Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2016

10.12.2015 | Chest

Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs

verfasst von: Esa Liukkonen, Airi Jartti, Marianne Haapea, Heljä Oikarinen, Lauri Ahvenjärvi, Seija Mattila, Terhi Nevala, Kari Palosaari, Marja Perhomaa, Miika T. Nieminen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare diagnostic accuracy in the detection of subtle chest lesions on digital chest radiographs using medical-grade displays, consumer-grade displays, and tablet devices under bright and dim ambient light.

Methods

Five experienced radiologists independently assessed 50 chest radiographs (32 with subtle pulmonary findings and 18 without apparent findings) under bright (510 lx) and dim (16 lx) ambient lighting. Computed tomography was used as the reference standard for interstitial and nodular lesions and follow-up chest radiograph for pneumothorax. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were calculated for assessments carried out in all displays and compared using the McNemar test. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05.

Results

Significant differences in sensitivity between the assessments under bright and dim lighting were found among consumer-grade displays in interstitial opacities with, and in pneumothorax without, Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine-Grayscale Standard Display Function (DICOM-GSDF) calibration. Compared to 6 megapixel (MP) display under bright lighting, sensitivity in pneumothorax was lower in the tablet device and the consumer-grade display. Sensitivity in interstitial opacities was lower in the DICOM-GSDF calibrated consumer-grade display.

Conclusions

A consumer-grade display with or without DICOM-GSDF calibration or a tablet device is not suitable for reading digital chest radiographs in bright lighting. No significant differences were observed between five displays in dim light.

Key Points

Ambient lighting affects performance of consumer-grade displays (with or without DICOM-GSDF calibration).
Bright light decreases detection of pneumothorax on non-medical displays.
Bright light decreases detection of interstitial opacities on DICOM-GSDF-calibrated, consumer-grade displays.
Dim light is sufficient to detect subtle chest lesions from all displays.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D et al (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225CrossRefPubMed Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D et al (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Norweck JT, Seibert JA, Andriole KP et al (2013) ACR-AAPM-SIIM technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 26:38–52CrossRefPubMed Norweck JT, Seibert JA, Andriole KP et al (2013) ACR-AAPM-SIIM technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 26:38–52CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hemminger B, Muller K (1997) A performance metric for evaluating conformance of medical image displays with the proposed ACR/NEMA display function standard. SPIE, BellinghamCrossRef Hemminger B, Muller K (1997) A performance metric for evaluating conformance of medical image displays with the proposed ACR/NEMA display function standard. SPIE, BellinghamCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blume H, Steven P, Ho A et al (2003) Characterization of liquid-crystal displays for medical images - part 2. In: Galloway R (ed) Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2003, vol 5029. International Society for Optical Engineering Edn, Bellingham, pp 449–473 Blume H, Steven P, Ho A et al (2003) Characterization of liquid-crystal displays for medical images - part 2. In: Galloway R (ed) Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2003, vol 5029. International Society for Optical Engineering Edn, Bellingham, pp 449–473
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abboud S, Weiss F, Siegel E, Jeudy J (2013) TB or not TB: interreader and intrareader variability in screening diagnosis on an iPad versus a traditional display. J Am Coll Radiol 10:42–44CrossRefPubMed Abboud S, Weiss F, Siegel E, Jeudy J (2013) TB or not TB: interreader and intrareader variability in screening diagnosis on an iPad versus a traditional display. J Am Coll Radiol 10:42–44CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McEntee MF, Lowe J, Butler ML et al (2012) iPads and LCDs show similar performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules. In: Abbey CK, Mello- Thomas CR (ed) Proceedings of SPIE McEntee MF, Lowe J, Butler ML et al (2012) iPads and LCDs show similar performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules. In: Abbey CK, Mello- Thomas CR (ed) Proceedings of SPIE
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Salazar AJ, Romero J, Bernal O, Moreno A, Velasco S, Diaz X (2013) Effects of the DICOM grayscale standard display function on the accuracy of medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays for telemammography screening. In: Brieva Je B (ed) Proceedings of SPIE, p 89220r Salazar AJ, Romero J, Bernal O, Moreno A, Velasco S, Diaz X (2013) Effects of the DICOM grayscale standard display function on the accuracy of medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays for telemammography screening. In: Brieva Je B (ed) Proceedings of SPIE, p 89220r
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin J, Guo Q, Zhang W et al (2012) Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules. Br J Radiol 85:E549–E555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yin J, Guo Q, Zhang W et al (2012) Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules. Br J Radiol 85:E549–E555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshimura K, Nihashi T, Ikeda M et al (2013) Comparison of liquid crystal display monitors calibrated with gray-scale standard display function and with gamma 2.2 and iPad: observer performance in detection of cerebral infarction on brain CT. Am J Roentgenol 200:1304–1309CrossRef Yoshimura K, Nihashi T, Ikeda M et al (2013) Comparison of liquid crystal display monitors calibrated with gray-scale standard display function and with gamma 2.2 and iPad: observer performance in detection of cerebral infarction on brain CT. Am J Roentgenol 200:1304–1309CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JB, Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS (2013) An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination. J Digit Imaging 26:683–690CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park JB, Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS (2013) An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination. J Digit Imaging 26:683–690CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tewes S, Rodt T, Marquardt S, Evangelidou E, Wacker FK, Von Falck C (2013) Evaluation of the use of a tablet computer with a high-resolution display for interpreting emergency CT scans. Rofo 185:1066–1072 Tewes S, Rodt T, Marquardt S, Evangelidou E, Wacker FK, Von Falck C (2013) Evaluation of the use of a tablet computer with a high-resolution display for interpreting emergency CT scans. Rofo 185:1066–1072
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammon M, Schlechtweg PM, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Schwab SA (2014) iPads in breast imaging - a phantom study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74:152–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammon M, Schlechtweg PM, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Schwab SA (2014) iPads in breast imaging - a phantom study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74:152–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barten PGJ (1999) Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. SPIE-The International Society For Optical Engineering, Washington, USA Barten PGJ (1999) Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. SPIE-The International Society For Optical Engineering, Washington, USA
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Salazar AJ, Aguirre DA, Ocampo J, Camacho JC, Diaz XA (2014) DICOM gray-scale standard display function: clinical diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography in medical-grade gray-scale and consumer-grade color displays. Am J Roentgenol 202:1272–1280CrossRef Salazar AJ, Aguirre DA, Ocampo J, Camacho JC, Diaz XA (2014) DICOM gray-scale standard display function: clinical diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography in medical-grade gray-scale and consumer-grade color displays. Am J Roentgenol 202:1272–1280CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleiss J, Levin B, Paik M (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, HobokenCrossRef Fleiss J, Levin B, Paik M (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, HobokenCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis J, Koch G (1977) Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis J, Koch G (1977) Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshimura K, Shimamoto K, Ikeda M, Ichikawa K, Naganawa S (2011) A comparative contrast perception phantom image of brain CT study between high-grade and low-grade liquid crystal displays (LCDs) in electronic medical charts rid B-5163-2010. Phys Med 27:109–116CrossRefPubMed Yoshimura K, Shimamoto K, Ikeda M, Ichikawa K, Naganawa S (2011) A comparative contrast perception phantom image of brain CT study between high-grade and low-grade liquid crystal displays (LCDs) in electronic medical charts rid B-5163-2010. Phys Med 27:109–116CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kallio-Pulkkinen S, Haapea M, Liukkonen E, Huumonen S, Tervonen O, Nieminen M (2014) Comparison of consumer grade, tablet and 6MP-displays: observer performance in detection of anatomical and pathological structures in panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118:135–141CrossRefPubMed Kallio-Pulkkinen S, Haapea M, Liukkonen E, Huumonen S, Tervonen O, Nieminen M (2014) Comparison of consumer grade, tablet and 6MP-displays: observer performance in detection of anatomical and pathological structures in panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118:135–141CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pakkala T, Kuusela L, Ekholm M, Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Kortesniemi M (2012) Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs. Caries Res 46:568–574CrossRefPubMed Pakkala T, Kuusela L, Ekholm M, Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Kortesniemi M (2012) Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs. Caries Res 46:568–574CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollard BJ, Chawla AS, Delong DM, Hashimoto N, Samei E (2008) Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions. Med Phys 35:2204–2213CrossRefPubMed Pollard BJ, Chawla AS, Delong DM, Hashimoto N, Samei E (2008) Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions. Med Phys 35:2204–2213CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fetterly KA, Blume HR, Flynn MJ, Samei E (2008) Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays. J Digit Imaging 21:193–207CrossRefPubMed Fetterly KA, Blume HR, Flynn MJ, Samei E (2008) Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays. J Digit Imaging 21:193–207CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Ranger N, Delong DM (2008) A comparative contrast-detail study of five medical displays. Med Phys 35:1358–1364CrossRefPubMed Samei E, Ranger N, Delong DM (2008) A comparative contrast-detail study of five medical displays. Med Phys 35:1358–1364CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim H, Chung MJ, Lee G et al (2013) Interpretation of digital chest radiographs: comparison of light emitting diode versus cold cathode fluorescent lamp backlit monitors. Korean J Radiol 14:968–976CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim H, Chung MJ, Lee G et al (2013) Interpretation of digital chest radiographs: comparison of light emitting diode versus cold cathode fluorescent lamp backlit monitors. Korean J Radiol 14:968–976CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Salazar AJ, Aguirre DA, Ocampo J, Camacho JC, Diaz XA (2014) Evaluation of three pneumothorax size quantification methods on digitized chest x-ray films using medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays. J Digit Imaging 27:280–286CrossRefPubMed Salazar AJ, Aguirre DA, Ocampo J, Camacho JC, Diaz XA (2014) Evaluation of three pneumothorax size quantification methods on digitized chest x-ray films using medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays. J Digit Imaging 27:280–286CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mcnulty JP, Ryan JT, Evanoff MG, Rainford LA (2012) Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study. Acad Radiol 19:1023–1028CrossRefPubMed Mcnulty JP, Ryan JT, Evanoff MG, Rainford LA (2012) Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study. Acad Radiol 19:1023–1028CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosmans H, De Hauwere A, Lemmens K et al (2013) Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography. Eur Radiol 23:2891–2898CrossRefPubMed Bosmans H, De Hauwere A, Lemmens K et al (2013) Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography. Eur Radiol 23:2891–2898CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Seradour B, Heid P, Esteve J (2014) Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program. Am J Roentgenol 202:229–236CrossRef Seradour B, Heid P, Esteve J (2014) Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program. Am J Roentgenol 202:229–236CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat De Paepe L, De Bock P, Vanovermeire O, Kimpe T (2012) Performance evaluation of a visual display calibration algorithm for ipad. Medical Imaging 2012: Advanced Pacs-Based Imaging Informatics and Therapeutic Applications 8319:831909 De Paepe L, De Bock P, Vanovermeire O, Kimpe T (2012) Performance evaluation of a visual display calibration algorithm for ipad. Medical Imaging 2012: Advanced Pacs-Based Imaging Informatics and Therapeutic Applications 8319:831909
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs
verfasst von
Esa Liukkonen
Airi Jartti
Marianne Haapea
Heljä Oikarinen
Lauri Ahvenjärvi
Seija Mattila
Terhi Nevala
Kari Palosaari
Marja Perhomaa
Miika T. Nieminen
Publikationsdatum
10.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4150-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

European Radiology 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.