Effects of milk powder intervention on bone mineral density and indicators related to bone metabolism in Chinese adolescents

Cluster sampling was used to attain the study sample in this randomized controlled trial. Three secondary schools were randomly selected in one rural district in Beijing, China, and then four classes in first grade were randomly selected in each school as participants. To be eligible for the trial, participants had to be 12–15 years of age and to be free of the following diseases in the one year prior to enrollment: musculoskeletal diseases, liver or kidney disorders, or other endocrinosis, such as diabetes and hyperthyroidism. In addition, participants were excluded from the trial if they were taking vitamin D or calcium supplements. Of the 286 participants recruited, 31 were not eligible, and 23 participants withdrew before the trial officially started. Therefore, 232 healthy Chinese adolescents (115 boys and 117 girls; 11.9 to 15.2 years of age) were recruited for an interventional trial of milk powder fortified with vitamin D and calcium from December 2009 to June 2011 (early fall and early spring in Beijing).

Twelve first-grade classes from three secondary schools in rural Beijing were randomized to one control group (consuming habitual diets) and three study groups (vitamin D and calcium supplements), matched for BMD at baseline by class. The details are as follow: One class in each school was randomized to the control group at first. After that, in the remaining nine classes, the participants were randomized to three study groups in a double-blind fashion, namely, 400 IU/day vitamin D plus a different dosage of calcium per day of 300 (Ca3D group), 600 (Ca6D group), and 900 (Ca9D group) mg. The supplement was performed in the form of packed milk powder (provided by Nestle, China) labeled with capitals A, B, and C, and only the manufacturers knew the difference of the calcium content. One pack of milk powder (20 g) containing 200 IU vitamin D and 150, 300, or 450 mg CaCO₃ was prepared by parents for participants of three different study groups in the morning and evening each day and participants had to drink them under parents’ intendance. The nutritional composition of the daily supplemented test milk powder (40 g) is shown in Table 1. The study milk powder was dispensed once a month over one and a half years, and the storage and blinded distribution of it were conducted by the Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (now renamed the National Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention).

At baseline, An experienced nutritionist and several trained investigators assessed usual dietary intakes using consecutive three-day food records (including two weekdays and one weekend day), including meals and snack. The quantification of food items was performed by Chinese measures of bowls, plates, and spoons of standard size with the assistance of a set of food measure models. Nutrient intakes were calculated using the Chinese Food Composition Tables published in 2002 [11] and 2004 [12].

Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer (Jianmin, Beijing, China). Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using electronic weight scales (Thinner; Measurement Specialities, Fairfield, NJ, USA), with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by the equation BMI (kg/m²) = weight (kg)/height (m²). Total body BMD and BMC were measured using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) via a Norland XR-46 densitometer (Norland Medical Systems, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA). Measurements were made at the Beijing Sport University, Beijing, at three time points (initial baseline, one year, and one and a half years) by two experienced technicians throughout the trial. All bone data was analyzed by the same technician using the Norland enhanced software version 3.9.4. A daily quality assurance test was performed with a manufacturer-supplied phantom, and the accuracy error of repeated measurements was < 1.0%. Prior to the first scan of each time, the densitometer was calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.

One 5-ml overnight fasting venous blood sample was collected between 6.30 and 9.00 a.m. during the period March to April at the end of fall. The plasma was separated and stored at − 80 °C prior to analysis. Plasma 25(OH)D concentration was determined by ¹²⁵I-radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits (Diasorin, Antony, France), which involved only a preliminary extraction without a chromatographic purification step, followed by the addition of antibody and tracer specific for the 25(OH)D3 metabolite. The limit of detection of the assay is 5 nmol/L and the cross-reactivity for 25(OH)D is 100%. The intra- and inter-assay CVs were 4.2% and 6.6% for 25(OH)D. The serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), and tartrate-resistant acid-alkaline phosphatase 5b (TRAP-5b) were measured using a commercial ELISA kit method (IDS Ltd., Boldon, Tyne and Wear, UK). The intra- and inter-assay CVs were 10%, 8.9–12.9%, 10%, and 10%, respectively. All samples were assayed in duplicate using the same batch of kits.

Figure 1 gives the flow through the study for participants. The characteristics of 232 study participants aged 11.9 to 15.2 years at baseline are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics including average age, height, BMI, dietary calcium intake, and proportion of pubertal stage. Average daily calcium intakes were insufficient for participants in all groups with a range of 32 to 41% of the Recommended Dietary Intake (AI, 1000 mg/day) for adolescents aged 11 to 18 years [13]. Total calcium intakes (dietary plus supplement calcium) were significantly different between groups, and the sequence was in accordance with the quantity of calcium supplements (Ca9D > Ca6D > Ca3D > control). Vitamin D supplements were significantly higher in three intervention groups than in the control group while no difference between interventional groups (Table 2). There were 55% or 7% of participants having serum 25(OH)D level ranged 20 up to 30 ng/mL or less than 20 ng/mL, indicating either insufficient or deficient vitamin D status [14]. During the one and a half years, 11 (15.0%), 6 (12.2%), 2 (3.6%), and 6 (11.1%) participants withdrew from the trial in control, Ca3D, Ca6D, and Ca9D, respectively. No significant difference between groups was observed in the number of participants lost to follow up. There was no significant difference in the compliance rate with the test milk powder between intervention groups (81.3%, 77.9%, and 73.7% for Ca3D, Ca6D, and Ca9D, respectively).

Serum 25(OH)D and ALP levels in all groups at baseline were not significantly different, while the TRAP-5b status in the Ca6D group was higher than those in control and Ca9D groups but not in the Ca3D group (Table 2). Changes in serum 25(OH)D, ALP, and TRAP-5b levels throughout interventional duration were presented in Table 3. Linear mixed-effects model did not indicate significant group by time interactions for all of them while significant time effect for ALP and TRAP-5b (p < 0.0001 for both of them) but not for 25(OH)D. Serum 25(OH)D levels had a decrease in control, Ca3D, and Ca6D groups while a slight increase in the Ca9D group; only the change, however, in the control group was statistically significant (p < 0.05). ALP levels were higher than those at baseline in all groups while significance was only found in the Ca6D group, and between-group differences were not significant. Similarly, TRAP-5b levels were significantly increased across all groups (p < 0.05) whereas no difference was found between groups.

There was no significant difference between groups for both PTH and IGF-1 levels in baseline values (Table 2). The mixed linear model indicated a significant group by time interaction and time effect for both PTH and IGF-1 (Fig. 2a, b). PTH levels were decreased in all intervention groups but increased in the control group; however, only the decrease in the Ca6D group was significant (31.2%, p < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant treatment effects for the Ca6D group compared with other groups (p = 0.0006, 0.0286, and 0.0064 in comparison with control, Ca3D, and Ca9D groups, respectively). IGF-1 levels were significantly lower than that at baseline in the control group (16.2%, p < 0.05) while higher in all intervention groups (18.5%, 22.6%, and 22.8% for Ca3D, Ca6D, and Ca9D groups, respectively, p < 0.05 for all of them), in which IGF-1 levels increased but decreased in the control group. In contrast, further pairwise comparisons indicated significant treatment by time interaction for all intervention groups compared with the control group (p = 0.0046, 0.0029, and 0.0022 for Ca3D, Ca6D, and Ca9D groups compared with the control group, respectively).

No significant differences were found between groups in BMD and BMC at all measured sites at baseline (Table 4). Total body, lumbar spine, total hip areal BMD, and total body BMC increased significantly from baseline at one and one and a half years in all groups (Table 4). There was no significant group by time interaction for any of bone variables when the linear mixed model was performed regardless of adjustment for baseline value, sex, and baseline pubertal stage or not, suggesting that there was no treatment effect, which was also not influenced by those variables adjusted.

In the present study, the control group had a 9.3% decrease in the 25(OH)D level after one and a half years compared with intervention groups, ranging from − 2.4 to 1.0%. These changes could be attributed to several aspects. First, the seasonal variations might contribute to fluctuations in serum 25(OH)D levels over time in our study as the baseline serum 25(OH)D levels were measured in fall (December 2010, Beijing, China) and measured again after one and a half years in early spring (May 2012, Beijing, China) [8]. Second, the relatively lower dose of vitamin D used in our study milk powder (approximately 300 IU/day) was unlikely to improve the 25(OH)D level effectively. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial indicated that the 25(OH)D status significantly increased from 32 to 60 nmol/L and 28 to 46 nmol/L as results of 800 and 1600 IU/day vitamin D₃ supplementation for 5 months in schoolchildren with similar baseline vitamin D levels to our study; however, it is still not enough to correct vitamin D deficiency [15]. However, in another similar study, girls aged 10 years who received milk fortified with 133 IU vitamin D and 245 mg calcium per day had a significantly higher increase in the 25(OH)D level in comparison with those receiving milk fortified with only calcium 245 mg/day or no supplements [9]. The discrepancy might be due to different baseline 25(OH)D status, which in our study was almost one and a half times higher than that in that study [9].

The role of calcium or milk supplementation in adolescents with insufficient baseline calcium intake is crucial in the improvement of bone mass acquisition [16‐18]. As reported in a meta-analysis [4], there is only a trivial effect on bone mineral density, possibly due to the short supplementation duration of the majority of included studies with less than two years. Studies on the association of vitamin D intake or serum 25(OH)D status with bone density or bone mass had no consistent findings [19‐25]. For instance, a previous study found that Chinese adolescent girls with insufficient vitamin D levels had significantly lower bone mass compared with those with sufficient vitamin D status [22], whereas this relationship was not found in some other studies [23‐25]. A meta-analysis including six randomized controlled trials has suggested vitamin D supplements are not likely to benefit BMD or BMC in children and adolescents with normal vitamin D levels but in those with deficient vitamin D levels [10]. The findings of the meta-analysis remain unconfirmed possibly due to several reasons, including the less number of included studies, the lower doses of vitamin D supplements, the statistical power (two of six studies had only 26 and 98 participants), and the short supplementation duration (four of six studies are only one year).

Studies relevant to the interaction of vitamin D and calcium are limited. In our study, we did not find the treatment effect on BMC or BMD in any site during the one and a half-year intervention period. A possible explanation is that non-significantly changed serum 25(OH)D levels resulted from insufficient vitamin D supplements and low baseline vitamin D status, despite sufficient calcium supplementation. One previous study found that low calcium diet and low 25(OH)D status had a negative interaction on the lumbar spine BMC and BMD [8], which might imply that a low serum 25(OH)D status would aggravate the adverse impact of deficient calcium. In the present study, we did not find significant intervention effects on ALP and TRAP-5b, whereas significantly increased serum ALP concentration was observed only in the Ca6D group while TRAP-5b levels increased significantly over time in all groups. This might be explained by different pubertal stages between groups as, at baseline, almost 50% of participants in the Ca6D group were at stage one and two, at which, however, only about 35% of participants in both Ca3D and Ca9D groups were [8]. In addition, the serum PTH level was significantly decreased by intervention only in the Ca6D group, although it was also decreased in two other intervention groups. The highest baseline PTH level and the lowest 25(OH)D level and the intervention could be the main reasons. In contrast, Esterle et al. indicated that the increased bone turnover was not evidenced to be the cause of lower lumbar spine mineralization in late-pubertal girls with low calcium and 25(OH)D. This study further suggested that increased PTH level was not likely to explain the lower lumbar spine aBMD as which was only found in participants with a high PTH level and low calcium and 25(OH)D status, whereas not in those with high calcium status. We, thus, proposed that comprehensive evaluation on calcium, vitamin D, and PTH levels might be necessary to determine their optimal level to bone health.

Our study showed a significant intervention effect on IGF-1, which increased in all intervention groups while decreased in the control group. This finding was consistent with a cross-sectional study suggesting a significantly positive association between energy-adjusted calcium intake and IGF-1 in adolescent females (adjusted r = 0.24, p < 0.05) [26]. In addition, it was evident that average serum IGF-1 levels in the present study at baseline (667 to 789 ng/mL for all groups) were higher than those in other studies (median ranged from 275 to 450 ng/mL) in terms of adolescents aged 12 to 15 years [27‐29]. This difference might explain that no dose-response relationship between calcium supplement and change in the IGF-1 level was observed in our study in spite of low baseline calcium intake and different calcium supplement. Studies in both adults [30] and adolescents [26] found that the IGF-1 level was also associated with protein intake, which was also supplemented in the milk powder used in our study. The positive association between protein intake and IGF-1 level was therefore supported by our results to some degree.

Several strengths of our study are randomized controlled design, high retention and compliance rates, and recruited participants who can represent healthy pubertal school-aged adolescents in China. A limitation of the present study is the limited funding and other markers of bone formation have not been detected, such as those recommended by IOF/IFCC: bone formation marker (s-PINP) and bone resorption marker (s-CTX) [31]. Another limitation is that participants had relatively high IGF-1 levels at baseline which could have an impact on the effect of increased IGF-1 in study groups on bone health. The third limitation is that relatively low vitamin D supplements could limit the effect of calcium supplements on bone mineralization and bone mineral accrual. Therefore, higher vitamin D and calcium intervention could be the focus of future research in healthy adolescents with a moderate IGF-1 level and low vitamin D and calcium status.

In conclusion, in these healthy pubertal adolescents with low vitamin D and calcium status, calcium and vitamin D–fortified milk powder supplementation did not have a significant effect on bone turnover and mineralization. IGF-1 levels were improved by intervention in spite of high baseline status.