nach oben

Osteoporosis International

Erschienen in:

01.04.2014 | Review

Effectiveness and characteristics of multifaceted osteoporosis group education—a systematic review

verfasst von: A. L. Jensen, K. Lomborg, G. Wind, B. L. Langdahl

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

The characteristics and effectiveness of osteoporosis multifaceted group education were determined from a systematic review of international literature. Findings showed that these educational programmes may be beneficial in a variety of important factors for the prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis.

Introduction

This systematic review investigated quantitative studies on osteoporosis multifaceted group education. The purpose was to investigate the characteristics as well as the effectiveness of this form of osteoporosis patient education.

Methods

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided this systematic review. Relevant databases were searched until January 2013.

Results

Seven studies published between 1993 and 2011 including osteoporosis patients with or without fractures were found. The multifaceted educational programmes all consisted of three overall themes: (1) Knowledge of osteoporosis, (2) Medication and diet and (3) Exercise, but with different foci across the studies. Overall, 24 outcome measures representing six topics were applied: (1) Health-related quality of life, (2) Psychosocial function, (3) Pain, (4) Physical activity, (5) Knowledge and (6) Medication and diet.

The review showed that multifaceted osteoporosis group education can increase the patients' knowledge of osteoporosis as well as their health-related quality of life, physical activity and psychosocial functioning. It has the potential to increase adherence to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

Conclusions

Multifaceted group education may have a positive impact on the patients' ability to engage in preventing and managing osteoporosis. Further research directed towards the complexity of multifaceted group education is needed. In addition, research investigating the educational needs of specific groups of osteoporotic patients is required.

Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182:1864–1873PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Kastner M, Straus SE (2008) Clinical decision support tools for osteoporosis disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med 23:2095–2105PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Ryan P, Pumilia NJ, Henak B, Chang T (2009) Development and performance usability testing of a theory-based, computerized, tailored intervention. CIN: Comput Inform Nurs 27:288–300PubMed

Coster S, Norman I (2009) Cochrane reviews of educational and self-management interventions to guide nursing practice: a review. Int J Nurs Stud 46:508–528PubMedCrossRef

Sujic R, Gignac MA, Cockerill R, Beaton DE (2011) A review of patient-centred post-fracture interventions in the context of theories of health behaviour change. Osteoporos Int 22:2213–2224PubMedCrossRef

Gronholz MJ (2008) Prevention, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis-related fracture: a multifactoral osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc 108:575–585PubMed

WHO Scientific group. Prevention and management of osteoporosis. 2003

Jensen AL, Harder I (2004) The osteoporotic pain experience. Osteoporos Int 15:204–208PubMedCrossRef

Dusdal K, Grundmanis J, Luttin K, Ritchie P, Rompre C, Sidhu R, Harris SR (2011) Effects of therapeutic exercise for persons with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 22:755–769PubMedCrossRef

10.

Reginster JY, Burlet N (2006) Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone 38:S4–S9PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24:23–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

Wilson SR (1997) Individual versus group education: is one better? Patient Educ Couns 32:S67–S75PubMedCrossRef

13.

Rickheim PL, Weaver TW, Flader JL, Kendall DM (2002) Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study. Diabetes Care 25:269–274PubMedCrossRef

14.

Wilson SR, Scamagas P, German DF, Hughes GW, Lulla S, Coss S, Chardon L, Thomas RG, Starr-Schneidkraut N, Stancavage FB (1993) A controlled trial of two forms of self-management education for adults with asthma. Am J Med 94:564–576PubMedCrossRef

15.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

16.

Schmucker C, Bluemle A, Briel M, Portalupi S, Lang B, Motschall E, Schwarzer G, Bassler D, Mueller KF, von EE, Meerpohl JJ (2013) A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses. Syst Rev 2:24PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

17.

Gold DT, Stegmaier KY, Bales CW, Lyles KW, Westlund RE, Drezner MD (1993) Psychosocial functioning and osteoporosis in late life: results of a multidisciplinary intervention. J Women's Health 2:149–155CrossRef

18.

Kessenich CR, Gordon HG, Patton CL, Griffith LE, Hamlin A, Rosen CJ (2000) Support group intervention for women with osteoporosis. Rehabil Nurs 25:88–92CrossRef

19.

Gold DT, Shipp KM, Pieper CF, Duncan PW, Martinez S, Lyles KW (2004) Group treatment improves trunk strength and psychological status in older women with vertebral fractures: results of a randomized, clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1471–1478PubMedCrossRef

20.

Alp A, Kanat E, Yurtkuran M (2007) Efficacy of a self-management program for osteoporotic subjects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86:633–640PubMedCrossRef

21.

Nielsen D, Ryg J, Nissen N, Nielsen W, Knold B, Brixen K (2008) Multidisciplinary patient education in groups increases knowledge on osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Public Health 36:346–352PubMedCrossRef

22.

Nielsen D, Ryg J, Nielsen W, Knold B, Nissen N, Brixen K (2010) Patient education in groups increases knowledge of osteoporosis and adherence to treatment: a two-year randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 81:155–160PubMedCrossRef

23.

Laslett LL, Lynch J, Sullivan TR, McNeil JD (2011) Osteoporosis education improves osteoporosis knowledge and dietary calcium: comparison of a 4 week and a one-session education course. Int J Rheum Dis 14:239–247PubMedCrossRef

24.

Bergland A, Thorsen H, Karesen R (2011) Effect of exercise on mobility, balance, and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic women with a history of vertebral fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 22:1863–1871PubMedCrossRef

25.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

26.

Cooper HM (2010) Research synthesis and meta-analysis: a step-by-step approach, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

27.

Naidoo J, Wills J (2009) Foundations for health promotion, 3rd edn. Bailliere Tindall, Toronto

28.

Ryg J, Nissen N, Nielsen D, Brixen KT (2005) Patients' and population's knowledge of osteoporosis. Ugeskr Laeger 167:282–285PubMed

29.

Winzenberg TM, Oldenburg B, Frendin S, Jones G (2003) The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:17PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

30.

Werner P (2005) Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporos Int 16:115–127PubMedCrossRef

31.

Ribeiro V, Blakeley JA (2001) Evaluation of an osteoporosis workshop for women. Public Health Nurs 18:186–193PubMedCrossRef

32.

Satterfield T, Johnson SM, Slovic P, Neil N, Schein JR (2000) Perceived risks and reported behaviors associated with osteoporosis and its treatment. Women Health 31:21–40PubMedCrossRef

33.

Blalock SJ, Currey SS, DeVellis RF, DeVellis BM, Giorgino KB, Anderson JJ, Dooley MA, Gold DT (2000) Effects of educational materials concerning osteoporosis on women's knowledge, beliefs, and behavior. Am J Health Promot 14:161–169PubMedCrossRef

34.

Brecher LS, Pomerantz SC, Snyder BA, Janora DM, Klotzbach-Shimomura KM, Cavalieri TA (2002) Osteoporosis prevention project: a model multidisciplinary educational intervention. JAOA: J Am Osteopath Assoc 102:327PubMed

35.

Sedlak CA, Doheny MO, Jones SL (2000) Osteoporosis education programs: changing knowledge and behaviors. Public Health Nurs 17:398–402PubMedCrossRef

36.

Smith A.A., Summers G.D., Baxendale A., Butterly R.J. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of weight-bearing exercise and resistance training on risk factors for fracture in women with osteoporosis. 1998; 128

37.

Malmros B, Mortensen L, Jensen MB, Charles P (1998) Positive effects of physiotherapy on chronic pain and performance in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 8:215–221PubMedCrossRef

38.

Bennell KL, Matthews B, Greig A, Briggs A, Kelly A, Sherburn M, Larsen J, Wark J (2010) Effects of an exercise and manual therapy program on physical impairments, function and quality-of-life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a randomised, single-blind controlled pilot trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:36PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

39.

Lorig K (2003) Self-management education: more than a nice extra. Med Care 41:699–701PubMed

40.

Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H (2012) Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 12:80PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

41.

Watts NB, Adler RA, Bilezikian JP, Drake MT, Eastell R, Orwoll ES, Finkelstein JS (2012) Osteoporosis in men: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1802–1822PubMedCrossRef

42.

Danish Bone Society (Dansk Knoglemedicinsk Selskab). Guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis (Vejledning til udredning og behandling af osteoporose). Danish Bone Society 2013; 1–27 http://wp.dkms.dk/?page_id=1089

43.

NAMS (2010) Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS). Menopause (10723714) 17:25–54CrossRef

44.

Solimeo SL, Weber TJ, Gold DT (2011) Older men's explanatory model for osteoporosis. Gerontologist 51:530–539PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

45.

Feldstein AC, Nichols G, Orwoll E, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Aickin M (2005) The near absence of osteoporosis treatment in older men with fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:953–962PubMedCrossRef

46.

Nielsen DS, Brixen K, Huniche L (2011) Men's experiences of living with osteoporosis: focus group interviews. Am J Mens Health 5:166–167PubMedCrossRef

47.

Solimeo SL, Silverman SL, Calderon AD, Nguyen A, Gold DT (2012) Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporotic males using the Male OPAQ. Osteoporos Int 23:841–852PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

48.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2011) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

49.

Nielsen D, Huniche L, Brixen K, Sahota O, Masud T (2013) Handling knowledge on osteoporosis—a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 27(3):516–24PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Effectiveness and characteristics of multifaceted osteoporosis group education—a systematic review
verfasst von: A. L. Jensen
K. Lomborg
G. Wind
B. L. Langdahl
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2014
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2573-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Effectiveness and characteristics of multifaceted osteoporosis group education—a systematic review

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Association of matrix Gla protein gene functional polymorphisms with loss of bone mineral density and progression of aortic calcification

Percentage of the population at high risk of osteoporotic fracture in South Korea: analysis of the 2010 Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination survey data

Elevated risk of clinical fractures and associated risk factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus versus matched controls: a population-based study in the United Kingdom

Osteogenic induction from marmoset embryonic stem cells cultured in feeder-dependent and feeder-independent conditions

Effects of zoledronic acid on bone mineral density in premenopausal women receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies for HR+ breast cancer: the ProBONE II study

Estrogen increases the transcription of human α2-Heremans-Schmid-glycoprotein by an interplay of estrogen receptor α and activator protein-1

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie