nach oben

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Erschienen in:

25.01.2017 | Editorial

Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference—The Least We Can Do

verfasst von: Seth S. Leopold, MD, Raphaël Porcher, PhD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

How should a clinician decide whether a treatment effect claimed in a journal article is worth caring about? …

Carragee EJ. The rise and fall of the “minimum clinically important difference.” Spine J. 2010;10:283–284.CrossRefPubMed

Carragee EJ, Cheng I. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2010;10:313–320.CrossRefPubMed

Colquhoun D. The problem with p-values. Aeon. 11 October 2016. Available at https://aeon.co/essays/it-s-time-for-science-to-abandon-the-term-statistically-significant, accessed on December 29, 2016.

Copay AG, Martin MM, Subach BR, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Schuler TC, Berven S. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: Inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements. Spine J. 2010;10:291–296.CrossRefPubMed

Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407.CrossRefPubMed

Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Lohmander LS. Minimally clinically important improvement: All non-responders are not really non-responders: An illustration from total knee replacement. Osteoarth Cartilage. 2012;20:364–367.CrossRef

Dorey F. Statistics in brief. Interpretation and use of p values. All p values are not equal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3259–3261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gilmer BB, Comstock BA, Jette JL, Warme WJ, Jackins SE, Matsen FA III. The prognosis for improvement in comfort and function after the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis. An analysis of 176 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e102.CrossRefPubMed

Glassman SD, Copay AG, Berven SH, Polly DW, Subach BR, Carreon LY. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1839–1847.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Cont Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.CrossRef

11.

Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E. Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopaedic conditions. J Ortho Surg Res. 2015;10:24.CrossRef

12.

Maltenfort M, Diaz-Ledezma C. Statistics in brief: Minimum clinically important difference—Availability of reliable estimates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. [Published online ahead of print January 3, 2017]. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5204-6.

13.

Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592.PubMed

14.

Rai SK, Yazdany J, Fortin PR, Aviña-Zubieta JA. Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

The B. Significance testing—Are we ready yet to abandon its use? Current Med Res Opin. 2011;27:2087–2090.CrossRef

16.

Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s Statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70:129–133.CrossRef

Titel: Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference—The Least We Can Do
verfasst von: Seth S. Leopold, MD
Raphaël Porcher, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 25.01.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5253-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference—The Least We Can Do

Excerpt

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Not the Last Word: Safety Alert: One in 200 Knee Replacement Patients Die Within 90 Days of Surgery

CORR Insights®: Does Surgeon Experience Impact the Risk of Complications After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?

CORR Insights®: “Knuckle Cracking”: Can Blinded Observers Detect Changes with Physical Examination and Sonography?

CORR Insights®: Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion

No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie