Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2017

07.01.2017 | Original Article

Early assessment of feasibility and technical specificities of transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi

verfasst von: Philippe Gorphe, Jean Von Tan, Sophie El Bedoui, Dana M. Hartl, Anne Auperin, Quentin Qassemyar, Antoine Moya-Plana, François Janot, Morbize Julieron, Stephane Temam

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The latest generation Da Vinci® Xi™ Surgical System Robot released has not been evaluated to date in transoral surgery for head and neck cancers. We report here the 1-year results of a non-randomized phase II multicentric prospective trial aimed at assessing its feasibility and technical specificities. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci® Xi™ Surgical System Robot. The secondary objective was to assess peroperative outcomes. Twenty-seven patients, mean age 62.7 years, were included between May 2015 and June 2016 with tumors affecting the following sites: oropharynx (n = 21), larynx (n = 4), hypopharynx (n = 1), parapharyngeal space (n = 1). Eighteen patients were included for primary treatment, three for a local recurrence, and six for cancer in a previously irradiated field. Three were reconstructed with a FAMM flap and 6 with a free ALT flap. The mean docking time was 12 min. “Chopsticking” of surgical instruments was very rare. During hospitalization following surgery, 3 patients experienced significant bleeding between day 8 and 9 that required surgical transoral hemostasis (n = 1) or endovascular embolization (n = 2). Transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci® Xi™ Surgical System Robot proved feasible with technological improvements compared to previous generation surgical system robots and with a similar postoperative course. Further technological progress is expected to be of significant benefit to the patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Hockstein NG (2005) Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 115:1315–1319CrossRefPubMed Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Hockstein NG (2005) Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 115:1315–1319CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116:1465–1472CrossRefPubMed O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116:1465–1472CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W et al (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1220–1226CrossRefPubMed Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W et al (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1220–1226CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS (2007) Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical application. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1215–1219CrossRefPubMed O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS (2007) Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical application. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1215–1219CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore EJ, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope 119:2156–2164CrossRefPubMed Moore EJ, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope 119:2156–2164CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Genden EM, O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: role in the management of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Head Neck 34:886–893CrossRefPubMed Genden EM, O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: role in the management of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Head Neck 34:886–893CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hans S, Badoual C, Gorphe P, Brasnu D (2012) Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1979–1984CrossRefPubMed Hans S, Badoual C, Gorphe P, Brasnu D (2012) Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1979–1984CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergez S, Lallemant B, Ceruse P et al (2012) Initial multi-institutional experience with transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:475–481CrossRefPubMed Vergez S, Lallemant B, Ceruse P et al (2012) Initial multi-institutional experience with transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:475–481CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707CrossRefPubMed Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat de Almeida JR, Li R, Magnuson JS et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes after transoral robotic surgery: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:1043–1051CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed de Almeida JR, Li R, Magnuson JS et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes after transoral robotic surgery: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:1043–1051CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Holsinger FC, Ferris RL (2015) Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery and its role within the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm of oropharynx cancer: robotics, lasers, and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 33:3285–3292CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Holsinger FC, Ferris RL (2015) Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery and its role within the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm of oropharynx cancer: robotics, lasers, and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 33:3285–3292CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross ND, Holsinger FC, Magnuson JS et al (2016) Robotics in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: recommendations for training and credentialing: a report of the 2015 AHNS education committee, AAO-HNS robotic task force and AAO-HNS sleep disorders committee. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E151–E158CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gross ND, Holsinger FC, Magnuson JS et al (2016) Robotics in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: recommendations for training and credentialing: a report of the 2015 AHNS education committee, AAO-HNS robotic task force and AAO-HNS sleep disorders committee. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E151–E158CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Razafindranaly V, Lallemant B, Aubry K et al (2016) Clinical outcomes with transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: experience of a french evaluation cooperative subgroup of GETTEC. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E1097–1101CrossRefPubMed Razafindranaly V, Lallemant B, Aubry K et al (2016) Clinical outcomes with transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: experience of a french evaluation cooperative subgroup of GETTEC. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E1097–1101CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen MM, Holsinger FC (2016) Morbidity and mortality associated with robotic head and neck surgery: an inquiry of the food and drug administration manufacturer and user facility device experience database. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:405–406CrossRefPubMed Chen MM, Holsinger FC (2016) Morbidity and mortality associated with robotic head and neck surgery: an inquiry of the food and drug administration manufacturer and user facility device experience database. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:405–406CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Aubry K, Vergez S, de Mones E et al (2016) Morbidity and mortality revue of the French group of transoral robotic surgery: a multicentric study. J Robot Surg 10:63–67CrossRefPubMed Aubry K, Vergez S, de Mones E et al (2016) Morbidity and mortality revue of the French group of transoral robotic surgery: a multicentric study. J Robot Surg 10:63–67CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Asher SA, White HN, Kejner AE et al (2013) Hemorrhage after transoral robotic-assisted surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:112–117CrossRefPubMed Asher SA, White HN, Kejner AE et al (2013) Hemorrhage after transoral robotic-assisted surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:112–117CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD (2013) Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:885–892CrossRefPubMed Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD (2013) Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:885–892CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Holsinger FC, McWhorter AJ, Menard M et al (2005) Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: I. Technique, complications, and functional results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:583–591CrossRefPubMed Holsinger FC, McWhorter AJ, Menard M et al (2005) Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: I. Technique, complications, and functional results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:583–591CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Holsinger FC (2016) A flexible, single-arm robotic surgical system for transoral resection of the tonsil and lateral pharyngeal wall: next-generation robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 126:864–869CrossRefPubMed Holsinger FC (2016) A flexible, single-arm robotic surgical system for transoral resection of the tonsil and lateral pharyngeal wall: next-generation robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 126:864–869CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Early assessment of feasibility and technical specificities of transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi
verfasst von
Philippe Gorphe
Jean Von Tan
Sophie El Bedoui
Dana M. Hartl
Anne Auperin
Quentin Qassemyar
Antoine Moya-Plana
François Janot
Morbize Julieron
Stephane Temam
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0679-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.