The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1174-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
To assess the sensitivity of prevalence and inequality estimates of Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI) to the choice of survey in European countries.
We use logistic regression to estimate adjusted risk ratios, quantifying differences in prevalence and educational inequalities, the impact of survey characteristics and Kendall’s tau to assess similarity in country rankings between surveys. We include the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), European Social Survey (ESS) and European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC).
EHIS estimates higher prevalence than EU-SILC 17% (men) and 23% (women), and ESS 24% (men) and 29% (women). Prevalence does not differ significantly between EU-SILC and ESS. EU-SILC estimates 52.5% (men) and 28.1% (women) higher inequalities than EHIS and 63.2% (men) and 32.7% (women) higher inequalities than ESS. Survey characteristics do not account for differences in prevalence or inequalities. Country rankings do not agree for prevalence or inequalities.
Survey choice strongly impacts estimates of GALI prevalence and educational inequalities. Further study is necessary to understand these discrepancies. Caution is required when using these surveys for cross-country comparisons of (educational inequalities in) GALI disability.
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 315 kb)38_2018_1174_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Berger N, Van Oyen H, Cambois E, Fouweather T, Jagger C, Nusselder W, Robine J-M (2015) Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:1 CrossRef
Bowling A (2005) Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health 27:281–291 CrossRef
Brønnum-Hansen H et al (2015) Educational inequalities in health expectancy during the financial crisis in Denmark. Int J Public Health 60(8):927–935 CrossRef
Cambois E, Grobon S, Van Oyen H, Robine J-M (2016a) Impact of question wording on the measurement of activity limitation: evidence from a randomized test in France. J Aging Health 28:1315–1338 CrossRef
Cambois E, Solé-Auró A, Robine J-M (2016b) Economic hardship and educational differentials in disability in 26 European countries. J Aging Health 28:1214–1238 CrossRef
Croezen S, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ (2016) Self-perceived health in older Europeans: Does the choice of survey matter? Eur J Public Health 26:686–692 CrossRef
Croux C, Dehon C (2010) Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Stat Methods Appl 19:497–515 CrossRef
EHLEIS (2011) Assesment of the GALI Question used in SILC since 2008. EHLEIS Technical Report
ESS (2016) ESS methodological overview. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/methodology. Accessed 9 July 2016
Eurostat (2016) EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/EU_statistics_on_income_and_living_conditions_(EU-SILC)_methodology. Accessed 9 July 2016
Hyder AA, Puvanachandra P, Morrow RH (2012) Measuring the health of populations: explaining composite indicators. J Public Health Res 1:222 CrossRef
Jürges H (2007) True health vs. response styles: exploring cross-country differences in self-reported health. Health Econ 16:163–178 CrossRef
Kulik MC et al (2014) Does the pattern of educational inequalities in smoking in Western Europe depend on the choice of survey? Int J Public Health 59(4):587–597 CrossRef
McClendon MJ, O’Brien DJ (1988) Question-order effects on the determinants of subjective well-being. Public Opin Q 52:351–364 CrossRef
Norton EC, Miller MM, Kleinman LC (2013) Computing adjusted risk ratios and risk differences in Stata. Stata J 13:492–509
Robine J-M, Jagger C, Mathers CD, Crimmins EM, Suzman RM (2003) Determining health expectancies. Wiley, Hoboken
Schwarz N (1999) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54:93 CrossRef
Sykes W, Collins M (1988) Effects of mode of interview: experiments in the UK. In: Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, Massey JT, Nicholls WL, Waksberg J (eds) Telephone survey methodology. Wiley, New York, pp 301–320
Tajeu GS, Sen B, Allison DB, Menachemi N (2012) Misuse of odds ratios in obesity literature: an empirical analysis of published studies. Obesity 20:1726–1731 CrossRef
Toch-Marquardt M (2017) Does the pattern of occupational class inequalities in self-reported health depend on the choice of survey? A comparative analysis of four surveys and 35 European countries. Eur J Public Health 27:34–39 CrossRef
Van Oyen H, Bogaert P, Yokota RTC et al. (2018) Measuring disability: a systematic review of the validity and reliability of the Global Activity Limitations Indicator (GALI). Arch Public Health 76(1):25 CrossRef
- Educational inequalities in Global Activity Limitation Indicator disability in 28 European Countries: Does the choice of survey matter?
Jose R. Rubio-Valverde
Wilma J. Nusselder
Johan P. Mackenbach
- Springer International Publishing
International Journal of Public Health
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Elektronische ISSN: 1661-8564