Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Acta Diabetologica 7/2017

09.04.2017 | Original Article

Early screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes mellitus in France: hardly any impact of the 2010 guidelines

verfasst von: K. Goueslard, J. Cottenet, A.-S. Mariet, P. Sagot, J.-M. Petit, C. Quantin

Erschienen in: Acta Diabetologica | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

Women who had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the years following pregnancy. Most follow-up screening studies have been conducted in limited geographical areas leading to large variability in the results. The aim of our investigation was to measure how the publication of guidelines affected early screening for T2DM after a pregnancy with GDM during the period 2007–2013, in France.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a representative sample of 1/97th of the French population using data from the “National Health Insurance Inter-Regime Information System,” which collects individual hospital and non-hospital data for healthcare consumption.

Results

The sample included 49,080 women who gave birth in 2007–2013. In the following 3 months, only 18.49% of women with GDM had an oral glucose tolerance test or a blood glucose test in 2007. This rate had not significantly increased in 2013 (p = 0.18). The proportion of women with GDM who had the recommended glycemic follow-up at 3 months (20.30 vs. 21.58%, p = 0.19) and 6 months (32.48 vs. 37.16%, p = 0.08) was not significantly different before the guidelines (2008–2009) and after the guidelines (2012–2013). At 12 months, the difference was significant (46.77 vs. 54.05%, p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Postpartum screening has improved only slightly since the guidelines and remains largely insufficient, with less than 25% of women with GDM screened in the first 3 months. In the first year after delivery, less than 60% of women were screened for T2DM.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat DeSisto CL, Kim SY, Sharma AJ (2014) Prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS), 2007–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 11:E104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeSisto CL, Kim SY, Sharma AJ (2014) Prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS), 2007–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 11:E104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley BS, Harreiter J, Damm P et al (2012) Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening. A review. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc 29(7):844–854CrossRef Buckley BS, Harreiter J, Damm P et al (2012) Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening. A review. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc 29(7):844–854CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Regnault N, Salanave B, Castetbon K et al (2016) Gestational diabetes in France in 2012: screening, prevalence and treatment modalities during pregnancy. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 9:164–173 Regnault N, Salanave B, Castetbon K et al (2016) Gestational diabetes in France in 2012: screening, prevalence and treatment modalities during pregnancy. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 9:164–173
4.
Zurück zum Zitat HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP et al (2008) Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358(19):1991–2002CrossRef HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP et al (2008) Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358(19):1991–2002CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Care 25(10):1862–1868CrossRef Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Care 25(10):1862–1868CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rayanagoudar G, Hashi AA, Zamora J et al (2016) Quantification of the type 2 diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95,750 women. Diabetologia 59(7):1403–1411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rayanagoudar G, Hashi AA, Zamora J et al (2016) Quantification of the type 2 diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95,750 women. Diabetologia 59(7):1403–1411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Köhler M, Ziegler AG, Beyerlein A (2016) Development of a simple tool to predict the risk of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 53(3):433–437CrossRefPubMed Köhler M, Ziegler AG, Beyerlein A (2016) Development of a simple tool to predict the risk of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 53(3):433–437CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Noctor E, Crowe C, Carmody LA et al (2015) ATLANTIC-DIP: prevalence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus by International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Acta Diabetol 52(1):153–160CrossRefPubMed Noctor E, Crowe C, Carmody LA et al (2015) ATLANTIC-DIP: prevalence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus by International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Acta Diabetol 52(1):153–160CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Barry E, Roberts S, Oke J et al (2017) Efficacy and effectiveness of screen and treat policies in prevention of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of screening tests and interventions. BMJ 356:i6538CrossRefPubMed Barry E, Roberts S, Oke J et al (2017) Efficacy and effectiveness of screen and treat policies in prevention of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of screening tests and interventions. BMJ 356:i6538CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons D, McElduff A, McIntyre HD, Elrishi M (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus: NICE for the US? A comparison of the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines with the U.K. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines. Diabetes Care 33(1):34–37CrossRefPubMed Simmons D, McElduff A, McIntyre HD, Elrishi M (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus: NICE for the US? A comparison of the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines with the U.K. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines. Diabetes Care 33(1):34–37CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat De Micheli A (2008) Italian standards for diabetes mellitus 2007: executive summary : diabete Italia, AMD associazione medici diabetologi, SID Società Italiana di Diabetologia. Acta Diabetol 45(2):107–127CrossRefPubMedCentral De Micheli A (2008) Italian standards for diabetes mellitus 2007: executive summary : diabete Italia, AMD associazione medici diabetologi, SID Società Italiana di Diabetologia. Acta Diabetol 45(2):107–127CrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (2010) Société francophone du diabète. [Gestational diabetes]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 39(8 Suppl 2):S139, S338–S342 Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (2010) Société francophone du diabète. [Gestational diabetes]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 39(8 Suppl 2):S139, S338–S342
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Carson MP, Frank MI, Keely E (2013) Original research: postpartum testing rates among women with a history of gestational diabetes—systematic review. Prim Care Diabetes 7(3):177–186CrossRefPubMed Carson MP, Frank MI, Keely E (2013) Original research: postpartum testing rates among women with a history of gestational diabetes—systematic review. Prim Care Diabetes 7(3):177–186CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen KK, Kapur A, Damm P, de Courten M, Bygbjerg IC (2014) From screening to postpartum follow-up—the determinants and barriers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) services, a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nielsen KK, Kapur A, Damm P, de Courten M, Bygbjerg IC (2014) From screening to postpartum follow-up—the determinants and barriers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) services, a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim C, Tabaei BP, Burke R et al (2006) Missed opportunities for type 2 diabetes mellitus screening among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Public Health 96(9):1643–1648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim C, Tabaei BP, Burke R et al (2006) Missed opportunities for type 2 diabetes mellitus screening among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Public Health 96(9):1643–1648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah BR, Lipscombe LL, Feig DS, Lowe JM (2011) Missed opportunities for type 2 diabetes testing following gestational diabetes: a population-based cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118(12):1484–1490CrossRef Shah BR, Lipscombe LL, Feig DS, Lowe JM (2011) Missed opportunities for type 2 diabetes testing following gestational diabetes: a population-based cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118(12):1484–1490CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chamberlain C, McLean A, Oats J et al (2015) Low rates of postpartum glucose screening among indigenous and non-indigenous women in Australia with gestational diabetes. Matern Child Health J 19(3):651–663CrossRefPubMed Chamberlain C, McLean A, Oats J et al (2015) Low rates of postpartum glucose screening among indigenous and non-indigenous women in Australia with gestational diabetes. Matern Child Health J 19(3):651–663CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunt KJ, Conway DL (2008) Who returns for postpartum glucose screening following gestational diabetes mellitus? Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(4):404.e1–404.e6CrossRef Hunt KJ, Conway DL (2008) Who returns for postpartum glucose screening following gestational diabetes mellitus? Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(4):404.e1–404.e6CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Olesen CR, Nielsen JH, Mortensen RN et al (2014) Associations between follow-up screening after gestational diabetes and early detection of diabetes—a register based study. BMC Public Health 14:841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Olesen CR, Nielsen JH, Mortensen RN et al (2014) Associations between follow-up screening after gestational diabetes and early detection of diabetes—a register based study. BMC Public Health 14:841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Blatt AJ, Nakamoto JM, Kaufman HW (2011) Gaps in diabetes screening during pregnancy and postpartum. Obstet Gynecol 117(1):61–68CrossRefPubMed Blatt AJ, Nakamoto JM, Kaufman HW (2011) Gaps in diabetes screening during pregnancy and postpartum. Obstet Gynecol 117(1):61–68CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark HD, van Walraven C, Code C, Karovitch A, Keely E (2003) Did publication of a clinical practice guideline recommendation to screen for type 2 diabetes in women with gestational diabetes change practice? Diabetes Care 26(2):265–268CrossRefPubMed Clark HD, van Walraven C, Code C, Karovitch A, Keely E (2003) Did publication of a clinical practice guideline recommendation to screen for type 2 diabetes in women with gestational diabetes change practice? Diabetes Care 26(2):265–268CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Quantin C, Benzenine E, Fassa M et al (2012) Evaluation of the interest of using discharge abstract databases to estimate breast cancer incidence in two French departments. J Int Assoc Off Stat 28:73–85 Quantin C, Benzenine E, Fassa M et al (2012) Evaluation of the interest of using discharge abstract databases to estimate breast cancer incidence in two French departments. J Int Assoc Off Stat 28:73–85
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Quantin C, Benzenine E, Ferdynus C et al (2013) Advantages and limitations of using national administrative data on obstetric blood transfusions to estimate the frequency of obstetric hemorrhages. J Public Health Oxf Engl 35(1):147–156CrossRef Quantin C, Benzenine E, Ferdynus C et al (2013) Advantages and limitations of using national administrative data on obstetric blood transfusions to estimate the frequency of obstetric hemorrhages. J Public Health Oxf Engl 35(1):147–156CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Quantin C, Benzenine E, Velten M et al (2013) Self-controlled case series and misclassification bias induced by case selection from administrative hospital databases: application to febrile convulsions in pediatric vaccine pharmacoepidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 178(12):1731–1739CrossRefPubMed Quantin C, Benzenine E, Velten M et al (2013) Self-controlled case series and misclassification bias induced by case selection from administrative hospital databases: application to febrile convulsions in pediatric vaccine pharmacoepidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 178(12):1731–1739CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Aboa-Eboulé C, Mengue D, Benzenine E et al (2013) How accurate is the reporting of stroke in hospital discharge data? A pilot validation study using a population-based stroke registry as control. J Neurol 260(2):605–613CrossRefPubMed Aboa-Eboulé C, Mengue D, Benzenine E et al (2013) How accurate is the reporting of stroke in hospital discharge data? A pilot validation study using a population-based stroke registry as control. J Neurol 260(2):605–613CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Quantin C, Cottenet J, Vuagnat A et al (2014) Quality of perinatal statistics from hospital discharge data: comparison with civil registration and the 2010 National Perinatal Survey. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 43(9):680–690CrossRef Quantin C, Cottenet J, Vuagnat A et al (2014) Quality of perinatal statistics from hospital discharge data: comparison with civil registration and the 2010 National Perinatal Survey. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 43(9):680–690CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Goueslard K, Revert M, Pierron A et al (2016) Evaluation of the metrological quality of medico-administrative data for perinatal indicators: a pilot study. J Community Med Health Educ 6:437 Goueslard K, Revert M, Pierron A et al (2016) Evaluation of the metrological quality of medico-administrative data for perinatal indicators: a pilot study. J Community Med Health Educ 6:437
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdulmalak C, Cottenet J, Beltramo G et al (2015) Haemoptysis in adults: a 5-year study using the French nationwide hospital administrative database. Eur Respir J 46(2):503–511CrossRefPubMed Abdulmalak C, Cottenet J, Beltramo G et al (2015) Haemoptysis in adults: a 5-year study using the French nationwide hospital administrative database. Eur Respir J 46(2):503–511CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lainay C, Benzenine E, Durier J et al (2015) Hospitalization within the first year after stroke: the Dijon stroke registry. Stroke 46(1):190–196CrossRefPubMed Lainay C, Benzenine E, Durier J et al (2015) Hospitalization within the first year after stroke: the Dijon stroke registry. Stroke 46(1):190–196CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorgis L, Cottenet J, Molins G et al (2013) Outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients: analysis of data from a French nationwide hospital medical information database. Circulation 127(17):1767–1774CrossRefPubMed Lorgis L, Cottenet J, Molins G et al (2013) Outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients: analysis of data from a French nationwide hospital medical information database. Circulation 127(17):1767–1774CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Goueslard K, Cottenet J, Mariet A-S et al (2016) Early cardiovascular events in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol 15:15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goueslard K, Cottenet J, Mariet A-S et al (2016) Early cardiovascular events in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol 15:15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tovar A, Chasan-Taber L, Eggleston E, Oken E (2011) Postpartum screening for diabetes among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Prev Chronic Dis 8(6):A124PubMedPubMedCentral Tovar A, Chasan-Taber L, Eggleston E, Oken E (2011) Postpartum screening for diabetes among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Prev Chronic Dis 8(6):A124PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson SA, Lim SS, Upham S et al (2014) Who’s responsible for the care of women during and after a pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes? Med J Aust 201(3 Suppl):S78–S81CrossRefPubMed Wilkinson SA, Lim SS, Upham S et al (2014) Who’s responsible for the care of women during and after a pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes? Med J Aust 201(3 Suppl):S78–S81CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association (2014) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care 37(Suppl 1):S14–S80CrossRef American Diabetes Association (2014) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care 37(Suppl 1):S14–S80CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Billionnet C, Weill A, Ricordeau P et al (2014) Diabète gestationnel et grossesse: données de la population française 2011. Diabetes Metab 40(1):A15 Billionnet C, Weill A, Ricordeau P et al (2014) Diabète gestationnel et grossesse: données de la population française 2011. Diabetes Metab 40(1):A15
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett WL, Ennen CS, Carrese JA et al (2011) Barriers to and facilitators of postpartum follow-up care in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study. J Womens Health 20(2):239–245CrossRef Bennett WL, Ennen CS, Carrese JA et al (2011) Barriers to and facilitators of postpartum follow-up care in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study. J Womens Health 20(2):239–245CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosson E, Bihan H, Vittaz L et al (2015) Improving postpartum glucose screening after gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study to evaluate the multicentre IMPACT initiative. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc 32(2):189–197CrossRef Cosson E, Bihan H, Vittaz L et al (2015) Improving postpartum glucose screening after gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study to evaluate the multicentre IMPACT initiative. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc 32(2):189–197CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Keely E, Clark H, Karovitch A, Graham I (2010) Screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: family physician and patient perspectives. Can Fam Phys Med Fam Can 56(6):558–563 Keely E, Clark H, Karovitch A, Graham I (2010) Screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: family physician and patient perspectives. Can Fam Phys Med Fam Can 56(6):558–563
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Chittleborough CR, Baldock KL, Taylor AW et al (2010) Long-term follow-up of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: the South Australian Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Recall Register. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50(2):127–131CrossRefPubMed Chittleborough CR, Baldock KL, Taylor AW et al (2010) Long-term follow-up of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: the South Australian Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Recall Register. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50(2):127–131CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark HD, Graham ID, Karovitch A, Keely EJ (2009) Do postal reminders increase postpartum screening of diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes mellitus? A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(6):634.e1–634.e7CrossRef Clark HD, Graham ID, Karovitch A, Keely EJ (2009) Do postal reminders increase postpartum screening of diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes mellitus? A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(6):634.e1–634.e7CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Yarrington C, Zera C (2015) Health systems approaches to diabetes screening and prevention in women with a history of gestational diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep 15(12):114CrossRef Yarrington C, Zera C (2015) Health systems approaches to diabetes screening and prevention in women with a history of gestational diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep 15(12):114CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Early screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes mellitus in France: hardly any impact of the 2010 guidelines
verfasst von
K. Goueslard
J. Cottenet
A.-S. Mariet
P. Sagot
J.-M. Petit
C. Quantin
Publikationsdatum
09.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Acta Diabetologica / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-5429
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-0986-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Acta Diabetologica 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.