Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 11/2014

01.11.2014 | Breast

Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Monique D. Dorrius, Hildebrand Dijkstra, Matthijs Oudkerk, Paul E. Sijens

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of the choice of b values and prior use of contrast medium on apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of breast lesions derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and on the discrimination between benign and malignant lesions.

Methods

A literature search of relevant DWI studies was performed. The accuracy of DWI to characterize lesions by using b value ≤600 s/mm2 and b value >600 s/mm2 was presented as pooled sensitivity and specificity, and the ADC was calculated for both groups. Lesions were pooled as pre- or post-contrast DWI.

Results

Of 198 articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Median ADCs were significantly higher (13.2–35.1 %, p < 0.001) for the group of b values ≤600 s/mm2 compared to >600 s/mm2. The sensitivity in both groups was similar (91 % and 89 %, p = 0.495) as well as the specificity (75 % and 84 %, p = 0.237). Contrast medium had no significant effects on the ADCs (p ≥ 0.08). The differentiation between benign and malignant lesions was optimal (58.4 %) for the combination of b = 0 and 1,000 s/mm2.

Conclusions

The wide variety of b value combinations applied in different studies significantly affects the ADC of breast lesions and confounds quantitative DWI. If only a couple of b values are used, those of b = 0 and 1,000 s/mm2 are recommended for the best improvement of differentiating between benign and malignant lesions.

Key Points

The choice of b values significantly affects the ADC of breast lesions.
Sensitivity and specificity are not affected by the choice of b values.
b values 0 and 1,000 s/mm 2 are recommended for optimal differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.
Contrast medium prior to DWI does not significantly affect the ADC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30PubMedCrossRef Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, Bluemke DA (2006) Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 26:1719–1734PubMedCrossRef Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, Bluemke DA (2006) Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 26:1719–1734PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Thickman D, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Lehman C, Gatsonis CA (2006) Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238:42–53PubMedCrossRef Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Thickman D, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Lehman C, Gatsonis CA (2006) Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238:42–53PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bone B (2003) Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 44:379–386PubMed Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bone B (2003) Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 44:379–386PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742PubMedCrossRef Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hrung JM, Sonnad SS, Schwartz JS, Langlotz CP (1999) Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 6:387–397PubMedCrossRef Hrung JM, Sonnad SS, Schwartz JS, Langlotz CP (1999) Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 6:387–397PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124PubMedCrossRef Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Martincich L, Faivre-Pierret M, Zechmann CM et al (2011) Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast MR imaging (DETECT trial). Radiology 258:396–408 Martincich L, Faivre-Pierret M, Zechmann CM et al (2011) Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast MR imaging (DETECT trial). Radiology 258:396–408
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P et al (2014) Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7T. Eur Radiol 24:913–920PubMedCrossRef Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P et al (2014) Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7T. Eur Radiol 24:913–920PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505PubMedCrossRef Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gourtsoyianni S, Papanikolaou N, Yarmenitis S, Maris T, Karantanas A, Gourtsoyiannis N (2008) Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 18:486–492PubMedCrossRef Gourtsoyianni S, Papanikolaou N, Yarmenitis S, Maris T, Karantanas A, Gourtsoyiannis N (2008) Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 18:486–492PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744PubMedCrossRef Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Michielsen K, Vergote I, Op de Beeck K (2014) Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT. Eur Radiol 24(4):889–901PubMedCrossRef Michielsen K, Vergote I, Op de Beeck K (2014) Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT. Eur Radiol 24(4):889–901PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha J, Kim ST, Kim HJ et al (2013) Analysis of the layering pattern of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumour progression. Eur Radiol 23:879–886PubMedCrossRef Cha J, Kim ST, Kim HJ et al (2013) Analysis of the layering pattern of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumour progression. Eur Radiol 23:879–886PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kartalis N, Lindholm TL, Aspelin P, Permert J, Albiin N (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours. Eur Radiol 19:1981–1990PubMedCrossRef Kartalis N, Lindholm TL, Aspelin P, Permert J, Albiin N (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours. Eur Radiol 19:1981–1990PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Mitsuzaki K, Urata J, Tsuchigame T, Takahashi M, Ogawa M (1998) Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 208:605–609PubMedCrossRef Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Mitsuzaki K, Urata J, Tsuchigame T, Takahashi M, Ogawa M (1998) Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 208:605–609PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno Y, Takahashi S, Kitajima K et al (2013) Computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis. Eur Radiol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRef Ueno Y, Takahashi S, Kitajima K et al (2013) Computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis. Eur Radiol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochi M, Kuroiwa T, Sunami S et al (2013) Diffusion weighted imaging (b-value = 1500 s/mm2) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes. Breast Cancer 20:137–144PubMedCrossRef Ochi M, Kuroiwa T, Sunami S et al (2013) Diffusion weighted imaging (b-value = 1500 s/mm2) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes. Breast Cancer 20:137–144PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonmez G, Cuce F, Mutlu H et al (2011) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Wien Klin Wochenschr 123:655–661PubMedCrossRef Sonmez G, Cuce F, Mutlu H et al (2011) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Wien Klin Wochenschr 123:655–661PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue K, Kozawa E, Mizukoshi W et al (2011) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumors: quantitative and visual assessment. Jpn J Radiol 29:429–436PubMedCrossRef Inoue K, Kozawa E, Mizukoshi W et al (2011) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumors: quantitative and visual assessment. Jpn J Radiol 29:429–436PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura T, Isomoto I, Sueyoshi E et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of ADC for non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:217–225PubMedCrossRef Imamura T, Isomoto I, Sueyoshi E et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of ADC for non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:217–225PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210–217PubMedCrossRef Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210–217PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fornasa F, Pinali L, Gasparini A, Toniolli E, Montemezzi S (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation. Radiol Med 116:264–275PubMedCrossRef Fornasa F, Pinali L, Gasparini A, Toniolli E, Montemezzi S (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation. Radiol Med 116:264–275PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer PA, Schäfer A, Dietzel M, Grässel D, Gajda M, Camara O, Kaiser WA (2011) Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 21:1–10PubMedCrossRef Baltzer PA, Schäfer A, Dietzel M, Grässel D, Gajda M, Camara O, Kaiser WA (2011) Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 21:1–10PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, Allain MD, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Lehman CD (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664–1673PubMedCrossRef Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, Allain MD, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Lehman CD (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664–1673PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie CM, Yin SH, Li H et al (2010) Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 32:217–220PubMed Xie CM, Yin SH, Li H et al (2010) Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 32:217–220PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin G, An N, Jacobs MA, Li K (2010) The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results. Acad Radiol 17:456–463PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Jin G, An N, Jacobs MA, Li K (2010) The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results. Acad Radiol 17:456–463PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2010) Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:562–570PubMedCrossRef Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2010) Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:562–570PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Camara O, Kaiser WA (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions. Eur Radiol 20:1101–1110PubMedCrossRef Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Camara O, Kaiser WA (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions. Eur Radiol 20:1101–1110PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722PubMedCrossRef Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Belli P, Costantini M, Bufi E, Magistrelli A, La Torre G, Bonomo L (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation. Radiol Med 115:51–69PubMedCrossRef Belli P, Costantini M, Bufi E, Magistrelli A, La Torre G, Bonomo L (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation. Radiol Med 115:51–69PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E, Domingues MN, Domingues RC, da Fonseca LM, Gasparetto EL (2009) Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1030–1035PubMedCrossRef Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E, Domingues MN, Domingues RC, da Fonseca LM, Gasparetto EL (2009) Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1030–1035PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozaki M, Fukuma E (2009) 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:840–849PubMedCrossRef Tozaki M, Fukuma E (2009) 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:840–849PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Barceló J, Vilanova JC, Albanell J et al (2009) Breast MRI: the usefulness of diffusion-weighted sequences for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Radiologia 51:469–476PubMedCrossRef Barceló J, Vilanova JC, Albanell J et al (2009) Breast MRI: the usefulness of diffusion-weighted sequences for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Radiologia 51:469–476PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Stadlbauer A, Bernt R, Gruber S et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) for the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions. Eur Radiol 19:2349–2356PubMedCrossRef Stadlbauer A, Bernt R, Gruber S et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) for the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions. Eur Radiol 19:2349–2356PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Herrmann KH et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 19:1612–1620PubMedCrossRef Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Herrmann KH et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 19:1612–1620PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yili Z, Xiaoyan H, Hongwen D, Yun Z, Xin C, Peng W, Youmin G (2009) The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing the ADC changes of tissues adjacent to breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer 9:18PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Yili Z, Xiaoyan H, Hongwen D, Yun Z, Xin C, Peng W, Youmin G (2009) The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing the ADC changes of tissues adjacent to breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer 9:18PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 17(10):2646–2655PubMedCrossRef Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 17(10):2646–2655PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo JD, Liu YY, Zhang XL, Shi LC (2007) Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breast diseases. Ai Aizheng 26:168–171 Luo JD, Liu YY, Zhang XL, Shi LC (2007) Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breast diseases. Ai Aizheng 26:168–171
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:319–324PubMedCrossRef Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:319–324PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, Hata H, Ozaki M, Iwabuchi K, Kuranami M, Watanabe M, Hayakawa K (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35–42PubMedCrossRef Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, Hata H, Ozaki M, Iwabuchi K, Kuranami M, Watanabe M, Hayakawa K (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35–42PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang JH, Yan FH, Zhou ML, Ye F, Xu PJ (2008) Comparative study of diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for the detection of small breast cancers. Zhonghua Fang She Yi Xue Yu Fang Hu Za Zhi 42:152–156 Tang JH, Yan FH, Zhou ML, Ye F, Xu PJ (2008) Comparative study of diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for the detection of small breast cancers. Zhonghua Fang She Yi Xue Yu Fang Hu Za Zhi 42:152–156
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu YJ, Feng XY, Tang F, Peng WJ, Mao J, Yang WT (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: Lesion characterization and parameter selection. Zhonghua Fang She Yi Xue Yu Fang Hu Za Zhi 41:451–456 Gu YJ, Feng XY, Tang F, Peng WJ, Mao J, Yang WT (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: Lesion characterization and parameter selection. Zhonghua Fang She Yi Xue Yu Fang Hu Za Zhi 41:451–456
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron P, Dorrius MD, Kappert P et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR 23:399–405 Baron P, Dorrius MD, Kappert P et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR 23:399–405
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M, Nishida K, Takahata A, Nishimura T (2009) Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1080–1084PubMedCrossRef Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M, Nishida K, Takahata A, Nishimura T (2009) Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1080–1084PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Janka R, Hammon M, Geppert C, Nothhelfer A, Uder M, Wenkel E (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions before and after contrast-enhancement. Röfo 186:130–135PubMed Janka R, Hammon M, Geppert C, Nothhelfer A, Uder M, Wenkel E (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions before and after contrast-enhancement. Röfo 186:130–135PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuoka A, Manito M, Harada M, Kubo H, Bandou Y, Tangoku A, Nakano K, Nishitani H (2008) Comparison of 3.0- and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15–20PubMedCrossRef Matsuoka A, Manito M, Harada M, Kubo H, Bandou Y, Tangoku A, Nakano K, Nishitani H (2008) Comparison of 3.0- and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15–20PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J (2006) Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J (2006) Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2327:557–560CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2327:557–560CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:249–255PubMedCrossRef Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:249–255PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Li WL, Zhang YL, Wu Q, Guo YM, Bai ZL (2010) Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC Cancer 10:693PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Chen X, Li WL, Zhang YL, Wu Q, Guo YM, Bai ZL (2010) Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC Cancer 10:693PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253:341–351PubMedCrossRef Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253:341–351PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Firat AK, Sanli B, Karakas HM, Erdem G (2006) The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiol 48:465–470CrossRef Firat AK, Sanli B, Karakas HM, Erdem G (2006) The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiol 48:465–470CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Zhang J, Bao J et al (2013) Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in differential diagnosis of lung lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1351–1358PubMedCrossRef Chen L, Zhang J, Bao J et al (2013) Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in differential diagnosis of lung lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1351–1358PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Monique D. Dorrius
Hildebrand Dijkstra
Matthijs Oudkerk
Paul E. Sijens
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3338-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

European Radiology 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.