Background
Vasospasm (VS) and its clinical counterpart, delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND), are common causes of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). There are multiple causes of VS but the most frequent are traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal SAH [
1,
2]. Aneurysmal SAH carries a significant risk of morbidity and high mortality rate. Survivors of SAH are often faced with sequelae of their hemorrhage and as many as 17–40% of SAH sufferers develop vasospasm and subsequent neurological deficits [
1,
2]. As a result, only a small percentage of all survivors return to their premorbid “normal” condition.
DIND is a common complication clinically detected in 30–40% of patients with aneurysmal SAH, although it might be angiographically present in up to 70% of a SAH patients [
3,
4]. It usually begins between day 4 and 7 post aneurysmal SAH episode and is heralded by a new neurological deficit or worsening of an existing one. Other metabolic and homeostatic derangements such as inflammation, microvascular dysfunction, or cerebral edema have also been described [
3,
5].
Although the gold standard for diagnosis of vasospasm and DIND is a cerebral angiogram [
6], several non-invasive tests are available to clinicians to better detect vasospasm. These include, but not limited to TCD, [
7,
8] and more recently improved application in CT perfusion [
9,
10]. However, for the most part, these applications are non-diagnostic of DIND. Another major concern with these imaging modalities is that irrespective of how informative they are, the radiation doses and contrast material involved in their generation, limit their utility as dynamic tests to go along with the clinical evolution in the short-term or better still, in real time. This has major drawbacks for the very nature of the decision-making process required in a critical care setting. This raises the need for a test that can be safely repeated and is informative in the realm of parameters affecting clinical care decisions.
Here, we investigate the utility of THRT as a predictor of clinical DIND in a cohort of patients with aSAH. The results of this small retrospective study may shed some light on the initial autoregulatory mechanism in patients presenting with aSAH.
Methods
Study design and equipment
A retrospective review of all THRT examinations done between January 2011 and July 2012 conducted at the intensive care units of the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital and the Montreal General Hospital. Both of these hospitals are tertiary care neurology and neurosurgery centers. All the procedures were carried out after ethical review and according to the hospitals safety protocols. Patient consent was received prior to accessing retrospective data. All of the TCD examinations were performed by a single operator (HA). All examinations were performed on a Zonare TCD ultrasound machine using the modifiable range 2–4 m Hz P4-1c Phased Array probe (ZONARE Medical Systems, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).
Sample selection
Twenty-one patients with a diagnosis of aSAH in which the THRT was performed within the first 24–48 h of admission were included in the study. Patients for whom the TCD examination was not possible, due to absent or suboptimal temporal insonation window, were excluded. Patients unable to tolerate the THRT due to induced bradycardia were also excluded. To harmonize the cohort, patients with severe carotid artery disease as well as with traumatic SAH associated with significant other traumatic intracranial lesions, such as contusions and diffuse brain swelling, were excluded from the sample.
Data acquisition
Two-dimensional transcranial Doppler images were obtained and velocities were recorded. The THRT technique was used according to the method described previously [
11]. In brief, while insonating the middle cerebral artery (MCA), the common carotid artery was occluded in the neck. The carotid artery was identified either by circulation arrest on the Doppler signal of the MCA or, to account for cross flow from the contributors of circle of Willis, more than 30% reduction of the systolic velocity of the middle cerebral artery. The compression was carried out for 5–9 s. Then, upon restoration of circulation, the first systolic peak was ignored and the following three systolic velocity peaks were kept for analysis and averaged. A positive response was one in which the velocity was increased by more than 9% of the baseline systolic velocity, indicating an intact cerebral autoregulation. The TCD was repeated every 48 h.
Data analysis
Lindegaard ratio is defined as the ratio between the velocities in the MCA to that of the extracranial internal carotid artery. A ratio greater than three is considered abnormal, and in the context of elevated systolic velocity of the MCA, is highly suggestive of DIND. In some patients, a computerized tomography angiogram or a formal digital subtraction angiography was performed within the first 24–48 h of admission and this data was included in the analysis of our cohort. The statistical analysis of calculating the means, Fisher contingency tables, and the likelihood ratio were performed on Graph pad prism software (version 4.0, 2010).
Discussion
To prevent DIND related cerebral damage, it is recommended to commence a decisive treatment within 2 h of the onset of the symptoms [
12]. This proves difficult to achieve in a clinical setting; firstly, due to the subtlety of the initial manifestation of DIND symptoms; and secondly, due to the difficulty of detecting a worsening neurological function in the presence of a major primary deficit. Therefore, this might not be a realistic endeavor in a lot of healthcare systems leaving many patients at a heightened risk of permanent deficits [
2,
4].
The gold standard for the diagnosis of DIND is a cerebral angiogram [
6]. It is an invasive procedure with inherent risk, including injury of the access artery and thromboembolic ischemic stroke [
13]. Transcranial Doppler applications (TCD) have been used frequently as a non-invasive diagnostic method of DIND. The measurements are based on trends of increased systolic velocities and increased Lindegaard ratio (mean velocity in the middle cerebral artery/mean velocity in ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery ratio (MCA/ICA) to improve the specificity of diagnosis) [
7,
8]. TCDs are a popular method because of their non-invasive nature and the fact that they do not have the side effects associated with the use of contrast agents and radiation. Moreover, they are easily accessible and pose no risk to the patient in terms of transportation while critically ill [
7,
8].
Another method frequently used in the clinics is computed tomography perfusion (CTP) [
9,
10]. Improvement in the imaging capabilities of CTP does allow for a non-invasive assessment of the cerebral circulation dynamics, but it is liable to the inter-evaluator variability and lack of clear interpretation paradigms given the multiplicity of variables involved in generating and influencing these images [
9,
10]. To add to the complexity of this issue, we frequently find areas of clinical deterioration that do not match the areas of vascular spasm detected on vascular imaging, a phenomenon called “clinico-radiological dissociation”. Another early detection method is continuous electroencephalography (cEEG); able to detect changes suggestive of vasospasm [
14]. However, for the most part, these applications are non-diagnostic of DIND. Another major concern with these imaging modalities is that irrespective of how informative they are, the radiation doses and contrast material involved in their generation limit their utility as dynamic tests to go along with the clinical evolution in the short-term or better still, in real time. This has major drawbacks for the very nature of the decision-making process required in a critical care setting. This raises the need for a test that can be safely repeated and is informative in the realm of parameters affecting clinical care decisions.
An invasive cerebral blood flow monitoring has the ability to detect changes conducive of vasospasm 24–48 h earlier than the onset of clinical vasospasm. This is suggestive of a failure of an initial autoregulatory mechanism that, if detected early, can be valuable in identifying patients at risk of developing DIND [
15‐
18]. Transient hyperemic response test (THRT), also known as carotid compression test, is a type of TCD examination of the cerebral vessels. It was described for the first time by Giller in 1991 as a bedside test for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation with the basic premise that, in the presence of an intact autoregulation, the cerebral vessels will be able to contract in response to a hyperemic challenge generated by a brief carotid occlusion [
11]. This would be translated in the TCD signal as an increase in systolic velocity. In a normal response, the velocity should increase by a minimum of 9% from the baseline velocity. Any value less than that or reduction of the velocity denoted a global failure of autoregulation. Since then, several studies have confirmed this concept in animal models, human subjects as well as several diseases including traumatic brain injury (TBI) and SAH [
19‐
21] THRT has been used to predict autoregulation failure in traumatic brain injury as well as the development of autoregulation failure conducive of DIND in patients with SAH [
20‐
22].
In our study, THRT was performed in the first 24–48 h and was abnormal in 83% of patient who subsequently developed DIND. Of interest, the two patients with radiological vasospasm also exhibited an abnormal THRT. This raises the possibility that the stress of SAH can prime the cerebral circulation into a deregulatory process that leads to the development of vasospasm, whether clinically overt or silent. Moreover, this predictability was not influenced by the clinical grade of the SAH, an observation that can lead to an unbiased and more attentive attitude toward patients at theoretical risk of DIND and establish lower threshold for their investigation and escalation of therapy when necessary. Although not reported in this study results, we occasionally detected the resolution of the autoregulation failure by the return of the normal response despite the aggressive therapy for vasospasm. This at least in theory can guide the timing of weaning of DIND treatment with an aim to reduce treatment morbidity.
Lam et al. reported the use of THRT in post-clipping patients performed 0–5 days post bleed, with five out of six patients exhibiting abnormal THRT [
20]. Another study compared three autoregulatory parameters: THRT, Sxa (based on TCD), and TOxa (based on near-infrared spectroscopy) and found equivalent reliability between the three parameters in predicting DIND, favoring THRT due to the time consuming nature of the latter two [
22].
Another interesting observation emerging from our small retrospective cohort study is that the systolic velocity in the MCA was elevated in five patients from their ictus; however, it did not translate into the development of DIND. We hypothesize that this could be a secondary response to either aggressive initial management or to the systemic stress response seen in SAH patients.
The analysis and comparison of the data obtained from THRT and radiological imaging measurements suggests that the latter methods are only moderately predictive of subsequent DIND development. We found that of all the CTP maps the MTT and TTP were the most predictive. These observations will have to be validated in a larger cohort studies.
This study suffers from the inherent drawbacks of any retrospective review. Our sample size is small but illustrative to this test. Longitudinal THRT testing was not done in all patients and would be considered in future projects.
Our results suggest the utility of THRT in detecting patients at increased risk of DIND from the time of admission, which if supported by prospective trials, will allow supporting a watchful clinical approach to their clinical course of investigation and management. It can also lead us to better select patients for trials involving early interventions in SAH and DIND, as it might serve as discriminatory test to stratify high versus low risk candidates. Understanding the trend of THRT during the period of DIND and its resolution might prove useful as well.