Thackeray JT, Pomper MG, Bengel FM, Gorin MA, Derlin T, et al. Recent updates on molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS) for theranostic radiotracers-navigating pitfalls of SSTR- and PSMA-targeted PET/CT. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):pii: E1060. CrossRef

21.

Toriihara A, Nobashi T, Baratto L, et al. Comparison of three interpretation criteria of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET based on inter- and intra-reader agreement [published online ahead of print, 2019 Sep 27]. J Nucl Med. 2019:jnumed.119.232504. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.232504.

22.

Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Ceci F, Cho S, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):1014–24. CrossRef

23.

Chen Y, Pullambhatla M, Foss CA, Byun Y, Nimmagadda S, Senthamizhchelvan S, et al. 2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pen tanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(24):7645–53. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

Mease RC, Dusich CL, Foss CA, et al. N-[N-[(S)-1,3-Dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-[18F]fluorobenzyl-L-cysteine, [18F]DCFBC: a new imaging probe for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):3036–43. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1517. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Sanchez-Crespo A. Comparison of Gallium-68 and Fluorine-18 imaging characteristics in positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;76:55–62. PubMedCrossRef

26.

Wondergem M, Jansen BHE, van der Zant FM, et al. Early lesion detection with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(9):1911–8. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

27.

Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, et al. Detection efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(3):362–8. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

28.

Zlatopolskiy BD, Endepols H, Krapf P, Guliyev M, Urusova EA, Richarz R, et al. Discovery of (18)F-JK-PSMA-7, a PET probe for the detection of small PSMA-positive lesions. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):817–23. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

29.

Eiber M, Kroenke M, Wurzer A, et al. 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(5):696–701. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Pfob CH, Ziegler S, Graner FP, Köhner M, Schachoff S, Blechert B, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 68Ga-PSMA HBED CC—a PSMA specific probe for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(11):1962–70. PubMedCrossRef

31.

Giesel FL, Hadaschik B, Cardinale J, Radtke J, Vinsensia M, Lehnert W, et al. F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(4):678–88. PubMedCrossRef

32.

Pollard J, Raman C, Zakharia Y, et al. Quantitative test-retest measurement of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (PSMA-11) in tumor and normal tissue [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 5]. J Nucl Med. 2019:jnumed.119.236083. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.236083.

33.

Sheikhbahaei S, Afshar-Oromieh A, Eiber M, Solnes LB, Javadi MS, Ross AE, et al. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(12):2117–36. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

34.

Hope TA, Goodman JZ, Allen IE, Calais J, Fendler WP, Carroll PR. Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):786–93. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

35.

Ristau BT, O’Keefe DS, Bacich DJ. The prostate-specific membrane antigen: lessons and current clinical implications from 20 years of research. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(3):272–9. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

36.

Siva S, Callahan J, Pryor D, Martin J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS. Utility of 68 Ga prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography in diagnosis and response assessment of recurrent renal cell carcinoma. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(3):372–8. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

37.

Kesler M, Levine C, Hershkovitz D, et al. 68Ga-PSMA is a novel PET-CT tracer for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective pilot study [published online ahead of print, 2018 Jul 12]. J Nucl Med. 2018:jnumed.118.214833.

38.

Sathekge M, Modiselle M, Vorster M, et al. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA imaging of metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(9):1482–3. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

39.

Rischpler C, Beck TI, Okamoto S, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC uptake in cervical, celiac, and sacral ganglia as an important pitfall in prostate cancer PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(9):1406–11. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

40.

Panagiotidis E, Paschali A, Giannoula E, Chatzipavlidou V. Rib fractures mimicking bone metastases in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(1):e46–e8. PubMedCrossRef

41.

Rauscher I, Krönke M, König M, et al. Matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):51–7. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Sasikumar A, Joy A, Nanabala R, Pillai MR, T AH. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT false-positive tracer uptake in Paget disease. Clin Nucl Med 2016;41(10):e454–e455.

43.

Ribeiro AMB, Lima ENP, Rocha MM. Fibrous dysplasia as a possible false-positive finding in 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography study in the follow-up of prostate cancer. World J Nucl Med. 2019;18(4):409–12. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Noto B, Vrachimis A, Schafers M, Stegger L, Rahbar K. Subacute stroke mimicking cerebral metastasis in 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(10):e449–51. PubMedCrossRef

45.

Bilgin R, Ergul N, Cermik TF. Incidental meningioma mimicking metastasis of prostate adenocarcinoma in 68Ga-labeled PSMA ligand PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(12):956–8.

46.

Bertagna F, Albano D, Cerudelli E, Gazzilli M, Giubbini R, Treglia G. Potential of radiolabelled PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI diagnostic procedures in gliomas/glioblastomas [published online ahead of print, 2019 Oct 16]. Curr Radiopharm. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874471012666191017093721.

47.

Hermann RM, Djannatian M, Czech N, Nitsche M. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT: false-positive results due to sarcoidosis? Case Rep Oncol. 2016;9(2):457–63. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Prasad V, Steffen IG, Diederichs G, Makowski MR, Wust P, Brenner W. Biodistribution of [68Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC in patients with prostate cancer: characterization of uptake in normal organs and tumour lesions. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18(3):428–36. PubMedCrossRef

49.

Bouchelouche K, Vendelbo MH. Pulmonary opacities and bronchiectasis avid on 68Ga-PSMA PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(4):e216–e7. PubMedCrossRef

50.

McGuiness M, Sounness B. 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT uptake in anthracosilicosis. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(10):e431–e2. PubMedCrossRef

51.

Ahuja A, Taneja S, Thorat K, Jena A. 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid tubercular lesions mimicking prostate cancer metastasis on simultaneous prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/MRI. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(12):e509–e10. PubMedCrossRef

52.

Lückerath K, Wei L, Fendler WP, et al. Preclinical evaluation of PSMA expression in response to androgen receptor blockade for theranostics in prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8(1):96. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

53.

Sasikumar A, Joy A, Nair BP, Pillai MRA, Madhavan J. False positive uptake in bilateral gynecomastia on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(9):e412–e4. PubMedCrossRef

54.

Tosoian JJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, Andreas D, Szabo Z, Pienta KJ, et al. Correlation of PSMA-targeted (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT findings with Immunohistochemical and genomic data in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(1):e65–e8. PubMedCrossRef

55.

Ceci F, Bianchi L, Borghesi M, et al. Prediction nomogram for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in different clinical settings of PSA failure after radical treatment for prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(1):136–46. PubMedCrossRef

56.

Bianchi L, Borghesi M, Schiavina R, et al. Predictive accuracy and clinical benefit of a nomogram aimed to predict 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT positivity in patients with prostate cancer recurrence and PSA < 1 ng/ml external validation on a single institution database [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 31]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04696-z.

57.

Ceci F, Castellucci P, Graziani T, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: efficacy in different clinical stages of PSA failure after radical therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(1):31–9. PubMedCrossRef

58.

Rauscher I, Düwel C, Haller B, et al. Efficacy, predictive factors, and prediction nomograms for 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in early biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73(5):656–61. PubMedCrossRef

59.

Budaus L, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Salomon G, Michl U, Heinzer H, Huland H, et al. Initial experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):393–6. PubMedCrossRef

60.

Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Weirich G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195(5):1436–43. CrossRef

61.

Farolfi A, Gafita A, Calais J, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography detects residual prostate cancer after prostatectomy in a multicenter retrospective study. J Urol. 2019;202(6):1174–81. PubMedCrossRef

62.

Wondergem M, Jansen BHE, van der Zant FM, van der Sluis TM, Knol RJJ, van Kalmthout LWM, et al. Early lesion detection with (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(9):1911–8. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

63.

Tiguert R, Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, Oskanian P, Banerjee M, Grignon DJ, et al. Lymph node size does not correlate with the presence of prostate cancer metastasis. Urology. 1999;53(2):367–71. PubMedCrossRef

64.

van Leeuwen PJ, Donswijk M, Nandurkar R, Stricker P, Ho B, Heijmink S, et al. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68) Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) predicts complete biochemical response from radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019;124(1):62–8. PubMedCrossRef

65.

Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179–90. PubMedCrossRef

66.

Corfield J, Perera M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2018;36(4):519–27. PubMedCrossRef

67.

Eiber M, Weirich G, Holzapfel K, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Rauscher I, et al. Simultaneous (68)Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70(5):829–36. PubMedCrossRef

68.

Rowe S, Gorin S, Pienta K, Siegel B, Carroll P, Pouliot F, et al. Results from the OSPREY trial: A prospective phase 2/3 multi-center study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with prostate cancer-examination of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:586.

69.

Kesch C, Vinsensia M, Radtke JP, Schlemmer HP, Heller M, Ellert E, et al. Intraindividual comparison of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with primary prostate cancer: a retrospective, Proof-of-Concept Study. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(11):1805–10. PubMedCrossRef

70.

Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–16. PubMedCrossRef

71.

Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M, et al. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsies. Eur Urol. 2019;75(3):506–14. PubMedCrossRef

72.

Rousseau E, Wilson D, Lacroix-Poisson F, et al. A prospective study on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT imaging in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(11):1587–93. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

73.

Morris MJ, Carroll P, Probst S, Pouliot F, Saperstein L, Siegel BA. A prospective phase 2/3 multicenter study of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with prostate cancer: examination of diagnostic accuracy (OSPREY). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15).

74.

Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, Will L, Maurer T, Flechsig P, et al. Detection efficacy of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(3):362–8. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

75.

Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Seifert R, Wagner S, Schafers M, Bogemann M, et al. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(12):2055–61. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

76.

Pereira Mestre R, Treglia G, Ferrari M, et al. Correlation between PSA kinetics and PSMA-PET in prostate cancer restaging: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Investig. 2019;49(3):e13063. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13063. CrossRef

77.

Ceci F, Herrmann K, Hadaschik B, Castellucci P, Fanti S. Therapy assessment in prostate cancer using choline and PSMA PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(Suppl 1):78–83. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

78.

Fanti S, Hadaschik B, Herrmann K. Proposal of systemic therapy response assessment criteria in time of PSMA PET/CT imaging: PSMA PET Progression (PPP) [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 5]. J Nucl Med. 2019:jnumed.119.233817.

79.

Hofman MS, Emmett L, Violet J, et al. TheraP: a randomized phase 2 trial of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 theranostic treatment vs cabazitaxel in progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Clinical Trial Protocol ANZUP 1603). BJU Int. 2019;124(Suppl 1):5–13. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

80.

Thang SP, Violet J, Sandhu S, et al. Poor outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with low prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression deemed ineligible for 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(6):670–6. PubMedCrossRef

81.

Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):825–33. PubMedCrossRef

82.

Violet J, Sandhu S, Iravani A, et al. Long term follow-up and outcomes of re-treatment in an expanded 50 patient single-center phase II prospective trial of Lutetium-177 (177Lu) PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer [published online ahead of print, 2019 Nov 15]. J Nucl Med. 2019:jnumed.119.236414.

Titel: E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET
Autoren:: Francesco Ceci
Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
Louise Emmett
Judit A. Adam
Jamshed Bomanji
Johannes Czernin
Matthias Eiber
Uwe Haberkorn
Michael S. Hofman
Thomas A. Hope
Rakesh Kumar
Steven P. Rowe
Sarah M. Schwarzenboeck
Stefano Fanti
Ken Herrmann
Publikationsdatum: 19.02.2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Zeitschrift: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089

Springer Medizin

Supplementary Information

Publisher’s note

Abstract

Rationale

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

e.Med Radiologie

e.Med Onkologie