Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Original Article

Effect of fesoterodine on urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry

verfasst von: Niels Klarskov, Amanda Darekar, David Scholfield, Laurence Whelan, Gunnar Lose

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim was to evaluate, using urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR), the effect of fesoterodine on urethral function in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

Women aged 18 to 65 years were eligible for this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study if they had had clinically significant SUI or SUI-predominant mixed urinary incontinence for >3 months. Each participant received fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg, and placebo once daily for 7 days, with a 7- to 10-day washout between treatments. UPR was performed at baseline and 4 to 8 h after the last dose in each treatment period. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary before randomisation and during the last 3 days of each treatment period.

Results

Of the 22 women randomly assigned and treated, 17 met the criteria for the primary efficacy analyses. No statistically significant differences were seen between fesoterodine 4 mg or fesoterodine 8 mg and placebo in opening urethral pressure (primary endpoint) or other UPR endpoints. No statistically significant differences were seen between either fesoterodine dose and placebo in the change from baseline in the bladder diary variables (total urinary incontinence, SUI, or urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 h). Adverse events were reported by 8 participants taking fesoterodine 4 mg, 17 taking fesoterodine 8 mg, and 8 taking placebo.

Conclusions

Fesoterodine did not affect urethral pressure or significantly decrease the number of incontinence episodes in women with SUI. The UPR parameters showed no placebo effect, while there was a placebo effect of 60 % based on the bladder diary.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93(3):324–330PubMedCrossRef Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93(3):324–330PubMedCrossRef
2.
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang A, Carr LK (2008) Female stress urinary incontinence. Can J Urol 15 [Suppl 1]:37–43, discussionPubMed Wang A, Carr LK (2008) Female stress urinary incontinence. Can J Urol 15 [Suppl 1]:37–43, discussionPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Weir M, Brien J (2000) Adolescent urinary tract infections. Adolesc Med 11(2):293–313PubMed Weir M, Brien J (2000) Adolescent urinary tract infections. Adolesc Med 11(2):293–313PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 26(2):254–261PubMedCrossRef Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 26(2):254–261PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int 100(2):351–356PubMedCrossRef Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int 100(2):351–356PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Klarskov N, Scholfield D, Soma K, Darekar A, Mills I, Lose G (2009) Measurement of urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 181(6):2628–2633, discussion 33PubMedCrossRef Klarskov N, Scholfield D, Soma K, Darekar A, Mills I, Lose G (2009) Measurement of urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 181(6):2628–2633, discussion 33PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson KE (2011) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the urinary tract. In: Anderson KE, Michel MC (eds) Urinary tract, handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Berlin, pp 327–328CrossRef Anderson KE (2011) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the urinary tract. In: Anderson KE, Michel MC (eds) Urinary tract, handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Berlin, pp 327–328CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrams P, Andersson KE (2007) Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder. BJU Int 100(5):987–1006PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Andersson KE (2007) Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder. BJU Int 100(5):987–1006PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wein AJ (2001) Pharmacological agents for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 10(1):65–83PubMedCrossRef Wein AJ (2001) Pharmacological agents for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 10(1):65–83PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson KE, Pehrson R (2003) CNS involvement in overactive bladder: pathophysiology and opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Drugs 63(23):2595–2611PubMedCrossRef Andersson KE, Pehrson R (2003) CNS involvement in overactive bladder: pathophysiology and opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Drugs 63(23):2595–2611PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK, Forst HT, Haag-Molkenteller C, Massow U et al (2007) Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome. J Urol 178(6):2488–2494PubMedCrossRef Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK, Forst HT, Haag-Molkenteller C, Massow U et al (2007) Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome. J Urol 178(6):2488–2494PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A, Haag-Molkenteller C, Forst HT, Massow U et al (2007) Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 52(4):1204–1212PubMedCrossRef Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A, Haag-Molkenteller C, Forst HT, Massow U et al (2007) Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 52(4):1204–1212PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of fesoterodine on urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry
verfasst von
Niels Klarskov
Amanda Darekar
David Scholfield
Laurence Whelan
Gunnar Lose
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2269-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.