Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020

26.08.2019

Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy in geriatric patients: a propensity score matching study

verfasst von: Xin-Yang Liu, Jing Cheng, Wei-Feng Chen, Mei-Dong Xu, Zu-Qiang Liu, Yun Wang, Shi-Yao Chen, Yun-Shi Zhong, Yi-Qun Zhang, Wen-Zheng Qin, Jian-Wei Hu, Ming-Yan Cai, Li-Qing Yao, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe and effective approach for achalasia. However, the safety, feasibility, perioperative and long-term efficacy in treating geriatric patients has not been well evaluated.

Methods

Data of 2367 patients diagnosed with achalasia and treated with POEM in the Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from August 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Last follow-up was in December 2018. Propensity score matching based on baseline characteristics was used to adjust for confounding. With a caliper of 0.01 in propensity scoring, 139 patients aged ≥ 65 years were matched at a 1:2 ratio with 275 patients aged < 65 years. Perioperative complications and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

After propensity score matching, the two groups had similar baseline clinical characteristics and distribution of propensity scores. The mean age was 70.22 years in geriatric patients and 42.02 in younger patients. Technical failure occurred in one geriatric and one non-geriatric patients (p = 0.485). The procedural time in geriatric patients was similar to younger patients [50 (interquartile range (IQR) 36–76) vs. 50 (IQR 36–70) min, p = 0.398]. There were also no significant differences in major perioperative adverse events (2.88% vs. 2.18%, p = 0.663) and hospitalization length (median 3 vs. 3 days, p = 0.488). During a median follow-up period of 41 months (IQR 26–60), mean decrease in Eckardt score and pressure of the LES were 6.63 and 11.9 mmHg in geriatric patients, which were similar to the change in non-geriatric patients (6.49 and 11.6 mmHg, p = 0.652 and 0.872, respectively). Clinical reflux occurred in 23.53% geriatric patients and 21.59% non-geriatric patients (p = 0.724). 5-year success rate of 92.94% was achieved in geriatric patients and 92.61% in younger patients (log-rank p = 0.737).

Conclusions

POEM is a safe and reliable treatment in geriatric achalasia patients with confirmed short-term and long-term efficacy compared with those in non-geriatric patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter JE (2010) Achalasia—an update. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 16:232–242CrossRef Richter JE (2010) Achalasia—an update. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 16:232–242CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE (2014) Achalasia. Lancet (London, England) 383:83–93CrossRef Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE (2014) Achalasia. Lancet (London, England) 383:83–93CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonnenberg A (2009) Hospitalization for achalasia in the United States 1997–2006. Dig Dis Sci 54:1680–1685CrossRef Sonnenberg A (2009) Hospitalization for achalasia in the United States 1997–2006. Dig Dis Sci 54:1680–1685CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gennaro N, Portale G, Gallo C et al (2011) Esophageal achalasia in the Veneto region: epidemiology and treatment Epidemiology and treatment of achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 15:423–428CrossRef Gennaro N, Portale G, Gallo C et al (2011) Esophageal achalasia in the Veneto region: epidemiology and treatment Epidemiology and treatment of achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 15:423–428CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin DB (2004) On principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13:855–857CrossRef Rubin DB (2004) On principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13:855–857CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271CrossRef Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren Y, Tang X, Chen Y et al (2017) Pre-treatment Eckardt score is a simple factor for predicting one-year peroral endoscopic myotomy failure in patients with achalasia. Surg Endosc 31:3234–3241CrossRef Ren Y, Tang X, Chen Y et al (2017) Pre-treatment Eckardt score is a simple factor for predicting one-year peroral endoscopic myotomy failure in patients with achalasia. Surg Endosc 31:3234–3241CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu QN, Xu XY, Zhang XC et al (2017) Submucosal fibrosis in achalasia patients is a rare cause of aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy procedures. Endoscopy 49:736–744CrossRef Wu QN, Xu XY, Zhang XC et al (2017) Submucosal fibrosis in achalasia patients is a rare cause of aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy procedures. Endoscopy 49:736–744CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang XC, Li QL, Xu MD et al (2016) Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy 48:967–978CrossRef Zhang XC, Li QL, Xu MD et al (2016) Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy 48:967–978CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Li QL, Wu QN, Zhang XC et al (2018) Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc 87(1405–1412):e1403 Li QL, Wu QN, Zhang XC et al (2018) Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc 87(1405–1412):e1403
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J et al (2009) Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 30:1030–1038CrossRef Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J et al (2009) Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 30:1030–1038CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Li CJ, Tan YY, Wang XH et al (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in patients aged >/= 65 years. World J Gastroenterol 21:9175–9181CrossRef Li CJ, Tan YY, Wang XH et al (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in patients aged >/= 65 years. World J Gastroenterol 21:9175–9181CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Tan Y, Lv L et al (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia in patients aged >/= 65 years. Rev Esp Enferm Digest 108:637–641 Wang X, Tan Y, Lv L et al (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia in patients aged >/= 65 years. Rev Esp Enferm Digest 108:637–641
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang X, Ren Y, Gao Q et al (2017) Peroral endoscopic myotomy is safe and effective in achalasia patients aged older than 60 years compared with younger patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 17:2407–2413CrossRef Tang X, Ren Y, Gao Q et al (2017) Peroral endoscopic myotomy is safe and effective in achalasia patients aged older than 60 years compared with younger patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 17:2407–2413CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez-Mondragon OV, Solorzano-Pineda OM, Blancas-Valencia JM et al (2017) Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM): a safe and effective treatment for achalasia in geriatric patients. Rev Med del Inst Mex del Seguro Soc 55:S376–s382 Hernandez-Mondragon OV, Solorzano-Pineda OM, Blancas-Valencia JM et al (2017) Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM): a safe and effective treatment for achalasia in geriatric patients. Rev Med del Inst Mex del Seguro Soc 55:S376–s382
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakita S, Bloomston M, Villadolid D et al (2005) Age affects presenting symptoms of achalasia and outcomes after myotomy. Am Surg 71:424–429PubMed Rakita S, Bloomston M, Villadolid D et al (2005) Age affects presenting symptoms of achalasia and outcomes after myotomy. Am Surg 71:424–429PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy in geriatric patients: a propensity score matching study
verfasst von
Xin-Yang Liu
Jing Cheng
Wei-Feng Chen
Mei-Dong Xu
Zu-Qiang Liu
Yun Wang
Shi-Yao Chen
Yun-Shi Zhong
Yi-Qun Zhang
Wen-Zheng Qin
Jian-Wei Hu
Ming-Yan Cai
Li-Qing Yao
Quan-Lin Li
Ping-Hong Zhou
Publikationsdatum
26.08.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07070-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.