Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology 4/2021

11.01.2021 | Original Article

Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography

verfasst von: Masoumeh Eftekhar, Hanieh Kaviani, Nina Rouzmeh, Aitin Torabinia, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence, and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods

This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 4 sheep skulls with both the maxilla and mandible accompanied by the surrounding soft tissue. Fenestration (n = 30), dehiscence (n = 65), and furcation defects (n = 46; 18 grade I, 25 grade II, and 3 grade III) were randomly created by round and needle burs in both jaws, and 40 areas served as control sites. CBCT scans were obtained with 0.300 and 0.150 mm3 voxel sizes and 8 × 11cm2 field of view (FOV), and were randomly observed by four observers (two oral and maxillofacial radiologists and two periodontists). The kappa values, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each voxel size and compared using paired t test.

Results

By an increase in image resolution, diagnostic sensitivity increased while specificity decreased. The kappa values for fenestration (0.602–0.623), and grade III furcation defects (0.903–1.00) were optimal (> 0.6), and almost similar for both voxel sizes. The kappa values for dehiscence, and grades I and II furcation defects were unfavorable (< 0.6) and almost similar for both voxel sizes, except for grade I furcation defects, which had a significant difference in kappa values between the two voxel sizes (0.014 and 0.34).

Conclusion

Smaller voxel size had higher sensitivity and lower specificity for detection of all defects except for grade I furcation defects, for which the smaller voxel size had higher sensitivity and higher specificity.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Vasconcelos Kde F, Neves FS, Melo SL, Campos PS, Haiter-Neto F. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(1):121–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.003. de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Vasconcelos Kde F, Neves FS, Melo SL, Campos PS, Haiter-Neto F. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(1):121–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​oooo.​2012.​10.​003.
6.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat SD B, A L. 2Dand 3D images generated by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dentomaxillofacial investigations. In: CARS ’98 Proceedings of the 12th international Symposium and Exhibition: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1998:792–7. SD B, A L. 2Dand 3D images generated by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dentomaxillofacial investigations. In: CARS ’98 Proceedings of the 12th international Symposium and Exhibition: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1998:792–7.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Da Silveira PFFM, Oliveira HW, Vizzotto MB, Montagner F, Silveira HL, et al. CBCT-based volume of simulated root resorption—influence of FOV and voxel size. Int Endod J. 2015;48(10):959–65.CrossRef Da Silveira PFFM, Oliveira HW, Vizzotto MB, Montagner F, Silveira HL, et al. CBCT-based volume of simulated root resorption—influence of FOV and voxel size. Int Endod J. 2015;48(10):959–65.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Fine J. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. Stat Med. 2004;23:2537–50.CrossRef Li J, Fine J. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. Stat Med. 2004;23:2537–50.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Machin D, Campbell MJ, Tan SB, Tan SH Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies, . Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, United Kingdom. 2008;Third Edition. Machin D, Campbell MJ, Tan SB, Tan SH Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies, . Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, United Kingdom. 2008;Third Edition.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou XH, Obuchowski, p.n.A., McClish, D.K. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 2002. Zhou XH, Obuchowski, p.n.A., McClish, D.K. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 2002.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schork MaW, G. Number of Observations Required for the Comparison of Two CorrelatedProportions. Commun Stat-Simula Computa, 1980;B9(4), 349–57. Schork MaW, G. Number of Observations Required for the Comparison of Two CorrelatedProportions. Commun Stat-Simula Computa, 1980;B9(4), 349–57.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales Educ Psychol Meas. SAGE Publications Inc. 1960;20:37–46. Cohen. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales Educ Psychol Meas. SAGE Publications Inc. 1960;20:37–46.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC, Statistical Methods for Rates and proportions. . New YorkWily. 2003;3rd ed. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC, Statistical Methods for Rates and proportions. . New YorkWily. 2003;3rd ed.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat de Faria VKEK, Rodrigues CD, Estrela C, de Sousa TO, Silva MA. Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(1):64–9.CrossRef de Faria VKEK, Rodrigues CD, Estrela C, de Sousa TO, Silva MA. Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(1):64–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography
verfasst von
Masoumeh Eftekhar
Hanieh Kaviani
Nina Rouzmeh
Aitin Torabinia
Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Publikationsdatum
11.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00508-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Oral Radiology 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.