Exercise therapy is an inexpensive, safe, and extremely effective primary and secondary intervention for the prevention of cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. Reduced exercise capacity after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients may lead to worse clinical outcomes [1]. A major issue for rehabilitation in people with restricted movement is how to suppress skeletal muscle atrophy and the decreases in motor function [2, 3]. It was suggested that the start date of gait is related to one of the predictors of activities of daily living in elderly people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [4]. Electrical muscle stimulation to encourage skeletal muscle contraction has been a known treatment for disuse-induced muscle atrophy. Even in patients diagnosed with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure, for whom exercise therapy is contraindicated, electrical stimulation can be safely used without affecting blood pressure or heart rate while increasing maximum muscle strength [5]. However, it is known to have important precautions and contraindications. For example, endocrine organs such as the thyroid and genitalia, sensory organs such as the eyes, and people with pacemakers are contraindicated for electrical muscle stimulation [5].

Several studies have used belt-electrode-type skeletal muscle electrical stimulation with electrodes attached to the torso, thighs, and lower legs to examine its effectiveness on circulatory dynamics, muscle contraction and hypertrophy, and safety in patients with arterial disease and diabetes mellitus [6‐9]. Nowadays, there are novel and useful wearable devices for whole-body neuromuscular electrical stimulation (WB-NMES), rather than the traditional belt type, that efficiently provide electrical stimulation to the forearms and back arms, chest, back, abdomen, oblique abdomen, gluteus muscles, and front and back thigh muscles [10]. Watanabe et al. [10] have shown that a combination of aerobic exercise and WB-NMES for 15 min enhances metabolic response to the same extent as high-intensity exercise. It would be useful if this exercise regimen could be applied to patients with heart failure who cannot do vigorous exercise. However, the effect of battery-powered WB-NMES devices on hemodynamics, including of the heart and peripheral microcirculation, have not been fully elucidated. Blood fluidity plays an important role in the pathogenesis of various disease and is also a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events [11]. The factors behind the decrease in blood fluidity due to exercise are the transient increase in hematocrit, and the activation of leukocytes and platelets due to catecholamines and cytokines [12]. Strenuous exercise can lead to platelet activation, and hypercoagulation, which can lead to acute coronary syndrome [13]. We have reported that vigorous exercise induced transient deterioration in microcirculation [14]. There is an urgent need to evaluate the safety and effects of electrical stimulation to the whole body, including the chest, on circulatory dynamics, arrythmia, microcirculation, systemic metabolism including blood glucose, lactate levels, and oxidative stress.

This study aimed to examine the safety of a novel WB-NMES wearable device as a modified phase 1 study and its effect on circulatory dynamics, arrythmia, sublingual microcirculation, blood glucose and lactate levels, and oxidative stress. This will help us evaluate whether it is safe to apply electricity using WB-NMES to the whole body including the chest.

No arrhythmia was detected during the WB-NMES or after the 10 min recovery period. Blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged during the WB-NMES and recovery period. Echocardiography showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction and diastolic function were maintained in all participants, but one showed transient mild mitral regurgitation during WB-NMES which lasted a few minutes after termination of WB-NMES (Table 2). Five of the 19 patients received electrical stimulation three times a week for 1 month, with no adverse effects observed.

Significant decreases in blood glucose and increases in lactate levels were observed (Fig. 3). Although there were no significant differences in d-ROMs, BAP, or blood fluidity (Table 3, Fig. 4), three out of 19 participants showed prolonged whole blood passage time just after WB-NMES. The whole blood passage time of these three participants recovered to baseline measures 20 min after WB-NMES (Fig. 5). The sublingual microcirculation parameters were not statistically different before and after WB-NMES (Table 3, Fig. 5).

This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of WB-NMES on hemodynamics, arrhythmia, and sublingual microcirculation. Our results from healthy participants showed that no arrhythmia was detected, while the WB-NMES effectively increased blood lactate level, decreased blood glucose level, and maintained blood pressure, blood fluidity, and sublingual microcirculation.

WB-NMES has been introduced as an alternative to physical training or in combination with low-grade exercise. However, associated muscular damage, as evident by elevation of serum creatine-kinase activity, has been reported [23, 24]. Until more evidence regarding the physiological contraindications is gathered [8, 24], the electrical strength should be prescribed, the health of the users should be considered, and instructors should be trained to avoid WB-NMES-related side effects [25].

Although the efficacy and safety of WB-NMES have been examined, specific guidelines regarding cardiopulmonary function are lacking. A study by Jee et al. [26] reported that there were no abnormal changes in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and oxygen uptake during or after WB-NMES. The major findings of the present study suggest that the application of the maximum tolerable WB-NMES intensity did not cause arrhythmias and did not negatively affect heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, or cardiac function in healthy young people as observed by echocardiology. Since electrical stimulation is applied near the heart in WB-NMES, it is necessary to confirm its effects on heart function in addition to heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen intake. In this study, we confirmed the safety of WB-NMES in healthy participants by evaluating the cardiac function with echocardiography. We found transient mild mitral regurgitation in one male subject during WB-NMES. The volume of transient functional mitral regurgitation was too small to measure precisely. Vena contracta at the suction was 1.0 mm with colour area trace method. And his cardiac function was within the normal range. The possible mechanism may be a temporary increase in venous perfusion due to WB-NMES, because the mitral regurgitation was observed during lower extremity NMES without pulmonary hypertension. Lower extremity NMES increases venous return in normal participants and patients with heart disease. The activation of the muscular-venous pump by NMES-induced muscle contraction increases venous return [27]. For this reason, patients with NYHA class IV heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%), severe cardiac arrhythmias, and electronic devices such as pacemakers and implanted defibrillators, are listed as contraindications in WB- NMES trials [24‐26]. Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of poor outcomes, with increased risk for cardiac-related death [28]. Therefore, the safety and effects of WB-NMES in patients with heart failure is a target for future research.

Blood glucose was significantly decreased by WB-NMES in this study. This is similar to findings from a previous study [6] that found insulin-independent glucose uptake during muscle contraction when NMES was performed on the lower legs. NMES to the lower legs has been reported to significantly enhance whole-body glucose uptake compared to voluntary ergometry exercise at the identical oxygen uptake in the presence of significantly higher blood lactate and respiratory quotients [6]. The reduction in glucose after NEMS is most likely due to insulin-independent glucose transporter type 4 upload [29]. Although electric stimulation was applied to several regions of the body in the present study, it was not clear whether it had a stronger hypoglycemic effect than general NMES devices. However, it is known that NMES can enhance anaerobic energy metabolism due to the recruitment of high-threshold motor units or muscle fibers associated with glucose metabolism [6, 30].

Lactate accumulates during anaerobic exercise and can be utilized as an energy source by skeletal muscles during voluntary exercise [31]. Lactic acid increased from 1.3 ± 0.3 mmol/L at rest to 3.5 ± 1.8 mmol/L after WB-NMES. In the present study, it was not clear if the maximum effect was reached by applying electrical stimulation over a wider range compared to the lower leg alone. In our pilot study, three participants showed 2.96 ± 0.3 metabolic equivalents (METs) on the cardiopulmonary exercise test during WB-NMES alone. In a previous study in which NMES was applied to the lower leg, the exercise intensity showed 3.0 ± 0.47 METs [32], which is similar to our results. Therefore, these observations suggest that lactate production from skeletal muscle is limited during walking equivalent to three METs, whereas is much higher with WB-NMES at three METs. In addition, aerobic exercise and resistance training increased blood pressure and heart rate, while WB-NMES alone did not increase either. Therefore, we posit that WB-NMES can provide the systemic skeletal muscle a relatively high-intensity exercise load that produces lactate without affecting cardiac function. In addition, Watanabe et al. [10] have reported that combining WB-NMES with low-intensity voluntary exercise lead greater energy expenditure with the metabolic equivalent of 5.31 ± 0.89 Mets and serum lactic acid level of 7.5 mmol/L. They concluded that more lactic acid was produced by combining voluntary exercise and WB-NMES than WB-NMES alone [10].

Blood fluidity was not significantly different before and after WB-NMES in the present study. Several studies have reported that acute exercise at the anaerobic threshold reduces blood fluidity [14, 33]. The decrease is explained by the increased blood viscosity due to the increase of hematocrit induced by dehydration and activation of white blood cells [14], platelets, and cytokine [13]. However, vigorous exercise leads to increased oxidative stress [34], which may be associated with a decrease in insulin secretory ability and aggravates diabetes [35]. An increase in oxidative stress contributes to the development of various diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, and aging [36]. The present results showed that d-ROMs and BAP remained unchanged by WB-NMES.

There were limitations to the study to consider. First, the sample size was limited, because the present study was a single-center observational study analysis without control, and thus, causation could not be established. However, the number of 19 participants may be appropriate as a modified phase 1 study. Second, the study participants were limited to healthy young men and women, so the results cannot be applied to other populations. Third, as we gave only one 20-min session of electrical stimulation, we cannot comment on the safety and efficacy of its long-term use.

WB-NMES applied to healthy young individuals with the tolerable maximum intensity for 20 min significantly decreased blood glucose and increased blood lactate level; however, it did not change hemodynamic parameters, and it did not induce arrythmia or changes in blood fluidity and sublingual microcirculation. The effects of combining resistant training and/or stretching with WB-NMES should be clarified in future studies. In addition, safety and efficacy of WB-NMES in patients with chronic heart disease or chronic respiratory failure should be examined.