Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 5/2017

27.04.2017 | Original Article

Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion

verfasst von: Seden Akan, Ayse Gul Torgut, Hüsamettin Oktay

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and to determine if it was correlated with the divine proportion.

Methods

Standard frontal facial photos were taken from 335 subjects in natural head position. Facial attractiveness of the subjects was evaluated by 10 dental students using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). All of the evaluations were arranged in order, and 30 attractive subjects with the highest score and 30 nonattractive subjects having the lowest score were chosen. On the frontal photos of these subjects, 13 landmarks were determined and 12 ratios were measured. Two way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness, Student’s t test was used to compare the facial proportions of the attractive and nonattractive subjects, and one sample t test was used to define the relationships between the divine proportion and facial ratios.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found between malocclusion groups in terms of facial attractiveness. Of the 12 facial ratios, significant differences were found between attractive and nonattractive subjects regarding trichion-menton/nasion-menton, subnasale-menton/stomion-menton, nasion-subnasale/stomion-menton, nasion-subnasale/nasal width, and trichion-menton/right-left frontotemporale ratios. All of the ratios except nasion-subnasale/stomion-menton in the attractive group and subnasale-menton/stomion-menton and nasion-menton/nasion-trichion in the nonattractive group were found to be different from the divine proportion.

Conclusions

Sagittal skeletal malocclusions evaluated by ANB angle are not effective on facial attractiveness. Facial ratios used in this study have little effect on attractiveness, and are different from the divine proportion.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Angle EH (1899) Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 41:248–264 Angle EH (1899) Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 41:248–264
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker BW, Woods MG (2001) The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. The Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 16:108–120PubMed Baker BW, Woods MG (2001) The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. The Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 16:108–120PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-Bassat Y, Dinte A, Brin I, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E (1992) Cephalometric pattern of Jewish East European adolescents with clinically acceptable occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:443–448CrossRefPubMed Ben-Bassat Y, Dinte A, Brin I, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E (1992) Cephalometric pattern of Jewish East European adolescents with clinically acceptable occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:443–448CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Tartaglia G (1995) Facial morphometry of television actresses compared with normal women. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1008–1014 (discussion 1014–1005) CrossRefPubMed Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Tartaglia G (1995) Facial morphometry of television actresses compared with normal women. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1008–1014 (discussion 1014–1005) CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Herzberg BL (1952) Facial esthetics in relation to orthodontic treatment. Angel Orthod 22:9 Herzberg BL (1952) Facial esthetics in relation to orthodontic treatment. Angel Orthod 22:9
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Holdaway RA (1983) A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 84:1–28CrossRefPubMed Holdaway RA (1983) A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 84:1–28CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Howells DJ, Shaw WC (1985) The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 88:402–408CrossRefPubMed Howells DJ, Shaw WC (1985) The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 88:402–408CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hungerford MW (1890) Molly Bawn. Smith, Elder and Company, London Hungerford MW (1890) Molly Bawn. Smith, Elder and Company, London
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jefferson Y (2004) Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. Int J Orthod 15:9–22 Jefferson Y (2004) Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. Int J Orthod 15:9–22
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawakami S, Tsukada S, Hayashi H, Takada Y, Koubayashi S (1989) Golden proportion for maxillofacial surgery in orientals. Ann Plast Surg 23:417–425CrossRefPubMed Kawakami S, Tsukada S, Hayashi H, Takada Y, Koubayashi S (1989) Golden proportion for maxillofacial surgery in orientals. Ann Plast Surg 23:417–425CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ (1997) Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent 9:76–85CrossRefPubMed Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ (1997) Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent 9:76–85CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koury ME, Epker BN (1992) Maxillofacial esthetics: anthropometrics of the maxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:806–820CrossRefPubMed Koury ME, Epker BN (1992) Maxillofacial esthetics: anthropometrics of the maxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:806–820CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lusterman EA (1963) The esthetics of the occidental face: a study of dentofacial morphology based upon anthropologic criteria. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 49:826–850CrossRef Lusterman EA (1963) The esthetics of the occidental face: a study of dentofacial morphology based upon anthropologic criteria. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 49:826–850CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Matoula S, Pancherz H (2006) Skeletal Morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 76:204–210PubMed Matoula S, Pancherz H (2006) Skeletal Morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 76:204–210PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Peron APLM, Morosini IC, Correia KR, Moresca R, Petrelli E (2012) Photometric study of divine proportion and its correlation with facial attractiveness. Dental Press J Orthod 17:124–131CrossRef Peron APLM, Morosini IC, Correia KR, Moresca R, Petrelli E (2012) Photometric study of divine proportion and its correlation with facial attractiveness. Dental Press J Orthod 17:124–131CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Proffit WR (2000) The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent 12:46–49CrossRefPubMed Proffit WR (2000) The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent 12:46–49CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricketts RM (1982) The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 81:351–370CrossRefPubMed Ricketts RM (1982) The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 81:351–370CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricketts RM (1982) Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg 9:401–422PubMed Ricketts RM (1982) Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg 9:401–422PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez GLC, Cambron ZH, Vargas RM (2014) Relationship between facial golden ratio and malocclusion in Mexican patients who attended the Orthodontics Clinic at Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Tecnológica de México during 2009 with facial aesthetics criteria evaluated with Marquardt mask. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia 2:9–17CrossRef Rodriguez GLC, Cambron ZH, Vargas RM (2014) Relationship between facial golden ratio and malocclusion in Mexican patients who attended the Orthodontics Clinic at Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Tecnológica de México during 2009 with facial aesthetics criteria evaluated with Marquardt mask. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia 2:9–17CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ronchi P, Guariglia A (2011) Surgical orthodontic treatment of class III malocclusions. In: Naretto S (ed) Principles in contemporary orthodontics. In Tech, Rijeka, Croatia, p 419 Ronchi P, Guariglia A (2011) Surgical orthodontic treatment of class III malocclusions. In: Naretto S (ed) Principles in contemporary orthodontics. In Tech, Rijeka, Croatia, p 419
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossetti A, De Menezes M, Rosati R, Ferrario VF, Sforza C (2013) The role of the golden proportion in the evaluation of facial esthetics. Angle Orthodt 83:801–808. doi:10.2319/111812-883.1 CrossRef Rossetti A, De Menezes M, Rosati R, Ferrario VF, Sforza C (2013) The role of the golden proportion in the evaluation of facial esthetics. Angle Orthodt 83:801–808. doi:10.​2319/​111812-883.​1 CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sforza C, Laino A, D’Alessio R, Grandi G, Binelli M, Ferrario VF (2009) Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Italian women as compared to normal women. Angle Orthod 79:17–23. doi:10.2319/122707-605.1 CrossRefPubMed Sforza C, Laino A, D’Alessio R, Grandi G, Binelli M, Ferrario VF (2009) Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Italian women as compared to normal women. Angle Orthod 79:17–23. doi:10.​2319/​122707-605.​1 CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Shell TL, Woods MG (2004) Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment. Aust Orthod J 20:51–63PubMed Shell TL, Woods MG (2004) Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment. Aust Orthod J 20:51–63PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Slakter MJ, Waltz KJ (1983) A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part II. Consistency of perception. Am J Orthod 83:44–46CrossRefPubMed Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Slakter MJ, Waltz KJ (1983) A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part II. Consistency of perception. Am J Orthod 83:44–46CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tweed CH (1944) Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 42:22–45PubMed Tweed CH (1944) Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 42:22–45PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Tweed CH (1954) Frankfort mandibular incisor angles in diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169 Tweed CH (1954) Frankfort mandibular incisor angles in diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169
Metadaten
Titel
Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion
verfasst von
Seden Akan
Ayse Gul Torgut
Hüsamettin Oktay
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0097-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.