Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017

23.08.2016 | Review

Effectiveness and safety of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for treating liver diseases: a meta-analysis

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness and safety of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for treating liver diseases.

Methods

Several databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case–control studies on the use of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery to treat liver diseases from their inception until March 24, 2016. The primary outcomes were the operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, rate of postoperative complications, median length of postoperative stay, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, volume of postoperative drainage, and postoperative drainage time. The study-specific effect sizes and their 95 % confidence interval were all combined to calculate the pooled value by using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of nine studies were included, which involved 277 patients. The total and subgroup data were combined by meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that single-port and multi-port laparoscopic liver surgery for treating liver diseases did not differ in terms of operative time (P = 0.48), rate of postoperative complications (P = 0.56), median length of postoperative stay (P = 0.80), and recovery time of gastrointestinal function (P = 0.54). For liver diseases, the single-port group exhibited a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than that presented by the multi-port group (P = 0.0006). In the hepatic resection subgroup, a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss was noted in the single-port group (P < 0.0001). By contrast, in the hepatic cyst subgroup, the single-port group showed a higher volume of intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.02) but a shorter median length of postoperative stay (P = 0.02). The findings of the potential subgroup analysis in these outcomes were consistent with the total data.

Conclusion

Compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery, the single-port method showed comparable effectiveness and safety for the treatment of liver diseases in terms of current evidence.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1203–1215. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2705-8 (Epub 2012 Oct 26) CrossRefPubMed Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1203–1215. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2705-8 (Epub 2012 Oct 26) CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen J, Bai T, Zhang Y, Xie ZB, Wang XB, Wu FX, Li LQ (2015) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(11):20679–20689. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26884991 (eCollection 2015) Chen J, Bai T, Zhang Y, Xie ZB, Wang XB, Wu FX, Li LQ (2015) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(11):20679–20689. http://​europepmc.​org/​abstract/​MED/​26884991 (eCollection 2015)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Benzing C, Krenzien F, Atanasov G, Seehofer D, Sucher R, Zorron R, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M (2015) Single incision laparoscopic liver resection (sill)—a systematic review. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. doi:10.3205/iprs000076 (eCollection 2015) PubMedPubMedCentral Benzing C, Krenzien F, Atanasov G, Seehofer D, Sucher R, Zorron R, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M (2015) Single incision laparoscopic liver resection (sill)—a systematic review. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. doi:10.​3205/​iprs000076 (eCollection 2015) PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu M, Zhao G, Wang F, Xu D, Liu R (2014) Single-port and multi-port laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy for treating benign liver diseases: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. World J Surg 38(10):2668–2673. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2610-3 CrossRefPubMed Hu M, Zhao G, Wang F, Xu D, Liu R (2014) Single-port and multi-port laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy for treating benign liver diseases: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. World J Surg 38(10):2668–2673. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-014-2610-3 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.​cochrane-handbook.​org
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Catena M, Pulitanò C, Ferla F, Cipriani F, Ferla G (2012) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery for left-lateral hepatic sectionectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopy: case-matched analysis from a single center. Surg Endosc 26(7):2016–2022. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2147-1 CrossRefPubMed Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Catena M, Pulitanò C, Ferla F, Cipriani F, Ferla G (2012) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery for left-lateral hepatic sectionectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopy: case-matched analysis from a single center. Surg Endosc 26(7):2016–2022. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-012-2147-1 CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ban D, Kudo A, Irie T, Ochiai T, Aihara A, Matsumura S, Tanaka S, Tanabe M (2015) Advances in reduced port laparoscopic liver resection. Asian J Endosc Surg 8(1):11–15. doi:10.1111/ases.12164 (Epub 2014 Dec 15) CrossRefPubMed Ban D, Kudo A, Irie T, Ochiai T, Aihara A, Matsumura S, Tanaka S, Tanabe M (2015) Advances in reduced port laparoscopic liver resection. Asian J Endosc Surg 8(1):11–15. doi:10.​1111/​ases.​12164 (Epub 2014 Dec 15) CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss M, Mittermair C, Brunner E, Schirnhofer J, Obrist C, Pimpl K, Hell T, Weiss H (2015) Inline radiofrequency pre-coagulation simplifies single-incision laparoscopic minor liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(12):831–836. doi:10.1002/jhbp.295 (Epub 2015 Nov 18) CrossRefPubMed Weiss M, Mittermair C, Brunner E, Schirnhofer J, Obrist C, Pimpl K, Hell T, Weiss H (2015) Inline radiofrequency pre-coagulation simplifies single-incision laparoscopic minor liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(12):831–836. doi:10.​1002/​jhbp.​295 (Epub 2015 Nov 18) CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA, Granderath FA, Berrevoet F, Muysoms FE, Bonham Group (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia 20(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8 (Epub 2015 Apr 7) CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA, Granderath FA, Berrevoet F, Muysoms FE, Bonham Group (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia 20(1):1–10. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-015-1371-8 (Epub 2015 Apr 7) CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Effectiveness and safety of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for treating liver diseases: a meta-analysis
Publikationsdatum
23.08.2016
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5199-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.