nach oben

Erschienen in:

13.06.2019 | Original Article

Effect of MRI-based semiautomatic size-assessment in cerebral metastases on the RANO-BM classification

verfasst von: Hans-Christian Bauknecht, Randolf Klingebiel, Patrick Hein, Claudia Wolf, Lars Bornemann, Eberhard Siebert, Georg Bohner

Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

Evaluation of a semiautomatic software algorithm for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based assessment of cerebral metastases in cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Brain metastases (n = 131) in 38 patients, assessed by contrast-enhanced MRI, were retrospectively evaluated at two timepoints (baseline, follow-up) by two experienced neuroradiologists in a blinded manner. The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria for brain metastases (RANO-BM) were applied by means of a software (autoRANO-BM) as well as manually (manRANO-BM) at an interval of 3 weeks.

Results

The average diameter of metastases was 12.03 mm (SD ± 6.66 mm) for manRANO-BM and 13.97 mm (SD ± 7.76 mm) for autoRANO-BM. Diameter figures were higher when using semiautomatic measurements (median = 11.8 mm) as compared to the manual ones (median = 10.2 mm; p = 0.000). Correlation coefficients for intra-observer variability were 0.993 (autoRANO-BM) and 0.979 (manRANO-BM). The interobserver variability (R1/R2) was 0.936/0.965 for manRANO-BM and 0.989/0.998 for autoRANO-BM. A total of 19 lesions (15%) were classified differently when using semiautomatic measurements. In 14 cases with suspected disease progression by manRANO-BM a stable course was found according to autoRANO-BM.

Conclusion

Computerized measuring techniques can aid in the assessment of cerebral metastases by reducing examiner-dependent effects and may consequently result in a different classification according to RANO-BM criteria.

Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, Barani IJ, Barboriak DP, Baumert BG, Bendszus M, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chang SM, Dancey J, de Vries EG, Gaspar LE, Harris GJ, Hodi FS, Kalkanis SN, Linskey ME, Macdonald DR, Margolin K, Mehta MP, Schiff D, Soffietti R, Suh JH, van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY; Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: Proposal from the RANO Group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e270–8.CrossRefPubMed

Radbruch A, Bendszus M. Advanced MR imaging in neuro-oncology. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25(Suppl 2):143–9.CrossRefPubMed

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed

Suh JH. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of brain metastases. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1119–27.CrossRefPubMed

Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klessen C, Lembcke A, Dicken V, Bornemann L, Bauknecht HC. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels—Intra scan and inter-scan analysis. Rofo. 2009;181:24–31.CrossRefPubMed

Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klessen C, Lembcke A, Bornemann L, Dicken V, Hamm B, Bauknecht HC. Variability of semi automated lung nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose CT: Comparison with nodule volumetry on standard-dose CT. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23:8–17.CrossRefPubMed

Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Zidowitz S, Kuemmerlen B, Krass S, Peitgen HO, Wein BB, Schubert H, Shin HO, Wormanns D. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics. 2005;25:841–8.CrossRefPubMed

Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L et al. Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(4):417–434CrossRefPubMed

Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155–9.CrossRefPubMed

10.

O JH, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: A simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016;280:576–84.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Takimoto CH. Commentary: Tumor growth, patient survival, and the search for the optimal phase II efficacy endpoint. Oncologist. 2008;13:1043–5.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Shah GD, Kesari S, Xu R, Batchelor TT, O’Neill AM, Hochberg FH, Levy B, Bradshaw J, Wen PY. Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2006;8:38-46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Klingelhöfer L, Mucha D, Geiger K, Koch R, von Kummer R. Prognostic value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging for adult patients with brain tumors. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25:281–9.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Lee GS, Cho SJ, Kim JH, Park HK, Park SQ, Kim RS, Jang JC. Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of multisession radiosurgery to single dose radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2015;3:95–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Da Silva AN, Nagayama K, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP. Early brain tumor metastasis reduction following gamma knife surgery. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:547–52.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Bauknecht HC, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, Wolf C, Bornemann L, Hamm B, Hein PA. Intra- and interobserver variability of linear and volumetric measurements of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:49–56.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Vogel MN, Vonthein R, Schmücker S, Maksimovich O, Bethge W, Dicken V, Claussen CD, Horger M. Automated pulmonary nodule volumetry with an optimized algorithm. Accuracy at different slice thicknesses compared to unidimensional and bidimensional measurements. Rofo. 2008;180:791–7.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Gahrmann R, van den Bent M, van der Holt B, Vernhout RM, Taal W, Vos M, de Groot JC, Beerepoot LV, Buter J, Flach ZH, Hanse M, Jasperse B, Smits M. Comparison of 2D (RANO) and volumetric methods for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab—A report from the BELOB trial. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:853-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Fabel M, Wulff A, Heckel F, Bornemann L, Freitag-Wolf S, Heller M, Biederer J, Bolte H. Clinical lymph node staging—Influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3124–30.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Huber T, Alber G, Bette S, Boeckh-Behrens T, Gempt J, Ringel F, Alberts E, Zimmer C, Bauer JS. Reliability of semi-automated segmentations in glioblastoma. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017;27:153–61.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:781–90.CrossRefPubMed

22.

He L, Teng Y, Jin B, Zhao M, Yu P, Hu X, Zhang J, Li S, Gao Y, Liu Y. Initial partial response and stable disease according to RECIST indicate similar survival for chemotherapeutical patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:681.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Effect of MRI-based semiautomatic size-assessment in cerebral metastases on the RANO-BM classification
verfasst von: Hans-Christian Bauknecht
Randolf Klingebiel
Patrick Hein
Claudia Wolf
Lars Bornemann
Eberhard Siebert
Georg Bohner
Publikationsdatum: 13.06.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1869-1439
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-1447
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00785-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Effect of MRI-based semiautomatic size-assessment in cerebral metastases on the RANO-BM classification

Abstract

Aim

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen

Die Ganz-Genom-Sequenzierung startet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Aim

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 14 Patients with Congenital Oculomotor Nerve Palsy

Treatment Outcomes of Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Comparison of Radiosurgery and Endovascular Embolisation

Intracranial Artery Injury in HIV-negative Tuberculous Meningitis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain Using Compressed Sensing – Quality Assessment in Daily Clinical Routine

Risk Factors of Procedural Complications Related to Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms

Delayed Treatment (≥5 Days) by Flow Diversion of Ruptured Blister-Like Cerebral Aneurysms

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen

Die Ganz-Genom-Sequenzierung startet

Update Radiologie