Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2017

17.11.2016 | Original Article

Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 fixed functional appliance on class II/1 patients at their postpubertal-peak growth period compared with the extraction method

A randomized clinical trial

verfasst von: Siamak Hemmatpour, Ali Mokhtar, Vahid Rakhshan

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of the Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 (SUS 2) fixed functional appliance compared to the premolar extraction method in correcting class II/1 malocclusion in patients who had passed their peak of postpubertal growth (stages 4–6 of Cervical Vertebral Maturation Index).

Methods

In all, 40 class II/1 patients were randomized to receive SUS 2 application (7 males, 13 females, age 15.75 ± 1.02 years) or maxillary premolar extraction (8 males, 12 females, age 15.40 ± 0.99 years). Pre- and posttreatment digital cephalographs were traced at least twice. A paired t test was used to compare the pre- and posttreatment measurements. Treatment changes were compared using an independent samples t test (P ≤ 0.05).

Results

The extent of change was significant in the following variables: ANB, nasolabial angle, Mand1-ML, 1L-NB, anterior and posterior facial heights, N-A-Pog, 1U-NF, 6L-MP, Ar-Go, OP-HP, A-B, A-Sn, B-Sm, APDI, NAPog, AB-NPog, POr-DOP, SN-OcP, POr-OcP, Wits, 1 l-APog, 1LMeLm, S-Go:N-Me, N-ANS-Pog, Ap1LAp1u-DOP, ANS-Cond, Pog-Cond, SS-Ls, A-N-Pog, Pog–Pog′, MeGoOcP, 1L-Npog, Go-Me, Go-Me:N-S, S-Me, Ls-(Sn-Pog′), Stms–Stmi, N′-Gn′, N′NsPog′, 6u-PTV, 1u-NA, FMIA, and IMPA.

Conclusions

SUS 2 corrected class II/1 malocclusion of patients in the postpubertal growth period by inhibiting the maxilla’s forward growth, advancing the mandible, decreasing the nasolabial and interincisal angles, proclining the incisors, increasing the facial height, and clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane. Extraction reduced the interincisal angle and protruded the lower incisors. However, it did not change the soft tissue thickness and did not cause a clockwise rotation in the occlusal plane.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aelbers CF, Dermaut L (1996) Orthopedics in orthodontics: part I, fiction or reality—a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:513–519CrossRef Aelbers CF, Dermaut L (1996) Orthopedics in orthodontics: part I, fiction or reality—a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:513–519CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Booij JW, Goeke J, Bronkhorst EM et al (2013) Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison. J Orthop 74:52–63 Booij JW, Goeke J, Bronkhorst EM et al (2013) Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison. J Orthop 74:52–63
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassidy DW, Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS et al (1993) A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in “borderline” adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104:455–470CrossRef Cassidy DW, Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS et al (1993) A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in “borderline” adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104:455–470CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R (2002) Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:470–476CrossRef Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R (2002) Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:470–476CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP et al (1999) A cephalometric study of class II division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 69:311–320PubMed Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP et al (1999) A cephalometric study of class II division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 69:311–320PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dermaut LR, Aelbers CM (1996) Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality. A review of the literature—part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:667–671CrossRef Dermaut LR, Aelbers CM (1996) Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality. A review of the literature—part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:667–671CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanandeh BA, El-Bialy AA (2010) Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 21:13–24PubMed Hanandeh BA, El-Bialy AA (2010) Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 21:13–24PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Sanches FS, Henriques JF, Janson G et al (2013) Class II malocclusion treatment using Jasper Jumper appliance associated to intermaxillary elastics: a case report. Dental Press J Orthod 18:22–29CrossRefPubMed Herrera-Sanches FS, Henriques JF, Janson G et al (2013) Class II malocclusion treatment using Jasper Jumper appliance associated to intermaxillary elastics: a case report. Dental Press J Orthod 18:22–29CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H et al (2006) Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 76:666–672CrossRefPubMed Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H et al (2006) Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 76:666–672CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan V, Raeesi E (2013) Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115:29–37CrossRefPubMed Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan V, Raeesi E (2013) Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115:29–37CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinzinger G, Diedrich P (2005) Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA). J Orofac Orthop 66:469–490CrossRefPubMed Kinzinger G, Diedrich P (2005) Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA). J Orofac Orthop 66:469–490CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P (2009) Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery—a Cephalometric Study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. J Orofac Orthop 70:63–91CrossRefPubMed Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P (2009) Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery—a Cephalometric Study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. J Orofac Orthop 70:63–91CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kucukkeles N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA (2007) Treatment efficiency in skeletal class II patients treated with the jasper jumper. Angle Orthod 77:449–456CrossRefPubMed Kucukkeles N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA (2007) Treatment efficiency in skeletal class II patients treated with the jasper jumper. Angle Orthod 77:449–456CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kucukkeles N, Orgun A (1995) Correction of Class II malocclusions with a Jasper Jumper in growing patients. Eur J Orthod 17:445 Kucukkeles N, Orgun A (1995) Correction of Class II malocclusions with a Jasper Jumper in growing patients. Eur J Orthod 17:445
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent BH Jr et al (1995) Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator. Angle Orthod 65:423–430PubMed Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent BH Jr et al (1995) Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator. Angle Orthod 65:423–430PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG (1990) A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98:134–144CrossRef McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG (1990) A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98:134–144CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mihalik CA, Proffit WR, Phillips C (2003) Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 123:266–278CrossRef Mihalik CA, Proffit WR, Phillips C (2003) Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 123:266–278CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K et al (2005) Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 75:426–436PubMed Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K et al (2005) Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 75:426–436PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda R (2015) Current therapy in orthodontics. Mosby Elsevier, London Nanda R (2015) Current therapy in orthodontics. Mosby Elsevier, London
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J (1997) Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in class II division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 3:222–231CrossRefPubMed Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J (1997) Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in class II division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 3:222–231CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Uyanlar A et al (2012) A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances. Eur J Dent 6:302–310PubMedPubMedCentral Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Uyanlar A et al (2012) A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances. Eur J Dent 6:302–310PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1985) The Herbst appliance—its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 87:1–20CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H (1985) The Herbst appliance—its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 87:1–20CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1997) The effects, limitations, and long-termdentofacial adaptations to treatment with the herbst appliance. In: Seminars in Orthodontics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 232–243 Pancherz H (1997) The effects, limitations, and long-termdentofacial adaptations to treatment with the herbst appliance. In: Seminars in Orthodontics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 232–243
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H, Fackel U (1990) The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 12:209–218CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H, Fackel U (1990) The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 12:209–218CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N (1992) A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:556–565CrossRef Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N (1992) A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:556–565CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakhshan V, Rakhshan H, Sheibaninia A (2009) Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance. Int J Comput Dent 12:327–343PubMed Rakhshan V, Rakhshan H, Sheibaninia A (2009) Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance. Int J Comput Dent 12:327–343PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 69:239–246PubMed Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 69:239–246PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf S, Pancherz H (2004) Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 126:140–152CrossRef Ruf S, Pancherz H (2004) Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 126:140–152CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Valant JR, Sinclair PM (1989) Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 95:138–147CrossRef Valant JR, Sinclair PM (1989) Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 95:138–147CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP (1995) Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance—a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 108:341–350CrossRef Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP (1995) Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance—a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 108:341–350CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiland FJ, Droschl H (1996) Treatment of a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with the Jasper Jumper: a case report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:1–7CrossRef Weiland FJ, Droschl H (1996) Treatment of a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with the Jasper Jumper: a case report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:1–7CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang X, Zhu Y, Long H et al (2016) The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 38:324–333CrossRefPubMed Yang X, Zhu Y, Long H et al (2016) The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 38:324–333CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 fixed functional appliance on class II/1 patients at their postpubertal-peak growth period compared with the extraction method
A randomized clinical trial
verfasst von
Siamak Hemmatpour
Ali Mokhtar
Vahid Rakhshan
Publikationsdatum
17.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0060-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.