Background
Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) is an important cause of acute kidney injury, and it causes inflammation and dysfunction mainly in the tubules, without affecting glomeruli and vasculature. ATIN accounts for 0.5
–2.6% of all kidney biopsies and 5
–27% of unexplained acute kidney injury [
1‐
4]. The etiology of ATIN includes drug-induced, autoimmune disease, infection, malignancy, and others [
5]. ATIN was originally thought to be mainly caused by infection, but a drug-induced cause has become the main etiology in recent years [
4,
6‐
8].
With regard to the pathogenesis of ATIN, a hypersensitivity reaction to kidney antigens is thought to play a major role. ATIN occurs only in a small percentage of individuals and in a dose-independent manner, and sometimes exhibits extra-renal manifestations related to hypersensitivity [
9,
10]. However, the underlying mechanism of ATIN is not fully understood. In previous retrospective reviews, steroids were mostly used or recommended to be used for ATIN [
11‐
17]. Additionally, oral prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day for ATIN was usually used with or without pulse therapy of methylprednisolone over the next 3
–12 weeks [
4]. However, there is no clear consensus on the effectiveness of steroids because there have been no prospective, randomized, controlled trials of steroid use in relation to the clinical course of ATIN to date.
Cohort studies on patients with ATIN and possible effects of steroids have been conducted [
11‐
16]. However, further studies on patients with ATIN and various characteristics are required to determine the significance of steroid capacity. Research on the underlying mechanism may also provide information on this issue. The present cohort study aimed to examine the effect of steroids on renal outcomes, including recovery of ATIN, and the risks of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality. Subsequent analyses of cytokine and chemokine, which are possibly related to tubular inflammation, were conducted to provide a clue of the pathophysiology of ATIN.
Methods
Patients and data collection
The study design was approved by the institutional review boards of all involved centers (nos. H-1801-043-914, B-1801/447–409, and 20,180,124/30–2018-3/023) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consents were waived under this approval. A total of 7196 patients had a kidney biopsy performed at three tertiary referral hospitals (Seoul National University Hospital, Boramae Medical Center, and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) over 18 years (from January 2000 to December 2017). Among them, 270 patients were diagnosed with ATIN. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they also had glomerulonephritis (n = 122), pyelonephritis (n = 3), or other pathologies, including thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 6) and atheroembolism (n = 1), they were younger than 18 years (n = 5), and they had an insufficient follow-up period (< 3 months) (n = 11). We also excluded patients without azotemia at the time of biopsy (n = 9: 5 were renal tubular acidosis, 2 were drug-induced ATIN, 1 was renal tuberculosis, and 1 was related with Sjögren syndrome) because the effect of steroids on outcomes of ATIN could not be examined in these patients. Finally, the analyzed cohort comprised 113 patients.
All of the patients’ clinical data such as age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, renal outcomes, and steroid treatment for ATIN, were collected. Baseline blood laboratory data, such as serum creatinine, hemoglobin, cholesterol, uric acid, and albumin levels, were measured. The dipstick test was used to evaluate proteinuria, which was semi-quantitatively scored. Microscopic evaluation of urine was performed to define hematuria and pyuria. The random urine protein to creatinine ratio was measured at the time of biopsy, but this variable was not available in five patients. The etiology of ATIN was classified into idiopathic if there were no specific factors inducing kidney dysfunction. Two nephropathologists reviewed all of the slides and semi-quantitative graded scores for tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis, and leukocyte infiltration, according to the Banff working classification [
18].
Renal recovery, which was primary outcome, was defined as a decrease in serum creatinine levels to ≤1 .3mg/dL or ≥ 50% from its peak value. Renal recovery was evaluated at multiple time points, such as at 6 months after kidney biopsy and at the last follow-up. The outcome of ESRD was defined as initiation of renal replacement therapy or kidney transplantation due to failed kidney function. The events of ESRD and all-cause mortality were obtained from the Kidney Renal Registry and the National Database of Statistics Korea, respectively.
Cytokine analysis
Thirty three patients’ plasma and urine were acquired at the time of kidney biopsy and before any treatment was provided. Forty healthy individuals’ plasma and urine were also recruited at the time of a health checkup for comparison with the patients. We performed a bead-based multiplex assay according to the manufacturer’s instruction (LEGENDplex™; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). This assay included 13 cytokines and chemokines which were known to play a crucial role in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury [
19‐
22] and were possibly related to tubular inflammation pathways [
23], such as interleukin (IL)-1β, interferon (IFN)-α2, IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23, and IL-33. Cytokine- and chemokine-bound beads were read on a flow cytometer (BD LSRFortessa™; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using the analysis program recommended by the manufacturer’s instructions (LEGENDplex™, Data Analysis v8.0; VigeneTech, Carlisle, MA, USA).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R software (version 3.4.1; The Comprehensive R Archive Network:
http://cran.r-project.org). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean value and standard deviation if they had a normal distribution and as the median value and interquartile range if they were not normally distributed. A normality test was performed using the Kolomogrov–Sirnov test. Categorical variables are expressed as proportions. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables (Fisher’s exact test if not applicable) and the Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. The Mann–Whitney test was used if variables were not normally distributed. Analysis of variance analysis was used when normality was satisfied for comparison between group, and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used if normality was not satisfied. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard ratio models were conducted to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) of the outcome risk, respectively. All of the covariates shown in Table
1, except for the random urine protein to creatinine ratio (missing in five cases), were adjusted in the multivariate models. To assess the effect of steroids in ATIN, we pooled the data of three previous retrospective cohort studies, and compared the ESRD progression rate between the steroid-treated and non-treated groups. Pooled estimates of the relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were obtained using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic and I
2. All
P values were set to two-sided, and values ≤0.05 were defined as significant.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of study subjects according to the etiology
Age (year) | 58.3 ± 15.2 | 57.2 ± 15.4 | 62.7 ± 12.8 | 58.0 ± 22.6 | 54.7 ± 15.4 | 0.428 |
Female (%) | 40.7 | 45.5 | 28.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 0.338 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.3 ± 3.6 | 23.5 ± 3.4 | 23.2 ± 4.1 | 22.9 ± 4.0 | 20.5 ± 2.5 | 0.263 |
Comorbidities (%) |
Diabetes mellitus | 30.1 | 35.1 | 20.0 | 0 | 33.3 | 0.255 |
Hypertension | 40.7 | 41.6 | 44.0 | 40.0 | 16.7 | 0.687 |
Chronic kidney disease | 11.5 | 9.1 | 20.0 | 0 | 16.7 | 0.330 |
Blood findings |
Peak sCr (mg/dL) | 4.50 (3.02–7.23) | 4.35 (3.02–6.40) | 5.42 (3.70–9.70) | 2.61 (2.50–7.02) | 5.36 (3.94–7.85) | 0.362 |
sCr at biopsy (mg/dL) | 3.77 (2.51–5.90) | 3.50 (2.67–5.58) | 3.91 (3.02–8.80) | 2.50 (2.04–5.93) | 4.54 (2.48–7.68) | 0.528 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 10.1 ± 1.7 | 10.0 ± 1.6 | 10.4 ± 1.8 | 10.2 ± 1.9 | 10.1 ± 1.6 | 0.785 |
Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 139.0 (119.0–165.0) | 139.0 (121.0–167.0) | 143.0 (116.0–166.0) | 127.0 (111.0–146.0) | 127.0 (101.0–149.0) | 0.338 |
Uric acid (mg/dL) | 6.1 (4.6–8) | 5.9 (4.2–8) | 6.3 (5.1–8) | 5.3 (3.8–7.4) | 7.6 (5.1–8.7) | 0.665 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 3.5 (3–3.9) | 3.5 (3.1–3.9) | 3.3 (2.9–3.9) | 2.4 (2.3–3.7) | 3.7 (3.5–3.9) | 0.279 |
Proteinuria (%) | | | | | | 0.886 |
- or trace | 27.4 | 31.2 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 16.7 | |
1+ | 36.3 | 32.5 | 36.0 | 60.0 | 66.7 | |
2+ | 24.8 | 24.7 | 28.0 | 20.0 | 16.7 | |
≥ 3+ | 11.5 | 11.7 | 16.0 | 0 | 0 | |
Hematuria (%) | 40.7 | 35.1 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 33.3 | 0.175 |
Pyuria (%) | 58.4 | 57.1 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 66.7 | 1.000 |
uPCR (g/g) | 1.3 (0.7–2.5) | 1.3 (0.8–2.5) | 1.3 (0.7–4.7) | 1.1 (1.0–1.5) | 1.7 (1.2–1.9) | 0.865 |
Dialysis at biopsy (%) | 30.1 | 24.7 | 44.0 | 40.0 | 33.3 | 0.251 |
Steroid use (%) | 81.4 | 79.2 | 84.0 | 100 | 83.3 | 0.892 |
TA/IF (%) | | | | | | 0.378 |
None | 15.9 | 10.4 | 24.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | |
Milde | 33.6 | 33.8 | 36.0 | 40.0 | 16.7 | |
Moderate | 39.8 | 44.2 | 28.0 | 40.0 | 33.3 | |
Severe | 10.6 | 11.7 | 12.0 | 0 | 0 | |
Leukocyte infiltration (%) | | | | | | 0.906 |
Mild | 17.7 | 15.6 | 24.0 | 20.0 | 16.7 | |
Moderate | 38.1 | 41.6 | 28.0 | 40.0 | 33.3 | |
Severe | 44.2 | 42.9 | 48.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | |
Follow-up duration (months) | 33 (19–55) | 37 (19–54) | 24 (19–60) | 48 (30–56) | 16 (8–24) | 0.316 |
Discussion
ATIN is an important cause of tubular injury, but its pathophysiology and treatment are not well understood. The present study evaluated the effect of steroids in patients with idiopathic and drug-induced ATIN. However, our results did not support an effect of steroids on renal outcomes and patients’ survival. For the first time, we performed cytokine and chemokine analyses in plasma and urine before steroid treatment. We found that certain cytokines and chemokines were elevated in patients with ATIN.
The present study showed that renal outcomes of ATIN were significantly different depending on the etiology. Drug-induced ATIN showed the most favorable outcome (88.0% of renal recovery during the study period), and malignancy-associated ATIN was the worst (20%). The etiology should be considered to evaluate the effects of steroid. Therefore, drug-induced and idiopathic ATIN were included in analysis of the effect of steroids in our study. In these groups, steroid use did not appear to play a significant role in renal recovery. This trend remained consistent, even after matching was performed. Subgroup analysis of the steroid-treated group also showed that there was no significant difference in renal recovery according to pattern of steroid use, such as methylprednisolone pulse therapy, steroid dose, and a delayed start of steroids.
In drug-induced ATIN, steroids are recommended after culprit drug withdrawal [
8]. Although inconsistent results have been shown in previous papers on the steroid effect of ATIN [
4], steroids are generally used for treating ATIN. Previous retrospective studies related to the effect of steroids on ATIN that compared a steroid group and a non-steroid group are shown in Table
5 [
11‐
16]. Most patients with ATIN in these studies were treated with steroids (59
–87%), and different criteria were applied to evaluate renal recovery in each article. Three of these studies [
12,
13,
16] showed that steroids were effective in renal outcome, while the other three [
11,
14,
15] did not. Among the studies that analyzed the effect of steroids on drug-induced ATIN, only one study [
12] showed a positive result of steroid use. These previous studies and the current study do not provide clear evidence to support steroid use.
Table 5
Summary of previous published articles regarding steroid effect in acute tubulointerstitial nephritis
Prendecki, 2017 | 187 | All etiologiesa | 84 | Median eGFR comparison at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months, and last follow-up | The steroid-treated group had a significantly higher eGFR at 6, 12, 24 months and at last follow-up |
Valluri, 2015 | 124 | Drug induced | 59 | Median sCr comparison and renal recovery within 1 year (complete: return to baseline sCr) | No difference in sCr at time points of 1, 6, and 12 months and no difference in renal recovery between the two groups (48% vs. 41%) |
Muriithi, 2014 | 95 | Drug induced | 87 | Renal recovery at 6 months (complete: within 25% of its baseline or < 1 .4mg/dL if baseline was not available, partial: ≥50% decrease of peak sCr) | Treatment with steroids did not affect renal recovery status at 6 months (complete: partial: none = 49%: 39%: 12% vs. 17%: 67%: 16%; P = 0.3) |
Raza, 2012 | 49 | All etiologiesb | 76 | Fold improvement in eGFR at last follow-up | Greater improvement in eGFR in patients with steroids (3.4 vs. 2.1; P < 0.05) |
Gonzalez, 2008 | 61 | Drug induced | 85 | Median sCr comparison and renal recovery (> 50% decrease of peak sCr) based on last follow-up | Significantly lower sCr in steroid group (2.1 vs. 3.7, P < 0.05), No significant change in renal recovery between two groups (54% vs. 33%, P = ns) |
Clarkson, 2004 | 42 | All etiologiesc | 62 | Median sCr comparison at 1, 6, and 12 months | No difference in sCr at time points of 1, 6, and 12 months between the two groups |
Yun, 2018 | 102 | Idiopathic & drug induced | 80 | Renal recovery at 6 months (≥50% decrease of peak sCr or < 1 .3mg/dL) | Treatment with steroids did not affect renal recovery at 6 months (67.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.154) |
The pathophysiology of ATIN is likely to be associated with hypersensitivity and immune reactions [
9,
10], and steroid use is believed to have favorable effects on such mechanisms [
24]. However, the detailed mechanisms of ATIN are not clearly understood, and thus, a treatment option for ATIN is currently limited. In addition to steroids, there could be other treatment options such as immunosuppressive agents, which are used to reduce the duration of steroid use or to treat steroid-refractory cases. Mycophenolate mofetil was introduced after steroids in patients with ATIN [
25]. Additionally, other agents, including azathioprine and cyclosporine, were also prescribed in some patients [
17]. Recently, rituximab was administered in immunoglobulin G4–related ATIN and reported to be effective in a case report [
26]. However, these agents have not been proven as superior to steroids and are not easily applicable to current clinical practice.
Because patients with ATIN occasionally showed peripheral eosinophilia and tissue eosinophilic infiltration as well as extra-renal manifestations (e.g., skin rash), the pathophysiology of ATIN had been considered to be related with hypersensitivity reaction or Th2 cytokines [
9,
10]. The present study showed that inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were elevated in patients with ATIN compared with healthy individuals. Most of patients with ATIN have a Th1 response with elevated levels of TNF-α, monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1, IL-6, and IL-8 in both urine and plasma. The pattern of cytokine levels elevated in ATIN was similar to that in renal ischemia-reperfusion model, although some cytokines (e.g., INF-γ) were not evident in patient samples. Furthermore, levels of IL-10 and IL-33, as representative Th2 cytokines, were not elevated in our patients. The findings suggest that pathogenesis of ATIN may be different from that of typical asthma or allergic rhinitis, which are known as Th2- or hypersensitivity-related disease. Intriguingly, IL-12p70 levels, related to NK cells activity [
27], were elevated in urine, but not plasma, of patients.
The underlying mechanisms could not be determined by the present observations alone, but the cytokine assay may provide a clue for investigating another potential treatment agent. Many cytokine-targeting agents are currently used in clinical practice such as TNF-α inhibitor [
28], and novel agents are in course of preparation to various diseases such as IL-17Rα inhibitor [
29]. This cytokine analysis may be helpful in future application of treatment on ATIN.
Although our data are informative, there are some limitations. The present study was an observational study and not a randomized, controlled trial on steroid use. Accordingly, trials under control of baseline are required for a definite conclusion. The definition of renal recovery in the study focused on azotemia, and improvement in proteinuria could not be evaluated due to lack of follow-up data on urinalysis. Additionally, there were many unknown etiologies in this study, and this precluded from performing subgroup analysis by etiology. Cytokine levels after kidney biopsies were not examined, which may provide more insights on pathophysiologic significance.