Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 9/2020

20.06.2020 | Original Article

Effect of K-line on posterior cervical surgery in patients with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification

verfasst von: Cheng Li, Hong Zhou, Sen Yang, Xuanchen Zhu, Guochun Zha, Zhi Yang, Feng Yuan, Weimin Jiang

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of K-line on posterior single-door decompression with fusion fixation (PFF) and posterior single-door decompression with non-fusion fixation (PNF) for patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Methods

A total of 65 patients with OPLL were analyzed retrospectively. They consisted of 44 patients with positive K-line, designated as the K ( +) group, and 21 patients with negative K-line, designated as K (−). The patients were also divided into a PFF group (38 patients) and a PNF group (27 patients). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, C2–C7 Cobb angle, improvement rate of JOA score, and complications were calculated and statistically analyzed between the groups.

Results

In the K ( +) group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy and C2–C7 Cobb angle between the two groups of surgical patients, but there were significant differences in the improvement rate of JOA score and the incidence of axial pain. In the K (−) group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of axial pain, the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy, and preoperative C2–C7 Cobb angle between the two groups, but significant differences were observed in the improvement rate of JOA score and C2–C7 Cobb angle at the last follow-up.

Conclusion

In the K ( +) group, the improvement rate of JOA score was higher and the incidence of axial pain was lesser in the PNF group than in the PFF group. In the K (−) group, the improvement rate of JOA score was higher in the PFF group than in the PNF group, and there was significant loss of C2–C7 Cobb angle in the PNF group.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuyama N (1984) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:71–84 Tsuyama N (1984) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:71–84
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima H, Tetreault L, Nagoshi N et al (2016) Comparison of outcomes of surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinalligament versus other forms of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the prospective, multicenter AOSpine CSM-international study of 479 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(5):370–378. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00397CrossRefPubMed Nakashima H, Tetreault L, Nagoshi N et al (2016) Comparison of outcomes of surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinalligament versus other forms of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the prospective, multicenter AOSpine CSM-international study of 479 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(5):370–378. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​JBJS.​O.​00397CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan L, Chang Z, Liu Y, Li YB, He BR, Hao DJ (2013) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the human bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene (109T > G) affects the smad signaling pathway and the predisposition to ossification of the posteriorlongitudinal ligament of the spine. Chin Med J (Engl) 126(6):1112–1118 Yan L, Chang Z, Liu Y, Li YB, He BR, Hao DJ (2013) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the human bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene (109T > G) affects the smad signaling pathway and the predisposition to ossification of the posteriorlongitudinal ligament of the spine. Chin Med J (Engl) 126(6):1112–1118
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8(7):693–699CrossRef Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8(7):693–699CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirabayashi K, Satomi K (1988) Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 13(7):870–876CrossRef Hirabayashi K, Satomi K (1988) Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 13(7):870–876CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire part 2 verification of its reliability : the subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the japanese orthopaedic association. J Orthop Sci 12(6):526–532 (Epub 2007 Nov 30)CrossRef Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire part 2 verification of its reliability : the subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the japanese orthopaedic association. J Orthop Sci 12(6):526–532 (Epub 2007 Nov 30)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin R, Chen X, Zhou P, Li M, Hao J, Zhang F (2018) Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27(6):1375–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6 (Epub 2018 Jan 15)CrossRefPubMed Qin R, Chen X, Zhou P, Li M, Hao J, Zhang F (2018) Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27(6):1375–1387. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-017-5451-6 (Epub 2018 Jan 15)CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Geck MJ, Eismont FJ (2002) Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am 33(2):329–348CrossRef Geck MJ, Eismont FJ (2002) Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am 33(2):329–348CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon BJ, Kim D, Shin DA et al (2019) Patterns of short-term and long-term surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for cervicalossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament between anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and posterior laminoplasty. Neurosurg Rev 42(4):907–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-01069-x (Epub 2019 Jan 4)CrossRefPubMed Moon BJ, Kim D, Shin DA et al (2019) Patterns of short-term and long-term surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for cervicalossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament between anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and posterior laminoplasty. Neurosurg Rev 42(4):907–913. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10143-018-01069-x (Epub 2019 Jan 4)CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JH, Ahn JS, Lee HJ, Shin BK (2016) Comparison between radiological and clinical outcomes of laminoplasties with titaniumminiplates for cervical myelopathy. Clin Orthop Surg 8(4):399–406 (Epub 2016 Nov 4)CrossRef Park JH, Ahn JS, Lee HJ, Shin BK (2016) Comparison between radiological and clinical outcomes of laminoplasties with titaniumminiplates for cervical myelopathy. Clin Orthop Surg 8(4):399–406 (Epub 2016 Nov 4)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tung KL, Cheung P, Kwok TK, Wong KK, Mak KH, Wong WC (2015) Single-door cervical laminoplasty using titanium miniplates alone. J Orthop Surg 23(2):174–179CrossRef Tung KL, Cheung P, Kwok TK, Wong KK, Mak KH, Wong WC (2015) Single-door cervical laminoplasty using titanium miniplates alone. J Orthop Surg 23(2):174–179CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Numasawa T et al (2016) K-line (−) in the neck-flexed position in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinalligament is a risk factor for poor clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 41(24):1891–1895CrossRef Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Numasawa T et al (2016) K-line (−) in the neck-flexed position in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinalligament is a risk factor for poor clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 41(24):1891–1895CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H et al (2016) Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (–) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 25(7):2294–2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4555-8 (Epub 2016 Apr 13)CrossRefPubMed Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H et al (2016) Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (–) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 25(7):2294–2301. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-016-4555-8 (Epub 2016 Apr 13)CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A et al (2007) An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusionversus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(1):7–13CrossRef Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A et al (2007) An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusionversus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(1):7–13CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsumi K, Izumi T, Ito T, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Ohashi M (2016) Posterior instrumented fusion suppresses the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a comparison of laminoplasty with and without instrumented fusion by three-dimensional analysis. Eur Spine J 25(5):1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4328-9 (Epub 2015 Nov 19)CrossRefPubMed Katsumi K, Izumi T, Ito T, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Ohashi M (2016) Posterior instrumented fusion suppresses the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a comparison of laminoplasty with and without instrumented fusion by three-dimensional analysis. Eur Spine J 25(5):1634–1640. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-015-4328-9 (Epub 2015 Nov 19)CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Koda M, Furuya T, Saito J et al (2018) Postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive is independentlyassociated with a better surgical outcome after posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posteriorligament. Eur Spine J 27(6):1393–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5505-4 (Epub 2018 Feb 14)CrossRefPubMed Koda M, Furuya T, Saito J et al (2018) Postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive is independentlyassociated with a better surgical outcome after posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posteriorligament. Eur Spine J 27(6):1393–1400. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-018-5505-4 (Epub 2018 Feb 14)CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of K-line on posterior cervical surgery in patients with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification
verfasst von
Cheng Li
Hong Zhou
Sen Yang
Xuanchen Zhu
Guochun Zha
Zhi Yang
Feng Yuan
Weimin Jiang
Publikationsdatum
20.06.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06507-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

European Spine Journal 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.