nach oben

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Erschienen in:

28.10.2022 | Review Article/Brief Review

Echocardiography findings in amniotic fluid embolism: a systematic review of the literature

verfasst von: Daniel Wiseman, MD, Camille Simard, MD, Stephen S. Yang, MD, MSc, Maral Koolian, MD, MSc, Haim A. Abenhaim, MD, MPH, Jed Lipes, MD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a leading cause of obstetrical cardiac arrest and maternal morbidity. The pathogenesis of hemodynamic collapse is thought to be from right ventricular (RV) failure; however, there is a paucity of data documenting echocardiography findings in this population. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the echocardiography findings in patients with AFE.

Sources

We retrieved all case reports and case series reporting AFE in Embase and MEDLINE from inception to 20 November 2021. Studies reporting AFE diagnosed by fulfilling at least one of three different proposed AFE criteria and echocardiography findings during hospitalization were included. Patient and echocardiographic data were retrieved, and univariate logistic regression analysis was performed for outcomes of interest. Bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute clinical appraisal tool for case series.

Principal findings

Eighty publications reporting on 84 patients were included in the final review. Fifty-five out of 82 patients with data (67%) showed RV dysfunction, including 11/82 (13%) with biventricular dysfunction; 14/82 (17%) had normal systolic function. No data on RV or left ventricular function were reported for two patients. The presence of RV dysfunction on echocardiography was associated with cardiac arrest (odds ratio [OR], 3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39 to 9.67; P = 0.009), and a composite risk of cardiac arrest, maternal death or use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.43 to 10.4; P = 0.007). A low risk of bias was observed in 15/84 (18%) cases.

Conclusions

Right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography is a common finding in AFE and is associated with a high risk of cardiac arrest. The finding of RV dysfunction on echocardiography may help diagnose AFE and help triage the highest risk patients with AFE.

Study registration

PROSPERO (CRD42021271323); registered 1 September 2021.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.007CrossRef

Shamshirsaz AA, Clark SL. Amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016; 43: 779–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2016.07.001CrossRefPubMed

Mhyre JM. Maternal mortality. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 277–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e3283530580CrossRefPubMed

Ito F, Akasaka J, Koike N, Uekuri C, Shigemitsu A, Kobayashi H. Incidence, diagnosis and pathophysiology of amniotic fluid embolism. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 34: 580–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2014.919996CrossRefPubMed

Clark SL, Romero R, Dildy GA, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the case definition of amniotic fluid embolism in research studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 408–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kanayama N, Tamura N. Amniotic fluid embolism: pathophysiology and new strategies for management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 1507–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12428CrossRefPubMed

Fitzpatrick KE, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of amniotic-fluid embolism: a population-based cohort and nested case-control study. BJOG 2016; 123: 100–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13300CrossRefPubMed

Stafford IA, Moaddab A, Dildy GA, et al. Evaluation of proposed criteria for research reporting of amniotic fluid embolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 285–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1099CrossRefPubMed

Kobayashi H, Akasaka J, Naruse K, et al. Comparison of the different definition criteria for the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: QC18–21. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/26746.10283

10.

Ponzio-Klijanienko A, Vincent-Rohfritsch A, Girault A, Le Ray C, Goffinet F, Bonnet MP. Evaluation of the 4 diagnosis criteria proposed by the SMFM and the AFE foundation for amniotic fluid embolism in a monocentric population. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49: 101821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101821CrossRefPubMed

11.

Thomson AJ, Greer IA. Non-haemorrhagic obstetric shock. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 14: 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.1999.0061CrossRefPubMed

12.

Clark SL. A biomarker for amniotic fluid embolism: the search continues. BJOG 2021; 128: 1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16833CrossRefPubMed

13.

Simard C, Yang S, Koolian M, Shear R, Rudski L, Lipes J. The role of echocardiography in amniotic fluid embolism: a case series and review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2021; 68: 1541–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02065-4CrossRefPubMed

14.

Blanco P, Abdo-Cuza A. Point-of-care ultrasound in the critically ill pregnant or postpartum patient: what every intensivist should know. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 1123–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05682-2CrossRefPubMed

15.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18: 2127–33. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00099

17.

Erez O, Novack L, Beer-Weisel R, et al. DIC score in pregnant women--a population based modification of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis score. PloS One 2014; 9: e93240. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Barriuso V, Pombar X, Bankowski HA. The use of therapeutic hypothermia in the management of amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Med 2013; 6: 92–3. https://doi.org/10.1258/om.2011.110069CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

De Angelis E, Prota C, Matturro R, Citro R. Amniotic fluid embolism in a grown-up congenital heart disease patient. J Cardiovasc Echogr 2019; 29: 20–2. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_64_18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Maack KH, Munk K, Dahl K, Jørgensen HH, Christiansen A, Helmig RB. Right heart masses demonstrated by echocardiography in a patient with amniotic fluid embolism during labour. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2018; 62: 134–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13006CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bernstein SN, Cudemus-Deseda GA, Ortiz VE, Goodman A, Jassar AS. Case 33-2019: a 35-year-old woman with cardiopulmonary arrest during cesarean section. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1664–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcpc1904046CrossRefPubMed

22.

Zaidi A, Knight DS, Augustine DX, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 2020; 7: G19–41. https://doi.org/10.1530/erp-19-0051CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Mandoli GE, Sciaccaluga C, Bandera F, et al. Cor pulmonale: the role of traditional and advanced echocardiography in the acute and chronic settings. Heart Fail Rev 2021; 26: 263–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10014-4CrossRefPubMed

24.

Viau-Lapointe J, Filewod N. Extracorporeal therapies for amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134: 989–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003513CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tabi M, Burstein BJ, Anavekar NS, Kashani KB, Jentzer JC. Associations of vasopressor requirements with echocardiographic parameters after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Intensive Care Med 2022; 37: 518–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066621998936CrossRefPubMed

26.

Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: e1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.052CrossRef

27.

Elfwén L, Hildebrand K, Schierbeck S, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound after return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac-arrest patients. Resuscitation 2019; 142: 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.282CrossRefPubMed

28.

Zengin S, Yavuz E, Al B, et al. Benefits of cardiac sonography performed by a non-expert sonographer in patients with non-traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 2016; 102: 105–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.025CrossRefPubMed

29.

Balki M, Liu S, León JA, Baghirzada L. Epidemiology of cardiac arrest during hospitalization for delivery in canada: a nationwide study. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 890–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001877CrossRefPubMed

30.

O'Neill JO, Iqbal R, McGarry K. "Thrombus in transit"--the role of echocardiography in the diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism and a review of the literature. Acta Cardiol 2002; 57: 291–4. https://doi.org/10.2143/ac.57.4.2005429CrossRefPubMed

31.

Shen F, Wang L, Yang W, Chen Y. From appearance to essence: 10 years review of atypical amniotic fluid embolism. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293: 329–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3785-zCrossRefPubMed

32.

Albaroudi B, Haddad M, Albaroudi O, Abdel-Rahman ME, Jarman R, Harris T. Assessing left ventricular systolic function by emergency physician using point of care echocardiography compared to expert: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med 2022; 29: 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/mej.0000000000000866CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Echocardiography findings in amniotic fluid embolism: a systematic review of the literature
verfasst von: Daniel Wiseman, MD
Camille Simard, MD
Stephen S. Yang, MD, MSc
Maral Koolian, MD, MSc
Haim A. Abenhaim, MD, MPH
Jed Lipes, MD
Publikationsdatum: 28.10.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02343-9

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Echocardiography findings in amniotic fluid embolism: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract

Purpose

Sources

Principal findings

Conclusions

Study registration

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Update AINS

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Sources

Principal findings

Conclusions

Study registration

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

A novel “double-dye” technique to determine the injectate spread of bolus versus continuous infusion in erector spinae plane block in cadavers

Strategies to prevent long-term opioid use following trauma: a Canadian practice survey

Genitofemoral peripheral nerve stimulator implantation for refractory groin pain: a case report

Assessment of the reliability of virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared to traditional in-person airway evaluation: a prospective observational study

Use of injections for chronic pain from 2010 to 2019 in Ontario, Canada

Anesthesia and neurodevelopment after 20 years: where are we now and where to next?

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Update AINS