Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 10/2020

03.09.2020 | Original

Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial

verfasst von: Peter Santer, Matthew H. Anstey, Maria D. Patrocínio, Bradley Wibrow, Bijan Teja, Denys Shay, Shahzad Shaefi, Charles S. Parsons, Timothy T. Houle, Matthias Eikermann, on behalf of the MIDAS Study Group

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

ICU discharge is often delayed by a requirement for intravenous vasopressor medications to maintain normotension. We hypothesised that the administration of midodrine, an oral α1-adrenergic agonist, as adjunct to standard treatment shortens the duration of intravenous vasopressor requirement.

Methods

In this multicentre, randomised, controlled trial including three tertiary referral hospitals in the US and Australia, we enrolled adult patients with hypotension requiring a single-agent intravenous vasopressor for ≥ 24 h. Subjects received oral midodrine (20 mg) or placebo every 8 h in addition to standard care until cessation of intravenous vasopressors, ICU discharge, or occurrence of adverse events. The primary outcome was time to vasopressor discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included time to ICU discharge readiness, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and ICU readmission rates.

Results

Between October 2012 and June 2019, 136 participants were randomised, of whom 132 received the allocated intervention and were included in the analysis (modified intention-to-treat approach). Time to vasopressor discontinuation was not different between midodrine and placebo groups (median [IQR], 23.5 [10–54] vs 22.5 [10.4–40] h; difference, 1 h; 95% CI − 10.4 to 12.3 h; p = 0.62). No differences in secondary endpoints were observed. Bradycardia occurred more often after midodrine administration (5 [7.6%] vs 0 [0%], p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Midodrine did not accelerate liberation from intravenous vasopressors and was not effective for the treatment of hypotension in critically ill patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Low PA, Gilden JL, Freeman R, Sheng KN, McElligott MA (1997) Efficacy of midodrine vs placebo in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. A randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Midodrine Study Group. JAMA 277(13):1046–1051CrossRef Low PA, Gilden JL, Freeman R, Sheng KN, McElligott MA (1997) Efficacy of midodrine vs placebo in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. A randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Midodrine Study Group. JAMA 277(13):1046–1051CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial
verfasst von
Peter Santer
Matthew H. Anstey
Maria D. Patrocínio
Bradley Wibrow
Bijan Teja
Denys Shay
Shahzad Shaefi
Charles S. Parsons
Timothy T. Houle
Matthias Eikermann
on behalf of the MIDAS Study Group
Publikationsdatum
03.09.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06216-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

Intensive Care Medicine 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.